1. Don't miss our 7th annual American Craft Beer Fest featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers this May 30 & 31 in Boston, MA! Buy your tickets now!
  2. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Hop Kitchen - French Aramis IPA - New Belgium Brewing

Hop Kitchen - French Aramis IPAHop Kitchen - French Aramis IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
81
good

265 Ratings
THE BROS
85
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 265
Reviews: 66
rAvg: 3.55
pDev: 13.52%


Brewed by:
New Belgium Brewing visit their website
Colorado, United States

Style | ABV
American IPA |  6.70% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
A drier IPA for the summer, brewed with French Aramis hops to create an aroma of fresh cut flowers and garden herbs.

(Beer added by: Humulus85 on 06-29-2013)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 265 | Reviews: 66 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of Auraan
Auraan

Arizona

4.29/5  rDev +20.8%
look: 3.25 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25

Poured a pale orange, with a thin ring of white head. Standard for an IPA in appearance, though more head would be welcome. Scents of herbal hops, floral hops, cardamom, slight perfume notes and earthy yeast. Very pleasing, almost tea-like, like a good herbal tea. Flavor consists mostly of herbal hops, with some floral hop notes, a good hit of earth yeast and a very, very, very slight bit of citrus. There is a slight biscuit malt backbone that supports the herbal flavors. It's a good IPA style flavor, but one that is very different from any IPA I've tried. It's mild and herbal, but assertive in it's own way. Mouthfeel is medium bodied, with low carbonation. About right for an IPA, it drinks quite easy and feels right on the tongue. Overall this is an excellent IPA. It's different from any other IPA I have tasted and has a nice herbal tea and floral character that makes it almost soothing to drink. I'd recommend trying it, for it's uniqueness, if nothing else.

Serving type: on-tap

08-21-2013 01:29:12 | More by Auraan
Photo of garymuchow
garymuchow

Minnesota

3.8/5  rDev +7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Nice complex hop aroma. Soft pale malt background.
Hay colored and slightly cloudy. White cap with some stamina.
Hop forward in flavors but very subdued bitterness. Soft doughy malt background. The hops by which it is given it's name must be the grassy flavor that is most upfront, but it is also spicy and additional hops are fruity and flowery.
Soft feel.
Quite drinkable (as are most NB beers) and went well with a rather salty and somewhat spicy food fare.

Serving type: on-tap

08-18-2013 21:06:54 | More by garymuchow
Photo of beertunes
beertunes

Washington

2.8/5  rDev -21.1%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Served in straight pint glass. Poured a hazy, almost cloudy, pale gold, with about 1/4 inch of white head that had decent retention and good lace.

The aroma was mostly light pine, with some barely noticed floral notes, no malt, grain or yeast presence. Same dealio on the tongue yo! In addition to the pine, there was a weird, odd funk at the back of the palate. Not overpoweringly funky, just "off" enough to notice.

The body was decent enough, medium and smooth, with a dry finish. Drinkability was sort of a chore, that odd tang at the back made the beer less than pleasurable. Overall, I'd say you could probably safely skip this one. Or, try it and decide for your self. Either way really.

Serving type: on-tap

08-18-2013 18:34:20 | More by beertunes
Photo of homebrew311
homebrew311

Illinois

3.66/5  rDev +3.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance is hazy orange with thin white head and a bit of lacing. Nose is heavy on lemon zest and grapefruit. Notes of mango and sweet fruit also present. Taste is fruity up front with a considerable amount of sweetness for the style. Hops are fruity with some firm bitterness to follow. The flavor starts off very light and gains flavor towards the finish. Not a whole lot in the way of malt profile here. Mouthfeel is light with moderate to high carbonation. Overall, not a standout brew but decent enough flavors here.

Serving type: on-tap

08-14-2013 01:37:37 | More by homebrew311
Photo of BucBasil
BucBasil

South Carolina

3.46/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured on tap into a tulip-style glass at the Federal in North Hollywood.

A: Slightly hazy bright orange. Pure white head that was 2 fingers and dissipating quickly. The lacing comes in layers down the glass.

S: Surprisingly sourish note in there. Other than that a typical citrusy hop. Not a strong aroma, but not bad overall.

T: Pretty balanced with notes of citrus all around. Orange/tangerine in there dominantly. Finishes with a bitter sap wallop at the back of the throat to keep you anting more. The malt backbone is somewhat sweet but overall a nonfactor. Just enought to balance. OK.

M: Slightly drying with a medium body.

Overall: This one surprised me. Very refreshing. Good summer beer for what it is, but in other areas just typical.

Serving type: on-tap

07-28-2013 06:57:33 | More by BucBasil
Photo of ccrida
ccrida

Oregon

2.88/5  rDev -18.9%
look: 3.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

On draught at The Bier Stein, appearence is hazy pale orange with a creamy off-white head, leaving foamy lace.

Smell is mildly hoppy, a touch earthy, a little orange. Weak.

Taste is similarly faint and lame for an "IPA". Kind of malty, some lime and orabge zest, a hint of resin, but overall, a boring american pale ale. Dissapointing.

Mouthfeel is off dry, medium bodied.

Drinkability is ok, clean but boring by pale ale standards. As an IPA, fail.

Serving type: on-tap

07-23-2013 02:56:36 | More by ccrida
Photo of PieOhMy
PieOhMy

Minnesota

3.09/5  rDev -13%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured into New Belg goblet.

A Murky golden orange. Half inch white foam. Thick lacing down the glass.

S Hints of malt. Some pine. Not a whole hell of a lot.

T Much like the smell (boring). Kind of sweet. You can taste the hops but nothing in your face. Not much lingering bitterness.

M Malty. Especially for an IPA. Finishes clean and watery.

O The Hop Kitchen started pretty good with Hoppybock. This one does not match the not too lofty heights of its predecessor. Where are the hops, Hop Kitchen? This one will be a forgettable representative in the series.

Serving type: on-tap

07-20-2013 20:06:50 | More by PieOhMy
Photo of gatornation
gatornation

Minnesota

3.11/5  rDev -12.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

on tap pint glass

A- pours a hazy garnet orange color with an off white head nice amount of lacing
S- floral grassy smells with a garden and fuity smell
T-a floral taste with notes of pepper and flowers and vegtables oranges and oats/malts
m- dry with medium carbonation a touch bitter
O- strange IPA it was a potpourri and a garden variety thin for an ipa i will have to try this one again

Serving type: on-tap

07-17-2013 21:41:39 | More by gatornation
Photo of blackcompg
blackcompg

Illinois

3.14/5  rDev -11.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Appearance - Pours just over a finger of off white rocky head, body is a slightly hazy lite gold color, small amount of carb action, and I'm getting some pretty nice laced rings after each quaff.

Smell - Very earthy and floral, also getting some light toffee and baked bread.

Taste - Hmmm, much like the nose it begins with alot of floral and earthy hop flavors, but the flavors seem a bit thin, and as a result I'm only getting more of the bitter nuances of these flavors vs. something more full and flavorful. I'm also getting just a touch of citrus pith, and a whiff of white pepper. There is a light bready malt backbone that has a touch of sweetness to it. Long into the finish I get a slight minerals and something like sour plumskin. Alcohol is completely hidden.

Mouthfeel - Lighter side of medium, there are alot of flavors here but feels a bit thin. Carb is higher side of medium and has alot of edges, which accentuates some of the bitter, slightly dry flavors here - along with a light sourness at the end. Drinkability is on the lower side.

Overall - This is an ipa, but if you were blindfolded you would likely not call it an ipa based on the flavors. There are some potentially good flavors here but they seem just a bit off and unbalanced. In some respects this seems more like a pils than an ipa. New Belgium makes some pretty good ipa's - try this if you must, but Ranger is a far better ipa offering for the money.

Serving type: bottle

03-23-2014 03:45:57 | More by blackcompg
Photo of Iain_Riule
Iain_Riule

California

2.08/5  rDev -41.4%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Very disappointing beer. Supposedly an IPA, but does not taste like one. Exhibits a subtle weird taste at room temp, pretty much no taste when cold. Something of a herbal tea nose if you try hard. Cloudy beer which tastes of nothing. But, at 6.7%, it will get you wasted pretty quickly, to your detriment if you want to appreciate other beers in the same sitting. The only positive is the finish, which is beer-like. I think the "mystery" of why French Aramis hops aren't much used has been solved.

Certainly won't be buying again, in fact about a third of it ended up down the drain (without any "middleman").

Serving type: bottle

02-18-2014 04:43:51 | More by Iain_Riule
Photo of smanders
smanders

Virginia

2.05/5  rDev -42.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Found the Hops Kitchen pack at Costco and had to give it a whirl.

A - looks like a Saison (i.e. very light color). Foamy, three finger head.

S - very flowery...and not in a good way. Think Lysol.

T - so 'meh' I had to check to see if the bottle was mislabeled; I thought this was an IPA.

M - too much carbonation.

O - Very disappointing offering from NB. This beer was not finished.

Serving type: bottle

01-25-2014 20:26:56 | More by smanders
Photo of warmstorage
warmstorage

California

1.93/5  rDev -45.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 1.75

Came as part of a six pack of New Belgium IPA bombers from Costco, roughly $3 apiece. Others were Rampage and Rewind. I normally like to love New Belgium's serious stuff (I don't count FT as serious) and thoroughly enjoyed both the Rampage and the Rewind. But this was a huge disappointment.

Appearance: slightly hazy medium orange, limited lacy head.

Aroma: if I'm being kind, I'll say very earthy, and slightly grassy. If I'm being honest, at best, it smells like a slightly sour version of the mushroom compost I spread on my winter garden recently. I like compost, and I like the smell of compost. But not in an IPA. Maybe some hints of chocolate, like bittersweet chocolate, or baking chocolate? But no hop aroma at all. Nothing suggesting an IPA.

Taste: god, this beer kinda sucks. Earth / dirt, slight hints of sour, slight hints of grass. Hops don't seem to have darkened the door. The closest it gets is earthy grassy, with maybe a touch of lemon citrus.

Mouthfeel: decent, relatively low carbonation, slightly slick.

Overall: I was already planning on making veggie stock tonight, so I'm glad I don't have to drainpour it.

Serving type: bottle

01-08-2014 01:38:26 | More by warmstorage
Photo of RblWthACoz
RblWthACoz

Pennsylvania

3.7/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Nice enough looking beer I guess. Nose was nice off the initial pour but calms down fairly quickly. Flavor is slightly earthy with a mild spice and kick to it. This is kind of a "standard" IPA in that it doesn't really push to blow you away, but comes off as easy drinking and consistent.

Serving type: bottle

01-03-2014 04:14:55 | More by RblWthACoz
Photo of Fatehunter
Fatehunter

Oregon

3.55/5  rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a finger of head on a cloudy straw colored body.
The aroma is lemon and grapefruit. Nice.
The taste is mild lemon bitterness with a little sweetness to it.
The texture is light and airy with only a little carbonation.
Great texture with nice flavor and aroma. Solid.

Serving type: bottle

12-30-2013 02:18:23 | More by Fatehunter
Photo of Jadjunk
Jadjunk

Georgia

3.71/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

"A drier IPA for the summer, brewed with French Aramis hops to create an aroma of fresh cut flowers and garden herbs." Brewed in the style of an American IPA. This is the second release in New Belgium's recently launched Hop Kitchen series, another one-off beer, this time focusing on the reclusive French Aramis hop variety and its impact on a mildly flavored ale. Available in very affordable 22 oz. bottles and on limited draft. Released in the mid-summer 2013.

Poured from a 22 oz. bottle to a pint glass. Served above 51º Fahrenheit.

(Appearance) Pours a pearly golden cream head of a frothy foam consistency over a pale medium amber body with moderate haze and heavy flecked sediment. Retention is very good and lacing is medium and curtained. Carbonation is plentiful and vivacious. 4.5

(Smell) Aromas of strong floral notes, some milder herbaceous and grassy notes, but lively and wild without being too sharp and bright. Perceived bitterness is low to medium at strongest. Malt character is a basic pale malt with a pinch of biscuity body. Aside from some understated diacetyl and a pinch of cider acid, the yeast profile is fairly clean and pairs well with the hop profile. Potency is medium+. 3.5

(Taste) Up front, a light clean pale malt body with a moderate sweetness is joined by a potent blend of floral, fruit and herbal hop notes with a very muted bitterness. Clean and simple, a very hop-forward beer nonetheless, features the more overshadowed hop subtleties amidst a simple malt body with few malt and yeast distractions. French Aramis ends on a lightly bitter faint herbal lemon berry tea blend with a lingering herbal drag. The bitterness is very subdued in this beer, and is rather more hop-flavor focused. Very light and delicate hop presence but one that brings a great deal of unique and underrepresented hop characters to this beer. 3.75

(Mouthfeel) Dry, slick and clean. Carbonation adds some sprite and a bit of froth but keeps things simple and focused on the hops. Body is light/medium for the style, shy of medium overall. Alcohol presence is very mild. Balance is slightly in favor of sweet over bitter with a greater focus on hop character and flavor over bitterness, thus allowing an otherwise incredibly mild and simple malt profile to stand unchallenged. 3.5

(Overall) Although I would have desired a bolder bitterness and malt profile in a casual-drinking beer, I find that this beer better serves as an entry to a beer explorer's guide to hops and their utilization. In that case, one can clearly enjoy the impact that French Aramis hops, a seldom used hop in my drinking experience, creates in a simple pale ale. Hopefully, we can see more from these hops in the near future as they generate a lot of herbal, floral and lemon-tea character, the latter possibly more than any other hop variety that I have explored. This would accent very nicely an American Pale Ale, or even a full strength, highly bitter India Pale Ale. I am glad that I got to explore another new hop variety and recommend you do the same if you are interested in tasting new hops. As a drink otherwise, it's a decent, albeit simple beer, and leaves the imagination craving so much more. 3.75

New Belgium Brewing's
French Aramis India Pale Ale
3.71/5.00

Serving type: bottle

12-27-2013 03:51:07 | More by Jadjunk
Photo of archyquaffer
archyquaffer

Montana

3.81/5  rDev +7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Served from a bomber into a sampler. A moderate pour produces about 1/2 inch of frothy white head. This dissipates but is relatively sticky, coating the sides of the glass with streamers of lace. The beer is a hazy honey-golden and lightly carbonated.

Lots of floral hops on the nose suggestive of mixed fruit. The hops smell fresh, very grassy and herbal tea-like- flavors which manage to overshadow the usual citrus and pine, and yet don't completely overpower the malt, which hints at subtle caramel. Just a brief aftertaste of floral bitterness, and then a rather clean finish.

I bought a few bombers of this on sale for 1.99 a piece (cheap!). This is pretty easy drinking for the style and well worth a go, even if you're not a hophead.

Serving type: bottle

12-27-2013 02:42:08 | More by archyquaffer
Photo of mverity
mverity

Florida

4.21/5  rDev +18.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25

Bottle share at Proof. Hazy creamsicle color with thin white head and thin white collar. Aroma is vaguely tropical fruit hops, and a good medium malt presence. Taste follows aroma very closely. Good medium body, medium carbonation. Surprisingly good. New Belgium is hit or miss for me, and this was a hit.

Serving type: bottle

12-22-2013 03:13:31 | More by mverity
Photo of Pencible
Pencible

Virginia

3.48/5  rDev -2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: This poured a clear light gold with a little white head.
S: It smelled like orange zest and a little grapefruit and floral hops.
T: It tasted like light grassy and floral hops, with some fresh wheat. It had a clean bitter aftertaste.
M: It was watery with moderate carbonation. Light body.
D: This was an interesting unique IPA, but the scent and taste weren't great. The body was weak, but the finish was really smooth. So, easy enough to drink. Meh.

Serving type: bottle

11-29-2013 19:51:47 | More by Pencible
Photo of SBXLII
SBXLII

New York

4.3/5  rDev +21.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Poured into a round bottom, and settled with an excellent head. Laced with every sip.
The smell is a lot juicier and fruit dominant than your ordinary IPA. Couldn't stop smelling it after opening the bottle. The taste is very similar. It was tough pinning what the flavor was really, somewhere along the lines of tangerine or apple, a whole mixture. An almost creamy, chewy body - very impressive. The malt never intruded, and it wasn't missed.

Can't say enough about this, about anything by New Belgium, a job well done for sure -

Serving type: bottle

11-05-2013 17:51:09 | More by SBXLII
Photo of HoppyBastard
HoppyBastard

Nebraska

3.86/5  rDev +8.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Poured from a 22 ounce bomber into a Shaker pint glass.

APPEARANCE: clear amber/orange with one finger head that dissipates to a thin layer that is retained throughout, moderate amount of lacing, light carbonation.

SMELL: not overpowering hop profile for an IPA, flowery, mild pepper, lemon.

TASTE: piney hops, pepper, bread, everything understated.

PALATE: lightly carbonated, alcohol is well hidden, lighter body for the style.

OVERALL: I enjoyed this beer, it's a good value at $2.99 and very drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

11-03-2013 02:24:02 | More by HoppyBastard
Photo of superspak
superspak

Michigan

3.68/5  rDev +3.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

22 ounce bottle into signature globe glass, best before 1/5/2014. Pours moderately hazy golden orange color with a 2 finger dense and fluffy off white head with great retention, that reduces to a nice cap that lingers. Spotty soapy lacing clings around the glass. Aromas of tangerine, lemon peel, pineapple, orange zest, floral, grass, light caramel, light pine, bread, and herbal/floral earthiness. Nice and pleasant aromas with good balance and complexity of hop notes with a moderate malt balance; and solid strength. Taste of tangerine, lemon peel, pineapple, orange zest, floral, grass, light caramel, bread, light pine, and herbal/floral earthiness. Fair amount of earthy floral/pine bitterness on the finish; with lingering notes of tangerine, lemon zest, pineapple, floral, grass, light caramel, bread, light pine and herbal earthiness on the finish for a good bit. Nice balance and complexity citrus/tropical/earthy hop flavors; with a good malt/bitterness balance and zero cloying flavors after the finish. Medium carbonation and body; with a smooth, moderately crisp, and lightly sticky mouthfeel that is good. Alcohol is very well hidden with only a slight warming present after the finish. Overall this is a nice IPA. Good balance and complexity of unique hop flavors with moderate malt balance; and very smooth and crisp to drink for the ABV. Not as bold as I was expecting for an IPA, but it was pleasant and enjoyable.

Serving type: bottle

11-02-2013 05:55:07 | More by superspak
Photo of Gavage
Gavage

New Jersey

3.78/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

Appearance: pours a hazy golden yellow color with a 1" head that breaks down to spotty surface covering.

Smell: floral and earthy bitterness are easily detectable.

Taste: caramel, pears. mango, floral hop bitterness and a bit of earthy tones arrive late. There is a bit of spiciness too.

Mouthfeel: medium bodied beer. Lightly crisp throughout with a very dry and slight spicy finish.

Overall: a slower sipping IPA since the dryness is strong, but it is mildly refreshing. An interesting beer.

Serving type: bottle

11-01-2013 22:47:21 | More by Gavage
Photo of kojevergas
kojevergas

Texas

2.94/5  rDev -17.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Picked up a single at Whole Foods HQ a few days ago. Best before 12 January 2014. 6.7% ABV confirmed. 1 pint 6 fl oz brown glass bottle with standard Lips of Faith label art and branded orange/red pry-off pressure cap served into Cantillon stemware in me gaff in low altitude Austin, Texas. Reviewed live. Expectations are average given the brewery - whose non-sour Lips of Faith offerings are rarely very good. Reviewed as an IPA because it clearly identifies as such on the label.

Served cold - straight from me fridge. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: No bubble show forms as I pour.

Pours a two finger wide head of soft beige colour. Nice fluffy consistency. Decent creaminess and thickness. Not as frothy as would be ideal. As the head recedes, a nice even coat of lacing clings to the sides of the glass. Head retention is good - about 5-6 minutes - but the restrained 6.7% ABV makes this less impressive.

Body colour is a clear copper-gold of above average vibrance. No yeast particles are visible. Translucent. Semitransparent. Appears adequately carbonated.

Within IPA style conventions. Far from unique or special, but there are no obvious flaws.

Sm: Hm. It's a bit odd, featuring a prominent sage-like minty note. Herbal hop character is dominant here, which is strange, but it does have a more common floral hop dimension as well. A bit grassy. Evokes a white tea-like note. A hint of cedar, perhaps. As it warms slightly, I pick up a buried reticent peach note.

Pale malts and pilsner malts balance the hops.

No spice, alcohol, or yeast character comes through, though the fermentation does seem quite clean. I suspect a standard IPA yeast was used.

A pleasant aroma of average strength. I like the unusual herbal emphasis, but I'm uncertain the flavour profile will deliver.

T: Herbal, with the aforementioned sage-like mint coming through in addition to rosemary. Nicely floral - both in terms of actual flowers and hop content. Grassy. I definitely want more of a fruity hop character from it, but it does deliver a bit - mainly peach, with a hint of generic citrus. Hop bitterness is decently tamed on the open and going into the second act, but breaks out at about the midpoint, yielding an unwelcome assaulting aggression that is very unwelcome and really brings down the balance.

Pale malts and pilsner malts comprise the bulk of the body.

It does have some tea-like notes; white tea, English tea, herbal tea. Some hints of cedar as well.

No yeast character, alcohol, or spices come through.

The balance certainly needs some work; that hop bitterness needs to be more carefully handled. As with most beers, it could use more complexity and subtlety. Average depth, duration, and intensity of flavour. There's little nuance here, if any. The whole French Aramis hop approach feels more like a marketing gimmick than an actual informed decision; frankly there's little about the flavour profile that convinces me the beer is better for having used this uncommon hop strain.

Mf: Clean, crisp, lightly coarse, and wet. I always appreciate a bit of coarseness to coax out the flavours, but it goes a bit too far here. Not quite refreshing. Overcarbonated in classic New Belgium fashion. I like it a bit more oily. It's also not as soft as would be ideal.

Dr: Priced decently. Drinkable. Very forgettable. The French Aramis gimmick is a nice marketing toy, but even at this relatively low price I can't recommend it to friends. It's rather unremarkable, but maybe this will open the doors to other better breweries utilizing these types of hops in a more refined way. It does hide its ABV decently. Another disappointing bomber release from New Belgium.

High C

Serving type: bottle

10-27-2013 07:55:44 | More by kojevergas
Photo of dv8sean
dv8sean

California

3.8/5  rDev +7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

This was a refreshing change from the grapefruit-pine hop bombs carpeting the West Coast these days. Not that I have anything against grapefruit-pine carpet bombing.

Appearance is homebrew cloudy. Pours well and leaves proper lace inside glass.

Smell is all tropical fruit. Floral, perfumy...delightful.

Taste follows suit with smell. Malt takes a back seat to allow the aromatic hops to fil your head. Again, a very refreshing change from the trend.

Nothing remarkable about the mouthfeel. Maybe just a little light on carbonation.

Overall, a very nice, most approachable, and wonderfully aromatic IPA.

Serving type: bottle

10-13-2013 02:24:23 | More by dv8sean
Photo of BeerKangaroo
BeerKangaroo

Alaska

3.09/5  rDev -13%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

White stamp in bottom right hand corner that says: "12Jan14," best by date I'm assuming:

22 oz bottle:

Into a pint glass:

A: hazy golden orange colored body with a one finger white foamy head that dissipates within a minute, a fair amount of speckled spider web lacing

S: floral yet there are elements of toffee that come through, ok, weird, but I'll proceed

T: bitter but sweet, the toffee comes back fairly strong, super dry aftertaste and finish (wow, perhaps one of the driest beers I've ever had)

M: light to medium, fairly sessionable, carbonation is fairly subdued but still good for the style

O: AIPA, wow, uh... ok, I guess it is, but I say pretty different than what I've had, the strong toffee coming through in the aroma and taste is pretty different, not sure where I'm getting that, but alright, good for New Belgium for trying something different

Serving type: bottle

10-08-2013 23:09:07 | More by BeerKangaroo
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Hop Kitchen - French Aramis IPA from New Belgium Brewing
81 out of 100 based on 265 ratings.