1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Pauwel Kwak - Brouwerij Bosteels

Not Rated.
Pauwel KwakPauwel Kwak

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
85
very good

1,336 Ratings
THE BROS
71
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,336
Reviews: 639
rAvg: 3.77
pDev: 13.79%
Wants: 32
Gots: 117 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij Bosteels visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Belgian Strong Pale Ale |  8.40% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 06-30-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Pauwel Kwak Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,336 | Reviews: 639 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of elricorico
3.48/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A medium ruddy brown with a nice three finger ivory head. A bit of floaties to this one, but it isn't a new bottle, so I'm not surprised.

The smell is a bit boozy and a bit yeasty. Faintly citric as well. Overall the aroma is a bit on the light end for the style.

Toasted bread in the malt with a bit of toffee on top. Fruity apple and melon mix in there too. A bit alcoholic, somewhat dry and spicy in the finish.

Medium bodied with plenty of carbonation. The floaties are notable when drinking though, and that is a substantial turn off.

Something about this beer doesn't make me want to revisit it often. I can't say I dislike it, but I also can't say it is one of my favourites.

elricorico, Sep 16, 2006
Photo of crwills
3.43/5  rDev -9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Sampled as part of a large tasting with biegaman, grub, and northyorksammy. I think this may have been an old bottle, even though I just bought it a couple of weeks ago, as the whole group rated it much lower than most of the earlier reviewers. Then again, it was late in the tasting..

Anyway, poured a typical Belgian pale ale colour -- cloudy gold, bordering on orange or amber. Aroma is unpleasantly boozy, with some vegetable notes that probably shouldn't be there. There's an almost fishy aroma to this beer that carries over into the flavour. Carbonation is overly aggressive.

Taste isn't too bad, primarily malty and fruity, with pears, apples, peaches, and other mild fruits dominating. Mouthfeel is ruined by the carbonation. Aftertaste is fine. The beer is drinkable, just not as good as you'd expect with the reputation and the price.

ON ANOTHER NOTE: I just reviewed my 200th beer today. I had been planning to pick a really good beer to celebrate my 200th review, and also my 1 year anniversary on BA. However, I wasn't paying attention and my 200th review ended up being... Rolling Rock, of all things! I got a good laugh out of that. Lowest ranked beer I've ever reviewed, and I accidentally do it for my 200th. Oh well. #300, here I come!

crwills, Sep 15, 2006
Photo of grub
2.88/5  rDev -23.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

tasting party sept 11/06 with northyorksammy, crwills, biegaman and me (grub). everyone threw in a few bottles and we had an interesting mix of beer and mead. not sure of exactly who contributed what, so i'll just thank everyone.

pours a nice amber colour with a big off-white head. lots of lace.

aroma is not what i expected. smell is dominated by corn and DMS. some alcohol noticeable.

taste is ok. a bit of caramel and noticeable alcohol content. DMS is present here too.

mouthfeel is ok. the body is ok, but i think the carbonation is a bit too high, even for the style.

drinkability on this one isn't great. i expected more of this and was somewhat disappointed with it. might have to try this one again sometime as my experience seems to be worse than most other reviewers report.

grub, Sep 12, 2006
Photo of mcallister
4.45/5  rDev +18%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Served in a very cool rounded bottom tapered flute type Kwak glass that was placed in a wooden kwak holder for stabiliztion. You actually use the holder to lift and drink.

A very clear amber with hues of gold throughout. Off white head of medium density rests atop with good retention. Minute lace resides.

Lovely fruity, flowery esters. A roasted caramel malt aroma also. Chamomile, honey, peach and apricot are some of the smells as long as a guest appearance of sweet hops.

Wow!! What a smack of sweet malt and honey suckle in the front palate. Dominated by a flowery floral mid palate with a slight hop bitterness finish. The same flavors as were in the nose with a little more malt and less fruit.

Mouthfeel is smooth and simple. Somewhat creamy and very drinkable.

mcallister, Sep 08, 2006
Photo of allergictomacros
3.55/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A - Clear, filtered coppery red with a medium sized head. Medium lacing.

S - Spicy, yeasty, fruity aromas. High levels of alcohol in the nose and a touch of banana as well. A bit of soft lemon also shows up a little later.

T - Taste is slightly tart up front, with a subdued fruitiness. Light toasted grain comes through in the middle of the sip, followed by a dry-ish, mildly bitter finish.

M - Carbonation is a little high. Mouthfeel is medium bodied with a spritzy touch.

D - Not bad at all. Well balanced but light-ish in flavour. Not nearly as boozy as I expected.

allergictomacros, Sep 03, 2006
Photo of plaztikjezuz
4/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

tasted at the classic wines annual beer tasting earlier this year, i am reviewing this from my notes.
was served a amber colored sample with a good head.
the aroma was citrus, carmel, and malt.
the flavor was malty, soft, citrus, candy sugar.
i really enjoyed this brew.

plaztikjezuz, Aug 30, 2006
Photo of mmcave
3.98/5  rDev +5.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a nice deep butter scotch amber, not too effervescence, decent enough head that dissipates at a medium pace. The sent is not dissimilar to that of porter or even a Belgium strong dark ale. The alcohol sent is at minimum. There are more earthy scents than fruity, the toasted malt is present, but not over powering. The first taste is rich, but not thick, with notes of dark chocolate, coffee, raisins and a tiny hint of licorice. These are present, but not over powering in the least, they are more a subtle coloration of the flavor than driving characteristics. Over all I would say this is an decently well balanced beer, not too exciting, but drinkable and of course as most strong ales their strength will sneak up on you.

mmcave, Aug 25, 2006
Photo of janubio
4/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bottle, served in the Kwak glass. Pours a nice but not very creamy head, that doesn't last much, Aroma: raisins, tropical fruits, spices, caramel. Very sweet flavor, maybe too much because it masks the depth of the beer. Mouth, licorice, tropical fruits, some hot spice that I can't indentify, caramel.

janubio, Aug 20, 2006
Photo of geographie
3.13/5  rDev -17%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured into tulip glass from a 330ml bottle at the suggested serving temp (~6 degrees C)

Head retention is outstanding, ~1 minute before i could start seeing the colour of the beer from above. Head is light and airy, signs of lacing. Carbonation seems moderate to weak. Colour is a clear, light brown.

Aroma is rich and malty. Slight smell of lightly burnt toast with jam. Curious.

Taste is quite well balanced - a light dry sweetness, followed by a warming alchohol sensation on the tongue, and then the bitter, which is a fairly plain bitter taste. Nothing floral or controversial about these hops. The alcohol sensation follows through the nose during the sip and stretches just to the belly...would be nicer if it was cooler out. I wish the taste matched the smell.

The carbonation is a bit lacking in the mouthfeel. The beer remains relatively flat after a good swish in the mouth.

Being new to Belgium ales, i am no connoisseur, however, this beer did not leave me wanting a second. The flavours were all there, although not well defined, texture is so-so, and the alcohol sensation was a bit extreme for this beer.

geographie, Aug 19, 2006
Photo of medic25
4.3/5  rDev +14.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Served in the traditional Kwak glass. Color is a reddish-amber, with a big white head that leaves a persistent lace. Sweet, malty aroma. Taste is outstanding; acomplex blend of peppery and sweet, candy sugar flavor, with a faint hoppy aftertaste. Incredibly drinkable; with the alcohol well masked. This has become one of my new favorites, rivaling La Fin du Monde.

medic25, Aug 13, 2006
Photo of atigerlife
3.58/5  rDev -5%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 330ml bottle into a Kwak glass [yeah, the one with the wooden holder].

Pours a light amber w/reddish highlights. Huge light brown head with decent lasting power. Good lacing. Lots of carbonation can be seen rising. The most curious thing is the amount of yeast floating around in the bottle--a LOT of this stuff. The yeast is rather distracting.

Aroma is nice with sweetness dominating. Some fruit in the background.

Taste is rather light with some sweetness throughout, slightly winey and malts being dominant.

Mouthfeel is rather placid considering the carbonation that is rising. Some tingly cleansing ability. Rather light body.

Overall, this is drinkable but not too exciting. Suprisingly placid considering the ABV. Maybe a decent "beginner" Belgian beer but not something I will be seeking.

atigerlife, Aug 07, 2006
Photo of kdmorse
4/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

750 mL bottle used as an apertif at a dinner party with some friends. Enjoyed by all.

Beautiful glowing orange with a solid whitish head and lots of yeast floating. Sweet and sourish odor. Good, sweet malt body. Creamy and slightly syrupy. Easy and enjoyable to drink.

Not my favorite Belgian Pale, but a very solid offering. Easy and tasty to drink.

kdmorse, Jul 28, 2006
Photo of Viggo
4.3/5  rDev +14.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

750 ml bottle, approximately 3 years old. Interesting to see how this one ages.

Pours a hazy copper orange, some red, lots of chunks, off white head forms, settles down after a while, some lace sticking to the glass. Smell is sweet, apples/pears, caramel, some yeast. Taste is reallly nice, toffee is insane, citrus, orange peel and spice through the middle, more caramel and chocolate in the finish. Mouthfeel is medium bodied with medium to high carbonation. Nice and smooth, this definately is nice after aging.

Viggo, Jul 24, 2006
Photo of Conrad
2.9/5  rDev -23.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I tried this one before reading the other reviews so as not to influence my opinion. I was surprised to find I do not rate it as highly as most of the others. But that's the idea, isn't it?
Here goes:
A: Nice deep cleer copper/amber. But no head, and little lacing. I like my beers, especially Belgians with at least some head.
S: Sour alcohol and malt upfront. Then some sharp fruit odours, like over-ripe plums. The first hit of aroma was not all that pleasant.
T: Nice big roasted, but not burnt malt. The alcohol was warming, and quite pleasing. Some good balance between the sweet malt and the hops bitterness.
M: Sour hits on the finish that did not last long. Medium body, a bit slick or oily.
D: It's okay. That's all. I would have another if you are buying.

Conrad, Jul 24, 2006
Photo of johnniemarg
4.05/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

1pt 9.4 fl oz bottle poured into a tulip.

Beautiful crystal clear amber color with a two finger white head. The head dissipates fairly quickly. Tornado of tiny bubbles rising in the middle of the glass. There is very little lacing left on the glass.

Smell is primarily fruity plum and candy sugar that smells of cotton candy. There is also an alcohol astringent smell. No noticable hop aroma to my nose.

The flavor is very closely in line with the smell. The fruity plum-flavored malt is promptly followed by the cotton candy and the finish is all warm alcohol.

This is on the light side of medium-bodied. It has a slick, oily texture, a perfect amount of carbonation and is warming in the mouth from the alcohol content.

I'm surprised I haven't had this before. Some Belgians turn me off. This one, while not hugely complex by any means, is a supremely drinkable and pleasant brew. This will be a go-to-beer for me from now on. I love this stuff.

johnniemarg, Jul 24, 2006
Photo of supercolter
3.45/5  rDev -8.5%
look: 3 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

The appearance is average. The high points are the caramelly reddish orange color a bit of lacing. The low points are the large amount of sediment and minimal head retention.
Smell is glorious. Very caramelly, a bit of dried fruit, and some dry malt nose.
Taste is a bit above average. It tastes like caramel and some berry fruit to start and finishes with a bit of alcohol taste.
Mouthfeel is good. Some carbonation and good feel on the tounge other than the sediment.
Drinkability is not bad for the style.

supercolter, Jul 05, 2006
Photo of karst
4.03/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured in 0.4 L rastal New Belgium sniffer @ 56°F ( not like the distinctive hourglass round bottom glass of Pauwel Kwak - shown in Jackson's " Great Beer Guide" - modeled after the stirrup cup served to coach drivers.

Brewed with three types of malt and sweetened with candi sugar. The yeast has formed particles that are suspended by beading. A fine lace and dense head make this rich clear copper colored Belgian (with a healthy bunch of yeast floaties) makes this a very showy brew. Has a rich malt body which hides the 8% abv with its sweet caramel malts. Faint 4-VG adds a little finish to the sweet malty Ale. Amazingly little alcohol in aroma, taste or finish although it aides in the drying. Pepper, clove and other esters are well restrained let the malts dominate.

Like no other Belgian Strong Ale.

karst, Jul 02, 2006
Photo of jamie2dope
3.98/5  rDev +5.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Kwak Kwak. Pours a nice crimson color, with a literal blizzard of sediment swirling from top to bottom. My only complaint with its appearance is its head retention which, looks uneven and practically non-existent. Smell was an improvement with overly ripe dark fruit, strong alcoohol, candy sugar and maple syrup.In the taste department was honey, strawberry, more syrup. Not too hoppy in the end, almost seems to be a bit one dimensional with the thickness dominating. One or two would not be a problem. This beer is interesting, but also seems a bit over-done and strong for the sake of being strong. Still worth a try

jamie2dope, Jun 19, 2006
Photo of SkeeterHawk
4.03/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Appearance: Pours an initially cloudy burnt orange color with a 1/4" head of tan bubbles. There are quite a few bubbles rising, but the head doesn’t maintain all that well and is a small ring within a minute or so.

Aroma: Sweet caramel malts along with a hint of roast are the most noticeable from the cold beer. As you get deeper into the aroma, there is a subtle hint of floral that I am not sure is coming from hops or residual sweetness from fermentation. It is still rather pleasant.

Taste: Sweet and rich malt driven flavor. The beer starts out with a bit of syrupy sweetness and then the carbonation makes an impressive showing during the swish. After the carbonation starts to let up, you get a brief blast of floral to lead you into a long dry finish with some sweetness and a tad of warming to show up on the back of the throat.

Opinion: This is a pretty tasty beer. It is clean and has a good flavor profile the entire time. I can't really speak of anything that this beer lacks or anything that it excels in. It is a pretty neutral Belgian Ale and would probably be a good one for someone to try that was new to the Belgian beer scene. It is a good beer, but I will likely stick to the more exotic styles.

SkeeterHawk, Jun 18, 2006
Photo of Absumaster
3.18/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

This beer pours an dark-amber, brown colour with minimal lacing.

Smell was pretty good, grapes and raisins, with candy sugar and some caramel. Somewhere in the back some cork.

Taste was candy sugar and raisins with a slight burned touch. I could also taste some hard candy sweets. Bitterness was low. Bdoy was low to medium. All together, taste was a bit boring.
Once I tasted the above flavors, there were no other tastes to be explored. Not bad, but for sure a bit bland.

Absumaster, Jun 18, 2006
Photo of hunteraw
3.4/5  rDev -9.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I literally had to give up my left shoe to taste this beer. Sampled at Den Anker Belgian restaurant on the waterfront in Cape Town, the restaurant serves these in a Kwak mini-yard glass on a wooden stand. Because the glasses cost so much, they require you to forfeit your left shoe until you finish, which is hoisted above the bar in a basket. Makes for a good story, but not a real good air freshener.

Appearance: Pours a transparent red-orange, with a big head that looks like egg whites that have been beaten until they form stiff peaks - how is it so dense? Nice lacing as you get down the glass. A beautiful beer.

Smell: A touch of spicy fresh hops aroma here, which picqued my interest, but some candi sweetness too that I'm not a fan of.

Taste: sweet, as expected, but with a nice toastiness as well. Alcohol is definitely noticeable.

Mouthfeel is syruppy, and gets old quick. The label indicates otherwise, but it's hard to believe there's not some sugar in here. Drinkability suffers from being overly sweet. Unfortunately, the appearance was the best part of this one, and I think it may have set my expectations too high.

hunteraw, Jun 13, 2006
Photo of DaPeculierDane
3.48/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Transparent reddish-orange. Extremely assertive carbonation. Large tan head. Not long lasting but easily reinvigorated.

N: Alcohol, spices, caramel, toffee, pinch of the tropics.

T: Fruity malts with plenty of booze and sugar cane. Caramel, toffee, and rum. Specifically rum flavored with the addition of fermented tropical fruits.

MF: Thick and malty. Pleasant but with a slight alcohol burn.

D: Somewhat lacking in smoothness and the ABV isn’t well covered limiting drinkability. Also lacking in complexity.

DaPeculierDane, Jun 09, 2006
Photo of wl0307
3.8/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Coming in a 750ml champange bottle, corked and caged. BB 14/12/2007, served lightly-chilled in a large Burgundy bulb wine glass.

A: pours a clear and bright chestnut brown or copperish hue; semi-thick, beige-hued beer head dissipates very slowly, leaving moderate layers of lacing along the way; the gentle carbonation is much milder than most Belgian ales. Looking elegant~~
S: sweet, caramely Munich malts, slightly syrupy with a spicy hint like ginger on top of a profound sweet fruit-preserve: cherries, orange, coconuts, sticky plums, and slightly banana-ish yeasty at the back. Not terribly complex, but quite pleasant all the same.
T: semi-thick textured, dark candy-sugary malts pour onto the palate, followed by slightly spicy yet rather cloying flavour of ginger-syrup + orange-cordial + over-ripened melon, before the palate hits a semi-dryish and lively aftertaste mixing (Saaz?) hops and more residual caramely maltiness... A surprisingly dryish-sweet aftertaste lingers at the back of the palate, resulting in a (next-to-)healthy balance b/w bitterness and maltiness overall.
M&D: softly-carbonated and medium-bodied for its high alc. content, this beer is quite robust yet unbelie...vably easy to drink. Compared with my previous note of the same beer on tap, it seems the bottled version is indeed sweeter, but in an ideal glassware--a bulb wine glass, rather than the stupid (sorry!) "chemical experiment" like glass-tube--the beer is truly nice and more pleasant.

wl0307, Jun 01, 2006
Photo of nickss
4.2/5  rDev +11.4%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Poured into appropriate glassware at Henri Belga Sororzo in Budapest.
Hint of orange and ruby permeate this brew. Light apparent carbonation with a 2" tan head.

The aroma is filled with dark fruit and berries with some significant spice, which certainly adds a bit of a kick.

Big, rich flavours of caramel with a bit of chocolate. Alcohol shines through as the brew warms.

Nice, subtle carbonation. With it was a bit thicker, but nicely done.

Very drinkable brew. Finished it entirely too quicky.

nickss, May 27, 2006
Photo of Orrshow
3.1/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Appearance – Pours deep brownish amber with a ton of off white frothy head which leaves lots of lacing. There are some floaties in there as well.

Smell – I get some apple, sugar, caramel, pepper spice, and yeast. It smells somewhat enticing.

Taste – The taste is a little boring. Similar aspects as the smell but weaker and less complex. There is a bit of caramel with a slight alcohol bite. A slight tartness comes about after with an extremely dry feeling. There is not a lot of spiciness here, but just enough to notice. Disappointing.

Mouthfeel – The carbonation is pretty coarse. Beer is slightly thin as well. Plus there is a very dry feeling is not very pleasurable.

Drinkability – Not bad. The mouthfeel didn’t make me want to drink more of it. The taste was boring.

I don’t plan to buy this beer again. It wasn’t good for enjoying and I would never want to session it. Quite average.

Orrshow, May 21, 2006
Pauwel Kwak from Brouwerij Bosteels
85 out of 100 based on 1,336 ratings.