X Ale, 22nd February 1945 | Pretty Things Beer & Ale Project

YOUR RATING = None |
BA SCORE
82
good
42 Reviews
THE BROS
-
no score
Send samples
BEER STATS
Reviews:
42
Ratings:
91
Avg:
3.61
pDev:
19.67%
 
 
Wants:
2
Gots:
3
For Trade:
0
X Ale, 22nd February 1945X Ale, 22nd February 1945
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Pretty Things Beer & Ale Project
Massachusetts, United States | website

Style: English Dark Mild Ale

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 2.80%

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes / Commercial Description:
So, these are our new historical beer releases: two beers from the same brewery, brewed under the same brand name, 107 years apart. X Ale, 22nd November 1838, and X Ale, 22nd February 1945. These beers were from Barclay Perkins brewery in London (now long closed). They were brewed & sold as the same beer over these 107 years, but the recipe and process changed dramatically. The beer changed from a golden, 7.4%, extremely hopped ale in 1838 into a 2.8% dark grainy beer in 1945. Probably a lot of factors came into play: wars, hop shortages, grain pricing, rationing, taxation, patriotism, the motorcar, the industrial revolution… I’m guessing these all played a role in the weakening and darkening of this beer. Interestingly, since 1945, Mild ale in Britain hasn’t changed so much: it’s still dark, and one of the weakest beers produced.

Added by UncleJimbo on 03-17-2012

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Reviews: 42 | Ratings: 91
Photo of UCLABrewN84
3.67/5  rDev +1.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Bottled I brought to share on the party bus to San Diego, CA.

Brewed 2/14/12.

Pours a murky dark orange with a foamy bone colored head that settles to a film on top of the beer. Small streaks of lace form around the glass on the drink down. Smell is of toasted malt, caramel, and herbal hops. Taste is much the same but the flavors are somewhat mild. There is a mild amount of hop bitterness on the palate after each sip. This beer has a good level of carbonation with a crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty good beer with a better smell than taste and not something I would go after again. Really interesting to see how the same beer changed over 100+ years with different recipes.

 692 characters

Photo of metter98
3.43/5  rDev -5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A: The beer is hazy caramel-amber in color. It poured with a quarter finger high off white head that left lacing on the surface and a ring of large bubbles around the edge of the glass.
S: There are very light aromas of malts in the nose.
T: The taste is similar to the smell but is slightly stronger; flavors of grainy and toasted malts are distinguishable.
M: It feels light-bodied (but not thin and watery) on the palate with a low to moderate amount of carbonation.
O: This beer is very light and refreshing, making it easy to drink and perfectly sessionable.

 563 characters

Photo of jlindros
3.73/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

At 2.8% I'm not sure if I'm about to drink beer or malt juice. But I guess that's the point Pretty Thing is making with the difference between this and the 1838 version.

It pours a light fizzy head of about 1/2 a finger that fades pretty slowly at least, over a beer that's slightly hazy coppery cranberry reddish slightly orange tinge color. The head leaves a bit of lazing when it does disappear.

Nose is a bit light but more potent than I expected. Starting with some herbal earthy hops, a hedgerow style I believe but not strong, more like a mild. Then some malts, a light aromatic like malt with a hint of a more complex malt like rye but not quite rye, can't put my finger on it.

Taste is also mild, quite malty, bready tasting, it does taste like fresh bread dough. Then toasty malts, flaked malt flavors, a bit of a sweet sugary taste, not quite brown sugar but something like that. Malt husks give a bit of a grainy effect, with a juicy malt flavor. Then mild grassy hops, a light bitterness, with a slight herbal hop but not much. A slight crystal toasty malt comes through as well. The finish is dry, with a light but decent bitterness, a slight grassy hop lingering, and some light toasted malts finishing late, but fairly thin on the back end.

Mouth is lighter bodied but fits the beer well, decent carbonation.

Overall not bad, fairly light overall but that was the style at the time, and the flavor potential is pretty good for what they had to work with. No bad flavors either, but I'm sure this wouldn't last more than a couple months before getting bad tasting. I can't wait to compare this to the 1838 version.

 1,634 characters

Photo of mactrail
3.63/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a lovely dark amber in the big chalice. Grains in the nose, kind of a brown rice aroma. Not as light bodied as you might expect, though certainly watery in a pleasant way. Plenty of carbonation to add some kick to the mouthfeel.

The grainy flavor is quite robust. Some browned biscuits and a little hop bitterness. Rather hoppy, but finishes with some restraint so as not to overpower the delicate malt. Sort of a rye toast flavor with some roasted malt and an interesting zing of bittering hops. Quite interesting a sensationally flavorful given the "table beer" strength.

An excellent quaff, nice for recalibrating the fluids after the salty surf. From the 22 oz bottle bought at Krisp, formerly Best Damn Beer Store, aka Super Junior Market.

 752 characters

Photo of smcolw
3.53/5  rDev -2.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Rich, three-finger head that settles in a lumpy fashion. Leaves plenty of chunky spots on the glass. The liquid is amber leaning on the darker side and cloudy.

Dry and earthy smell. Darker malt but with no sugar.

The flavor matches the nose but with a stronger level of bitterness which shows up in the swallow. Lighter body with an above average carbonation. There's a bit of a bite to the dry malt flavor.

 409 characters

Photo of dbrauneis
3.58/5  rDev -0.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Pours a hazy golden copper to amber in color with very light amounts of visible carbonation near the surface of the beer. The beer has a thin (maybe an eighth of a finger tall) white head that quickly reduces to a medium sized patch of mottled extremely thin film with a thin ring at the edges of the glass. Light to moderate amounts of lacing are observed.

S: The overall aroma of this beer is quite mild with light malt smells.

T: There are moderate flavors of toasted and grainy malts with just a very light hint of sweetness. Overall the taste is pretty well balanced.

M: Light bodied with moderate amounts of carbonation.

O: A very interesting experiment to bring back a beer as it was brewed over 65 years ago - I think the experiment was successful and I would definitely enjoy this beer again if I had the opportunity (perhaps I will seek out some of the others in this series when I go shopping next time). Very easy to drink and very sessionable.

 964 characters

Photo of Gobzilla
3.3/5  rDev -8.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: poured a brown in color with light brown highlights and a thin bubbly head but did leave a little lacing sticking to the glass.

S: there was some mild roastiness, slight caramel sweetness, a bit of graininess and plenty of malty character.

T: the tase actually had some bitter hoppy flavor alongside caramel, hints of toffee, grainy notes, and sweet malty accents.

M: the brew was light to medium in body with a moderate amount of carbonation which had a sweet malty, slight roasty, grainy, and mild bitter hoppy finish.

O: haven't really had a whole lot of beers of this style but was pretty good and had an interesting combination of flavors going on.

 660 characters

Photo of Halcyondays
3.38/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

22 oz. bottle,

A: Pours lighter than I expected. Deep cooper with a firm white head, leaving some nice lace.

S: Bready malt, toast, surprisingly fragrant.

T: Toast, some light caramel flavours. Hop character is noticable especially in the finish. Bit of seltzer water as well.

M: Light-bodied, but not really thin. Rather long aftertaste. Creamy. Carbonation is too high for the style, it shows why milds really need to be on cask to shine.

O: A pleasant mild, I like the experiment, just wish it wasn't so pricey.

 519 characters

Photo of lacqueredmouse
3.65/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Saw the two bottles at K&L Wine Merchants in Redwood City, CA, and brought them back to Sydney, Australia to share side-by-side with @LaitueGonflable and @tobeerornottobe.

Pours a clear deep coppery colour, with a mild, filmy head of white that stays in pock-bubbled islands on the surface of the glass. Body is pretty solid and holds carbonation nicely. Looks decent enough.

Nose is rather pleasant. Firm grainy, slightly roasted and sweet malt characters, with a twist of biscuity nuance and even perhaps some vanilla. Not bad.

Taste is clear and clean, with more crisp grain notes giving an aromatic, sweet cookie fragrance to the brew as a whole. Despite the very thin body, the grain flavours manage to pull it through to the finish, leaving no weak or empty spots on the palate. It ends up pretty tasty.

Feel is weak and light, which is not unexpected.

Overall, this is decent stuff, and (surprisingly, given the back story) easily the better of the two. Perhaps I'm just a child of my century, but I much preferred this grainier, more flavoursome 1945 version than the insipid (although markedly stronger) 19th century version.

 1,139 characters

Photo of rudzud
3.98/5  rDev +10.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Picked up a bottle of this at Julio's. Shared with veotho.

A - Poured into a Chimay tulip a crystal clear hazel hue with a creamy one finger head that fades to leave a thick, creamy, frothy head. This is only 2.8%?? Quite impressive.

S - Aromas of rich roasty toasty malts and grains. Slight metallic finish.

T - Like drinking a bowl of cereal...really. I mean that. Strong sweet malts and roasted grain. Toasted grain and nuts. Very different.

M - Mouthfeel is thin and watery, which I suppose is to be expected for such a low ABV. Still though this is easy drinkin.

O - Overall I felt this was very good and unique. I would have thought this would be the 1800's style based off the ABV but I guess people made the most they could during the grain shortage due to the War. Glad to have tried this.

 803 characters

Photo of DrJay
3.73/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 4

Clear copper with a fluffy beige cap, sticky lacing and good head retention. Mild aroma, malty and earthy with a hint of fruit, a bit herbal -- very nice. Medium bitterness with mild malt character, herbal hops, light breadiness, perhaps a hint of mint. Very light bodied and nearly thin, with moderate carbonation and a bit of dryness. Pretty tasty and easy drinking with an interesting hop profile.

 400 characters

Photo of Jwale73
3.58/5  rDev -0.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

22oz. bottle served in a willibecker. Pours a semi-hazy brownish-amber with a frothy, three inch, cream-colored head. Textured swaths of lacing are exhibited during the session. Nose definitely smells like an English Dark Mild - pale, biscuity malts and some coffee notes. Taste follows nose, but it's really quite watered down. There's also a faint, earthy hops presence at the finish. Mouthfeel is light in body with a pleasant, even carbonation. Overall, not my favorite Pretty Things offering, but I do appreciate the juxtaposition between this brew and the X Ale, 22nd November 1838. That said, I enjoy the sessionability of this beer and would really like to see more readily available offerings of this style.

 716 characters

Photo of popery
3.95/5  rDev +9.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

The beer pours a rosy shade somewhere between mahogany and amber. It's fairly cloudy, though that could be my fault from the pour or just not letting the beer settle for long enough (I cracked the bottle within hours of liberating it from my local beer shop). Small, sudsy head, off-white. Just a bit of lacing.

The aroma is stronger than you might expect from a <3% abv beer. It's full of biscuity malt with a dash of mineral, herbaceous hops and a hint of smoke. There's a light medicinal note, some caramel and fresh bread. A healthy amount of layered malt sweetness is apparent. It's surprisingly complex, and the varied malt bill comes through very nicely. This is a beer that could hold its own with stronger brews.

The taste starts with some light, bready sweetness with a touch of herbal hops. The hop presence builds to a pleasant balance, as the malt picks up darker tones of caramel and light roast. There's a mild acidity. It's almost tangy with citrus and wisps of smokes.

The beer has relatively low carbonation. There's nothing really wrong with that, but the beer would be better out of a cask. Otherwise, it has a nice round mouthfeel, even as it manages to sit rather lightly on the palate. The beer is very easy to drink.

To be honest, I was very excited to see these beers get distributed to my area. I had read about them on Shut Up About Barclay Perkins and am a longtime fan of Ron Pattinson. Plus, any beer backed up by proper historiography with lovely primary sources and such is going to make me a bit weak in the knees. Tacking on a recent read of Amber, Gold & Black and a love of good English-style ales, it would be fair to say that I'm somewhat primed for this review. Happily, I don't think you'll need that perspective to enjoy this beer, as it's a tasty treat for anyone with an appreciation with low abv beers with an English profile. I fervently wish that more American brewers would take on authentic British recipes, particularly the lower abv stuff that is simply missing from the American beer world, outside of the occasional brewpub or limited keg release.

 2,107 characters

Photo of laituegonflable
2.8/5  rDev -22.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pours a deep red colour, streaming cascade of bubbles up the body. Head is cream-coloured, fairly dense with sticky lace. Looks good.

Smells massively sweet. Slight toasty edge with toffee, creme anglaise and buttermilk the main components; nicely but not wholly tempered by a light roasted bitterness which gives a slight boiled-sweet aroma. Some coconut and marshmallow. A bit sweet, but very nice.

Taste is very disappointingly sparse. Weakly sweet, with a hole in the middle of the palate. Sweet on the assault, then quickly watery with light pearl barley and some rice pudding notes. Slight vanilla on the finish and maybe a touch of toastiness, but it's a weird and disappointing palate, bereft of flavour and almost entirely bereft of complexity.

Quite thin, but a bit of texture to it. Gets watery again by the end. Pretty meh.

Held such promise until I tasted it. I'm really baffled as to where the charming aroma character went. Just a big gaping maw where a nice tasty beer might have been.

 1,005 characters

Photo of Dope
3.53/5  rDev -2.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: A medium brown pour with some red in it. Large fluffy white head. Head retention is decent with nice speckles of lacing all over the glass.

S: Subtle smell. Grainy mostly with a bit of toast, caramel, and maybe even nuts? Like a really mild brown ale.

T: Very grainy overall. Some hints of toasted malt, nuts and caramel. Again, it's like the world's weakest brown ale.

M: Thin, but what do you expect? It's 2.8%

O: For the third time, it's similar to a watered down brown ale. Drinkable and honestly fairly tasty, just very mild as the name suggests.

 559 characters

Photo of ngeunit1
4/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A - Pours an almost clear copper-orange with a finger of frothy off-white head atop. The head fades down at a normal pace leaving behind some light lace.

S - Aroma is a mix of some toasted caramel malts, some nuttiness, dark brewing sugars, a bit of bread, and a light fruitiness.

T - Starts off with a mix of some sweet caramelized malts, dark brewing sugar, and a touch of nuttiness. Through the middle, a touch of pine and reiny hop comes through with a touch of light fruity yeast esters. The finish is a mix of sweet bready malts with some brown sugar and a bit of yeast esters.

M - Medium-light bodied with moderate carbonation. Feels smooth with a sweet and estery finish.

D - Very drinkable. Very smooth and sessionable, but there is still a good amount of balanced flavors. Nice malt character.

 807 characters

Photo of philbe311
3.6/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - A fat fingers worth of rich frothy slightly off-white colored head... Decent retention ultimately recedes leaving a full rich lacing and thicker color... The color is a mix of pale bronze and light brown... A bit murky with a faint haze... A moderate bit of moderate paced carbonation...

S - Interesting aroma... Equal parts spent grain / mash from home brewing and burning charcoals... A touch of smoke... Perhaps jut a very faint hint of brown sugar... A very faint whiff of tobacco...

T - Oddly, almost a near absence of flavor... Some bread crust... A hint of tobacco... A hint of smoke... Simple and subtle...

M - Light to medium bodied... A faint burnt texture... A bit chalky... Light to medium carbonation... A bit thin and a bit rough around the edges...

D - Love the attempt by Pretty Things (disclaimer - I dig everything they put out)... The flavor is a bit dull and the mouthfeel a bit weak, but that's the trade off with a sub 3% ABV offering... Not something I would drink on a regular basis, but worth checking out if you like interesting, low ABV, or slightly offbeat brews...

 1,103 characters

Photo of OtherShoe2
3.83/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Nice medium orange with an off-white head that does not last. No true lace.

Nice grain and malt in the nose. Not much else, but what is there is nice.

I liked this. Malt forward, and very toasted bread and grain-first. Leads right into the bitterness. Malt is a touch lean, but does not disintegrate into something that should not be. Bitterness is not overbearing, but has a firm hand in all of the flavor profiles. Nice malt and bitter finish.

This beer feels thinner than it is. A little watered down , and somewhere between light and medium in body. Still works. Needs touch more carbonation, but still is fine.

I liked this. Nice malt notes and easy drinking body will make me want another bottle.

 706 characters

Photo of brewandbbq
3.7/5  rDev +2.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

22oz bottle.

Pours dark copper with an inch of bone head that settles to a solid skim coat for the duration. Rings of lacework as well.

Aromatics are a blend of husky, sweet malt, light roast, and a hint of caramel.

Light bodied with a thinnish mouthfeel. Crispish.

Grainy malt with an earthy, bitter bite leads off the palate. Shades of acridity, burnt toast, and dirty crackers follow through.

Finishes with roasted malt, bitter acridity, and burnt bread crusts.

Interesting beer. With the grainy nature I wonder if it is the second runnings of the 1838 version.

 571 characters

Photo of jaasen64
3.45/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

22oz bottle poured into Sam Adams glass. Bought to compare with the 1838.

A- Golden brownish, about a half finger of frothy head, hazy translucent. Similar characteristics as the 1838 however a darker brown color compared to the light yellowish of the 1838. Similar head, maybe slightly more carbonation.

S- Malts, barley, a little bit of chocolate, some light spices. Definitely much more malty and less hoppy then the 1838.

T- Malts, a little bit of barley, very light spices and chocolate flavor, a little bit bitter. More watered down then the 1838 version.

M- Fairly light bodied, smooth, easily drinkable/sessionable.

O- It was interesting to see how much this beer changed from the 1838 version to the 1945 version, definitely shows the times of change between the centuries. Both versions had similar appearance characteristics, however the 1945 version definitely had more of a malt backbone then a hop. The 1945 was a little bit less flavorful but much darker both in appearance and taste. I liked the 1838 one a little bit better, however the 1945 version wasn't bad. Definitely worth trying to compare the two.

 1,127 characters

Photo of BarryMFBurton
3.65/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I love the idea of this series of beers – thank you, Pretty Things. Let’s see what was brewing in London over sixty years ago…

Brewed five months before the date of this tasting (“This batch brewed February 14th, 2012”).

A: Pours very light and foamy, dirty orange-brown and extremely bubbly. Smooth-as-silk foam, light tan and incredibly creamy in texture, is at an inch or so before it drifts delicately down to a remarkable pillowy retention. Lacing doesn’t stop – it IS the interior of the glass; superb.

S: Creamy, biscuity malt aromas are the center of this nose: rich caramel, vanilla extract, brown sugar, and a little maple. It’s unapologetically toasted caramel-forward, and I like it; straightforward British goodness, with complexity that I’d never expect from something so light.

T: Wow, that’s light. Huge mineral tones come out – the biggest I’ve ever had in a single beer – in droves of distinct, semi-metallic dryness. Hops are quite strong for such a low-alcohol beer (or they stick out because it’s such a low-alcohol beer), with bright flavors of herbal, flowery bitters. Think sparkling water with lemon – sweet and tart, zesty and light. Malts are mild and grainy, with a dark mix of nutty and buttery tastes, as well as a tannic profile that’s strong enough to match the hops. Chewy yeast presence on the palate’s end – mildly estery, and even better when you displace the yeast in the bottom of the bottle and pour it in. Aftertaste is a light, almost powdery dryness.

M: Slight seltzer texture on top of a thicker foundation of yeast. It comes out as a layered drink, which is at least interesting, if not enjoyable.

O: Once again, thank you Ron Pattinson and Pretty Things for such a cool experience in beer history. I’d never think something so light could be so flavorful – certainly an eye-opening experience.

 1,884 characters

Photo of wisrarebeer
3.6/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

A: clear, copper color, poured with thin, but compact, creamy head
S: medium nose, malty, roasted, toasted, grassy, nutty
T: very light but still has some decent taste, light roasted malt with some bitter/astringent finish
M: thin (obviously for ABV) but quenching, albeit light
O: thanks to Ron and Dann for recreating a style that was nearly lost, I love tasting history

 372 characters

Photo of Bendurgin
3.65/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured into a pint glass. This one pours a cloudy muddy brown with a small fluffy beige head. Some soapy lace left behind.

The aroma has a nice bready malt profile with a slight metallic hop aroma. Mild and really enjoyable. The pallet give off dry toast flavors with some grassy bitter hops to round it out. Again this one is subtle and enjoyable.

The body is light with good carbonation. Overall a pretty tasty one here. Wouldn't mind having this one on hand for easy drinking occasions.

 491 characters

Photo of silentjay
3.33/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

pours darker than the 1838 (a cloudy amber/brown) with a huge off-white head that laces more in chunks while it recedes in average time.

much, much maltier in the aroma. toasted crackers, a bit nutty, a touch buttery and caramelly.

nutty, caramelly, toasted nuts, brown sugar, no hop presence.

much lighter, and with a watery finish when compared to the 1838.

Some nice flavors, but much more one-dimensional than the 1838.

Overall take on the series: LOVE it. love the historical learning experience this provided. While I'd much rather drink today's more refined, complex, and tastier beers, this experience of comparison between historical timeframes was worth the price alone.

 688 characters

Photo of axeman9182
3.97/5  rDev +10%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

22 oz bottle, thanks to jaasen64 for the hookup. It was poured into my Dogfish Head signature glass.

Pretty Things OUAT X Ale, February 22, 1945 pours an opaque amber, with some reddish highlights around the edges of the glass. Just under two fingers of off-white foam crown the beer, displaying a little bit of head retention and some solid lacing. The nose has some biscuit and nutty aromas, along with a touch of earthy hop character. The maltiness of the beer is a little more intense in the flavor profile. Along with the nutty and biscuit flavors, there's a slight coffee-like roasty edge to the proceedings. Bitterness is very restrained, and the earthy hops meld in well with the malt profile in the finish. The body, while still light, is surprisingly sturdy for a <3% beer, and is aided by a somewhat restrained carbonation. I really enjoyed this Once Upon A Time beer, proof that a good, flavorful beer can be brewed at such a low ABV.

 950 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
X Ale, 22nd February 1945 from Pretty Things Beer & Ale Project
82 out of 100 based on 42 ratings.