1. Rating beers by attributes (look, smell, taste, feel, overall) is back! Read the latest update ...
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Yuengling Bock - Yuengling Brewery

Not Rated.
Yuengling BockYuengling Bock

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
77
okay

632 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 632
Reviews: 235
rAvg: 3.37
pDev: 16.32%
Wants: 24
Gots: 43 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Yuengling Brewery visit their website
Pennsylvania, United States

Style | ABV
Bock |  5.10% ABV

Availability: Spring

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: ClockworkOrange on 02-08-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 632 | Reviews: 235 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Slowpoke
2.5/5  rDev -25.8%

Slowpoke, Jun 23, 2014
Photo of rooster1970
2.5/5  rDev -25.8%

rooster1970, Aug 19, 2012
Photo of wattoclone
2.51/5  rDev -25.5%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

There are two predominant characteristics of beer flavor: hops and malt. Some palates prefer one of these, I prefer a balance of the two as is found in the beers from Germany. This bock is an example of a typical American style of bock where the hops predominate and the malt sweetness is in the background. FIne if you prefer this style, a tragedy if you do not. I prefer a more balanced brew.

wattoclone, Mar 05, 2013
Photo of chodinheaven
2.55/5  rDev -24.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Clear, deep, mahagoney color with a bubbly pure white head. Smell is reminiscent of an adjunct lager, which does not bode well for this beer. Maybe some caramel-like malts in there as well.

Taste is lacking a bit. Some caramel malts come through, not a hint of hops, amd just the slightest hint of booze in the finish. The taste itself isn't actually so bad, but combined with an unpleasant smell and a weak, but too-highly carbonated mouthfeel, the taste and beer take a hit. Not a terrible beer, but I probably wouldn't be drinking it again anytime soon. Not sitting very well with me.

chodinheaven, Apr 15, 2011
Photo of paKIRK
2.58/5  rDev -23.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

appernce - a dark amber brown with a fluffy white head that fades quick in to a thin lacing.

smell - a strong malt sent.

tast - a caramely malt with some tones of burnt flavor verry littel bittering.

mouthfeel - mediumlight.

not for me but it is worth a try.

paKIRK, Oct 17, 2010
Photo of DoubleJ
2.63/5  rDev -22%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

On-tap at Fox & Hounds, located inside the Desmond Hotel (Malvern, PA). On to the beer:

Dark amber color to light brown. No head on top and lacing is nonexistant. The aroam is weak. Well....the bread crust is there, but what's that in the back, coriandor?!? Very light in the flavor as well. There's a touch of bread crust and a touch of sweet bread. Light and fizzy in the mouth.

This is more Shiner Bock than Anchor Bock overall. You could kick back with this, but you won't get a kick of flavor with this beer.

DoubleJ, Aug 11, 2009
Photo of Dotcubed
2.65/5  rDev -21.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Not a stranger to the dark side; love the brown beers.

Had a clear memory of loving the high point: Celebrator.

Not going to say the look of the package didn't affect my purchase, but it may have nudged the appearance rating.
Above average, but too pale for good. Nice foam.

Weak malty smell. Hint of something, rye I think.

Mostly metallic, smooth malt. Rye, bitter, watery finish.

I want to love it, but it has barely manages a like.
The six I bought was enough.

Dotcubed, Feb 17, 2011
Photo of Bslied
2.68/5  rDev -20.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

I ran across this interesting find in my go to beer store here in MD. Being born and raised in PA I was astonished to find a Yuengling brew that I had yet to sample. This was the start and the end of my happiness with regard to this beer. It pours slightly darker then there traditional lager. There is little to no overpowering aroma upon initial investigation. I took my first sip and was immediately surprised; however, in an unpleasant way. WHERE IS THE TASTE? I was expecting something akin to a doppelbock, but what I got was something much less. I feel that in the world of bargain beer, Yuengling has shown through and produced a fairly good lager. Entering this tasting with that in mind was a poor idea. I feel that this was a half hearted attempt at capturing the ever growing craft beer market. Yuengling family, please stick to what you are good at and not wonder off the beaten path. I am unfortunately not looking around anymore to find new concepts from this brewery.

Bslied, Feb 01, 2011
Photo of carlspeed
2.7/5  rDev -19.9%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Good beer! I liked it very much. I am going to pick up some more next time I go to the store. It's just a nice change, a little darker a little richer, kind of like a stronger Yuengling Porter. If you are in the mood for it, it will taste even better!

carlspeed, May 13, 2010
Photo of bevenson
2.7/5  rDev -19.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a bottle into a Sam Adams glass.

A - Deep brown to amber and crystal clear. Tan head with tight bubbles that leaves nice lace on side of glass. Very pretty.

S - Light chocolate malt aroma with a slight metallic tinge. Light burnt smell. Aroma seems a little simple for a bock.

T - Caramel and burnt malt flavor on the forefront. As with the aroma, the flavor is missing complexity and richness. Burnt malt and hop bitterness linger in finish.

F - Moderate carbonation and smooth. Light bodied for a bock and with quite a dry finish. I don't mind variations if it makes for a better beer, but this beer just feels a little thin.

D - Personally I'm a fan of Yuengling's flagship lager, but I don't feel that they did as a good a job with the bock. Nice to see them branching out, but I think they missed the mark on this beer.

bevenson, Mar 31, 2010
Photo of breedsimpsonville
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

breedsimpsonville, Jun 13, 2012
Photo of Damian74Shensky
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

Damian74Shensky, Dec 07, 2012
Photo of tempest
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

On-tap at Liberty St. Tavern for $3. Paired it with the mac & cheese pizza. Yum.

Frankly I'm not surprised, but this turned out to be a very bland beer. It was clean both in that there were clearly no flaws, but that the flavor profile is similar to that of water. There is a pleasant kiss of spicy hops in the aftertaste, but consider that's all my tongue could pick up, the hops are really the only taste. The beer reminds me a bit of bland "spring ales" or a watery copper ale.

tempest, Mar 15, 2009
Photo of Comparison_Ford
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

Comparison_Ford, Jul 11, 2014
Photo of wellsnb
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

wellsnb, Apr 16, 2014
Photo of Cloaked_Phantom
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

Cloaked_Phantom, Jul 19, 2014
Photo of GreesyFizeek
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

GreesyFizeek, Jun 26, 2013
Photo of tviz33
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

tviz33, Mar 13, 2014
Photo of NonicPanic
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

NonicPanic, Dec 06, 2013
Photo of jdavolos88
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

jdavolos88, Jan 03, 2013
Photo of TheDudeAbides
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

TheDudeAbides, Mar 12, 2012
Photo of relynnjr
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

relynnjr, Jul 01, 2014
Photo of khargro2
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

khargro2, Mar 13, 2013
Photo of ShakaShakaShaka
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

ShakaShakaShaka, Oct 16, 2012
Photo of rorjets
2.75/5  rDev -18.4%

rorjets, Feb 10, 2013
Yuengling Bock from Yuengling Brewery
77 out of 100 based on 632 ratings.