1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Lindemans Faro Lambic - Brouwerij Lindemans

Not Rated.
Lindemans Faro LambicLindemans Faro Lambic

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
82
good

796 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 796
Reviews: 442
rAvg: 3.64
pDev: 16.48%
Wants: 37
Gots: 45 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij Lindemans visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Faro |  4.20% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
ABV varies slightly

(Beer added by: stcules on 12-28-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 796 | Reviews: 442 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of CampusCrew
CampusCrew

Florida

4.18/5  rDev +14.8%

appearance: deep dark brown, no head retention

smell: lemon, toasty nutty malts

taste: balanced sour ale, plenty of sweetness to go with the sour aspect of the beer. lemon flavors and bitter on the back.

mouthfeel: medium, good carbonation, not over done

drinkability: forst faro and loved it. undertaed sour ale.

05-09-2011 16:35:01 | More by CampusCrew
Photo of STEG
STEG

New York

3.85/5  rDev +5.8%

Dark amber hue in color, off white fine bubbled head gloppy lacing as the beer goes bye bye.

Smell is sweetly acetic, like sweet red wine vinegar. Some brown sugar and light black pepper notes as well.

Taste is relatively different than the smell Very sweet throughout most of the palate progression with some light notes of that red wine vinegar smell cropping up towards the finish. It's oddly candy like until the finish.

Mouthfeel starts a bit airy in nature and progresses to a slightly slick middle with a mild carbonation throughout.

Overall not too bad. I would like to try more of the style before making any further judgements in this category. It's a bit too sweet for my liking and a bit odd in the smell and taste category but I hear that's fit to style.

05-07-2011 23:52:25 | More by STEG
Photo of Daniellobo
Daniellobo

District of Columbia

4/5  rDev +9.9%

Nice soft and sugary lambic… Like a faro should be?

Presentation: 355 ml custom green capped. corked, and foiled bottle. Silver Art Nouveau motives with white typography and black background. Side note offers a brief description of ingredients, and history. Served in a tulip glass.

A - Medium amber pour, generous frothy head early on with medium to poor retention, small surface memory leaving a shy ring with minimal lacing.

S - Sugary, light funk… nice candied fruit sense.

T - Very sweet, with a small touch of funk, and more so a nice range of ripe fruit in the back end. A bit of granny smith apples… touch of sour cherries….

M - Medium-light body, slightly sticky, assertive early carbonation that fades leaving a quick and soft tingly texture.

O -The sweet character might be a bit overwhelming as it ends but all things considered it feels tasty and intriguing enough.

Notes: Soft and accessible style, sugary and not for most expected ranges of beer but there is room for it. Reminds me of the soft cider experiences, of the sugary kind a la El Gaitero, in Spain, and in that context it may serve a similar function. Low alc. decent range of flavor, sweet, accessible… An interesting style to keep in mind.

05-07-2011 14:19:53 | More by Daniellobo
Photo of Daredevil
Daredevil

Switzerland

3.5/5  rDev -3.8%

elegant Jugendstil label ....
pours a beautiful bronze colour, with a firm foamy head ...
smell is very fresh and soury ...
taste goes into caramelized apples, a bit of wild cherries, very sweet and very sour .... certainly a great thirst quencher ...

04-30-2011 12:01:10 | More by Daredevil
Photo of vfgccp
vfgccp

New York

4/5  rDev +9.9%

A – Beautiful orange amber. Pours a big white, fluffy head that settles fairly quickly and leaves an ok lace.

S – Tart and barney. Earthy, wet hay. Light honey. Nice bready malt note on the backend was surprising.

T – First notable characteristic is distinct, almost dosed, sweetness. Like a teaspoon of sugar was added to the bottle right before I popped the cork. Tart, green apple middle with hay and earthy candied citrus. Backend includes sweet honey and is lightly peppery. Overall the sweetness is a bit much, but balanced to a tolerable level by the tart and earthy sides of the profile.

M – Soft and well carbonated. Medium body. Slightly syrupy.

O – Not a bad beer. Very sweet, but drinkable. Almost a Flemish wine-cooler.

04-30-2011 02:41:36 | More by vfgccp
Photo of aasher
aasher

Indiana

3.95/5  rDev +8.5%

I'm always down to try a new style, so here is my first Faro. Shared with zep9865 during a mini tasting. This beer pours an orangish amber in color with a light cream colored lacing around the glass. It is very clear and translucent. It smells like it should be tasty. It smells of candied fruit and has some syrupy raspberry to it. The flavors are very sweet but not too sweet. As zep said, my girlfriend would love this. It is so flavorful and full of sweet fruits. It's almost like a fruity soda and reminds me of cherry Dr. Pepper. It is a little sticky on the palate but I guess I should expect that from such a sweet beer. This is a tasty beer and worthy trying to knock out a new style.

04-28-2011 03:58:39 | More by aasher
Photo of UnknownKoger
UnknownKoger

California

3.68/5  rDev +1.1%

Poured from bottle into tulip glass. Appearance is light copper with faint shades of red. Good carbonation.

Smell is more sour than I had anticipated. Some funkiness. My mouth is watering already

The taste is interesting. It's definitely sweeter than the nose lets on. Some grapes and other vine fruits are in there. Very surprised. Not entirely thrilled, but decent

Mouthfeel is fine. Smooth

Overall-- decent. I don't think I'd go out of my way to buy it again. It's nice, light and fruity. I went to this blind, and it is my first Faro I've had, so I don't know how representative this is of the style. But glad to have tried it. Cheers

04-28-2011 03:39:14 | More by UnknownKoger
Photo of harrymel
harrymel

Washington

3.8/5  rDev +4.4%

A: Brown-golden ale. Excellent clarity. single finger peanut head falls quite quickly to a shiny surface. No lacing.

S: Up front, very sweet. Quite syrupy, sweet and sour oranges. Some farmy tones, evident wild yeasty flavors.

T: See "S". Then intensify the sweetness. The beer is like candy. I can't imagine this beer coming in a bottle any larger than 12oz - too much, unless for a party.

M: Body is like a light syrup from a can of fruit. Sticky feel. Slick on the finish. Medium carb.

O: Well done from what I understand the style to be.

04-25-2011 08:13:58 | More by harrymel
Photo of nickfl
nickfl

Florida

4.1/5  rDev +12.6%

A - This beer pours with about half an inch of white foam that rests on top of a slightly hazy, orange-brown body. The head settles fairly quickly and leaves light rings of lace sticking to the glass.

S - A dry, musty aroma of wild microbes with notes of wet moss, tart cherries, and a hint of sulfur.

T - Tart fruit up front, quickly followed by a sweet tea level of sugar. Notes of black cherry, caramel malt, lemon, and sweetened balsamic vinegar in the middle. The beer finishes with an emphasis on sugar, lemon, and cherry; it almost tastes like a soda.

M - Medium-thick body, moderately high carbonation, and a fairly sweet finish.

D - This contrast between the earthy, funky aroma and the sweetened, soda like flavor is really different from most other beers. It shows the funky complexity of its base beer much better than Lindeman's less traditional sweetened lambics and despite the strange descriptors that I am forced to use in relating the flavors it is actually pretty enjoyable. Unlike the sweetened fruit lambics, the sourness is able to show through a bit along with the wild character and thanks to the tradition behind this style, you aren't left with the feeling that they ruined something wonderful to appeal to the masses. If you know what you are getting into with this beer you can enjoy it for what it is and I can see it being a really refreshing beer on a hot day.

04-16-2011 00:36:28 | More by nickfl
Photo of lstokes
lstokes

Illinois

3.35/5  rDev -8%

I was excited to try this beer because I usually love these Belgians with the sour and musty wild yeast, but this is faaar too sweet, such that the sugar drowns out the nicer flavors of sour apricot ans musty yeast, and so it's also a little bit one-note--the front of your tongue is the back of your tongue, so to speak. Thin, kind of acerbic body. I see the potential in the style, but I don't really know that I would want to drink this particular brew again.

04-15-2011 03:36:21 | More by lstokes
Photo of Risser09
Risser09

Pennsylvania

3.35/5  rDev -8%

12oz bottled poured into a white wine glass · fridge temp · not sure about the bottling date

Appearance: Pours a golden orange color, clear, without yeast disturbance. 2" tall head is off-white in color. Great retention and plenty of lace on the glass.

Smell: A classic aroma of funky yeast and wheat malts. Barnyard, gym sock funk is mouth watering. A fresh lemon citrus aroma furthers the salivary glands into action. Nice and musty.

Taste: Wow. Being that this is my first faro, I didn't expect so much sugar to leap forward. Plenty of candi sugar to go around. It's actually kind of a shame that the sugar gets added to this beer, because it washes away any other sense of taste that I can decipher. I get a little bit of funk on the tail end.

Mouthfeel: Medium body, but sticky sweet with candi sugar. Some yeast dregs give the beer a little bit more discernible funkiness. Hardly any alcohol warmth.

Drinkability: This beer is too sweet for me. I love what it stands for, but I couldn't see myself drinking more than one, which I certainly could do with another lambic. That being said, I love sours, and would drink another if given the chance.

04-13-2011 01:00:08 | More by Risser09
Photo of bucklemyshoe
bucklemyshoe

Georgia

3.55/5  rDev -2.5%

12 oz corked and capped bottle. $26 at The Brick Store Pub. Served in a Lindemans flute.

A: It pours a boring light brown color with a quickly rising and falling head of white. What head that existed is long gone after a few seconds and there is no real lacing afterwards.

S: Somehow, this combination of funky sourness and brown sugar reminds me of vomit. Perhaps I'm the only one but the smell just makes me think of praying to the porcelain gods.

T: The taste is considerably better than the smell; it features a delicious blend of sweet and sour pears, peaches, and green apples with brown sugar. It comes across as a very sweet beer that leans more towards the brown sugar.

M: The body is medium-light but a bit oily with low carbonation.

O: I can really see how this would be a tasty beer style but this is a bit too sweet.

04-11-2011 05:27:43 | More by bucklemyshoe
Photo of foogerd
foogerd

New York

3.43/5  rDev -5.8%

A- Really dark orange almost brown, clear body, small off white head that leaves some lacing.

S- Yeast, sugar, the yeast seems almost sweet in itself, some slight sour aroma.

T- Sour green apple juice, green grapes, some white wine quality, caramelized sugars.

M- Wet feel throughout the drink, moderate carbonation.

O- Decent Faro, at times it was just too sweet for my palette and I felt it was lacking balance in that aspect. Good for the ladies.

04-08-2011 19:42:16 | More by foogerd
Photo of DCon
DCon

Missouri

3.83/5  rDev +5.2%

Bought this bottle from Lukas Liquor in Ellisville, MO for $4.95 in a 355mL and poured into my Schlafly snifter to enjoy after my Monk's Cafe Flemish Sour Ale. This is my first time enjoying these two Belgian Style ales (Oud Bruin & Faro).

Appearance- This was an orangish, light brown color with 3 fingers of foamy head. Carbonation was evident from bubbling but retention wasn't very good. This seems very common for Lambics. There was a great amount of lace that was left on the side.

Smell- The smell was fantastic on this one! Starts off with a strong apple and sour scent. This seems like it is a hard, sour candy that was put in a beer.

Taste- From the start, the sour attribute is a "no-duh", but possibly to strong. I was thinking that the apple taste would have came out here but it sure didn't. This wasn't like any other sour's I've ever had before.

Mouthfeel- Light- Medium Bodied, puckered the tongue after keeping on the palate for a few seconds, and was very light on the viscosity.

Overall- Have enjoyed at the iTap House, Chesterfield, MO before and had the same reaction as this time having at home. Really enjoy these sour ales now that I've been introduced to the style from my cousin and will keep searching for new and better ones. The drinkability is unreal with this Faro as it disappears from the glass in no time but very sweet/sour. This may turn people off from the start but I say you just have to get used to it and appreciate it for what it is! Would say this is one of my top Sours from Lindenman's Brouwerij.

04-07-2011 05:16:11 | More by DCon
Photo of busterthecat
busterthecat

Massachusetts

3.38/5  rDev -7.1%

undated bottle, poured into champagne flutes.

A- Pours a crisp transparent brown amber, some sparkling bubbly head forms.

S- Tart unripe green apples, a pretty funky & wild tone, a mild sweetness. A little dirty earthy aroma.

T- Very sweet. Doesn't match smell. A light tartness on top of heavy sweet apple juice.

M- Pretty intense on palate. bold, lingers well. Slightly acidic on teeth, wet on tongue.

O- A good take on this lambic varietal. Very easy to drink, but far to sweet for me. The girlfriend liked it quite a bit.

04-03-2011 23:09:09 | More by busterthecat
Photo of yesyouam
yesyouam

New York

3.95/5  rDev +8.5%

Lindemans Faro is a crystal clear amber brew that's topped with a white film that leaves excellent lacing. It has a very sweet, tangy candy aroma. It's light bodied and lively with a dry finish. It tastes very sweet and tangy. There's almost a hint of green apple. It's the Lindemans flavor without the fruit. This is funky candy juice. It's a very unique beverage that's fun to drink.

04-01-2011 19:00:40 | More by yesyouam
Photo of RoyalT
RoyalT

Ohio

4/5  rDev +9.9%

Appearance - This is a beautiful dark brownish copper with an easy white head.

Smell - The nose is light fruit, maybe some mild orange and a spritz of lemon. There's also a nice, light funk and a bit of raw sugary goodness.

Taste - The sugars are mild, just enough to soften the taste without calling too much attention to themselves. The orange and lemon are a nice mix and any acidity is offset by the sugars.

Mouthfeel - This is medium-bodied with good carbonation and light and tingly in the cheeks.

Drinkability - I like the strong taste of a stiff Lambic but it's nice to have a Faro every now and then. This does exactly as advertised. It's a nice, refreshing midday drink.

03-20-2011 23:51:10 | More by RoyalT
Photo of jerryjeff
jerryjeff

Tennessee

4.22/5  rDev +15.9%

Aroma-Seems to have mainly an apple ciderish scent to me with maybe some toffee. A bit of pear possibly.

Mouthfeel-Finely carbonated, feel some tartness on the sides of the mouth.

Appearance-Brown/amber without haze. Poured to little head which quickly disappeared, but still have fine carbonation bubbles a few minutes after pour.

Taste-Initially get sweetness in the front of the mouth but bitterness along sides soon follows, sweetish/sour all at once and rather interesting. Not sure if as good as a blended geuze but is very good.

Drinkability-Rather, if price wasn't an issue. I'd love to see how much I could get through. This is truly more of an accent piece or initial drink most likely though.

Overall-I will almost certainly purchase this again at some point and am really into lambics just in general. This seems a bit more straight forward than a blended geuze, but I really enjoyed it.

03-19-2011 23:39:05 | More by jerryjeff
Photo of callmemickey
callmemickey

Pennsylvania

3.25/5  rDev -10.7%

A: Amber-orange body. Nice clarity. Small, quickly dissipating dirty ivory head.

S: Caramel, apples, musty wood, citric sourness.

T: Unfortunately the taste is out of proportion. The caramel sweetness completely dominates that citric/woodsy lambic flavors unlike the better examples of the style. the presence of the apple flavors also didn't work for me.

M: Medium body and moderate carbonation were both appropriate. The sweetness became cloying after getting a fifth of the way in.

O: Not the most stellar example of the style. Unfortunately it's the only one that comes to the states, giving the style a bad rep.

03-19-2011 11:52:33 | More by callmemickey
Photo of generallee
generallee

New York

3.63/5  rDev -0.3%

Presentation: It was poured from a green capped and corked 355ml bottle into a Lindemans fluted glass. The label has a description of the beer but there is no freshness date or abv%.

Appearance: It's dark in the glass with a bronzy amber colored body held up to light. It has good clarity and some visible carbonation. A good two finger head caps of the beer. It's off white in color and tightly packed. On the glass it leaves some spotty lace.

Smell: There are notes of white bread, raw grain and wheat malt with a hint of sweetened whiskey or sweet brandy.

Taste/Palate: It is candy sweet up front with notes of white bread, sweet caramel, and nougat. Some tangy wheat and yeast tartness just tries to sneak in as some fruit notes like sweet apple peach and pear lead into a stick sweet finish. The palate is medium bodied, smooth and slick. On the lips it feels sticky.

Notes: I'm not quite sure what to think of this beer. My palate is confused, is it a tart beer trying to be sweet or a sweet beer trying to be tart/sour. It is interesting if nothing else.

03-17-2011 23:39:04 | More by generallee
Photo of Dawkfan
Dawkfan

Alberta (Canada)

3.28/5  rDev -9.9%

A- A clear amber color, visible carbonation bubbles that rise up to a small white head that dissipates rather quickly. No lacing to be found on my glass.

S- Not familiar with this style, but I'm not picking up any sweetness from the candied sugar. Funk & sour apples dominate the nose. Smells like Lambic to me!

T- Faint flavors of Brett and then a wallop of sugar and sweetened berries hit you. The aftertaste has some sour apple/cherries and tart lemon, but it remains very sweet as well.

M- Sugary feel on the teeth and tongue. Body feels medium, soft carbonation.

D- I didn't find this easier to drink than Lambic, but the flavors are nice just a bit to cloying for my liking. I definitely enjoyed this much more when it was chilled. It's probably a good place to start for someone looking to try Lambic for the first time. I think a wine drinker may like this as well.

03-16-2011 20:13:15 | More by Dawkfan
Photo of rapidsequence
rapidsequence

Virginia

3.95/5  rDev +8.5%

Shared this 750 that I brought back from France. Best by 2012. Poured into a tulip.

Appearance: Clear orange white head with good retention.

Smell: Apples, kind of cidery. A little bit of welcome funkiness and a slight acetic note. I'm pleasantly surprised.

Taste: Of course its very sweet. Slightly tart, enough to keep the sweet from being overbearing. More apple and a little vinegar. Finish is sweet.

Mouthfeel: Slick and kind of sticky. A little more carbonation might lighten this up a bit.

Drinkability: Much better than I thought. This was my first faro. Not bad at all.

03-12-2011 01:42:17 | More by rapidsequence
Photo of BeerAndBourbon
BeerAndBourbon

Ohio

2.42/5  rDev -33.5%

Reviewed from sour tasting notes.

A. Pours amber/ orange with a small head.

S. Wood, apple cider vinegar, maple syrupy sweetness, funky

T. Very sweet, funky, too sweet - the tremendously high sweetness is very odd - like tasting smirnoff coming back up

M. Thin with low carbonation level

D. Not a fan of this one at all

03-11-2011 05:51:57 | More by BeerAndBourbon
Photo of THECPJ
THECPJ

Delaware

3.7/5  rDev +1.6%

Reviewed from notes:

appearance: copper orange brown color with 1 finger white head

smell: sour, apples, floral

taste: belgian yeast, sour cherries, apple,

mouthfeel: mild carbonation, crisp, sweet

drinkability: due to how sweet it is I would consider this to be a dessert beer. but highly enjoyable.

cheers,

the CPJ

03-03-2011 17:45:08 | More by THECPJ
Photo of Naugros
Naugros

New Jersey

3.63/5  rDev -0.3%

Not a bad look to this beer at all. Reddish-orange with a bit of a chill haze that goes away as the beer warms...wel, duh...allowing you to watch the carbonation that built a 1/4" head that doesn't last long before it gives way to a top film.

The smell is the star of this beer, letting you know that this is a lambic and you should be ready for some sour taste notes. Sour fruit (maybe apple) and a perceptible floral back tone make you want to get to that first sip.

This is my first faro and I had not read the standard for the style and wound up surprised at how sweet this beer is. It was as if someone took a lambic and poured some sugar into it. Well, that's almost exactly what it is. The sweetness really knocks down the sour, but the fruits (now I get apple/raspberry) become a little more clear.

Medium body and crisp, but there is a slight "oiliness" on the tongue that I'm not enjoying. It makes me wonder if the sugars made it a bit syrupy. The body may have been lighter without this.

They sugar these beers to make them more approachable and sweeter, but for whom? Certainly not me. This is too sweet for me and even for my wife who prefers a sweeter brew. Yes, it's easy to drink for then first few sips, but then becomes cloying. This is definitely the white zinfandel of beer.

This was my first faro, but may not be my last if I can find one from Cantillon or Boon. Hopefully they're a little more even-handed with the sugar.

02-28-2011 14:53:00 | More by Naugros
Lindemans Faro Lambic from Brouwerij Lindemans
82 out of 100 based on 796 ratings.