1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Chapeau X'mas Gueuze - Brouwerij De Troch

Not Rated.
Chapeau X'mas GueuzeChapeau X'mas Gueuze

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
69
poor

41 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 41
Reviews: 28
rAvg: 2.78
pDev: 30.94%
Wants: 3
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij De Troch visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Gueuze |  5.60% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Naerhu on 04-13-2005)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 41 | Reviews: 28 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by Avagadro:
Photo of Avagadro
1/5  rDev -64%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

A: Cap pulls with the faintest of hisses, and the cork releases no sound to speak of. The copper hued nectar pours lifelessly into the glass, with only thick chunks of sediment to break the monotony.

S: Sweet-and-sour sauce, fish sauce, and cherry cough medicine are all unpleasantly invited to the bouquet.

T: Cloying sweetness is exacerbated by the sickly sourness of the brew, which gives one the impression of drinking hoisin sauce. Off flavors run rampant in this brew, with cherry cough drops, solvent, and band-aids being most noticeable.

M: Thick, sticky, lifeless... what a mess.

D: Whoever dubbed this brew a gueuze should be shot. This is easily the most poorly executed brew I have come across since Cave Creek Chile Beer. Avoid at all cost.

Avagadro, Jul 26, 2011
More User Reviews:
Photo of Mora2000
2.2/5  rDev -20.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours orange brown with a white head. The aroma is very odd and not too good. This beer smells exactly like French's Yellow Mustard. You also get a little cherry or strawberry. The flavor is similar, only sweeter. Picture a sweet mustard with a little cherry thrown in. Thin mouthfeel and medium carbonation.

Mora2000, Jan 21, 2010
Photo of chinchill
1.63/5  rDev -41.4%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

12.7 oz bottle, capped and corked, served in a snifter. Bottle has a thick coat of sludge in the bottom; several chunks got poured despite my effort to avoid this. The beer remained clear, nonetheless, with the chunks and pieces on the bottom; so no harm done I believe.

Pours clear orange brown with minimal headl

S: very tart but over-ripe fruit; a strong, off-putting aroma of decayed wood; earthy and funky.

T: Both sweet and tart.Even worse that the aroma, but not by much. Altogether, rather unpleasant funky and medicinal flavor featuring wet wood, green apples and very old light-colored fruit juice.

M - medium body; low carbonation -- undercarbonated.

O - Gueuze is a variable style with which I have little familiarity. That and the poor quality of this brew led me to think I had a spoiled bottle ... until I saw other reviews with similar reactions. A particularly poor Belgian - Avoid!

Happy to finish the brew so I can pour out the remainder and cleanse my palate with a good beer.

chinchill, Jul 10, 2012
Photo of cjgator3
3.33/5  rDev +19.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Capped and corked 12.7oz bottle poured into a tulip glass. Pours a unique brownish amber color with a small white head. The aroma is slightly sour and extremely sweet smelling with some woody notes and grapes and raspberries rounding out a very sweet and fruity nose. The taste like the aroma suggests is very sweet and fruity which can be cloying at times, with a touch of sourness in the finish.

I have a hard time reviewing these types of beers. They are pretty decent for what they are, but I have a hard time reviewing them alongside beer, because to me they are so different than beer they almost should not even be in the same category. Overall, this is a pretty decent brew that is highly refreshing. The main detracting quality from this beer is its high amount of sweetness that can be cloying. This really is not that horrible as a drink, but it is about the last thing that comes to mind when I think of a beer (malt/wheat and hops).

cjgator3, Jan 12, 2008
Photo of Gonzoillini
4.25/5  rDev +52.9%

Gonzoillini, Nov 13, 2013
Photo of zonker17
2.25/5  rDev -19.1%

zonker17, Mar 05, 2013
Photo of BKotch
3/5  rDev +7.9%

BKotch, Aug 10, 2014
Photo of GRG1313
3.73/5  rDev +34.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I can't resist reviewing this beer. Let's just summarize and say yes, it's very, very sweet. However, there are some real redeeming qualities, as long as you don't expect a tart, sour traditional lambic or gueuze.

Pours crystal clear medium copper orange with no head at all. Very clear and nice looking.

Nose is burnt bananas and over cooked stone fruit with a strong orange candy undertone. There is a sweet tart undertone, highlighted by the sweet tones, not the acidic tones - but they are there. Not unpleasant, as long as you're ok with sweet.

Mouthfeel is very clean, almost refreshing, lightly tart, lightly acidic and with almost no carbonation. Not bad at all. There is a pleasant sweet fruit vinegar acidic mouth feel.

Flavor profile is the real issue here. I think I'm tasting a newer or well stored bottle. There is some oxidation but in a good way. The primary flavor profile is very sweet, thick and assertive cooked apricots or strong apple juice or cider.

Flavor profile is like a sweetened compote of stone fruits. It's actually very nice, unless your expectations were for a tart/sour lambic or gueuze - that this is not! There are hints of tart and hints of sour. But, truth be known, this tasted like a lightly carbonated cider; apple or apricot cider. Lightly oxidized apple juice is the pefect description and I don't find it offensive or bad - just not typical lambic or gueuze.

Real question is what did the brewer intend? If brewer wanted traditional - no success; he he/she wanted a sweet and somewhat refreshing relatively low alcohol pleasant drink- then success. You be the judge. I'd drink it cold and as a refreshing sweet "juice" drink.

GRG1313, Aug 01, 2012
Photo of matjack85
2.63/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

I found this 12.7oz capped and corked green bottle at Sal's Liquors in Addison, IL for $4.99. My bottle labels itself as Winter Guezue rather than Christmas Guezue, although Santa Clause is definitely on the front label. No bottled on date on mine.

The beer poured a dark apple juice color that had some pinkish tinting to it when held to the light. There was absolutely no head and no lacing, but there are a gazillion bubbles and you'll get lots of unattractive floaties if you're not careful with your pour.

This is a very earthy smelling beer. It has a little Belgian funk to it, but it mostly smells like wood and a rosin bag.

Puckering tartness with big green apple flavor. After that it's just syrupy sugar.

Medium thickness with low carbonation.

It's not horrible, but it's not the best example of a guezue either.

matjack85, Feb 08, 2012
Photo of PEBKAC
1.85/5  rDev -33.5%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Two year old bottle. Poured into a Sam Adams Perfect pint glass just because. Tainted cork reeked of vinegar & fish sauce.

Thin, hollow layer off-white head atop a slightly reddish, but mostly amber brew. Managed to keep most of the sediment out this time as well.

Smell is an odd combo of green beans, wet leaves, cherry juice, adhesive, & hard/stale water.

Taste is basically cherry syrup & boiled vegetables, with a splash of apple cider vinegar. A saccharine sweetness, sort of like what you find in Duchesse. Light acidity & a mild bitterness akin to that buzz your throat gets when sucking on pesticide laden fruit.

Constantly frothy, but nearly flat. Somewhat syrupy.

This isn't the worst thing in the world. It's just not brewed with you in mind. Still doesn't make it any good.

PEBKAC, Apr 23, 2011
Photo of stumac
3.85/5  rDev +38.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Found this little bombshell on a trip to Austin....

this brew pours up a nice red amber color with a small off white head. the nose is cherries, candy sugar, light sourness. the taste is sour cherries, a lil cork, subtle oak, medium bodied, low carbo, I like Chapeau...

stumac, Oct 28, 2008
Photo of cofeeguru
4/5  rDev +43.9%

cofeeguru, Jul 08, 2012
Photo of woodychandler
2.73/5  rDev -1.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

I couldn't work up much of a head but there was a lightly hazy white head floating atop the beer. Nose was sour cherry - kriek. Color was a fairly clear deep amber. Mouthfeel was somewhat thin, taste was somewhat tart, but overall, not much on which to report. Finish was really sweet. I have had MUCH better from Chapeau.

woodychandler, Dec 18, 2009
Photo of sweemzander
1.6/5  rDev -42.4%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

12.7oz. capped and corked bottle poured into a tumbler.

(A)- Pours a dirty cider-brown color. Some white bubles.

(S)- Lots of cider-like apple aromas. Some funky earth and lactic bits. Very very earthy.

(T)- Is this a gueuze? Its is very fruit/spice forward with lots of apple/grape flavors. Little to no sourness or acidity. . . or oak even.

(M)- Very minimal carbonation level; practically flat. Little to nothing sour or acidic; just fruits. . nothing to remind me of a gueuze really.

(D)- For a gueuze, this really is a mess. For a fruit beer, its still not really even that good. Sorry to say this is an epic fail and do not waste your money on it. Whoever thought this was a gueuze needs to get his/her brain checked.

sweemzander, Nov 26, 2011
Photo of womencantsail
1.93/5  rDev -30.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

Thanks to Bobby as I finally wrap up the torture that has been the Chapeau lineup of lambics.

A: The pour is a dark amber sort of color, much darker than pretty much any other gueuze that I have come across.

S: A strong fruity smell right away with some plums, cherries, and strawberries. Underneath some weird mix of tobacco and herbs, along with some wet wood and earth. I don't dislike any of these aromas individually, but they just don't work all that well in concert.

T: A distinct bile/vomit flavor that I just can't ignore. The fruits are there again, but so is a strong herbaceous character (pine or rosemary?). Intensely sweet and sugary, just like so many other Chapeau beers.

M: The body is medium, and a bit sticky and syrupy, with a moderate level of carbonation.

D: I don't have too much else to say about this other than the flavor is just completely off-putting. As is any beer with a strong bile component.

womencantsail, Sep 12, 2010
Photo of johnwarne
2.2/5  rDev -20.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

A beer haiku for you:

"Not really my style--
Lambic un-extraordinaire!
Belgian not worthy."

OK: as a Belgian connoisseur I recognize that lambic/gueuze's are a breed all their own, but even so....too sickly sweet, too much of a poseur for my liking. Glad I tried--to rule out for future sessions.

Cheers!

johnwarne, Jan 12, 2011
Photo of ajzy
1.25/5  rDev -55%

ajzy, Dec 14, 2013
Photo of josephwa
4.25/5  rDev +52.9%

josephwa, Jul 07, 2014
Photo of TheLongBeachBum
3.38/5  rDev +21.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Presentation: Sampled at ‘t Ostens Bierhuus on Easter Friday 25th April, 2005 during my annual Easter trip to Belgium. 37.5cl (12.7 fl.oz.) bottle with a very colorful label which includes a picture of Father Christmas. Cost €3.30.

I’m not one for sampling the De Troch brews usually, even if I have not tried them before, but I couldn’t resist the temptation to pick up a bottle of this late on a night after a heavy days drinking, guess that’s the only occasion I ever try these, when I’m well-oiled.

Appearance: Ruddy turbid body, light brown with a murky amber hue. Poured with some head at first but this immediately disappears to leave a flat looking Xmas Gueuze.

Nose: At first I thought I may have got a Kriek. A very fruity nose, cherries mainly but mixed with raspberries and maybe a hint of blackcurrants. Beery laden fruit aromas.

Taste: As with the nose, lots of berries fill the aroma and contribute to a Kriek-Framboise Gueuze. Incredibly sweet, cloyingly so at times. But then peeled apples and pears add some balance to the sweet berries in the finish. Sweet fruit berry finish, which lingers a little.

Mouthfeel: Sweet and cloying throughout. Minimal conditioning gives a flat and heavy feel to the over-sweet berries.

Drinkability: The fruity nature of this “gueuze” lends a rather neat Drinkability to it at first, but it soon all becomes a tad over powering and then sickly sweet.

Overall: Utterly strange……sweet and berry laden, not bad, but a Gueuze it is not.

TheLongBeachBum, May 09, 2005
Photo of requiem960
3.5/5  rDev +25.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: (I drank this from a wine glass) Pours like a mildly carbonated apple juice with a slight ruby coloration. There is absolutely no head or lacing in the glass.

Smell: Tart apple/cherry with a light woody scent.

Taste: Subtle taste of dark cherry, apple in a wine-ish atmosphere. There is definitely a candy flavoring going on inside my glass. As it warms, there is a taste that I can't narrow down whether being cork, or maybe a slight cask taste, or a mild tobacco. This is also a bit more sweet than most Gueuze beers.

Mouthfeel: Thin-bodied and very light on the carbonation.

Drinkability: Enjoyable in a different way, but I wouldn't want more than one of these a year. Definitely worth a try. On the 100 point scale I'd give it a 75%, C average. I think this is worth a try and a beer to add your holiday season "to drink list!"

requiem960, Jan 02, 2012
Photo of homebrew311
2.38/5  rDev -14.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Carefully decanted into a Petrus glass to keep the nasty sludge from ending up in the glass...

A: pours a clear amber color with no head, minimal lacing

S: nose is funky and acidic, lots of oak, some cork, bubblegum, and white grapes

T: taste starts off with a bit of funky geuze goodness, but quickly takes a turn to a diabetic coma inducing sweetness, taste is similar to heavy syrup, quite off putting, totally loses all of it wild characteristics

MF: thick and syrupy with minimal carbonation

O: the aroma was nice but the taste...not so much. Terrible balance, bad example of style.

homebrew311, Feb 03, 2012
Photo of KindaFondaGoozah
3.5/5  rDev +25.9%

KindaFondaGoozah, Apr 13, 2014
Photo of harpus
2.75/5  rDev -1.1%

harpus, Mar 27, 2013
Photo of Exiled
2/5  rDev -28.1%

Exiled, Nov 24, 2011
Photo of donnebaby
3.35/5  rDev +20.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Definitely not what I expected from a gueze -- and thus interesting, although not really my cup 'o brew.

Nose contains a muted sourness which comes across a little bit salty as well. Taste and body are thin and sweet, like a sugar water solution, with fruity flavors of grape, mango, and apple. Just a hint of sourness. Carbonation is very dampened, which I thought did not go well with the thin body and taste. I would think if you're going sweet at least go spritzy. Imperceptible bitterness.

donnebaby, Jul 15, 2006
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Chapeau X'mas Gueuze from Brouwerij De Troch
69 out of 100 based on 41 ratings.