1. American Craft Beer Fest returns to Boston on May 29 & 30, featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers. Tickets are on sale now.

Yuengling Premium Beer - Yuengling Brewery

Not Rated.
Yuengling Premium BeerYuengling Premium Beer

Educational use only; do not reuse.

522 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 522
Reviews: 154
rAvg: 2.87
pDev: 21.95%
Wants: 23
Gots: 37 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Yuengling Brewery visit their website
Pennsylvania, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  4.40% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 09-21-2000

No notes at this time.
View: Beers (10) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Yuengling Premium Beer Alström Bros
Ratings: 522 | Reviews: 154 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of ZimZamZoom
2.63/5  rDev -8.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Served ICE cold from a 12 oz. bottle, poured into my favorite tulip glass.

This beer pours a medium yellow color, crystal clear. Pure white head was minimal and not long for this world.

Smell is of light malt and adjuncts. Taste is mild, light maltiness and some hops in the finish.

mouthfeel is medium in body and heavy on carbonation.

This is a good drinkable beer, I could hit it hard if I had to. A much better choice than a typical BMC would be.

Photo of edskirk3
3.1/5  rDev +8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours very pale gold with almost no head retention or aroma. It's better than most macro lagers I have tasted (there's actually some bitterness trying to come through, I think) but still not anything to write home about. I'm pretty sure there's corn in this too.

Photo of Phatz
3.1/5  rDev +8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I cannot honestly say that I enjoy this beer but it is in my opinion the stereotypical American Macro Lager and a 3.0 is far better than most in the style. This beer seem more BMC that their Lager but I consider it a beer that is close too a baseline beer for the style. Their Traditional Lager is better IMO but this is more mainstream. It is crisp and light in the mouth and very easy to drink. Here's the breakdown:

Appearance: Pours a golden straw color that is clear. The bleach white head fades fast to zero lacing.

Smell: Dirty grain. Syrup - like a sugar. Corn. and cream/butter in the nose make a reserved but not unpleasant.

Taste: Corn, and dry grain flavors are very dry with a solid to strong bitter element. this beer is confused because it wants to be light but the bitter is assertive. The beer is pretty typical in the AML style in that it is simple straightforward and avoids becoming offensive by a hair. A sweet sugar dextrin like a malt liquor character lies beneath the bitter dry bite. The finish is astringent.

Mouthfeel: quite solid for the style. It wants to think medium but no quite and it is very crisp almost cheek pinchingly crisp.

Drinkability: If ever there were an American Macro Brewery qualified to make Light bodied, pale, fizzy lagers that don't suck, it is Yuengling.

Hope this is helpful.

Photo of ski271
2.7/5  rDev -5.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Clear medium-pale yellow with a small, white, creamy head with good retention. Smells grassy and grainy. Light, but not too bad. Taste is of weak grain and hops that don’t really balance all that well. Some light apple and a bitter finish with a touch of citrus rind. It has a medium-thin body, dry texture and low carbonation. It’s not a terrible beer, but nothing I’d ever really have again by choice.

Photo of JCBears
3.7/5  rDev +28.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Anthor good environment, but it wasnt the BEST beer ever. Pale limp kinda unimpresive but it had a deffinate drinkability. I liked the mouthfeel but didnt love it but it was pretty ok. THis was a brew bought with some anticipation but didnt live u the hype my brother gave it It was fair enough but if something ese better is on tap take it.

Photo of TurdFurgison
3/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I drank a bunch of these at a Pirates game in Pittsburgh. This beer seems big in Pennsylvania, but you can't find it 4 hours away in Columbus where I live. I've had it in Philadelphia and State College, and I had fond memories. But after a fresh review I don't think much of it.

It tasted balanced, a little corn flavor maybe, but maybe I was imagining it. Not a bad beer for a ball game, but nothing to savor at home.

Photo of joeskirkie
2.98/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Clear yellow straw colored body, white bubbly head.

Aroma of pale malts, sorta like grainy corn. And yeah, the same pretty much goes for taste.

It's light, crisp and very sessionable. I know from several sessions.

Even though the classification of American Macro Lager can be like a figurative scarlet letter. I'd have to say it is one of the better ones. I'm a born and raised Philadelphian that "grew up" on this stuff, which can be seen from my various Yuengling apparel, bottle openers, and glassware. So even though I have and will continue to encounter stronger and more flavorful brews. I'll always have a desire to pick up some of this every now and then.

Photo of ChuckD
2.53/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12oz can poured into a pint glass. Thin light lacing atop a straw colored body.

To the nose there is a slight malty sweetness with an even slighter hop bouquet.

In the mouth, single hits of the malts - nothing really melding together to give is a nice sweet character. The hop array is very inconsistent too - creating a bunch of weird tastes that crash into each other.

The feel is thin and metallic. Very dry and refreshing on the tongue with a clean finish.

Musings: This is a lager I drink in the summer quite a bit. Hence my interest in the cans. It's not a terrible brew - actually for the price point it is right up near the top. However, it does have the "whats that taste" characteristic to it that needs to be explained.

Photo of Frozensoul327
3/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

From a one quart "stubbie on steroids" bottle. Pours out to a clear golden color with a big white head of foam that quickly calms to about 1/8th inch. No lacing. Medium to medium high levels of carbonation. Aromas are light, some floral hops and malt. Smells fresh. Taste is mediocre; some malt, grain, and a definite whisky like flavor toward the finish. Mouthfeel is uninspiring, yet not dead, as the carbonation keeps things alive on the palate. Fair drinkability. I think I like regular Yuengling better, but this bottle is bad-ass. Thanks goes out to MaltyGoodness for the sample.

Photo of casualbeerman
3.1/5  rDev +8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

I had high, high hopes for this beer when I tried it. Yuengling Premium! It must be a step above the Traditional right? How awesome would that be? Well I guess we'll never know (from the Yuengling Brewery that is) because this is definately NOT a step above traditional. It is a step below. It turns out that "Premium" is a euphamism for "Macro". That's what this is, Yuengling Brewery doing a Macro style beer, as opposed to Traditional, which is well traditional (That's Amber American Lager, it was a style which was a much bigger pre-prohibition staple in America). Anyway the color is a sort of clear-gold. Not nearly as deep as say Urquell but noticably more amber than most macros. Compared to the Traditional its lighter and clearer. Smell is pretty boring. A little sweet grain and a lot of hops. The hops are kind of hard to describe. I guess I'd call them metallic or typical macro if I found them objectionable, but I don't. They're pretty bitter, but leave no unpleasant aftertaste. They're clean and surprisingly strong for the style, but still not too interesting. I guess the best way to describe them would be typical macro hops if typical macro hops were't disgusting. They are balanced by light malts that are slightly sweet. Mouthfeel is all about carbonation. Maybe this would feel thin if not for all those bubbles, but I honestly can't tell you. I could taste the beer fine, but carbonation was all the mouthfeel I could get. Drinkability is fine. You could definately drink these all night. The hops don't get in my way, the taste isn't bad, nothing is wrong with this except that no store or bar exists that carries this unless they carry the Traditional Lager as well, so why bother? This is obviously what Yuengling brewed to catch the Budweiser crowd. And the result? Well it splits the difference. It definately kicks Budweiser's ass by not being the least bit nasty or looking anything like urine. But Traditional Lager in turn kicks its ass by looking the way real beer should look and packing a lot more taste. Uses? Serving to my friends who when I tell them my favorite beer say "Yuengling? That's like liquid bread" or "Wow that's really strong beer." This would be a good compromise for them, maybe even a good gateway to discovery of the fact that there are more than 3 breweries in this country. I would call this the best macro-style out there except who the hell wants a macro-style beer from a regional brewery even if they do a good job? The Traditional owns this and the easily outsells it besides.

Photo of tomthumbsblues
3/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This beer poured a crystal clear yellow color with a one figne frothy white head, which went down quickly. Streams of bubbles arose from the bottom. Smell was malty. Taste consisted of light malt which became fuller throughout. A slightly sweet quality was also detected, as was a metallic quality to the beer. Light in the mouth, but not too watery. An okay brew. Definitely not as good as Yuengling Lager.

Photo of tugdriver7
3.8/5  rDev +32.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

IMHO, rating beer is ike rating pies or sandwiches. You can't compare dutch apple to pumpkin if you're not a pumpkin fan (which I am, by the way). Likewise, a PBJ will never measure up to a BLT (unless you truly prefer peanut butter). Yuengling is going out on a limb to call this beer "premium," but in the realm of comparing similarly priced adjunct (regional) macro lagers, this is a keeper. Smooth, easy to drink, nicely carbonated, refreshing, balanced taste, and (given its limited distribution area) quite fresh to boot. Much different than the Traditional Lager, yet equally unique in its quality. Yuengling has a reputation for taking the macro-brew to a whole new level of taste. This one is no exception!

Photo of Ricochet
3.33/5  rDev +16%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Had the Y's black & tan and gave it an average rating. Well, I was in Pitt again, buying some JJWEEHB and then decided to pick up something cheap and different and got some of this. I wasn't sorry. It was cheap, tasted cheap, but better than the BMC and PBR leaning heavily into High Life territory.

Here goes:

App: Lighter yellow and plenty of carb bubbles making it look more like champaign than beer. Score one towards MHL.

Smell: Slightly lower than average, almost a wet dog smell, lots of corn.

Mouth: Yep. It's a beer. A "Premium Beer" Yellow, burp beer.

Taste: Very heavy on the corn, slight alcoholic and hops notes, this tastes like a cheap beer but then, it doesn't seem to be a macro, having a fuller flavor than MHL. The corn actually adds to the flavor rather than tasting like bad creamed corn.

Drinkablity: Drank 12 within the weekend. Really easy beverage to drink, especially when it was hot, I'd consider this again over any of the BMC and Genny and PBR.

Photo of maek228
3/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Oh Yuengling, how is it that you always do me so right? This beer is comparable in price to other macro-swill such as Bud, Miller, Coors, and so and so forth.

Yet, despite being in the same price range, Yuengling, being the fine brewery that it is, has rose above the competition and made a "premium brew"...well let's not shit ourselves, it is far from "premium", but for 14 bones a case...it is well worth the price

Appearance: straw yellow with a decent head that retained itself for a bit

Smell: strong corn scent...rather average...despite not tasting like a Mexican beer, it still manages to smell like one

Taste: certainly crisp, without a doubt refreshing...although in spite of this, I have to admit it tastes a bit...cheap. Even though it tastes cheap, it tastes like a GOOD cheap beer. Kudos to Yuengling

Mouthfeel: standard

Drinkability: standard

Photo of tgbljb
3.38/5  rDev +17.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

poured a clear light amber color with white puffy head that has good staying power. Smell is on the sweet side with a mild malt background. Taste is light, refreshing with no pleasant notes. Mouth feel is refreshing. An easy drinking beer on a hot afternoon.

Photo of Suds
2.63/5  rDev -8.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I was pretty disappointed in this one. It’s barely this side of an under-done macro. Pours a pale, clear yellow with above average effervescence. The head isn’t worth much: thin turning to non-existence. Mild aromas: cereal grains, CO2, faint hops. It has very watery and muted tastes, similar to the aroma. In it’s defense, it’s easy to drink, and would probably be a good summertime lawn-mowing thirst-quencher. All in all, though, I won’t be trying it again.

Photo of Vancer
2.58/5  rDev -10.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Just didn’t care for this one from them – did like the B&T ! Pour was OK but the aroma was missing. Taste was bland, no real flavor and something spunky about it. Not something I would go to get or have over a session. Had it on tap so I can't really blame it on a skunky bottle.

Photo of WesWes
3.43/5  rDev +19.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

The beer pours a pale gold color with a thick frothy white head that quickly fades to lacing. The aroma is decent. It's not very complex, but as far as adjunct lagers are concerned it has a "premium" aroma. It boasts of pale malts and lager yeast. It's light and mildly fruity. The taste is average. It has a very light and refreshing flavor, but it lacks in beer taste. It tastes really watered down. The mouthfeel is good. It is a low bodied beer with good carbonation. This is a good adjunct lager. It's not at all skunky or musty and it goes down quick. I like the aroma and the taste is better than most. This is a good drinker.

Photo of necoadam
2.88/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured out a clear light golden color with a head that went to lacing quite quickly.

Smell consisted of, well, I don't know! Is there anything in here? Some very light hops and grainy aromas are in there, but everything was light.

Taste was ok actually. Some hops do show through with a slight hop bite. Finished on the dry side.

Mouthfeel was average at best. Perhaps a bit too much carbonation at the first sips. A bit watered down.

Ah, it's ok. It's one of those beers to wash down pizza at a party. Or a lawnmower beer.

Photo of 57andcounting
3.48/5  rDev +21.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Well, I was in Pottsville, I figured I should have a few Yuengling Premiums on draft. You will be hard pressed to find this on draft outside a short driving distance from Pottsville.

This is a good drinking beer.
Has a deep yellow gold color with a head that stays around for a few minutes.
Smells like beer!! What can I say, a bit of grain and malt, not much else.
The taste is easy. A bit grain and malt, enough complexity so you know your not drinking a B, M or C light. Light on the mouth with a clean after taste. Goes down pretty good for a beer from an, almost mainstream brewer.
This is a good beer to accompany a lunch or the few after work.
Not a craft beer, but when you see it on tap, have a couple.

Photo of Brent
3/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Waiting in the bar area of a small restaurant outside Baltimore for a table to open (the place was reputed to have the best crab cakes, and it was worth the wait) - this was the only non A-B offering available. Pale straw to golden with tight carbonation streamers up the glass and a modest head. Aroma was a bit sweet, with some grain notes. Light flavor, with some sweet grain. Slipped into a bit of astringency toward the end, with a relatively clean finish. Solidly average (an oxymoron?)

Photo of ElGordo
2.95/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a pale amber with a foamy head that evaporates pretty quickly, leaving a very still-looking beer. Not much aroma - light hints of malt, adjunct, and a little bit of astringency. Palate is lightly malty, a touch of hops, and a light sweetness. Body is definitely more substantial than more American lagers. Goes down pretty easily, it's a good session beer. At its premium price, though, I'd rather drink Pabst and save the money.

Photo of nomad
2.68/5  rDev -6.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

A pale and eerie looking amber, if you can call it that, the head is minimal and too reminiscent of dish-soap suds.

Smells like nothing much at all besides some faint malt that is without depth for desciption and some "bitter" ghosts of hops. It tastes like most industrial lagers do, except with more tone to it. That is, the malt is more distinguishable than your average lager, with a decent bitterness residing through out the flavor profile. Very ordinary in almost all respects.

I truly enjoy their flagship Lager, so how do they justify the Premium labeling of this product? Oh well, back to the Lager.

Photo of francisweizen
2.5/5  rDev -12.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Yuenglings answer to BMC. Drunk straight from the can I have to dock this a point for appearance. The Aromas are of faint hops, and slight malts and they are more subdued from the can version of this brew. The Taste follows suit. Mouthfeel is medium bodied and crisp. Drinkability is decent for a macro. Not bad. Definately better in the bottle than in the can.

Photo of palma
2.55/5  rDev -11.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Light gold color body with a thin foamy head. Smell was a little corny and bready. Light light malt aroma. Taste was of corn and citrus. A mellow tasting brew though the hops seem to jump out every other sip. A weird hopness to it. Kind of dry throughout. A little watery. Drinkable, but definitely not something I would go out looking for.

Yuengling Premium Beer from Yuengling Brewery
67 out of 100 based on 522 ratings.