1. Rating beers by attributes (look, smell, taste, feel, overall) is back! Read the latest update ...
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Fat Tire Amber Ale - New Belgium Brewing

Not Rated.
Fat Tire Amber AleFat Tire Amber Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

6,573 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 6,573
Reviews: 1,794
rAvg: 3.59
pDev: 14.76%
Wants: 138
Gots: 671 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
New Belgium Brewing visit their website
Colorado, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Ale |  5.20% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 10-07-2000)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Fat Tire Amber Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 6,573 | Reviews: 1,794 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of homebrew311
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

A: Pours a brilliant bright golden with a orange hue, pillowy white head forms and sticks around

S: Not a whole lot going on, faint notes of biscuit malts, breadiness, everything is very subtle

T: very mild flavor, after taste is biscuit malts, but like the nose, everything is very subtle and mellow. This makes for an easy drinker and certainly doesn't taste bad, but there just isn't a whole lot going on.

MF: light body, carbonation seems appropriate for style

D: This beer excels in the drinkability category. It is light and refreshing and a good option for a hot summer day. I wish the flavors were a little more pronounced, but of course that may take away from this beers appeal.

homebrew311, Nov 09, 2009
Photo of ericj551
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Fat tire ours a light orange with a dinky head that doesn't linger. The aroma is faint, bready malt, slightly grainy. The flavor is crisp with more toasted bread malt flavor. It's malt forward without being too sweet. The hops are light, almost no hop flavor, and just enough bitterness to be balanced. Overall this is a decent stepping stone beer, but it's not one I see myself going back to.

ericj551, Nov 12, 2010
Photo of John1985
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Ale poured a deep amber with a half inch head. Taste had a tangy malt flavor that just seemed a bit off, not really unpleasant but strange. Hops balanced with an adequate bitterness. Overall this is a decent beer but since I'm visiting the great Northwest, I didn't see any reason to dwell too long with this one.

John1985, Aug 18, 2007
Photo of benito
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

The much lauded amber ale of the Front Range...after living several months in CO and giving Fat Tire try after try, I'm not sure what all the hype is about (IMHO it's not even the best amber ale brewed in Fort Collins!)

Pours a transparent amber, with carbonation clearly present. Head is unexceptional, but once poured the beer does have a certain regal air about it. Good lookin' for sure.

The smell and taste are fairly straightforward, with few flavors emerging in the bouquet and a ho-hum carmel-sweetness. To its credit, the beer is very well balanced and the flavors, consistent. No surprising bite, no swelling carbonation, etc. What that makes for is an emminently drinkable beer and an emminently forgettable one.

I'm sure I'll have my fair share more of Fat Tires in my day--it is on tap EVERYWHERE in CO--but given the choice I'll buy a six-pack of Odell's Levity any day of the year.

benito, Nov 25, 2004
Photo of ckeegan04
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Crystal clear brownish-orange in color. Thick bubbly head with good retention and lacing.

S - Biscuity aroma with a somewhat faint smell of earthy hops. Something in the nose is a little off as well, almost smells like burnt grain.

T - Toasted malt taste; biscuity. Very light hop presence; earthy and spicy hops. The balance just does not line up and has a somewhat off flavor.

M/D - Medium bodied and very smooth. An easy drinker but not the best taste.

ckeegan04, Aug 09, 2008
Photo of Oxymoron
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

Fat Tire from a can is different than from tap or bottle! Count it! Did a tasting side by side. Pours a slightly hazy copper to amber color. A good fluffy white head with good retention and good lacing for the full tasting.

The nose is a bit cleaner than versus the bottle. The malt comes out with a light bready and biscuit aroma. Some minor caramel as well. There isn't the nutty aroma that I usually associate with Victory malt (and a bottled FT). A very clean yeast and some minor esters. The hops are a bit cleaner as well, and the herbal and floral hops come out a bit more.

The taste is similar in that it is a bit softer. The malt is very clean with a light caramel. Some minor hints of the nuttiness, which Im not a fan of. Some bready notes come out as well. The yeast is a tad more noticeable in the can version as well. Some light rose peddles and bananas. The finishing hops are about equal, a good balance with hops and malt.

The body is a about the same, moderate to light. Very clean and easy drinking. Overall there are still some things that I would like to see, more depth and a bit more hops. But just to compare can versus bottle, the winner = can!

Oxymoron, May 07, 2009
Photo of beer2day
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours copper gold with appreciable head and moderate lacing.

Straw nose with some grassier notes. Nothing too remarkable here.

Almost all malt in the taste. A little thin, and a little sweet, but slight burnt flavor on the finish. No hops really noted.

Drinkable, but not one I'd likely choose again.

beer2day, Mar 07, 2009
Photo of nhopkin
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: beautiful red amber color, good head retention, a little lacing but not much

Smell: lots of toasty malt, with a little caramel

Taste: very similar to the smell. Lots of crackery, biscuity malt. Almost a little bit of a stale bread flavor at times, but overall nice.

Mouthfeel: smooth, good carbonation. The body is a little on the lighter side.

Decent brew. Maybe would have liked sweeter maltiness or more hop balance, something to improve the dry crackery-ness

nhopkin, Dec 20, 2009
Photo of billab914
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle into my Southern Tier glass. It poured amber in color with a bubbly, frothy, half inch head filling the top of the glass.

The aroma shows a lot of bready, biscuity, slightly grainy flavors. I get a little caramel to it as well. Not a bad aroma, but a little one dimensional.

The taste has more of a caramel and toffee flavor to it. I get some of the bready, biscuity flavors as well with just a hint of graininess to it.

The mouthfeel is medium bodied with moderate carbonation. Overall it's a decent beer, but nothing that really stands out. It's flavorful but feels a little one dimensional to me. Again, not a bad beer, but not an outstanding one either.

billab914, Jun 10, 2011
Photo of jdoolin
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Presentation: 22oz bomber, poured into a pint glass.

Appearance: Orangish amber on the lighter side. Pale, almost white head with a thin lace.

Aroma: light malt dominates with a slightly fruity background.

Taste and Mouthfeel: The slight fruitiness in the aroma is even less apparent in the taste, but the malt is moreso. Biscuity and toasty, especially in the finish. Balanced well by the hops. Mouthfeel is somewhat light and very smooth.

Notes: This is a good crossover beer to get others into craft beer. A good session beer, as it's easy to drink. But overall, it's nothing special.

jdoolin, Oct 06, 2006
Photo of Alieniloquium
3.31/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

12 oz. bottle poured into a pint glass.

Appearance - Deep orange/amber body. Medium white head. Nice, but minimal lacing. Medium chunky collar.

Smell - Very nutty. More dominant than anything else. Toasty and nutty malts.

Taste - Again, nutty. The toasted malts have a little more dimension than the nose, but still it's nutty and toasty. Sweet caramel. Some hops in the finish, but minimal.

Mouthfeel - Medium body. Kinda sweet. Surprising that this is so popular considering how malty and sweet it is.

Overall - I expected this to be bland, but it isn't. It has flavor, it's just one flavor the whole time.

Alieniloquium, Dec 01, 2013
Photo of TheMarkE
3.31/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Appearance: Copper colored with a good head and lacing.

Smell: Bready malts, with a hint of caramel.

Taste: Bready malts, with slight hints of caramel and hops.

Mouthfeel: Medium bodied, with the tiniest bit of hop bitterness.

The Verdict: Not bad. New Belgium is kind of the western version of Samuel Adams- craft beer with a big company propensity for mainstream. NB does have some tasty offerings, but Fat Tire is closer to the average end of the scale. Drinkable, but nothing to make it stand out.

TheMarkE, Jan 09, 2013
Photo of JeffONeal
3.32/5  rDev -7.5%

JeffONeal, Tuesday at 10:28 PM
Photo of mbunje
3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Bomber poured into a pint glass

Aggressive pour yielded 1/2 inch of bone white head. quickly dissapates. Very clear amber/copper color. Looks clean/pure. Little lacing

Smell is chocolate and lemon. Unique. Well done for an amber.

Taste is malt and bready

Dry, carbonated feel.

Drinkable brew, not overpowering by any means.

Fairly boring brew, good for a few beers, but flavor is a bit lacking and it doesn't leave me with an impression.

I bought a 12 pack of bombers from Costco, UNREFRIGERATED. I know, I know, ....save it. I'll re-taste with a tap drawn beer or a cold bottle to see if there is any improvement.

mbunje, Jan 21, 2006
Photo of Sammy
3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Fresh On-tap at Pizza Plant. Light amber colour. A bit of yeast, creamy medium mouthfeel. Average bitterness, balanced with malting, a tad roast. A better than average beer all the way around, nothing special to standout and nothing to complain about.

Sammy, Jan 17, 2007
Photo of goldbot
3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Been looking to try this one for a while. This is the "2011 Washington D.C. Commemorative Beer-elation With Representation" 22 oz. bottle. I'm glad to try all of New Belgium's offerings finally after only hearing about them for so long.

Pours a nice amber color with a slight haze and plenty of foamy, white head that sticks around. Good carbonation. The aroma is very malty and bready. Earthy, a bit floral with hints of hops. Flavor as well - mostly malt and bread or grain; a bit of caramel sweetness as well. Slightly bitter and floral hoppiness. Well balanced with a crisp finish. A perfectly adequate beer for any occasion. I will definitely purchase again.

goldbot, Aug 27, 2011
Photo of TexIndy
3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Finally getting around to reviewing this one. First had it back in 1997 and helped start my craft beer journey. Poured from a 12oz bottle into a pint glass. Best before 12/25/09 on front label. Was a clear amber color with good carbonation and some lacing. It had an average sized beige head that settled into a foam and collar.

The aroma was biscuity and toasted malt with some floral hops but this is mainly a malt show. Never really enjoyed the aroma on this one and can't really pin it down. There is something in the aroma and taste that I find odd but not sure what. The taste follows the aroma and is biscuity with an odd aftertaste. Ambers are a middle of the road style for me but even then I usually don't find this aftertaste in the others. Mouthfeel is medium and crisp with good carb levels.

Overall, this is a good beer that I want to enjoy since it's from one of my favorite breweries and is readily available on tap but that odd aftertaste keeps it from being a big player. Even so, I get it on tap quite often as it's best choice. Recommend. Rotation: avail here bottle and tap. Won't be a bottle purchase but will do on-tap if best choice.

TexIndy, Nov 02, 2009
Photo of ReelBigwigFish
3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Poured into pint glass, no freshness date.

A: Golden light amber color with minimal one finger off-white head that fell quick.

S: Light sweet malt, some grassy floral hops. Biscuity diacetyl.

T: Sweet buttery malt with mild herbal hops. Smooth throughout with the mildest prickling of dry hop flavor coming in and out.

M: Smoooth. Creamy, mild carbonation, easy drinker.

O: I live in NJ, where Fat Tire does not exist. That being said, there is a certain amount of hype surrounding it, as with everything that people are aware of but can't have. Anyway, on a trip to OBX last week, there was the full range of New Belgium, so we picked up a bunch. Now that I've had it, Fat Tire is a let down. Yeah it's decent, but I would not buy this again. There are too many ambers to name that are better than this.

ReelBigwigFish, Nov 09, 2011
Photo of rtratzlaff
3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Fat Tire has a clear light amber body with a white head that dissipates and leaves minimal lacing.

The aroma is mainly sweetish malt that isn't really caramel, but more like light toast.

The taste matches up well with a hop balance that gives just enough flavor. Toasted bread is about the main quality of the flavor. A slight bit of diacytle is there as well giving it a slightly buttered bread flavor.

The mouthfeel is on the lighter side for the style, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing for me. This could be a good session beer, but nothing I would seek our or purchase often.

Compare this to the other beers of this style, and it doesn't come close to comparing to the best of them. Compare it to the anything people consider "beer" and yeah, it is better than most.

rtratzlaff, Apr 01, 2009
Photo of clm9
3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.25

A: Little more than a half inch of head, dissipates fairly quickly with an average display of lacing. Textbook amber color.

S: Fruity, slight malt fragrance. Definitely not a particularly strong smell.

T: Very drinkable/sessionable. Taste pretty much matches up with the smell, not particularly strong but also won't offend many.

M: As mentioned above, very drinkable, light feel.

O: As many others have mentioned, I view this as a good introduction into craft beers for the uninitiated. This beer won't scare any off, but in the same vein isn't likely to impress either. I'd never pass one up, but would only purchase it if the venue I was at had a poor selection.

clm9, Dec 05, 2013
Photo of david18
3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Hadn't had this beer for but had heard lots about the brewery and also that this beer was one of their more widely spread but not as good. This beer reminded me of Sam Adams and it's considered as such by people who drink it. It's the one micro from among the selection of domestics and foreigns. Good flavor, decent mouthfeel, color and carbonation but no better than a sam adams, brooklyn or sierra nevada.

david18, Aug 01, 2009
Photo of rmcnealy
3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

After trying New Belgium's Fat Tire Ambler Ale at several bars, generally with meals, I found it available at a Chicago grocery chain.

Poured a rich dark copper color with a nice vibrant head. Small bubbles were consistently small and dissappeared shortly. As advertised it has scents of "biscuit-like malt flavors" that are quite pleasant. Fat Tire is rather smooth. I prefer this beer with meals. Their web site suggests having this beer with grilled foods, and my experiences have been with pub burgers which this beer compliments greatly.

rmcnealy, Feb 13, 2007
Photo of StlHopHead77
3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A-Pours a dirty penny amber with a sturdy,two finger,pearly white crown that departed slowly leaving persistent spatterings of lace with medium carbonation visible.

S-Fried bread(Think churros without the cinnamon),candied nuts and the faint hint of sweet citrus.

T-Much like the nose.Caramel and toasted malt,some baked apple,and more toffee nutiness.

M-Smooth and active.Nice carbonation and silky finish.

D-Approachable and unintimidating beer with good drinkability.

StlHopHead77, Sep 04, 2010
Photo of srrn
3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This beer was quite the rage at a club I played, I had a bottle of it last week and on tap at the club. Perhaps I was expecting too much. This is a nice brew, the head wasn't much but it was biscuity malts with a bit of a hop bite in the aftertaste. All around a good decent sessionable brew, but not worth the premium price at this club on tap.

srrn, Mar 29, 2009
Photo of klk
3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I had this one on tap in Phoenix, AZ. The pour was a clear amber color without any cloudiness. The head was not large with little lacing.
There was very little aroma to sample with this one -- a little malty, but not strong at all. It has a easy-drinking taste that does not over-power the tastebuds.
Taste was decent but nothing to write home about.
Mouthfeel was overall decent, but I would only be able to drink two at most.
Overall drinkability was okay, it was the best thing on tap at the bar. If it's this versus the standard macrobrewery choices, I would go for it again. Otherwise a taster is all that is recommended.

klk, Nov 10, 2004
Fat Tire Amber Ale from New Belgium Brewing
81 out of 100 based on 6,573 ratings.