1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Cuvee De Tomme - The Lost Abbey

Not Rated.
Cuvee De TommeCuvee De Tomme

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
94
outstanding

965 Ratings
THE BROS
95
world-class

(view ratings)
Ratings: 965
Reviews: 389
rAvg: 4.21
pDev: 11.64%
Wants: 638
Gots: 244 | FT: 15
Brewed by:
The Lost Abbey visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Wild Ale |  11.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beers base starts out as "The Mother of all Beers" quadruple. It is then aged in oak barrels with lots of cherries. The cherries and the natural bacteria in the barrels from previous batches give the beer a tart sourness.

(Beer added by: xlperro on 12-14-2006)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Cuvee De Tomme Alström Bros
Ratings: 965 | Reviews: 389 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of ne0m00re
3.9/5  rDev -7.4%
look: 1 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 1 | overall: 3

05/08/11- Review of a 375 mL bottle. FLAT
A: Flat, murky mahogany. Doesn't look good at all.
S: Molasses, cherry, strong blue cheese, walnut, and vinegar. Welcoming.
T: Very nice... molasses, cranberry-cherry, fruity overall, leather earthiness, and not extemely sour, but rather with a dry finish. It is almost like fig and cherry pie.
M: Flat, thicker... not so good.
O: If carbonated, this would have been VERY delightful. However, in this case, it was only OK.

ne0m00re, May 18, 2011
Photo of PeprSprYoFace
4.1/5  rDev -2.6%
look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

2009 vintage poured into a Lost Abbey Tulip. Very nice garnet red color. No head at all. No lacing. Looks flat.

Aroma is super funky and sour. Lots of tart cherry aroma.

Taste is flat. Super sour. Like warhead candy sour. Little bit of cherry and funk lingers on your tongue after swallow.

Mouthfeel is dry and flat. Dry is good. But it should be on the high carb side.

Overall I've had this beer several times and it's good when carbed. Still tasty when it's not though.

PeprSprYoFace, May 12, 2011
Photo of Jwale73
3.88/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

2009 vintage courtesy of jedwards. He really pulled out the stops for this tasting. Bottles open with not so much a pop, but a light woosh. Pours a semi-hazy mahogany with no head, just a couple bubbles across the surface. Nose is vinous and has a slightly sweet character. There's also a suggestion of burnt sugar, ethanol esters and a slightly medicinal quality. Taste follows nose with the addition of light, tart cherries, a slightly buttery quality and a salty flavor that lingers on the lips between quaffs. Mouthfeel is light-medium (but closer to light). There's some minimal carbonation here, but it's almost still. A slightly acidic and vinous character also lightly stimulates the salivary glands along the sides of the cheek. All and all, an easy drinking dark sour - not over the top and fairly even-bodied throughout.

The 2010 vintage (opened immediately following) pours slightly darker in appearance. The nose on the 2010 is a 4.5 in my opinion - bourbon notes comes out as well as dark or caramelized sugar. Some cherries also come out as the brew begins to warm. Taste follow nose - much more cherry is expressed in the 2010 than the 2009. I'm also digging the bourbon character in this vintage. There's also a bit of citric acid in this one. The drinkability on the 2010 is a 4.5 in my opinion. I have to say that I enjoyed the 2010 vintage more than the 2009, but they really come off as two distinctly different beers in my opinion, so it's probably more of a preference thing. That being said, I'd have to rate the 2009 as a B+, while the 2010 is a solid A.

Jwale73, May 09, 2011
Photo of Trueant1
4.9/5  rDev +16.4%
look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

No pop of the cork. Pours a minimal head that has no retention.
sits in the glass dark brown. No lacing what so ever.
I am impressed with the smell. Warm booziness fills the nose alongside the cherries. Lots of oak and wood characters.
The taste is Sour with cherries up front. Booze, sweet figs, vanilla, real cream soda flavors, and even some cocoa flavors. Exceptional!
Mouthfeel is medium stickiness with a hint of carbonation.
Over all this is a world class brew. The style says some may not care for the sourness. I think the sour cherries are brilliant in the brew. This beer drinks way to easy for this style. Kudos again to the brewery who took over the old Stone building!!!

Trueant1, Apr 24, 2011
Photo of NorCalYeti
4.22/5  rDev +0.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

taste- tart fruit, sour flavors

color- chestnut

clarity- clear

smell- vanilla, funk, cherries, wine barrel, alcohol

body- medium weight, lean mouthfeel, medium length finish, hop bite at the front of the tongue, sour flavors on the side of the tongue

appearance- flat, very thin off-white carbonation ring around the glass with very little lacing

overall impression- glad i tried it but don't think i'd seek it out again for $34

notes and comments- 2009 vintage

beer spy- city beer store, san francisco ca, 2010, $33.99, 750mL

glassware: tulip

NorCalYeti, Apr 22, 2011
Photo of notchucknorris
3.55/5  rDev -15.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: I had read a few reviews of this one that talked about how flat it was, so I wasn't surprised when there was absolutely no pop when I took out the cork. What I wasn't ready for was the way this beer looked. This is an ugly mother. The color is a muddy, murky brown that kind of looks like sewage.

S: This is better. A lot of cherry smell with some vanilla. There's also a bit of a jammy smell that hints of blackberries. I know this was aged in bourbon barrels, but I'm just not picking up any hint of that.

T: A lot of tart cherries, some vanilla and a little bit of a funk/sour flavor. This had a lot of wine qualities to it and the tannins were definitely present and gave it a dry feel. Overall, I'm glad I tried this one, but I don't think it's worth $40 for a bomber.

notchucknorris, Apr 09, 2011
Photo of birchstick
4.08/5  rDev -3.1%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 4.5

A - poured a deep vinous red color without any head at all

S - smells of sweet cherries, vanilla bourbon, dark fruits, and caramel malts

T - starts off with loads of sweet cherries hitting the front of the tongue that merges into a really nice vanilla, brown sugar, caramel malt blend. It is akin to taking a bit out of cherry pie that used some brown sugar and vanilla in the crust and just a subtle splash of bourbon in the filling. Really good stuff here.

M - there isn't any carbonation in this guy at all...goes down smoothly enough though

D - I really enjoyed this wild ale a lot. Really good spectrum of flavors that came together to form a delicious beer. I would love to try this again.

birchstick, Apr 07, 2011
Photo of DavoleBomb
3.48/5  rDev -17.3%
look: 1.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

A flat beer? From Flat Abbey? Who'da guessed it. Poured into a tulip.

2.0 A: Ruddy dark plum color. No head.

3.5 S: Bourbon and cherry are the main attraction and work really well together. Sourness from the cherries and the bugs and vanilla from the barrels. Tangy lactic acid fruitiness. I bet this would smell amazing if there was some carbonation to shuttle aroma molecules to the surface.

4.0 T: I bet it would be amazing if the easy part was done right for once. Usually when bourbon meets Belgian, the bourbon covers all the subtle Belgian flavors. Apparently when bourbon meets Belgian and that meets cherries and bugs, the result ain't bad at all. Anyway, sour cherries and lactic acid start this off with a tangy sour punch. Leathery bourbon, vanilla, and oak supplement this well. Light "supple tannin" astringency. Vinous with prune and fig fruitiness.

2.0 M: Medium body. Flat, flat, flat, flat, and flat. Super smooth though.

3.5 D: Despite Tomme's usual carbonation antics, this is actually pretty good. This would be one hell of a beer with carbonation. This has a lot of things done right, but one major thing done wrong. Shame on you Tomme for releasing your namesake with such a major flaw.

DavoleBomb, Apr 05, 2011
Photo of UMNbeerhunter
3.73/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

2010 vintage poured into a Cigar City snifter on 4/5/11.

Pours a super dark brown almost a blackish watery liquid with no head at all. No carbonation in this one.

Smell has lots going on. Sour cherries, wood, vanilla, and a touch of bourbon.

Taste is a lot like wine. Also sour cherries, very sweet with a little bourbon on the back.

Mouthfeel has a lot to be desired on this vintage. Its smooth and I like it and all but it really needs some carbonation bite to complete the feel. I am disappointed but not hopeful that I will get to try a better vintage.

Drinkability is low to moderate on this vintage. I stress this vintage. I have heard good things about the others but try to stay away from

UMNbeerhunter, Apr 05, 2011
Photo of SpdKilz
3.23/5  rDev -23.3%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

I had a Red Poppy the other day and it had carbonation, and also tasted pretty damn good. I decided to give Flat Abbey another try with this. The most recent vintage.

Appearance - "Pop" Just kidding. As I pull the cork out I don't even hear the slightest bit of a hiss. This is not looking good. Pouring into my RR Tulip with a vigorous pour, I achieve zero head. Awesome.

Smell - Dark fruit, sour and tart aromas, oak, slight barnyard funk. The nose does not impress me nearly as much as Red Poppy.

Taste - I taste alcohol up front followed by dark fruits such as sweet cherries, prunes, and raisins. Slight oak and vanilla. Not enjoyable since it is completely flat.

Mouthfeel - Tastes like medium bodied flat beer. Does finish a hint dry.

Overall - Sadly, I have two more of these in my cellar. Perhaps with time they may gain a little carbonation. I obviously know LA is known to have carbonation issues but you would think after all this time, and with there being carbonation in this year's Red Poppy, it would have been fixed. I refuse to rate this high because of the slight hype around this or to justify the price. To be honest, this was probably the worst $16 dollars I have spent on beer. The flavors didn't impress me, the beer was flat, and the alcohol was noticeable. Red Poppy was much more enjoyable. I really haven't given LA much business in the past due to known carbonation issues and this has affirmed I will pretty much stay away from them in the future. They do put out some good stuff but I refuse to drop that much money on a beer that does not perform. Additionally, don't try to claim "it is supposed to be that way." There should be SOME carbonation. Mine had ZERO. It was a flat boozy mess. Not impressive at all.

SpdKilz, Mar 28, 2011
Photo of youradhere
4.33/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

2010 Vintage, Sinners Club item.

Beer pours flat, little sign of carbonation, whisps of lacing on the top. Dark body with reddish hues, murky and smooth looking. Aromas are immediately cherries and brett, slight smoke, sweet malt, slight vinegar, cinnamon, honey. Taste is interesting and complicated; chocolate cherries quickly upfront, followed by bourbon vanilla, some malt somewhere in there. Slight alcohol burn, not really too tart; sourness contribution could be confused between cherries or bacteria. Slightly medicinal but well balanced flavors. Slick mouthfeel, barely perceptible carbonation tickles the tongue, medium bodied. Pretty darn drinkable, if any one of the characteristics got too out of whack, drinkability would have suffered for me. It will be interesting to see how this one ages and tastes in a year.

youradhere, Mar 16, 2011
Photo of russpowell
4.43/5  rDev +5.2%
look: 2 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Got this from Bitterbill, cheers Bill!

Pour black/chestnut with a bit of tan head & no real pop when the cork is removed. Nice vicious look to this, zero head retention & lacing

D: Prunes, figs, sourness & oak notes. Opens up even more once warm

T: Follows the nose, hints of vanilla, a touch of booze, raisins & cherry juice up front. Dryness & vanilla are fairly prevalent as this warms along with boosey cherries & figs. Finishes dry, tart, figgy & with dry oakyness, plus a kiss of booze

MF: Slick, medium bodied; smooth carbonation is noticable. The fruitty sweetness melds well with the tartness/sourness. Nice warming sensations as well, but some boozeyness is present

Super drinkabilty for the style & ABV

russpowell, Mar 16, 2011
Photo of drink1121
4.13/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 2 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

2011 release. Poured into a wine glass
A- Dark brown with a light red hugh. No carbonation at all. Beer is supposed to be carbonated.

S- very, very complex smell here. its tough to pick things out, so I will just list everything I smell with no specific order: vanilla, little rubbing alcohol, vanilla, sour cherry, Belgian candi sugar, light bourbon

T- slightly less complex than the smell, but still really complex - the smell was just hugely complex. I would say its very close to the smell though, but a bit more cherry and also sour cherry

M- not great because of the carbonation, but nice thick feel besides that

D-For 11% and despite it being un-carbed, I am hugely impressed with this beer. I could rink a bomber easy - with such a huge beer, thats saying something

drink1121, Mar 14, 2011
Photo of LittleDon
3.65/5  rDev -13.3%
look: 1 | smell: 4 | taste: 5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

The color and life of cloudy flat Dr. Pepper. I obviously drew the short straw on this bottle and got something with no carbonation. No head, no lace, no carbonation. Lifeless. Aroma and taste make up some for the poor appearance. Lots of cherries, some oak, some acetone from the alcohol. The taste is phenomenally complex. Tart, a bit of alcohol in the middle, cherries and oak, finishing a bit buttery with a mild bitterness. Due to the absence of carbonation, mouthfeel was flat. The only thing keeping the rating above 1 was the medium body.

I am saddened that I was cursed with a sub-par example of this beer, made all the more painful due to the hefty price tag ($16 for 375ml). I am sure that with a bit of carbonation this is a world class brew (or with a bit more alcohol a great port like fermented beverage). Perhaps one day, I will venture back to the North County to try Cuvee De Tomme again. Until then, I am left with the memory of what may be the poorest value beer I have ever purchased.

LittleDon, Mar 11, 2011
Photo of ShanePB
4.35/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

'09 vintage poured from a 750 ml bottled at Imminent Liquidation this past weekend - thanks to whoever brought this!

A - Nice look but nothing flashy...no head, dark ruby red in color, hazy and murky...

S - Oak, sweet berry fruits, some musky notes that went away after this breathed a bit, tart lemon/citrus juice.

T - Now this is what I'm talking about...tart strawberry and blackberry flavors, with some dry tannins, oak wood and an overall sweetness.

M - Thankfully this '09 bottle is carbonated, but not overly so. It's evident it's mellowed but no where near flat like some of the other '09 Lost Abbey bottles. Bubbly, medium-bodied and juice-like body.

D - I could drink this all the time. Great tasting beer but it can't be perfect considering how high the alcohol is, though it's as close I can get put it for a Wild Ale.

This was the highlight of the tasting for me personally. A beer I've been seeking out for quite some time and it was really nice to be able to sample this one.

ShanePB, Mar 07, 2011
Photo of benclimbs
4.05/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours amazingly wonderful, dark brown/red with a big thick head and tons of visible bubbles and lacing.

smell is so wierd, all minerals and sour brett funk, some woody earthy smells but everything is just strange, it smells how vitamins taste.

Taste is really amazing and uber complex - a dry leathery character along with sour cherries, prunes, dried figs and bitter herbs...so interesting and unique.

feel is good - not too slick, not too light

drinkability is really hard to judge - i was happy with a 6oz pour and wouldn't have wanted another one, it was just so so so complex and intense, like no sour or wild ale i've ever had - wholly unique, very interesting and very wierd.

benclimbs, Mar 07, 2011
Photo of Dreadnaught33
3.93/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

2010 vintage. Thanks to ahalloin for sharing this one.

A: Dark brown with light brown highlights with no head and lacing.

S: Nice complex smell: part sour, part oak aged wine like vine character, part dark malt, and part dark cherry and raisin.

T: Follows the smell but wasn't as complex as I hoped. Much, much more cherries than the smell. Some oak and wheat tastes intermingle with sour tanins and red wine. Seems a little confused.

M: Could use some carbonation. Smooth and nice feel though.

D: Ok but not great.

Dreadnaught33, Mar 01, 2011
Photo of dougofthefuture
4.35/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

2009 vintage opened because it is Friday. opened with a nice pop but no gushing.

A. Nothing special here. Very little head. An appareling ruby red hue.

S. A bit musty, lots of oak, some fruity sweetness, and no hint of booze.

T&m. Initially a nice cherry tartness wakes up the taste buds, accompanied by just a hint of funk. There is a tannic oaky aftertaste that dries out the sweetness and balances everything. The bourbon at this point on this older bottle is almost imperceptable. Very well hidden alcohol at 11%. A nice balanced carbonation lets the flavors do the talking.

D. Like most wilds, a little bit goes a long way, but this is one I wouldn't mind sipping for quite a while. Very nice and worth seeking out.

dougofthefuture, Feb 26, 2011
Photo of AndrewNations
3.8/5  rDev -9.7%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance - Not much here, It's a bit murky and thin looking. The color is consistent with a normal quad but the way it moves in the glass gives me a idea that this one isn't vicious at all.

Smell- The smell is a bit sour with some slight Belgian notes of sweet sugar. It's a bit hard to separate the two on the nose alone but I get something unique each time I smell this one. Maybe some sour cherries and fig/raisin notes that come in and out.

Taste- My first impression was this is a great red wine. It really does have very similar notes as a good wine. Initially I thought this is a run of the mill quad spiked with brett and nothing more. I get all the great characteristics one desires in a Belgian quad. The sourness is dominant and doesn't leave a whole lot of room for anything else. This is apparent form the beginning to finish. I'm planning on laying this one down for a year or so and seeing if the sourness fades. It may take a while..

Mouth- A bit thin and very little of any carbonation.
Drink- I don't get a lot of booze on this one despite the high abv but the sourness makes this hard to drink.

Serving type: bottle, 375ml

AndrewNations, Feb 24, 2011
Photo of beerwolf77
3.95/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Good old sweemzander the cellar master cracked this one during a night of wilds. Poured into a tulip.

A: Cinnamon brown, no head, no lace. Uh oh!

S: Tart, funky and fruity. A good amount of citrus with a mild lactic punch. Just enough hay and damp basement to remind you this is a wild. Sweet dark fruits are represented as well. Definitely pick up the bourbon.

T: Pretty much a mirror of the nose. Juicy citrus fruits. Along with a decent funky band aid and wet oak. Cherries seem to push through as the dominant dark fruit. Good amount of bourbon. No heat. which is amazing considering the ABV.

M: Fullish to medium body. Carbonation is just fine.

D: Actually quite tasty. I had no problem finishing my glass. I think the heavy dose of cherry helped a lot for me.

beerwolf77, Feb 23, 2011
Photo of DJButters
3.78/5  rDev -10.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A: poured a dark brown in color with brown highlights that had almost no head and left virtually no lacing sticking to the glass.

S: could definitely sniff out the bourbon with vanilla, dark fruits, mild bretty funky, and lots of hot booze notes.

T: Everyone talks about the cherry, however I'm not tasting it. More bourbon and booze. Maybe time will help it to settle down. Hope I have some yeast for additional carbonation. palate with dark fruit oaky accents but had caramel and mild citrus notes.

M: the brew was medium in body with a low amount of carbonation which had a fruity, oaky, boozy, and tart finish.

D: What can I say? A lot of differences of opinion here. It was labeled as an AWA, but this is hardly that. The finish is long and boozy heavily on bourbon and less on sour. Some slightly unpleasant vinegarish tingling throughout. Well-crafted, but a little hot.

DJButters, Feb 17, 2011
Photo of thagr81us
3.83/5  rDev -9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

2009 Vintage! Served from bottle into a green Man snifter. Poured a deep reddish brown with a half finger very light tan head that subsided to a minimal amount quickly. Maintained decent lacing throughout the glass. The aroma was comprised of sweet malt, cherries, sour, and oak. The flavor was of sweet malt, cherries, sour, tart, oak, and slight alcohol. It had a medium feel on the palate with medium-high carbonation. Overall this was a pretty good brew. I was really glad that I got a chance to try this one. I wish I had a 2010 vintage to be able to compare as this one seems like it might have dropped off in the flavor department some as compared to it being fresh in my opinion. Still very good, don't get me wrong, but could be better. Had a nice aroma and decent flavor here. Worth trying without a doubt.

thagr81us, Feb 14, 2011
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
4.28/5  rDev +1.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Pours a slow deep red. Very little carbonation to it. Aroma of cherry, oak, bitter/sourness.

Taste, nice and tangy, balanced sweetness and sour, wood flavor, red tannins, tinge of vanilla. Alcohol extremely well hidden. Really enjoyed what it brought to the table. The sour aspect made sense that this wasn't all that carbonated, so quit complaining about it, I think its that way with good reason (complimentary).

Drinkability is a little low because the stuff is just so dang expensive ($40 at the goat) and isn't too easy to find around my parts. This was the 09 version.

Beerandraiderfan, Feb 10, 2011
Photo of Gosox8787
3.98/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Presentation: 375 mL corked and caged bottle that I shared with a friend. Served chilled and poured into a Sam Adams Perfect Pint glass. 2010 vintage. Thanks to buzbuzzer for this.

Appearance: Cloudy dark brown in color with some reddish highlights. Not much head at all on the pour.

Aroma: The red wine is really assertive, especially here. I'm not sure if its the barrels or the combination of fruit and dark ale, but I definitely get a strong pinot noir note. Tart cherries, molasses, raisans, and a touch of bourbon heat are definitely noticable here as well. Nicely complex and even some balance.

Taste: Again, big wine notes off the top. Oak and pinot noir dominate. The cherries add a nice fruitines then meld into a nice sour component. Some funk here as well. Among all this, there are still notes of a good quad floating in and out. Molasses and dark fruits add a nice sweet component. The bourbon really only presents in some heat. I think a little age on this might have improved the balance significantly and allowed the bourbon to shine more. At the same time, I think the fruit might have faded a bit and I really enjoyed the fresh cherry flavors.

Mouthfeel: Full bodied, but perhaps a little undercarbonated. Not a flat mess like a couple of Lost Abbey beers I've had though.

Drinkability: At this stage, this beer is pretty hot. Even with some age though, I have to imagine this is meant to sip.

Overall, a really interesting, unique, complex beer that I enjoyed for the most part. Definitely has its flaws but certainly worth trying. The sour component works well with the quad and the cherries are very nice. I would love to try an older vintage of this sometime to see how it evolves over a couple years.

Gosox8787, Feb 10, 2011
Photo of kbutler1
4.18/5  rDev -0.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Bottle. 2007 vintage. Poured into a Duvel tulip glass a slightly murky reddish mahagony color with a slight tan colored head that collars around the glass. Swirling does does some minimal head. Sour cherries right off the bat in the nose along with acetone sourness. Oaky as well. Wow, that has a lot going in the flavor. Sourness right off the bat with a malty belgian backbone. Some red wine type flavors as well in the end along with a dry finish. Light/medium mouthfeel. The 11.5% is in there but not really all that noticeable. Very easy drinking and smooth. Overall, I am very pleased with this in so many ways, the flavors are really nice, the sour/tart is there but not too much, and its carbonated nicely.

kbutler1, Feb 08, 2011
Cuvee De Tomme from The Lost Abbey
94 out of 100 based on 965 ratings.