Fathom India Pale Lager - Ballast Point Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Fathom India Pale LagerFathom India Pale Lager

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
87
very good

676 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 676
Reviews: 115
rAvg: 3.87
pDev: 10.59%
Wants: 42
Gots: 117 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Ballast Point Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial Pilsner |  6.80% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: Floydster on 09-29-2007

No notes at this time.
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 676 | Reviews: 115
Photo of Ryan011235
2.35/5  rDev -39.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2

On tap at King's Table

Hazy honey/amber color. Lasting layer of retention and great lace.

Orange, grapefruit and grassy hops hold most of the aroma aside from some toasty grain. Yeah, mostly hops though. In another example of WTF, the taste is vegetal all while suggesting the taste of perfume fragrances if one could taste the fragrence and not the purfume itself. Soft body and carbonation.

Overall: Gorgeous lace. Terrible beer.

Photo of vinny21bal
2.66/5  rDev -31.3%
look: 2.25 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.25

This beer is pretty boring. I give is credit for being refreshing in the summer, but just not a lot of character all the way around from nose, taste, mouth. Not to impressed. Ballast Point is a great Brewery so I am glad they don't bottle this one. I have been pouring it at the shop on tap for drinkers that come in looking for something generic like Blue Moon or Bud light. It seems to go good for them. For a heavy beer guy I would really stay away.

Photo of squaremile
2.76/5  rDev -28.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Had on tap at Ballast Point taproom in San Diego. This is my first IPL. Pours a golden yellow with a moderate white head. Smell is strange. The hops are there as well as a funky yeast. Taste is challenging for me. Some mild hop bitterness up front then a wash of diacetyl and buttery yeast flavors. Aftertaste is pretty dry but something sticks around longer than is welcome. Mouthfeel is medium. Not into it.

Photo of Silke_Neryn
3.11/5  rDev -19.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The pine is strong in this one.

Photo of champ103
3.14/5  rDev -18.9%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

On tap at the Blind Pig in Champaign IL.

A: Pours a dull, murky yellow color. A one finger white head forms, but recedes to a ring in a second. Some lace is left behind.
S: Floral, grassy, and citrus hops in the nose. Some dry biscuit and bread aromas as well. Very nice balance and nuance.
T: What ever the balance and nuance that was in the nose is gone here. Bitter grapefruit and resiny pine. Nothing else that i can come up with.
M/D: A medium to full body. Soapy, oily, and resiny. Kind of sticky as well. Some alcohol is noticeable, but the bitterness make this hard to drink a bunch of.

I don't understand why breweries continue to make "Imperial Pilsners." It is just an oxymoron IMO. This is really not bad. Though, just a bit of overkill. Tone it down a bit and this is a really good lager. As is, not something I really enjoy.

Photo of beertunes
3.18/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Served in straight pint glass. Poured a hazy medium honey-gold color with about 1/4 inch of white head that had moderate retention and low lacing.

The aroma had some nicely light grain malts and a bit of floral hops. On the tongue, The malts had the front, then blended with the floral hops in the middle. At the back was a blast of citrus hops that was unexpected.

The body was medium and had a bitter finish that lingered for a bit. Drinkability was OK, the beer went down easily enough, but didn't really have a noticeable personality. Overall, a pleasant enough little brew, probably worth a shot if you see it.

Photo of rand
3.23/5  rDev -16.5%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

From 22 oz bomber to pint glass

A: Clear copper-tan in appearance, forms a quickly receding wispy head that leaves scant lacing.

S: Hop-forward bouquet as expected. Lemongrass joins a bit a honey-sweetness. If you've had their Big Eye IPA, imagine that with a more crackery backdrop. Although strangely subdued, you really have to inhale to get the full bouquet.

T/M: Again, hop-citrus forward, notes of lemon and orange at the front of the palate. A touch of buttery sweetness mid-sip while a yeasty, crackery tone dries toward the finish. Heavier bodied than expected, much more ale-like than lager.

Drinkable, but unremarkable. When I heard they were bottling this I was expecting more, but I may have had too high of expectations. I'm assuming they accomplished the flavor profile they were looking for, there's nothing off-putting in this pint, but I think I need more IPL's before I can be as objectively critical as I should. Categories aside, the beer in itself is OK, better than average but nothing I would chase down.

Photo of Celtics17
3.25/5  rDev -16%

Not my favorite beer. I liked Samuel Adams IPL, but this missed big time. The malt character truly beat the hops. This was a true resin filled IPA/IPL, and not in a good way. Overall this was disappointing.

Photo of kojevergas
3.3/5  rDev -14.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

7.0% ABV according the bottle. 22 fl oz brown glass bottle with decent label art and branded pry-off pressure cap acquired for $6.00 USD at The Growler Room here in Austin earlier tonight and served into an Avery stem-tulip. Reviewed live. Expectations are fairly high given the brewery. Reviewed as an India Pale Lager because the label clearly identifies it as such. The name of the beer is "Fathom IPL" not "Fathom India Pale Lager."

Served cold - straight from the fridge. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: No bubble show forms as it's poured.

Pours a two finger wide head of white colour. Good thickness. Decent creaminess and frothiness. Head retention is pretty good - about 4-5 minutes. No lacing clings to the sides of the glass as the head recedes.

Body colour is a clear translucent copper of above average vibrance. No floating yeast particles or sediment is visible. Appears well-carbonated.

Overall, it's a good looking beer and boasts one of the better appearances I've seen in this emergent style. That said, it's not unique or special. But I'm looking forward to the first sip and I don't notice any overt flaws.

Sm: Has some lovely dank resinous hop oils, with plenty of herbal and floral character as well as some nectary character. I pick up on some cannabis and evergreen notes. Also some lovely citrus - bits of grapefruit and orange zest.

The malty base seems ideal - pale malts, clean barley, and a hint of caramalt.

No yeast character or alcohol is detectable.

It's a great aroma for the style, and has surprising strength. Clean and pleasant. I can't wait to try it. The resins are a definite highlight.

T/Mf: The clean feel of the hops isn't quite maintained here in the taste; untamed hoppy bitterness invades along with some dragging pine needles and grassy notes. It's still oily, but overall I wish it were more smooth and wet, with better balance of the hop bitterness. As is, it's slightly coarse and dry (especially in the second act), which really holds it back from being the refreshing lager it should be.

I get a bit of grapefruit and orange along with some citrusy twang. Those cannabis and evergreen hop notes do stay present in the flavour profile, and really work here. Hop character is primarily floral/herbal, but there's surprising depth and diversity of hop profile here - especially considering it's a lager of lesser ABV than most IPAs. Juicy and crisp.

No yeast character, alcohol, or off-flavours come through.

Overcarbonated. Has way too much bite and weight for the style and flavour profile, but overall I'd say the texture suits the taste pretty well and it has a nice presence on the palate in spite of its shortcomings. Clearly, brewers are still trying to figure out how much body and thickness to give India Pale Lagers; I think this is a bit too IPA-imitative for its own good. Clean and enjoyable nonetheless. Could be softer. It's overbearing for a lager.

The core of the beer is a pale malt/light caramalt build which works well for it. Overall, this is a cohesive approachable build but it's not quite gestalt. Decently balanced with impressive complexity for a lager. Not the most subtle or intricate beer out there. Above average duration and intensity of flavour.

I'm liking this quite a bit for what it is, and it's better than I remember Humulus Lager being.

Dr: A very drinkable sessionable India Pale Lager which I consider amongst the best of these early examples of the style. Ballast Point has a delivered an inspired lager with an impressive amount of flavour that will please IPA fans. With its kinks worked out, this could be a great beer in its style. I love the price point and would recommend friends give this a shot. I'll easily kill this bottle, and could probably go for another. Hides its ABV well.

B-

Photo of tbeckett
3.3/5  rDev -14.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

I tend to really enjoy well done Imperial Pilsners so I got excited when I saw this on the tap list at Reservoir in Waterbury. Seemed to miss the point of the style for me though. From notes.

A - Poured golden to dark golden with a half finger white head. Bright. Good ring of lace and film of retention.

S - Citrus. Orange. Not much going on.

T - Noble hop, orange, honey.

M - Good carbonation, light body, medium bitterness.

O/D - Weaker for the style. Missing that strong, delicious noble hop profile. Tastes good, but just didn't want more of this interpretation of the style.

Photo of jneiswender
3.31/5  rDev -14.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Had as part of a tasting at the Ballast Point Brewing Company. Served on tap in a tasting glass.

A-dark yellow body with an off white head

S-fruity and some faint smokiness

T-juicy flavor overall nice grain finish

M-medium

D-Not a bad brew. Not sure I get a pils feel to it.

Photo of bark
3.32/5  rDev -14.2%
look: 4.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

The colour is gold (7 EBC), the liquid is clear. The airy three finger head is white, it sinks slowly leaving lots of thick lacing. It looks very inviting.

The smell is semi-sweet and hoppy. Notes of grapefruit peel, honey, exotic fruit jam, green plands and a smooth bitterness.

The taste is sweeter than expected. Clean malty sweetness, smooth bitterness. Notes of orange juice, green plants, honey and plums. Medium to full body. The aftertaste got growing clean alcohol and bitterness, exotic fruits and bread-like malt. The finish is smooth and sweet with some floral bitterness.

The carbonation is medium strong, the small bubbles are long-lived. The liquid is a bit sticky.

Way too sweet, but apart from that, I liked it.

Photo of Halcyondays
3.4/5  rDev -12.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

On-tap at O'Brien's in San Diego, CA,

A: Pours a light amber with a firm white head, good retention.

S: Very bready at the first whiff, smells a lot like a hopped up Spaten.

T: Very bready at first, German lager malt, with a bit of a sour character. Hops come in with some pine bitterness and earth, an interesting tasting hybrid, but at the end of it all, I was only mildly enjoying it.

M: Crisp and smooth, easy drinking for sure, fairly light-bodied.

D: An interesting beer from Ballast Point, but I'd take their regular IPA over this any day.

Photo of DoubleJ
3.44/5  rDev -11.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I knew I'd come back one day to review this. On-tap most recently at Churchill's Pub, on to the beer:

Has the color of pale orange which provides little excitement for the eyes. The head is small and leaves a few spots of lace around. The nose features some vague citrus and pine zest.

It could taste better given the craftsmanship behind Ballast Point. This pilsner (notice that I'm not refering to this as an "India Pale Lager") features a bite of pine in the begining and throughout. A late surge of grapefruit keeps this from being resemblant to Pine Sol. Aftertaste is a little soapy and fairly bitter.

Nice enough. I recall liking this a little more when I first tasted it though.

Photo of Beaver13
3.46/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

22 oz bottle. Pours clear golden orange with a big creamy white head that retains well and laces the glass.

The aroma is crisp sweet doughy malt with some fruit and resiny metallic hops.

The flavor is sweet bready malts and some fruit with some peppery grassy hops. The mouthfeel is medium to full bodied with smooth carbonation.

Overall, a decent hoppy lager.

Photo of Uanof
3.52/5  rDev -9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: golden orange translucent color with big white fluffy persistent head which leaves a decent amount of lacing behind.

S: hops and more hops with some dry alcohol notes on the background.

T: it's pretty smooth and drinkable, probably too smooth, missing that hop bitterness kick. It has an alcoholic presence that's not overwhelming, but definitely present, that takes a little away from the experience. Lagers are usually pretty clear in terms of flavor profile, which is why this one at 7% shows it's abv.

M: light bodied, not overly dry or sticky, easy drinking.

O: more of a lager than an IPA, would have liked to see the hops being more present and pronounced. Maybe a wet-hopped variant?

Photo of humuloner22
3.53/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

This is a crisp beer. Definitely a lager or pilsner style beer. Color is light copper color, very similar to Yuengling really. Not a malt bomb but not really hoppy either. It was labeled as a IPA style lager. I don't detect that much hop in the flavors. Maybe I have had too many true IPA's but this one is not hoppy at all. It is very much a lager. I won't go through a full review. I will say that its a decent beer but like so many craft breweries that make stuff that is away from a good IPA or Stout that they are known for it just is not worth the price difference. When you can get a 12 pack of adjunct lager 12 oz cans for maybe a couple of bucks more. Like I said this beer reminds me a lot of Yeungling and was only two dollars less than the local grocery chain has a 12 pack on sale for this week.

Photo of dgilks
3.57/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

Clear golden colour with a moderate fluffy off white head.

Moderately malty and smooth. Slight hop aroma.

Resinous hop character with light malt. Quite sharp but in a good way.

Medium body with moderate carbonation. Good.

A crisp, clean strong lager. Nicely hoppy.

Photo of larryarms847
3.63/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a golden amber orange with a nice frothy off-white two finger head of foam.

Bread-like malts, caramel, pine, citrus, and some hop resin.

Much more citrus and pine in the swallow. Sweet pilsner malts are overpowered by a blast of citrusy hops.

Light-medium bodied, medium-high carbonation, bitter, dry finish.

Overall, not bad, but I was expecting Dissenter, so I was a little let down.

Photo of thecheapies
3.63/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Fathom IPL. It has good clarity through an amber-y red-ochre color. Head is soppy and short on collection. Laces pretty nice, though.

Strange bitter hoppiness like bitter orange and Campari. Really smells of Campari. Some nectarine notes, also. Lightly earthy. Malts are small and quite separate. No toastiness that I can perceive. I like the smell, but the intensity is low.

Not as extreme as the nose, but the Campari flavor is still spot-on. The hoppiness is, in turn, weak for a hoppy Ballast Point beer. Notes of nectarine, ruby red grapefruit, baked earth, semi-toasted malts, and mild salinity are noticed.

Low carbonation, medium body. Uneventful. Distracted by the low carbonation.

A little disappointed with this one. The aroma is the best factor, mostly, because it reminds me of Campari.

Photo of ManBat12
3.68/5  rDev -4.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Not the best Ballast Point has to offer but still a dang good beer

Photo of McStagger
3.69/5  rDev -4.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

No dating available. Served in a pilsner glass.

A: Pours a slightly hazy, slightly amber hue. Carbonation is moderate. Two and some change fingers of white head. Large bubbles. Moderate retention.

S: Has that clean lager snap to it. Otherwise, it carries a lot of tropical notes. Tangerine, mango, pineapple. Underneath that is some mint/herbal characteristics.

T: Mid palate of big tropical notes. Middle is tropical fruit, sugared citrus rind and candied ginger. End is drying, with some slighlty biscuit notes popping through. Aftertaste is mostly clean, with some residually dry grapefruit peel and soapiness.

M: Mildly carbonated. Medium bodied, or even a bit heavy. Dry in the finish, but lacks the crispness associated with a light lager.

O: I wonder what the hop bill on this bad boy is. It reminds me a lot of Stone 17th Anniversary. Like, a lot. Still, this one could use some "cleaning out". Reminds me too much of an ale, and misses on the clean/refreshing side.

Photo of BucannonXC5
3.7/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Type: 22-oz. bomber
Glass: 0.5L mug
From: Cherokee Market Beer & Wine in Normal Heights (San Diego), Calif.
Price: $4.49
Purchased: Aug. 16, 2013
Consumed: Aug. 16, 2013
Misc.: N/A

Poured a honey orange clear color with 5-to-6 fingers of frothy white head that spilled over the top of the mug. Foam looked rather light on top. A good deal amount of uneven sporadic lacing along the sides of the glass. Good retention all the way down.

Lots of different flavors in the nose. Got some hops (sweet floral, citrus, pine, tangerine and orange), and malts (caramel, honey, sourdough bread and corn). Also some bitter peppery spices. Definitely a mix of an IPA and a pilsner.

Tasted pretty close to the smell. Got a smooth taste of citrus hops to start, followed by caramel and honey malts and ending with bitter spicy notes. Those spices kept lingering after. Some faint notes of orange, tangerine and grapefruit. For a pilsner? Pretty good. For an IPA, average or below average.

Light body. Thin-to-oily texture. Average carbonation. Abrupt, bitter finish. Somewhat refreshing. The 7.0% ABV is well-hidden.

Was back and forth between a 3.50 and 3.75 overall, but I guess I was feeling gracious. Decent.

Photo of mactrail
3.75/5  rDev -3.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Nice medium amber in the Pilsener glass. Slight lacing in the glass. Some flowery hops in the nose. Not much mouthfeel. Tastes really rich, which is something of a novelty for anything with the word "lager" in its name. But a big, robust malty flavor immediately followed by a whole lot of hops. The hops are just short of overpowering, and whatever variety they are, it's a clean and intense taste.

I like a beer that creates some head-scratching as to style. Good to remember that the creative urge challenges the artificial boundaries. Call it a low-voltage DIPA. But for hopheads I think it would be worth tasting as a highly drinkable novelty.

Photo of VelvetExtract
3.75/5  rDev -3.1%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.75

A-Pours a clear, rich yellow color. Big, foamy, thick head. The head retains very well. It leaves hundreds of lacing dots all over the glass.

S-The aroma isn't very intense but it does dish out floral and tropical aromas. Cracker and bread malt with Lager yeast.

T-The flavor is better than the nose. The Lager yeast is pretty noticeable and it mingles well with the floral, citrus and other fruity-hop flavor elements. A dry cracker malt sets in too. Unfortunately I found the booze to be a bit too prominent.

M-The beer's lowest point. After a larger swig, I could really taste the hot sting of the alcohol. I found the flavors to fall apart a bit as it warmed too.

O/D-Good, not great. Especially when Jack's Abby IPLs are constantly sitting on the shelf for me at a fear better price point for a noticeably tastier product.

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Fathom India Pale Lager from Ballast Point Brewing Company
87 out of 100 based on 676 ratings.