St. Paul Triple - Brouwerij Sterkens N.V.
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 41 | Reviews: 36 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by davidchollar:
4.03/5 rDev +3.6%
as everyone has mentioned, this comes in a cool ceramic, swing-top bottle. pours into my tulip glass a great, dark golden color, but almost no head. in fact, there is a really weak little, big-bubbled head that dies after a minute. almost no carbonation. the color is very nice but overall appearance is disappointing.
smell is also underwhelming. i definitely smell a belgian ale, but not a strong one, not a lot going on. this was straight out of the fridge... ok. now i have come back to it after about 20 minutes, it's warmed up a bit and is probably the recommended serving temperature. the smell has opened up noticeably. it's still not fantastic, can't compare with westmalle, or a good saison. but it has that delicious belgian sweet smell, combo of yeast and light fruits, alcohol and peach. kind of reminds me of chimay white.
the taste makes me feel a little better about this purchase. tasty. you see, it was a little expensive, more so than the other tripels available at my local store. basically, i'm not disappointed. as you would guess from the appearance, the mouthfeel is thin-average, nothing special. but the taste has a pleasant bite, full, fruity flavor. complex enough to give it some character, i will probably remember this. easily drinkable. overall, it's not bad, right on that line between worth a try and recommended.
06-18-2006 15:00:55 | More by davidchollar
More User Reviews:
4.13/5 rDev +6.2%
Appearance This was a real foamer. It came right out of the bottle, so pop this one over the sink. The body was a gorgeous cloudy orange color and the head laced all of my glass when it finally went down.
Smell Big malt flavors and fruits from the Dubbel were complimented by the alcohol notes and Belgian spices.
Taste This is just as smooth and creamy as the Dubbel, but much more potent. The malt backbone was bigger here, and the light peppery spices more prevalent. The St. Paul fruit was out in force though, and this carried the show. Lots of peach and apricot flavors along with a tinge of banana, cherry juice, and apples.
Mouthfeel Lightly carbonated and full bodied in accordance with the style.
Drinkability This was the James Brown of the bunch. The head came up and down quickly, yet the body was light, full, and excellent. Yes, after tasting two Dubbels, two Trippels, and a BSPA tonight, I feel good.
09-20-2003 02:33:40 | More by RoyalT
4.33/5 rDev +11.3%
Hazed orange/gold color, lacy climbing head. Estery aroma, with some sweet grass. Medium bodied and tightly mannered dryness to the taste. Flavors are of nutmeg, just a slight bit of banana bread and peach. Hops break in to prevent too much fruitiness. Quite a nice beer, not as astringent and puckering as some and yet not a huge bowl of fruit either. Spicy dry and drinkable. Yet another beautiful Sterkens bottle...
08-23-2002 07:56:01 | More by ADR
3.48/5 rDev -10.5%
A pint was too much. Peachy fruit appearance with surprisingly small and dissipitating head on a triple. Too carbonated. Decent tangerine fruity yeast, but not too exciting. Medium mouthfeel, some malt. Drying finish and funky yeast noticed in second try two years later.
12-21-2004 03:23:20 | More by Sammy
3.93/5 rDev +1%
I found this brew very nice, but not as appealing as other triples. The overall appearance was OK, not much of a head for a triple, but a nice soft pale look made it look inviting. Nice aromas, fruity and pleasant, with a tame yeasty smell as well. Taste was also refreshing, but not overwhelmingly wonderful- given how much this beer costs. It has that unique Belguim tang, that makes it easy to drink and smooth. Overall a good beer, but not worth the money given what else is out there.
03-23-2003 06:49:39 | More by AaronRed
United Kingdom (England)
3.65/5 rDev -6.2%
Appearance: Crystal clear. White head that drops fast. Not too effervescent. minimal lacing
Aroma: No dominate flavors. Smells slightly tripelish. No hops
Taste: Watered down tripel. You can taste the alcohol. Tart apple. Some candi sugar. Strong bready finish. Complex but underwhelming. Too malty
Mouthfeel: Slightly hot from the alcohol. Tart.
Overall: Doesn't taste like a tripel to me. More of a belgian pale.
10-28-2011 20:19:38 | More by Squelch
4.18/5 rDev +7.5%
Beautiful earthenware flip-top bottle, bonus points for that.
Pours a clear golden yellow with a big rocky off white head with amazing lacing. Aroma of sourdough, and plenty of corriander. Taste was very pleasant tartness up front with some cookie-like sweetness. Buttery thick mouthfeel. This beer was very very nice and good.
02-12-2007 01:30:29 | More by tatterdash
3.93/5 rDev +1%
The color on the pour is a hazy lemon yellow to orange with a prosperous head, the lace a lattice work that covers the glass completely. Nose is citrus with malted grain aromas, quite pleasant. Front is sweet, the top middling with a tartness that lingers to the end. The hops are pleasing in their spicy bite, the acidity biting with a quite dry aftertaste, a decent drinking beer, a middle of the road Belgian in my humble opinion.
11-30-2002 10:45:37 | More by Gusler
4.03/5 rDev +3.6%
Nice white ceramic half-liter bottle with an amateurish professional label featuring a monk contemplating a large stemware glass of beer. Ingredients conform to the purity law. Best before 9/04, I opened it on 10/5/03.
Poured a pale cloudy orangish pink under a thin off-white head that lingered and lingered and lingered. Nice lace down the glass. The nose was fruity sweet - apricots, perhaps. The mouth was light, sweet and very carbonated. The initial taste is mild fruitiness and the sweetness so common in francophone brews. The alcohol is certainly present, but I was (pleasantly) surprised by the strength of the hops, providing a lovely bitter finish to balance the sweetness. The aftertaste combines the hops and the fruitiness into a very enjoyable bittersweet experience. Sure, I'll have another.
10-05-2003 18:42:16 | More by Globetrotter
4.03/5 rDev +3.6%
The second time I've been disappointed by the carbonation level in this brewery's flip-top bottles.
Pours a flat-headed, golden colour. The body's beautiful, but no head whatsoever.
Fruity nose, and the same for the taste. A fusel alcohol fruityness, with the sweetnes of malt and barely any hops noticable; they blend into the background to provide bitterness. A quite tasty beer, but where's the bubbles?!?
06-04-2006 09:23:06 | More by DaveFL1976
4.2/5 rDev +8%
appearance: light caramel colour, slightly cloudy, good head retention - nice earthenware flip top bottle looks good too.
smell: sweet light malt and caramel aroma with a some of alcohol in the aroma.
taste: slight malt with caramel and alcohol notes, nice balance of spices with nothing standing out or being over powering.
mouthfeel: slightly creamy and full, good carbonation - just the right size bubbles on the back of the tongue on the way down :)
drinkabilty: i like this beer, nice balance of flavours, carbonation spot on for my taste, hint of alcohol is nice.
overall good tasting beer - would drink again.
06-23-2007 07:49:17 | More by mkultra
3.95/5 rDev +1.5%
So the triple was by all means the best one of the lot, which is not surprising provided my bias to tripels for their full taste and body.
Pour was almost indistinguishable from the blonde except for the fact that the head seemed to last a bit longer and seemed a bit more compact if anything.
smell was more complex but still fairly hidden. fruitier by all means...some mango and apricot definetly there. alcohol comes off a bit steadier and does bite the nose a bit when sniffed vigorously.
Taste is nice. definetly sweeter than sour but no less citrusy, aiming towards the apricot-prune range and with a decent bitter finish. alcohol remains well hidden but the body seemed a bit thin and was my off-mark there.
in all this is the better one of the lot and at a decent price can (and will) be consumed regularly.
05-17-2010 13:34:11 | More by Andreji
2.83/5 rDev -27.2%
Best before 25-11-2005. Poors in ok with its white head and golden beercolor. Nose is quiet oxidated, litle estery and lots of sweet wortsmell. Taste is oxidated too, sweet and then going into a low bitter aftertaste. Guess this beer is over the edge however from the date it should ok for 3/4 of a year. Shows that bottle conditioning( witch I doubt it has from this one) does a good work in keeping the oxigene out and preserving brews.
03-11-2005 20:02:35 | More by paterlodie
3.9/5 rDev +0.3%
33 cl bottle (bb 13.11.16) poured into a tulip. Clear pale golden body, big white foamy head with good retention and chunky lacing.
Fruity, citrusy and malty smell with a hint of belgian yeast.
Taste begins with slightly tart bready malts, followed by fresh citrus and peppery spiciness, ending dry with a slight hop bitterness, leaving an aftertaste of citrus and pepper. Balanced taste.
Medium body, high carbonation, creamy mouthfeel. Very drinkable with well hidden alcohol, I could easily drink another one. Overall a crisp, easy tripel. Not the best I've had in its style, but tastes very good nonetheless. Would have this one again.
08-22-2014 19:06:38 | More by JTuomi
3.9/5 rDev +0.3%
A - Poured out a hazy, golden color with orange highlights. It had a bubbly, white, two-finger head of foam that left some sudsy lace.
S - It smelled of grains, lemon and yeastiness.
T - Good blend of sweet and spicy. Sweet caramel and grain flavors backed up by spiciness and lemon tartness.
M - It was crisp, sharp and smooth. A medium bodied ale with a dry finish a slight alcohol burn.
O - This is a really good tripel. I like the painted, swing-top bottle, too.
04-28-2012 13:58:25 | More by zeff80
British Columbia (Canada)
3.8/5 rDev -2.3%
Pours - from the very cool half-litre ceramic bottle - a nice clear bright amber, with a decent white foam head. The head wasn't as impressive as I hoped for/expected, but it left excellent lace on my tulip.
Fruits - peaches and citrus - are prevalent in the aroma. Some sweetish grain aromas as well, and just a touch of spice. White pepper, perhaps. Fairly mild.
Decent balance. Not as sweet as expected from the aroma; there is a significant malt base here keeping everything steady, and just a touch of hops. There's still fruit, mostly citrus and banana, and a hint of spice. Pepper again, and maybe cloves. The alcohol is noticeable but reasonably well-integrated, although it grows more prevalent as the beer warms. Overall, a very nice triple.
Nice on the palate, medium-strong carbonation keeps it light. Very dry, with the high alcohol becoming apparent.
Definitely a good brew, well worth drinking. It didn't wow me, but I certainly enjoyed it (and probably will again).
10-07-2005 14:59:15 | More by thesilverhand
3.93/5 rDev +1%
Poured from 500mL swing-top stone crockery bottle (awesome!) into a tulip. Date on the bottle says 4/9/12, which I assume is the bottling date.
Appearance: rich golden hue with a good haze and a huge effervescence. Head poured three fingers of pillowy white foam which has wonderful retention and leaves a good, chunky lace. Beautiful!
Smell: good malt aroma, though very much on the sweet side. There is a syrupy fruit aroma in here as well which is almost too sweet. Not bad but a little crazy.
Taste: good malty flavor, though not as thick and syrupy as some of the maltier tripels. Not over-sweet; really, a solid, middle-of-the-road tripel. I like its restraint.
Mouthfeel: medium body with a big carbonation and a big creaminess. The cream is a little ephemeral to be wonderful, but it's darn good nonetheless.
Overall: I rather like this tripel. It tastes good, and is quite beautiful both in and out of the bottle.
08-25-2012 21:00:07 | More by flagmantho
3.55/5 rDev -8.7%
33ml bottle purchased from The Beer Koning in Amsterdam, NL.
A- i couldnt find the cool ceramic 500 ml bottles so i settled for the super slim 33...Pours a hazy yellow, good white head, definitely some sediment floating around.
S- Grassy, some hop character, spice, overall good balance.
T- not too much going on, very balanced, great clarity, its just lacking something...
M- Light, it hits the tongue and then disappears, good aftertaste holds it together.
D- its so light i could drink many
04-29-2008 18:25:23 | More by ATPete
3.58/5 rDev -8%
Heavy white frothy head. Golden colour with a touch of a blush.
Floral nose, almost oaky. Caramel & spice, with a late herbal hop aroma.
Flavour sweet & spicy.... musk candy, white pepper, some brandy-like notes. Honeycomb, with a fruity/pear-like aftertaste. Alcohol heat evident.
Big frothy mouth upon sipping, with an initial malt body. But it fades a bit, with not much mid-back body.
01-13-2007 01:57:47 | More by vancurly
3.85/5 rDev -1%
a: cloudy gold color with lots of carbonation to start, medium head that dissipates to thin veil
s: sweet coriander with malts, spices and notes of alcohol
t: good carbonation upfront & all the way through, sweet malts and spices, with some fruity, citrus notes and strong malty finish
m: highly carbonated, medium to full body, very smooth
d: very good, sweet & smooth malty enjoyment. of the other st paul beers i've had, this is by far the most impressive. great beer
05-08-2007 13:25:08 | More by belgbeerdrinker
3.5/5 rDev -10%
Pours a slightly hazed gold with a minimal crème head. Nose is apple, slight yeast, and a touch of alcohol. Flavor is mild. A bit of yeast influence. Feel is good with carbonation and thicker on the tongue with ingredients. Drinkable, sure. But is this worth the $8.19 I paid for it? No. Way better tripels out there.
12-30-2007 22:27:11 | More by RblWthACoz
4.38/5 rDev +12.6%
Now Quaffing: St. Paul Tripel
Presentation: 1 pt. .9 oz. "dipped" bottle that looks like a small squat champagne bottle. Coating is white with black specks. Nice foil top.
This tripel pours a clear golden with a medium white head of fine bubbles. Lacing is minimal. Light fruity aroma (bananas?) with some spices to back it up. Mouthfeel is light but slightly creamy, but amazingly clean and dry in the finish. This is actually a tripel that is refreshing to drink. Tastes are sweet fruits--citrus, apples, the bananas appear again in the background just before the dry finish. Everything comes together as the beer warms up, keeping the balance and definitely making this one of the most drinkable tripels there is.
Notes: The first time I had this it was a tasting of most of the sterkens line. I don't remember liking it as much then as I do now, but I'm glad I bought it to try again.
08-11-2003 02:01:54 | More by TripelJ
3.98/5 rDev +2.3%
Deep golden color with a white head. Leaves excellent lacing when sipped down. Aroma is malty, herbal and somewhat medicinal. There is also a slight fruitiness in the aroma. The flavor is also malty and spicy, again with an herbal flavor. It is an easy drinking, light-medium bodied beer. Overall a decent Belgian.
01-21-2003 06:15:52 | More by BeerBuilder
St. Paul Triple from Brouwerij Sterkens N.V.
87 out of 100 based on 41 ratings.