1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Blue Heron Pale Ale - Mendocino Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Blue Heron Pale AleBlue Heron Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
78
okay

470 Ratings
THE BROS
88
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 470
Reviews: 289
rAvg: 3.4
pDev: 14.41%
Wants: 8
Gots: 15 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Mendocino Brewing Company visit their website
United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  6.10% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 10-22-2000)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Blue Heron Pale Ale Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 470 | Reviews: 289 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of pmcadamis
1.78/5  rDev -47.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

A - Dirty golden brew w/ a thick head of fluffy white bubbles. Lots of carabonation bubbles risisng to the top of the glass.

S - Herbal hint of hops with a distinct mineral aroma ....like metallic well water. Smells natural and refreshing like the cheesy painting on the bottle. Is that Thomas Kincaid "Painter of Light?"

T - Hard mineral well water flavor with metallic undertones. Dank and raw tasting. BItter in a rotten sort of way. Bitter, acidic, and very unpleasant....this is pretty foul.

M - Light and carbonated. Pretty average.

D - Suffers at the hands of the foul acidic, metallic, bitter, and downright nasty taste. Like chewing on a blade of grass....very bitter and vegetal.

pmcadamis, Nov 11, 2006
Photo of TexIndy
1.78/5  rDev -47.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a pint glass. A lasered code on the bottle but can't find a date in there so no idea if fresh or not. Was a hazy golden yellow color with slight carb streams. It had a thin, fizzy head that quickly evaporated into a thin collar. Quick sliding non sticking lace.

The aroma was weak with bitter hops, toffee malt and a metallic aroma which was very off putting. The taste followed suit with bitter hops at the start and then the metallic flavor hit and really ruined it. Horrible after-taste. Mouthfeel was thin and under carbonated.

Overall, a mess and a drain pour. Not sure if it's just the way the beer is or if out of date. Since they don't date the bottle I have to assume it's the beer. One of the worst beers in the past couple months. Like sucking on metal shavings. Rotation - one and done. If I can find one in a friends fridge I might try it to see if this sample was bad but no way am I buying another to find out.

TexIndy, Feb 11, 2010
Photo of Dapperticus
2/5  rDev -41.2%

Dapperticus, May 13, 2012
Photo of 1fastz28
2/5  rDev -41.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

pours without any head a pale golden color. looks ok so far, smell is nearly non-existent maybe some hops but thats it, taste is bitter, but not a hoppy bitterness, just bitter. mouthfeel is ok, drinkability is very low, i'm not a fan of this beer. maybe i just got a bad one, but this isn't very impressive.

1fastz28, Dec 07, 2007
Photo of Clydesdale
2.03/5  rDev -40.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

A: Pours a hazy, orange-yellow color with some visible carbonation. The off-white head is fairly tall, dense, and frothy. Retention is solid, with some nice lacing.

S: Very light malt aroma accompanied mainly by citric hops. Also a considerable metallic and floral character.

T: Malt? Nope, nothing to see here. A bland citric hop flavor of orange oil, along with a blunt, aspirin-esque bitterness with only the vaguest of floral hints. Hints of yeast and metal into the finish.

M: Disappointingly light-bodied. APAs don't need to be chewy or viscous, but this feels like slightly flat seltzer on the tongue. Carbonation is fairly crisp, leading to a dry finish.

D: Ugh. Just like their IPA, a bland, flavorless aspirin bitterness dominates here. Thin-bodied, poorly malted, and thoroughly forgettable. It seems that as my palate matures, Mendocino's beers drift further and further from respectability.

Clydesdale, Jun 10, 2009
Photo of TheKingofWichita
2.03/5  rDev -40.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a slightly golden yellow color with a thick white head that sticks around a while. Smells of caramel and malts and maybe a vague hint of hops. I am thinking my bottle is off a little. Tastes was of almost no hops like it certainly should have been. Mostly sweet malts and a little brown sugar with a little hops in the aftertaste. Mouthfeel is medium. Drinkability is low.

TheKingofWichita, Jan 03, 2011
Photo of rastaman
2.15/5  rDev -36.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Bottle. Bland peach citrus type flavour, really short finish, tinny, stale, tiring. Almost a lagery style pale ale, very thin. As i mentioned before has a slightly rusty, edgy tinny quality to it. Once again i was really left feeling dissapointed with this brewery.

rastaman, Feb 21, 2005
Photo of mcallister
2.15/5  rDev -36.8%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

This pale ale doesn't have the most pretty appearance I recall seeing. Pours a dirty yellowish gold. Very little head that dissapeared almost instantly.

The nose is a little better than the appearance. Nice flowery, hoppy aroma, with some sweet citrus fruit in there and malt..

See the problem I have with this beer (as well as many others) is the fact that it doesn't have it's own image per say. There is no style to it. It does have some hop to it but no hop character that makes it different, there is a slight maltiness but the malt component leads more towards a macro in variety than it does a micro trying to set itself apart. It is a tad creamy but the mouthfeel is more like a Budweiser than a fine APA to me.

I would drink a light beer before drinking this just because it would make me not have to worry about getting fat as much. Hate to dog a beer like this but if you're going to put the money, time, and effort into brewing beer try and set yourself apart to be remembered.

mcallister, Apr 18, 2006
Photo of Cyberkedi
2.2/5  rDev -35.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Aroma is crisp and malty, typical of a pale ale. It pours a clear straw yellow with a thick but quickly dissipating white head. Flavor is - well, it tastes a little bit like beer, malty with just a hint of fruit, but rather wan and uninspiring. Texture is smooth and just a little bit fizzy. OK, but I won't be looking for this one again.

Cyberkedi, Aug 11, 2010
Photo of Mbpike
2.25/5  rDev -33.8%

Mbpike, Jun 14, 2013
Photo of alcoholinside
2.25/5  rDev -33.8%

alcoholinside, Dec 05, 2013
Photo of Celtics76
2.25/5  rDev -33.8%

Celtics76, Mar 07, 2013
Photo of spicelab
2.3/5  rDev -32.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

12oz bottle from Beermasons.

Hazed cumquat with a sizable, white head of decent heft. Strong retention, eventually leaves an extensive lace lattice.

Sweet citrus, light caramel and doughy yeast. Subdued hop aromas of candied lemon, grapefruit and orange. Not complex but quite acceptable.

Descends almost immediately into a gritty, metallic bitterness that sweeps aside the malt backbone and most of the fruity hop character. Not impressed.

Oppressive carbonation all but conceals any sense of body. Metallic bitterness lingers on the mid palate.

Unimpressed when I first had it nearly 3 months ago. This bottle was from the same batch, and the kindest thing I can say is that it has held up okay. Pedestrian in comparison even with some of the more rudimentary craft offerings today.

spicelab, Sep 18, 2012
Photo of cdkrenz
2.3/5  rDev -32.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A - A dingy orange color with a thick haze. The head is stark white and starts out at an inch but quickly fades to a thin transparent layer.

S - Malt and hops with little structure.

T - Extremely mild hops to start. It gets a little more interesting as the brew gets toward the finish. Still, for a pale ale I'm not at all intrigued by it.

M - This is one of the finer qualities this brew has to offer. It has a nice and consistent fine-grained texture throughout.

~ I think it obvious I'm not impressed by this pale ale. I will say though, I'd pay another $0.49 to have one, but not a penny more.

cdkrenz, Jun 17, 2009
Photo of twiggamortis420
2.33/5  rDev -31.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12 oz bottle pours a very hazy gold color with a modest white head. Does leave some nice sheeting all the way around right above the collar.

Nose is very malty for a pale, mostly biscuits and grain. Little bit of floral hops comes out, but this is weak sauce for the most part.

Stil overly malty, but the hops assert themselves a little better on the finish. Its almost like the brewers got stoned and forgot to add the last 2 hop additions...maybe even boiled it a bit long cause there is some definite burnt caramel going on. Id think this was an older bottle...buuut for one thing there is no freshness date, for another its Mendocino. Glad this was just a single, cause this is one of the worst Pale Ales I have had in quite some time. Not a drain pour, but certainly well below average for the style.

twiggamortis420, Apr 03, 2012
Photo of jdhilt
2.38/5  rDev -30%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Pours with a two-fingered head and leaving a ton of lace. Light cloudy amber color. Hoppy nose, starts and finishes hoppy and bitter - you were expecting something else with a pale?? Malt may be there but it is hidden along with any alcohol overtones. Good carbonation.

jdhilt, Dec 22, 2003
Photo of Onslow
2.38/5  rDev -30%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Pours with a decent American Pale head, lacing is average ... Not as full as most APA's ... lacks any craft beer characteristics, feels like a mass market APA ... "stiff upper lip ole girl" ... needs work for sure! ..this is what happens when you hit the bottom of the barrel at your local..

Onslow, Feb 14, 2008
Photo of pbrian
2.4/5  rDev -29.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I don't really care for the aftertaste on this beer. Rather hoppy in an unbalanced kind of way.

pbrian, Oct 08, 2001
Photo of tigg924
2.42/5  rDev -28.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Appearance: 1/3 inch head, gold in color, clear, high carbonation

Smell: bready caramel malt with a touch of hops

Taste: honey, caramel malt, strong citrus hops, and some chemical taste

Mouthfeel: sweet start, super bitter middle and a sweeter end, light bodied, and moderate carbonation

Drinkability: A below average pale ale that is not as balanced as I would have liked. The super bitter and chemical tasting middle kills the beer for me. One is enough.

tigg924, Mar 29, 2010
Photo of Rabid_Llama
2.48/5  rDev -27.1%

Rabid_Llama, Oct 06, 2014
Photo of womencantsail
2.5/5  rDev -26.5%
look: 4 | smell: 1 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

A: The beer pours a fairly clear, pale yellow color with a finger or so of white head.

S: Just an awful aroma to this beer. Like a urinal or a gas station bathroom. Some definite rotten vegetable notes in there, too. Some bread and malt notes, but not much in the way of hops.

T: For as horrendous as the aroma was, the flavor is surprisingly unoffensive. Pale malt with a light floral hop note, some lemon zest, and a light to moderate bitterness. It has a hint of corn to it, though.

M: Light to medium in body with a medium level of carbonation.

O: The flavor was not great and the nose was atrocious. No thanks.

womencantsail, Jun 06, 2011
Photo of sonorb7
2.5/5  rDev -26.5%

sonorb7, Jul 28, 2012
Photo of ToddThompson
2.5/5  rDev -26.5%

ToddThompson, Oct 04, 2013
Photo of mwar
2.5/5  rDev -26.5%

mwar, Nov 27, 2012
Photo of thekevlarkid
2.5/5  rDev -26.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Out of the bottle this beer was a cloudy gold color with lots of visible rising carbonation. The head was an off-white, one-finger cap that retained excellently and left broken bands of thin lacing. The aroma was light, floral hops, citrus hops, pale malt and general appealing sweetness. The flavors were notably odd. The first note I got was pale malt that was then tempered by a bitter hoppiness. The bitterness was sharp and crude however, not citric and poignant as one would hope from an APA. Notes of soil and roots. Just too bitter for the malt to balance and a weird version of the style. The mouthfeel was average, the body medium and the carbonation average. Skip it.

thekevlarkid, Dec 27, 2008
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Blue Heron Pale Ale from Mendocino Brewing Company
78 out of 100 based on 470 ratings.