Redhook Slim Chance Light Ale - Redhook Ale Brewery
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 75 | Reviews: 58 | Display Reviews Only:
District of Columbia
2.05/5 rDev -33.7%
Fairly typical Blonde Ale. Nothing particularly special. The appearance and mouthfeel were average. Smell was not so great.. it was kind of like smelling a barn. Definitely natural, but not very appealing. The taste was pretty earthy too. It was a lot thicker than your typical beer of this style, but nothing to write home about. Would have this beer again if I had to, but I wouldn't buy it myself.
02-25-2010 20:03:03 | More by alysmith4
2.25/5 rDev -27.2%
A- Pours a golden yellow color with a thin white fizzy head that turns into a ring of lace.
S- The aroma is faint with grain and a touch of hay. Not much in terms of hops in the aroma.
T- The taste is grainy malt with just a touch of hops in the finish. Like the aroma, not much going on in the taste department.
M- The mouthfeel is light bodied with a good amount of carbonation.
D- Not a horrible lawnmowing beer, but nothing really special with this one that would warrant a repeat purchase in the future.
07-08-2009 04:15:30 | More by cjgator3
2.25/5 rDev -27.2%
12 oz. bottle, listed as a described as a light blonde ale,
A: Pours yellow with a good sized white head, some sticky lace.
S: Very light, some bready malt notes, nothing much to speak of really.
T: Again, very light, quite possibly the lightest beer I've ever had from a craft brewer. Some wheaty notes are there in the aftertaste, but there's nothing to latch onto.
M: Light-bodied, some carbonation character, really not that bad.
D: I don't really know what Redhook is going for here. The light beer drinkers aren't going to pay $7.99 a sixer and the craft drinkers are going to want a lot more flavour for their money.
03-19-2009 21:08:49 | More by Halcyondays
2.35/5 rDev -23.9%
A: Poured a clear brass-orange with a weakly formed and weakly retaining fizzy dull white head. Tightly bound micro bubble streams rose at a moderate pace while no visible lacing was observed. To say the appearance was average would be giving this to much credit.
S: The aroma was faint with pale oranges. The chances that you'll detect much else here...slim.
T: The flavor opens up with some stale cold oranges wit a light floral hopping. Brisk, slightly acidic, and tart with some mushy melon notes and other over ripened fruit comes to the surface. Theres not much flavor here, rather mundane and leaves rather quickly off the tongue with a light orange bitterness grind left on the tongue. Overall didn't find the flavor bad, but certainly didn't find anything memorable about it and was unimpressive to say the least.
M: perhaps one of its only bright points, but sadly still only comes off average. A medium fullness, with an oily slick texture was felt with a soft carbonation. The mouthful was much like the flavor mundane and hardly gave you any incentive to hold and savor it.
D: unimpressive, not bad, but a boring drink overall that certainly not leave any impression or reason to try again. Your not missing much here.
06-11-2009 22:55:06 | More by beerthulhu
2.35/5 rDev -23.9%
Pours a two finger white head that fades slowly to a ring leaving a good lace. Almost clear light amber color. Light-medium carbonation and light bodied. Light hoppy nose. Flavor is light citric with some hops. Slim chance this will ever be in the house again. There are better lights - like Sam Adams. $2.00 for a 12oz bottle from Barb's Beer Emporium Concord, NH.
09-16-2010 22:20:38 | More by jdhilt
2.4/5 rDev -22.3%
This beer is exceptionally bland. For a brewery that makes a decent ESB and a solid winter, I can't quite understand the point in brewing this beer. It tastes like a Miller Lite but costs the same as a micro.
I tasted this beer from a bottle that came with a sampler. All in all, it's pretty bland stuff. Little in the way of hops, yet it maintains that "Red Hook Taste" that i suspect comes from the type of yeast they use in the brewing process. Red Hook drinkers will know what I mean.
There is little to distinguish this brew from the macro-lagers except price. I would not recommend this beer to beer lovers. Perhaps it would appeal to persons who prefer beer without much hop profile. Otherwise, steer clear.
12-16-2009 17:58:24 | More by caseymconley
2.55/5 rDev -17.5%
Clear amber with one finger of white rapidly receding head. No lacings that stay. Sweet malts with a soapy character. Slight bitter almost sour finish. Mouthfeel is alright cold. I would almost prefer a Silver Bullet if I have to go light. Even better a S.A. light lager.
05-04-2009 02:50:01 | More by Spikester
2.58/5 rDev -16.5%
Not the best light beer in the world, but it is drinkable. Pours a light yellow. It actually has a hoppy aroma along with a bit of caramel malt aroma coming through. The head is decent for a light beer. I actually liked this one, it was a good escape from heavy brews for alll of a few minutes.
12-26-2009 02:01:06 | More by whtguitarguy
2.6/5 rDev -15.9%
Does this have a slim chance of getting a good review from me lol. We'll have to see, givin that this is only a 3.9%!
appearance - Clear golden yelloe. No head here, looks flat. Only a small ring and a fainted pond.
smell - Sweet malts here, some hops present.
taste - Pale malt taste with some wheat and hops here for balance. Watery taste all the way, very light.
mouthfeel - Watery light, I thought I was drinking a bud light.
drinkability - Very easy drinking beer, as in watery and you can down this thing. Not fond of that. Might be a good introduction to someone that is not into craft beer, maybe? Too light to me. Redhook has a blonde, blonde light?
08-16-2009 00:17:40 | More by auxiliary
2.63/5 rDev -14.9%
The beer pours a gold color with a thin, fizzy white head that fades to spotty lacing. The aroma is average. It has a pilsner and Munich malt scent along with a dry yeast aroma. There is little evidence of hops here. The taste isn't all that great. It has a bone dry pilsner malt taste with some Munich malt sweetness. Again, the hops are non existant. The mouthfeel is terrible. It is a low/medium bodied beer with prickly carbonation. This is a terrible low-calorie brew. If it were light and refreshing I could see the lack of character, but this is medium bodied and sweet in the finish. I'm not a fan of this beer at all.
06-06-2009 21:46:07 | More by WesWes
2.7/5 rDev -12.6%
Hazy yellow with a thin white head that thins out, becoming patchy.
Smell is faint bready malts, with some weak hops. Hint of lemon peel.
Taste is faint malts with a touch of hops. Watery, lackluster finish.
Mouthfeel is slightly crips and watery.
Drinkability is good. Not an impressive beer by any means, but easy enough to drink.
06-12-2010 21:47:55 | More by Parrotbeak
2.73/5 rDev -11.7%
pours a pale yellow with a thin white head, and good lacing.
smell of malt, citrus, and hay/straw.
taste is crisp, light, sweet and tart, citrus, malt, and grain.
not much to say on this one, it is a redhook version of a light beer, it is overall okay, and has big notes of citrus.
04-18-2009 03:15:48 | More by froghop
2.78/5 rDev -10%
Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a nonic imperial pint glass.
Appearance: Pours a slightly hazy pale straw color. Has a thin head that dissipates quickly and leaves spotty lacing.
Smell: Smells bready and slightly fruity. Not really a whole lot going on here...
Taste: Slight hoppy bitterness up front that develops into a biscuity/bready flavor towards the back. Slight fruitiness as well. Leaves a sweet, slightly metallic aftertaste. Unfortunately, I think making this a light beer stripped away much of the flavor.
Mouthfeel: Light-bodied with a nice carbonation bite to it.
Drinkability: Not terrible... That said, it is a light beer so I can't really see myself drinking it all that often. However, it is much, much better than the typical light beers on the market so I guess it deserves kudos for that dubious honor.
05-21-2010 20:29:11 | More by wahhmaster
2.8/5 rDev -9.4%
Had this beer the other night and not sure what to expect from a "light" ale.
A. Clean straw color brew, refreshing looking.
S. Not overly anything, but then again it was made to be light.
T. Enjoyed the flavor, light hops, expected more but was a clean, crisp beer.
D. Very drinkable ale. Could see myself indulging in a few at a outdoor party or after a finishing a weekend project around the house.
04-03-2009 16:41:21 | More by jimmytc
2.83/5 rDev -8.4%
Clear yellow colored beer with a small white head.
Smell is malty with a toasted grain and corn scent. Hops appear as a slight grassy and lemony scent.
Taste starts out malty with a strong wheat cracker flavor. Crackers and cooked vegetables this tastes a lot like most non-alcoholic beers out there.
Mouthfeel is average.
Not a great beer but better than a non-alcoholic one. Not awful, but not great either.
03-04-2009 02:53:03 | More by Zorro
2.85/5 rDev -7.8%
Pours out a light yellowish color. Smell is light tones of citrus and a bit of hops. The taste is simple an ale followed by a light taste of citrus. Feels like water in my mouth. I could have a few of these on a nice warm day other than that it would work to cleanse my mouth out of heavier beers on a normal day.
01-01-2010 00:33:22 | More by Kelp
District of Columbia
2.88/5 rDev -6.8%
Never heard of a "light ale" before, and for good reason. It wasn't any good. Combining a mediocre/bland style with a mediocre/bland brewery is a recipe for a boring, forgetable beer. And this is it. Everything about this beer is mild and uninteresting - a touch of malt, a hint of fruitiness, and a lot of water. No reason to drink this whatsoever.
08-05-2009 21:40:00 | More by soupyman10
2.95/5 rDev -4.5%
Pours a very light gold with a nice full head that has good retention.
It's a light beer and has a rather hefty 125 calories.
I am judging it as a light beer so the scores reflect that.
Oder is a little skunky along with some grainy grass.
Mouthfeel is dry from beginning to end without being bitter.
As light beers go, better than average.
11-24-2009 02:13:23 | More by jadpsu
District of Columbia
2.95/5 rDev -4.5%
Appearance: Clear and bright golden. Looks like very little carbonation, I can see a few bubbles, but not much. Head dissipates rather quickly leaving a layer of foam..and I can see some lacing stick to the top already.
Aroma: Some malty aromas, a little breadyness..but otherwise pretty light (which is what its meant to be...)
Taste: Sweetish and some malts, and a finish of breadyness. All on the lighter side
Mouthfeel: Crisp, light, goes down pretty well
Drinkability: Light, tastes fine, and goes down well, so it works in this one.
I don't know about recommending this. Its not bad really..for a light beer its actually better than I expected. But why would a craft brewery go out of its way to make a light beer? I don't think I'll be getting this one again...but I would like to try actual beers by Redhook.
The reason I got it was because it was in a shelf of individual bottles that were in the "seasonal" section of the beer store I go to. Doesn't really stand up next to the other ones I bought that day..
04-13-2009 04:17:16 | More by kshankar
2.98/5 rDev -3.6%
Poured into my Sweetwater Blue pint glass
A- Straw color with an inch head
S- Grassy caramel malt with some hop
T- Grainy malts with some mild caramel followed by subtle citrus hop bitterness
M- Rather light and heavily carbonated
D- An OK beer, probably a tad overpriced. The beer is a step up over the mass produced lager beers that flood the market, but you can do better for the money. It is a beer style that goes well with the warm summer weather. As far as a "light" beer goes it is very good.
06-07-2009 03:36:17 | More by Misfit138
2.98/5 rDev -3.6%
Obviously golden and insipid in color, with a bone white head of about one inch of thin bubbles. Lacing is actually quite good and long-lasting. Kudos there.
The nose and flavor are just really bland. Light grains, not quite pils malt, just...light. Quite grassy, even a little herbal, along with a slight fruitiness. The finish is a little sticky, with a distinct diacetyl edge in the aftertaste.
Drinkability is a big question mark for me. On the one hand, for a light "Blonde" ale, it's really pretty innocuous. But to be fair, I really have no desire for another.
05-16-2009 04:50:40 | More by BretSikkink
3/5 rDev -2.9%
A) Pours with a foamy head then settles quickly. Leaves no lacing on the glass. Bronze in color. Visible carbonation.
S) Malty. Some wheat notes. Just a bit of banana tries to get through. Light citrus notes as well.
T) Malty nose. Nutty finish. Not much in between.
M) Fizzy. Light bodied.
D) Meh, not that great. Not that bad. Refreshing enough for a hot summer day.
06-29-2009 22:35:47 | More by u2carew
Redhook Slim Chance Light Ale from Redhook Ale Brewery
73 out of 100 based on 75 ratings.