1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Yuengling Light Lager - Yuengling Brewery

Not Rated.
Yuengling Light LagerYuengling Light Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
66
poor

754 Ratings
THE BROS
80
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 754
Reviews: 210
rAvg: 2.81
pDev: 22.78%
Wants: 9
Gots: 48 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Yuengling Brewery visit their website
Pennsylvania, United States

Style | ABV
Light Lager |  3.20% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 05-22-2002)
View: Beers (10) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Yuengling Light Lager Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 754 | Reviews: 210 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of djrn2
djrn2

New Jersey

2.5/5  rDev -11%

09-05-2012 23:52:58 | More by djrn2
Photo of metter98
metter98

New York

2.71/5  rDev -3.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.75

A: The beer is crystal clear yellow in color. It poured with a short white head that quickly died down, leaving a patch of bubbles on the surface and eventually nearly completely faded away.
S: Light aromas of grainy and adjunct malts are present in the nose.
T: The taste follows the smell and has a light amount of bitterness; the hops mask any sweetness from the corn adjuncts.
M: It feels light-bodied and a bit watery on the palate with a moderate amount of carbonation.
O: This beer seems like it is a slight cut above the most common light lagers but isn't anything special.

Serving type: bottle

10-28-2013 01:39:56 | More by metter98
Photo of nmann08
nmann08

District of Columbia

3/5  rDev +6.8%

11-25-2011 17:48:11 | More by nmann08
Photo of mikesgroove
mikesgroove

South Carolina

3.33/5  rDev +18.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Went out to Applebees and it was this or a BMC combo, so I had to go with the Yiuengling. Well I guess Yuengling isn't really a macro, but still a light lager so I went ahead and added it to the same category.. Poured a decent amber with a small white head. Lots of visible carbonation and very clear consistency. At least the tone has a decent reddish tint. Smell was full of grains and not really much else, slight hint at a caramel or sugar sweetness but very slight and only as it warmed. The taste was a little musty. Grain, corn, and grass flavors were the big players here, slight amount of caramel trying to come through but never really made it. The feel was very smooth, decent body, not as light as some others. Overall it had a bit more of a flavor profile then some of the others did, but still needs a little work. I actually liked this slightly better then the premium lager, go figure. It seemed a bit more well wounded. The lager seemed too bready to me. This was a decent light beer.

Serving type: on-tap

07-28-2007 00:42:17 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of Phyl21ca
Phyl21ca

Quebec (Canada)

2/5  rDev -28.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 2

Bottle: Poured a clear golden color lager with small bubbly white head with minimal retention. Aroma of sweet notes with light cereal notes. Taste is also dominated by sweet cereal notes with almost no aftertaste. Body is light with good carbonation. Easy drinking lager with very little complexity.

Serving type: bottle

04-22-2014 00:10:34 | More by Phyl21ca
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

2.03/5  rDev -27.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pretty non-descript. Light in all facets. Basically no aroma, except for a very faint grain, hop detection. The color is very watery looking and overcarbonated; no real head to speak of. Tastes more grainy than malty, but the lightness keeps it from becomming a disaster. Light notes of green apples, and metailic note in the flavor, accompany the grains. Feels acidic and prickley with a mild hop linger. Will not go out of my way for this brew.

Serving type: bottle

03-22-2007 14:29:38 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

2.7/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

12 oz. bottle for $0.99 at Total Wine & More in Kennesaw, Georgia.

Appearance: Pours a clear, gold body topped with an inch of white foam. Slight, but steady effervescence.

Smell: Nose of steeped grain husks with an incredibly faint note of caramel.

Taste: Minor pale maltiness with a hint of grain and a very light malt sweetness. Touch of spicy hops and bitterness. Finishes clean and crisp.

Mouthfeel: Light-bodied. Medium-high carbonation.

Drinkability: It's OK for a light lager.

Serving type: bottle

11-20-2008 02:18:58 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of kylehay2004
kylehay2004

Florida

2.8/5  rDev -0.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Clear, amber with a white head, about a single finger head

S: Bready and grainy smell, little else.

T: Sweet and caramel notes. Smooth. Basically I imagine this as a watered down tradition yuengling lager.

M: Moderate carbonation and Medium body. One very nice difference from the traditional yuengling lager is that this one doesn't have a bad aftertaste. That is definitely a plus.

O: basically a watered down traditional yuengling without that sour lingering aftertaste. Still would take the full flavored version over this one though.

Serving type: bottle

01-02-2013 14:37:13 | More by kylehay2004
Photo of Knapp85
Knapp85

Pennsylvania

2.05/5  rDev -27%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Honestly I wish they'd stop making Light beers. This beer pours just like it's fuller version the Traditional Lager. It's got a copper-ish amber color with a white head that goes away quickly. The smells are almost the same, it's kind of hoppy and it's got some grains in there too. The aroma is super light though. The taste is virtually absent from this beer. Compared to the original Lager this beer is very weak on flavor. All I can say is that you should just drink the real thing.

Serving type: bottle

04-10-2011 04:22:59 | More by Knapp85
Photo of NeroFiddled
NeroFiddled

Pennsylvania

2.4/5  rDev -14.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

I understand why Dick wanted to create this brand. The Traditional Lager is immensely popular for some reason, and this should do just as well or better! Or will it? It may create a backlash from people who think that the Traditional Lager is something special. But this new beer is so bad that I'm going to have to spill the beans.
Here it is: Yuengling Traditional Lager is Yuengling Premium Lager with a caramel coloring called Porterine added. Same beer, different color. Yuengling Light is watered down Yuengling Premium Lager. Therefore, this is basically Yuengling Light with food coloring. There is nothing special about it. The Porterine does give a very slight flavor, but it's basically insignificant at this level. If you like the Light (and it's not bad compared to other lights) then you'll like this. Otherwise, forget it.

Serving type: on-tap

08-23-2002 13:58:04 | More by NeroFiddled
Photo of TheManiacalOne
TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

3.6/5  rDev +28.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a deep gold color with a thin white head that fades quickly and leaves a thin lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is of light caramelized malts, bready grains and a little bit of hops.

T: The taste is pretty bready for the style with some flavors of caramel and nuts. The malt character is hearty but not too heavy. The hops presence is stronger than any I've seen in a Light Lager and it creates a good balance. The after-taste is slightly bready.

M: Smooth and crisp, light-to-medium body, medium carbonation, finish is clean.

D: Tasty, goes down very easily, not too filling, very mild kick, very good representation of style, most beers in this style are light versions of Adjunct Lagers, however this is one of the few that is a lighter version of a Vienna Lager, the result is more flavor than most others.

Serving type: bottle

05-05-2009 02:29:53 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of Jason
Jason

Massachusetts

3.5/5  rDev +24.6%

02-12-2014 23:10:01 | More by Jason
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

West Virginia

2.03/5  rDev -27.8%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: Copper golden amber forms a thin short-lived off white head no lacing left at all. Aroma: Mild grainy caramel sweetness touch of hops very bland all in all. Taste: An off graininess comes off a bit tart and bready with no finishing flavors, starts off a decent sweetness then boom nothing not aftertaste nothing there, water. Mouthfeel: Watery thin spritzy carbonation, can't believe they produce this beer. Drinkability: I guess you could drink alot of it 2.7%abv and watery mouthfeel, but why would you waste your time with flavorless beer.

Serving type: bottle

02-24-2004 18:39:09 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of WesWes
WesWes

New York

3.03/5  rDev +7.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The beer pours a nice golden color with a thick frothy white head that fades to lacing. The aroma is average. It has a dry musty scent with little malts and fewer hops. The taste is average also. It is light, dry, and musty with a very watery grainy malt make-up. It goes down easy, but lacks any real flavor. The mouthfeel is decent. It is an extremely low bodied beer with good carbonation. This is an average light beer. There is nothing special here. I found this to be dryer than most. It's one and done for me.

Serving type: bottle

05-05-2004 01:45:27 | More by WesWes
Photo of StonedTrippin
StonedTrippin

Colorado

2.3/5  rDev -18.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

take all the bad features of the normal yuengling, its gross stale malt flavor, its way over the top carbonation, and its skunky aftertaste, then water it all down, and this is what you get. it pours clear and bubbly, minimal head. the aroma is pretty bad, metallc and off on the malt, no hops at all. the flavor is just a dumbed down regular yuengling, with a little less body. carbonation is also brutally ovedone, feels like a pepsi in my mouth, but tastes far worse. this had me on the verge of throwing up in my mouth, no joke. i can find some redeeming factor in any beer, which is hard in this case, but guess if you want to drink all day and not catch a buzz, this it your go. not something ill hopefully ever drink again.

Serving type: can

11-26-2012 18:40:02 | More by StonedTrippin
Photo of mdfb79
mdfb79

New York

2.75/5  rDev -2.1%

04-13-2014 23:34:28 | More by mdfb79
Photo of jwc215
jwc215

Wisconsin

2.58/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours golden amber with a thin head that becomes a patch before slowly disappearing.

The smell is of light grain/husk with caramel backing. Within style, at least it has something of a pleasant aroma.

The taste is of sweet grain/husk with caramel. Hops are barely noticeable, if at all. I suppose there are some to balance out sweetness, but they don't add to the taste at all. Thin finish with some lingering wet cardboard.

The feel is rather thin and fizzy.

I would say not horrible for style, but not much to it at all except some maltiness that is often lacking in light beers. Increasingly annoying aftertaste brings it down in my book. For a light beer, I suppose it's okay, though not much better than so many other light beers...Why bother....Glad I only had one sample. It was enough.

Serving type: bottle

07-18-2007 17:18:06 | More by jwc215
Photo of Gavage
Gavage

New Jersey

3.7/5  rDev +31.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Appearance: pours a clear golden color with a nice 2" white head. This beer actually looks like a beer, not like it's BMC lite counterparts, thus the high mark.

Smell: the aroma was of light malt and soft grassiness.

Taste: surprisingly there is some flavor with this light beer as some grainy malts and mild bitterness are easily detectable. Some grass tones round it out.

Mouthfeel: extremely dry and mildly crisp at the start all the way through the finish. Thin bodied. Little aftertaste.

Drinkability: not being a light beer fan, I was surprised that this didn't offend my tastebuds in relation to the light lager style. So this is nicely drinkable in my book. Choose this over the BMC alternatives if you need to drink a light beer.

Serving type: bottle

01-12-2006 00:40:44 | More by Gavage
Photo of beernads
beernads

Florida

2.75/5  rDev -2.1%

02-07-2013 05:55:58 | More by beernads
Photo of yourefragile
yourefragile

District of Columbia

2.95/5  rDev +5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle poured into a pilsner glass

Very light amber, clear golden color with steady carbonation. Off white head that quickly dissipates to a ring and leaves very little lacing. Aroma is nice for the style, light grain smell with a little caramel. Medium body with sharp carbonation. Strong grain flavor, light malt background and some hops bite in the finish with the carbonation balancing out initial sweetness. This beer is what it is, an above average macroish light lager.

Serving type: bottle

04-07-2009 18:34:12 | More by yourefragile
Photo of zestar
zestar

California

3/5  rDev +6.8%

05-31-2014 08:37:49 | More by zestar
Photo of oriolesfan4
oriolesfan4

Maryland

3.23/5  rDev +14.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 5

Part of a Yuengling sampler pack. Being a light beer definitely not my preferred 'style' of beer but I'm open to try anything. Pours a dark golden color, thin head.. looks pretty good for a light beer. No aroma to this one. Very light bodied, slight lacing on glass. Watery mouthfeel to say the least, but there's a slight hoppiness in there and definitely has at least SOME taste. Extremely drinkable and goes down easily, especially with the lower ABV. As a beer overall this wouldn't rank very high, but in the 'light beer' spectrum this one is pretty good. Looks/tastes better than a ton of other light beers (except Sam Adams Light of course) and goes down easy. Nice, easy beer to drink, just take it for what it is.

Serving type: bottle

11-19-2010 23:00:29 | More by oriolesfan4
Photo of woodychandler
woodychandler

Pennsylvania

3.2/5  rDev +13.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

I CANnot figure out how I reviewed Traditional Lager in a CAN and managed not to review its Light counterpart. CAN you shed some light? I was probably at a party or a bar and Light was not available. Let me make things right.

I got two fingers' of ecru head off of my pour which held in nicely. Color was the same medium-reddish amber as its leaded counterpart, which made my hopes rise. Nose had a light malty sweetness, again not too different from the leaded version. Mouthfeel was medium but the taste was really thin. Dang it! I would love to be able to recommend a low-calorie, low-carb counterpart, but this just did not have the Ooomph to cause me to do so. There was a light sweetness on the tongue. The finish was pleasant, which a lot of Light beers CANnot say, and even a little dry, but overall it was a lesser experience. Tood bad. If you are looking for a Light beer, this might be a good candidate, but otherwise, I'd say have a Traditional Lager (the leaded version).

Serving type: can

08-17-2009 01:06:45 | More by woodychandler
Photo of akorsak
akorsak

Pennsylvania

3.53/5  rDev +25.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: The lager is a pale amber color, coming in somewhere between light brown and orange. The head is a wispy ring that does not retain.

S: The aroma is a very grainy maltiness, thin and lacking much character.

T: The lager has a very thin, watered down taste, compared to the Traditional Lager. The malts are grainy and do little flavorwise. As for hops? Forget it. This is a malty beer only and even that doesn't fare so well.

M: This is probably a great beer when stacked up against BMC's light offerings. It reminds me of Sam Adams Light, a noble concept that, by its nature, falls short.

D: I'd pass unless you were looking for a very low abv beer to pound over many, many, many hours. The caloric increase up to Lager is not that significant, so take the dive dammit.

Serving type: on-tap

12-17-2006 23:01:26 | More by akorsak
Photo of orangesol
orangesol

Pennsylvania

2.75/5  rDev -2.1%

03-08-2013 00:35:48 | More by orangesol
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Yuengling Light Lager from Yuengling Brewery
66 out of 100 based on 754 ratings.