Yuengling Premium Light Beer - Yuengling Brewery

Not Rated.
Yuengling Premium Light BeerYuengling Premium Light Beer

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
65
poor

289 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 289
Reviews: 56
rAvg: 2.73
pDev: 23.08%
Wants: 9
Gots: 13 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Yuengling Brewery visit their website
Pennsylvania, United States

Style | ABV
Light Lager |  3.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Todd on 05-22-2002)
View: Beers (10) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 289 | Reviews: 56 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of djrn2
1.25/5  rDev -54.2%

Photo of Thorpe429
2.88/5  rDev +5.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Reviewed from notes.

Pours a very light straw color with a bit of a white head. Th nose brigs some grain, grass, and a bit of corn. Taste is moderately sweet with grass and grain elements. Light feel with fairly high carbonation. His goes down easy and does not have any real off flavors, it is simply quite light.

Photo of nmann08
3/5  rDev +9.9%

Photo of BuckeyeNation
2.2/5  rDev -19.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Macro Smackdown XXI features two light lagers from two of this country's oldest breweries. Yuengling, of course, is 'America's Oldest Brewery', having been founded in 1829. Stevens Point didn't come into existence until 1857, which means that it's only 150 years old. Slackers. Let's see which one of these newfangled light brews from these two tradition-rich breweries comes out on top.

Bright goldenrod; much darker than most beer of this ilk. The pale lemon cap doesn't look bad either. It topped out at two fingers and is taking its sweet time departing. A few squiggles of sudsy lace is at least something.

What I can appreciate of the nose is fairly decent. Its good points are a lack of offensiveness (always a plus) and a fresh grain-like aroma that is accented by a whiff of musky hops. I'm not impressed by any means, but it isn't all bad.

Take the first sentence of the previous paragraph and substitute the word 'flavor' for 'nose'. This is one of the least aggressive flavor profiles that I've ever run across in a style built on wimpiness. If you're looking for something that tastes a little like beer, but adds less than 100 calories to your daily count, grab yourself a cold Yuengling Premium Light. You know the drill... lightly sweet grain with a hint of hops. Yadda, yadda, yadda. A little apple as well?

Yeah, the mouthfeel is watery. What else is new? The only way the mouthfeel on a light lager has a prayer of standing out is to have a perfect amount of carbonation. This one doesn't get there, but it's close. At least it's spunky enough to provide some amount of mouth interest.

It looks like 'America's Oldest Brewery' claims the Macro Smackdown XXI crown. That doesn't mean that it's great beer, just that it had 'bupkis' for competition. As a low calorie rehydrator... okay. Just don't kid yourself that you're drinking real beer.

Photo of Knapp85
2.58/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This beer poured out as a clear looking yellow color with a fizzy white head on top. The lacing was light not much retention. The smell was sweet, a little grainy some lager yeast in there too. The taste had some corn flavors in there, sweet grains and a faint bitterness in the finish. The mouthfeel was light, nicely carbonated and very easy to drink. Overall I was glad I got to try this one as I haven't seen this one around much. I feel this one is better than the light lager.

Photo of oberon
3.1/5  rDev +13.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Bought it for the wife and decided to have one of the six,pours a clear straw color with a decent head,the aroma is very iron-like with some grainy notes.The taste is crisp and very clean with a light malty biscuit flavor to it,very clean beer.Hey this is one of the better "light" bers out there not real good but would have at a family gathering over AB products any time.

Photo of NeroFiddled
2.7/5  rDev -1.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A crystal-clear, light-straw colored body is topped by a decent sized head of creamy bright white foam. The retention is limited and it drops in size rather quickly; but surprisingly leaves some nice lace as it goes. The nose offers very little more than a generic "beer" character. The body is light and crisp on the tongue. Not unlike the aroma, the flavor offers very little. There's a delicate touch of malt and a backing bitterness, but nothing really stands out. It finishes as short and dry as it begins. It's not a bad light beer in comparison to many others, however, as it's clean and straightforward without any "odd" notes to it. It's simply watered down Yuengling Premium and that's fine. But for the 10 or so calories, I'd rather have the extra flavor in the standard version.

Photo of WVbeergeek
3.7/5  rDev +35.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Compared to most light lagers this one drinks like a dream, a really great tasting light drinking beer. It's a lawnmower beer that you don't have to think about it's for hydrating and satisfying the beer craving. Appears a pale golden color with a light fizzy white head forms ample scattered lacing. Aroma has a light cereal note semi sweet with a touch of grassy hops in the background. Clean tasting flavor from front to back with a wimsy light malt biscuit background and a touch of grassy hops, I drank a good bit of this at my father in law's 50th birthday last year. It was hot outside and it just kept going down so smooth. Mouthfeel is light bodied carbonation a little too much pretty unnatural, crisp overall mouthfeel no metallic harshness. Drinkability is up there with the most drinkable brews in number, not that this one will fill your tastebuds with satisfaction as a starter beer these would make great training wheels.

Photo of nickfl
3/5  rDev +9.9%

Photo of russpowell
3.08/5  rDev +12.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Got this one from WoodyChandler...

Pours a very fizzy straw color with 4+ fingers of pearl colored head. Below average head retention & even less lacing

S: Sweet bread, some grassyness

T: Slight soapyness, sweetness & light metallic hops up front. Cornyness, slight grassy hops & water as this warms, plus some dryness. Finishes fairly dry & grassy, somewhat crisp as well

MF: Light body, fairly firm carbonation, thins out a bit once warm

Drinks alright, nothing to get excited about, but nothing too nasty either. I could do 1 or 2 on a Summer's day if pressed...

Photo of WesWes
3.08/5  rDev +12.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

The beer pours a pale gold color with a thick frothy white head that quickly fades to lacing. The aroma is average. It has a light pale malt scent that is slightly sweet and dry with lager yeast aroma. The taste is average as well. It has a very light pale malt flavor with some adjuncts. It is watery, but has more flavor than most light lagers. It goes down easy and finishes dry and a bit musty. The mouthfeel is decent. It is a low bodied beer with good carbonation. This is an average light lager and quite possibly the weakest offering from Yuengling

Photo of jwc215
2.25/5  rDev -17.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Pours light golden with a thin white head that quickly descends to a very thin patch.

Macro-lager smell with a little more sweet grain and just a hint of bland hops. Thin smell.

The taste is of a watered down version of Yuengling Premium. Some graininess/husk. Some balancing non-descript hops. Slight tinny, flat, rather unpleasant, aftertaste. Musty, slightly crisp finish.

Thin/watery body with a slightly "off" aftertaste.

As to drinkability - within style it would have average drinkability for style (which isn't much), but the aftertaste, which is a bit annoying, though not making it undrinkable, puts it just below average for the style.

Glad I only had one sample - that's more than enough. Even for a light beer, it doesn't work very well.

Photo of InspectorBob
3/5  rDev +9.9%

Photo of orangesol
2.75/5  rDev +0.7%

Photo of woodychandler
2.3/5  rDev -15.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

I was at one of the local bottle shops today and picked this up as a single. I have had it in a CAN before, so I knew that I would not want more than one.

Once more, we have an example of Greg Koch's "fizzy yellow beer" and I poured it into a Sam Adams "Perfect Pint" glass. The glass really helped with head retention and I had a little over a finger of creamy, bone-white head. Color was a pale lemon yellow with NE-quality clarity. Nose smelled heavily of cereal adjuncts. Blah! Mouthfeel was somewhat thin and the taste was fairly bland. I was definitely not impressed. Finish was likewise bland, watery and dull. This is one of my least favorite styles, even less than AMLs and AALs, both staples of The CANQuest (TM) and this was a pretty light example.

Photo of ejimhof
3/5  rDev +9.9%

Photo of Stinkypuss
2.68/5  rDev -1.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

a. Cans via Friends Fridge. Overall presentation was average for this style of beer (canned macro).

s. Light grains and some sweet corn.

t. Typical macro lager. No real hops noticable. Finishes a bit sweet due to the adjuncts/corn. Maybe its a wee bit of malt that wasnt balanced. Overall lacks taste, but nothing offensive either.

m. Light and crisp.

d. Went well with a big italian meal. I had a few of these, and they hit the spot. Low alcohal helps the drinkability, and overall I've had much worse.

Photo of plaid75
2.9/5  rDev +6.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured a medium straw hue with a half finger foamy white head. There was decent retention and poor lacing.

The smell featured a bland boiled corn and light sweet syrup.

The taste was watery with a light corn and hop presence. Some husky grain. Decent doughy finish.

The mouthfeel was thin and carbonated.

Overall an uneventful light lager.

Photo of rolltide8425
2.5/5  rDev -8.4%

Photo of TheSevenDuffs
2.5/5  rDev -8.4%

Photo of tone77
2.68/5  rDev -1.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured from a brown 12 oz. bottle. Has a golden color with a 1/2 inch head. Smell is of, well, nothing. Taste is also missing for the most part, some gentle notes of malt and corn. Feels light in the mouth and is very drinkable, good for beer games. Overall this is a very mediocre light beer.

Photo of IPAchris
2.75/5  rDev +0.7%

Photo of ZEB89
2.5/5  rDev -8.4%

Photo of francisweizen
2/5  rDev -26.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Yuenglings answer to a BMC light beer. Drunk straight from the can, I have to knock a point for appearance. Aromas are of light breads and faint, old hops and they are more subdued in the can version of this beer than they are in the bottled version. The taste is similar to the aroma and is not very complex at all. As a light beer this is OK, but the watery mouthfeel makes the drinkability a low score!

Photo of ROGUE16
2/5  rDev -26.7%

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Yuengling Premium Light Beer from Yuengling Brewery
65 out of 100 based on 289 ratings.