1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Bernard Svetly Lezak - Bernard Family Brewery

Not Rated.
Bernard Svetly LezakBernard Svetly Lezak

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
81
good

39 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 39
Reviews: 16
rAvg: 3.52
pDev: 13.35%
Wants: 0
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Bernard Family Brewery visit their website
Czech Republic

Style | ABV
Czech Pilsener |  4.70% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Globetrotter on 08-13-2004)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 39 | Reviews: 16 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Peter_L
4.5/5  rDev +27.8%

Peter_L, Jan 09, 2014
Photo of Levita358
4.5/5  rDev +27.8%

Levita358, Feb 02, 2012
Photo of Globetrotter
4.43/5  rDev +25.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

After a week in Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic, this takes first prize for best beer sampled. The bottle is standard Czech brown half-liter with a tapered neck. The label is blue, white and gold, with a coat of arms and a few awards. Ingredients conform to the purity law. Best before 8/21/04, I opened it on 8/7/04. This family brewery now belongs to Staropramen, according to several locals I spoke to.

Pours an orange-tinged clear gold under a one finger white head with minimal body but good retention. A few spots of lace grace the side of the glass. Lots of Czech hops great the nose, with a touch of metal amongst the flowers and a bit of malt for balance. The mouth is very prickly and fairly thick. The opening features sweet malt graininess, accompanied by an ever present crisp hoppy bitterness, which is smooth rather than biting, but the bitterness is ubiquitous, lingering long after the finish. Definitely a good quaff.

Globetrotter, Aug 13, 2004
Photo of kurgan3
4.25/5  rDev +20.7%

kurgan3, Aug 23, 2012
Photo of abcdefghijkyle
4.25/5  rDev +20.7%

abcdefghijkyle, Mar 09, 2014
Photo of Marius
4/5  rDev +13.6%

Marius, Sep 05, 2014
Photo of angusdegraosta
4/5  rDev +13.6%

angusdegraosta, Jan 22, 2012
Photo of assurbanipaul
4/5  rDev +13.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Pours a light amber with a medium head. Aroma is mild and toasty with a light touch of sour wheat mash.

Taste is a lightly toasted pale malt with a nice gentle Saaz bite. Malty sweet, a little earthy with just a hint of butter, very smooth. Not very complex but very clean and sharp. Finish is clean and bitter.

Mouthfeel is nice and light, drinkability is through the roof. I was expecting a pilsner but this is closer to a rich hoppy Vienna lager style that finishes a little Oktoberfesty. I could learn to love this.

Best before date of "09:26-T04." Just caught it in time.

assurbanipaul, Sep 21, 2006
Photo of Slatetank
3.95/5  rDev +12.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

I picked up a bottle of this at Thirsty's in York, PA. Poured cold into a lager mug.
A - Light amber lager the shade of apple cider, maybe a tad lighter, with a thin whit 1/4 inch of head.

S - Yeasty w/ a trademark Czech aroma - light skunkiness gentle hop odor.

M - An average extra fizzy effervescence at first w/ a slightly bitter hop tinge and clean finish w/ a malty tinge.

T - A fresh malt fullness with an herbal sweet hop that has a grassy ting that makes the malt seem lightly dry, yet smooth w/ a gentle creamy aspect. Very mild yet full tasting w/ similarities to a Helles as others mentioned. Nice hop flavor w/ a noble hop character and greal malt.

D - A very tasty lager w/ character that most aren't capable of reproducing. Malty w/ an herbal hoppiness. Very quaffable w/ session strength went well w/ my six cheese pizza

Slatetank, Nov 06, 2007
Photo of scruffwhor
3.93/5  rDev +11.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Thanks again to piwoski for the hook-up.

Poured from a green twelve ounce bottle.

Pours a pale yellow with very light to nonexistent bubbling and no head and very, very little foam. The aroma was faint dry malt and drywall. Not overpowering, just sort of here and there beneath the surface. The taste is a refreshingly thirst quenching dry pale and pilsner malt with some very faint herbal hops. Very easy to drink beer.

scruffwhor, May 30, 2008
Photo of TwiggyCZ
3.75/5  rDev +6.5%

TwiggyCZ, Apr 28, 2014
Photo of twiggamortis420
3.6/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle without a freshness date. Pours a mostly clear, dark gold color with a thin, bubbly white head. Retention is poor and does not give much of a chance for lacing.

Nose is pleasantly grainy with a light touch of floral hops. Not much though, I could certainly use some more cones here.

Taste is not bad, lacks some saaz hop flavoring, but has a nice, leafy bitterness on the finish that grabs on well. Grains are honeyed with a little bit of toast, which explains the darker color of this pilsner. A little undercarbonated and not as crisp as I would like, but on the other hand it has a full body and plenty of flavor. This is a pretty tasty, albeit not very classical, take on the style. Worth a purchase if you know you are getting it fresh.

twiggamortis420, Sep 06, 2010
Photo of biegaman
3.58/5  rDev +1.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Their website has this listed as a "unique, half dark lager". Even after a 500ml bottle I wasn't sure exactly what to categorize this under. All the same it was good. Thanks to my parents for returning this one to me from Prague.

Pours... quite dark. A roasted amber colour. The nose has diminished significantly. Some hops, but mostly a caramel malt comes through. Flavour offers some lightly roasted caramel malt. Good presence. Some wheat in there maybe? This is very much like some of the dunkels I had in Poland. Carbonation is quite high despite a slightly dated bottle. A little grainyness in the texture. Aftertaste is light, with little stickyness. Pretty full bodied for a lager.

As I realized first hand from my experiences in Poland and Germany, beers really do - somehow - loose their lustre when crossing the pond. To have a simple Munich Helles fresh in Munich, or even a Zywiec off tap in Krakow are some of the best beers I've ever had. In that place and time they rate as high as any aged Belgian quad or Russian Imperial bursting with coffee. This, I would imagine is an excellent beer. Sadly, from my sample bottle is was nothing more than a "could be..."

biegaman, Nov 06, 2006
Photo of KristijanG
3.5/5  rDev -0.6%

KristijanG, Aug 21, 2014
Photo of GregaR
3.5/5  rDev -0.6%

GregaR, Jul 23, 2014
Photo of Sspeer1
3.5/5  rDev -0.6%

Sspeer1, Friday at 03:55 PM
Photo of mltobin
3.5/5  rDev -0.6%

mltobin, Oct 12, 2013
Photo of cwc
3.5/5  rDev -0.6%

cwc, Sep 16, 2013
Photo of SoPeL
3.5/5  rDev -0.6%

SoPeL, Aug 12, 2013
Photo of dcmchew
3.5/5  rDev -0.6%

dcmchew, Oct 31, 2013
Photo of welinaspalmeras
3.5/5  rDev -0.6%

welinaspalmeras, Jul 24, 2012
Photo of BeerZack
3.45/5  rDev -2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Firstly, I was expecting a pilsner when I bought this half liter swing-top, mostly because it says Original Czech Lager... but this reminds me of a Munich Helles or something with more full malt characteristics.

Pours a hazy golden honey-like color with soap-water head. Smells like sweet malt, a little caramely.

Sweet malty taste with some sourness and plenty of spicy hop bitterness on the finish

Feels spicy and sharp on the tongue but fine carbonation. Good drinkability overall, but not as good as a Pilsner in my opinion due to the heavier malt character which slows me down... err, makes me want to slow down faster?

BeerZack, Apr 16, 2007
Photo of SkeeterHawk
3.45/5  rDev -2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I just saw that this was available here in the Houston area, so I picked a bottle up. I am guessing that this is the same beer as the name on the review as these two beers were the only ones with the same alcohol percent. Often the TABC makes beers change their names before they will allow them to import so I am guessing that this is one of those times.

Appearance: 1/2 liter swing-top with lots of embossing on the bottle. Pours a very clear slightly orangish golden color with a 1/4" head of very active white foam at first. There were quite a few bubbles rising at first to maintain, but all of the action pretty much came to a halt in about 30 seconds. Now it sits pretty still with a very thin ring and only a few bubbles rising.

Aroma: The beer initially smelled really malty with a clean but noticeable spicy & floral hop presence. The cold beer doesn't yield much more than a few toasty notes as you get deep into the aroma. There seems to be a slight metallic note here.

Taste: The flavor has much more assertive hopping than I suspected from the aroma. The hops somehow manage to take charge of the show after only a few seconds of malt on the palate. The hops taste much more spicy than the aroma suggested and lead into a somewhat dry bitter finish to linger. The carbonation seems a lot more of a part in the flavor as the appearance will tell you. There is quite a bit of gas here to expel after drinking. Ahhh...

Opinion: Well, this is an OK beer. It isn't my favorite in that the hops are so assertive the entire time in the flavor. I expect a bit more of a balance to the malt than this beer has. It is still a good tasting and clean beer, but it is more geared to the hophead, which I am not. I'd drink it again, but I wouldn't seek it out.

SkeeterHawk, Aug 13, 2006
Photo of tempest
3.33/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Picked up a .5L swingtop from EuroMarket in Astoria. It poured a tall white head that left a little lacing and had a sweet bready aroma with a hint of cider. The malts are bland in the flavor, but there is a very pleasant, smooth spicy hop bitterness that quickly takes over and drowns out the sugary malt. It's drinkable, but I'd like a more barley-like taste before those lovely hops roll in. Maybe the bottle's old or been abused, but there's no dating or dust of the bottle, so I'll assume the best. Not a bad beer, but I'd certainly prefer a Pilsner Urquell.

tempest, May 22, 2013
Photo of Sigmund
3.3/5  rDev -6.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

500 ml green bottle, as Bernard Lager, now available in Norway at REMA 1000 stores. ABV is 4.5%. Golden colour, moderate white head of poor retention . Fairly nice aroma of Zatec (Saaz) hops, notes of grass, hints of honey. The flavour is fairly malty for a pilsener, and the hops are slightly better than average. Moderately bitter aftertaste.

Sigmund, Nov 22, 2008
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Bernard Svetly Lezak from Bernard Family Brewery
81 out of 100 based on 39 ratings.