1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Hook & Ladder Golden Ale - Hook & Ladder Brewing Company (No. 2)

Not Rated.
Hook & Ladder Golden AleHook & Ladder Golden Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
73
okay

151 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 151
Reviews: 119
rAvg: 3.14
pDev: 16.24%
Wants: 2
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Hook & Ladder Brewing Company (No. 2) visit their website
Maryland, United States

Style | ABV
American Blonde Ale |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: cichief on 04-28-2007)
View: Beers (7) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 151 | Reviews: 119 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of braddeshong
braddeshong

Maryland

2.98/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Had a pint on draught at at the Embassy Suites in Alexandria, VA.

Appearance - Light yellow color small CO2 bubbles slowly rise to the top creating a white, quarter to half inch head.

Smell - Not much to speak of (though I don't think smell is really my strong suit)

Taste - A light, crisp brew with lots of carbonation. The aftertaste had a slightly smokey taste that faded quickly.

Mouthfeel - Hook and ladder has a decent mouthfeel...nothing to write home about. The carbonation was a bit much for me, but once things settled down you're left with a crisp clean beer.

Drinkability - Overall, the beer was decent, and I could probably drink another if there's wasn't much else available. I didn't catcht he ABV of this one, but I don't think it was much maybe 4-5%.

Serving type: on-tap

05-14-2007 03:12:44 | More by braddeshong
Photo of williamherbert
williamherbert

New York

2.98/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Darker yellow color. Thin, watery head. Icy lace sticks to the glass like cold weather on a window.

The smell is a lighter, golden ale/lager aroma. It's like a lighter, weaker pub ale smell. Nothing unpleasant, just a bit wimpy.

The taste is an English light ale, along the lines of a Bass. Has a decent sweetish malt that is bready but with a dollop of molasses. It leaves a bit of an aftertaste.

The feel is watery and leaves a minor bitter film. Underwhelming on the palate; a light lagery film at the end. All told, it's an okay beer. Not overwhelmingly awesome, but drinkable I suppose.

Serving type: bottle

07-20-2008 20:01:47 | More by williamherbert
Photo of jwhancher
jwhancher

Pennsylvania

2.98/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Pours a clear golden color with very good carbonation and decent head.

S: Pretty clean smelling. Reminds me of a pilsner or lager.

T: Clean tasting, but a bit too bland. I'm wondering if they miscategorized the style of beer they made. This easily tastes like a pilsner to me.

M: Very light & refreshing. Would make a great beer in the summertime. I still wish there was more to it.

D: It is very drinkable, but again it's a bit too bland for me. I could see myself drinking lots of these; however, if I didn't know what brand I was drinking I could likely easily think this was a mass produced beer. For a craft brew, I wish it defined itself some more.

Serving type: bottle

01-06-2010 23:53:04 | More by jwhancher
Photo of scruffwhor
scruffwhor

Illinois

2.98/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Picked up a six pack from Paradise bar on my vacation to Galena,IL. First time I've ever seen this beer.

Pours a clear pale amberish yellow. Not a bad head after the pour that lesens to a ring of foam. The aroma gives off hints of banana and sme soft, fuity malts, and some unsavory adjuncts. I don' like saying this, but this beer tastes better when its cold. Don't let this beer warm up. The taste starts with some wheat banana read and some funky hops and corn husks. Very easy tasting and smooth with some ccheap tasting bitterness, but still pretty refreshing.

Serving type: bottle

08-23-2008 05:50:26 | More by scruffwhor
Photo of tatoodkelt
tatoodkelt

Maryland

2.95/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Consumed 11/4/2009- from notes.

A- A bold, gol color topped with a tight one finger white head. Pretty active carbination, some lacing.

S- A faint grassy/citrus aroma was about all I picked up.

T- Pretty much the same as the smell with the addition of a light biscuity note as well as a little almost metallic tinge at the end.

M- Light to medium, pretty smooth despite the carbination.

D- Pretty easy to drink as a BMC alternative, but not much else going on. Wont be picking this one up again. Pretty middle of the road to me.

Serving type: bottle

11-05-2009 19:47:07 | More by tatoodkelt
Photo of krisandajt
krisandajt

Pennsylvania

2.95/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Saw this beer sitting all by its lonesome in a beer cooler at my local watering hole...thought I would give it a try.

Appearance: Nice golden color, slight head, moderate lacing.

Smell: Nothing really stood out. Had some malty sweetness to it.

Taste: Again, nothing really stood out. Very average, not offensive at all. Did have a slight sweetness to it from the malt, good clean finish.

Mouthfeel: Smooth, mild carbonation. Par for an ale I suppose.

Drinkability: Not a bad brew. Average seems to be the best way to describe it. I had been drinking a nice porter for most of the night, so this ale was a good change of pace. That being said, I probably won't be going out to buy a case any time soon.

Serving type: bottle

12-06-2008 16:44:29 | More by krisandajt
Photo of Gavage
Gavage

New Jersey

2.93/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Had on tap at McCormick & Schmick's in Baltimore.

Appearance: only a thin surface foam for a head. Pale yellow in color with a load of fast rising carbonation bubbles. No lacing developed during the session.

Smell: little to no aroma, as only some very faint grain tones were detectable as your nose hits the surface of the beer.

Taste: mild graininess here with some very soft hop bitterness. Some pear and golden apple sweetenss lingers softly in the background. Very mild flavor profile.

Mouthfeel: lightly crisp at the start and a bit smoother towards the finish. Light in body. Clean aftertaste.

Drinkability: figured I give this a try since the restaurant had it and I wanted something mild with my appetizer. The beer was so-so at best as I didn't finish my pint. Not worth a try unless there are only macros on tap.

Serving type: on-tap

10-04-2007 11:14:08 | More by Gavage
Photo of tgbljb
tgbljb

Pennsylvania

2.93/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured a crystal clear bright golden color with respectable white head. Very poor retention and some spidery lacing.

Smell is mild and virtually non-existent.

Taste is also very light. This is a mild fruity character, but little else.

Litmited taste retention. Very thin in the mouth.

Would probably qualify as an expensive spacer.

Serving type: bottle

04-06-2008 01:55:49 | More by tgbljb
Photo of Pleepleus
Pleepleus

New York

2.93/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

The fourth of four in my sampler pack. Poured from bottle to pint it had a clear golden color with a half inch of white fluffy head. Minimal sweet corn in the smell. Tastes ok. Nothing spectacular, has sweet flavor with some mild hops. Medium body with crisp, dry finish. Better by itself than blended as in the Ember Amber.

Serving type: bottle

02-07-2009 03:38:34 | More by Pleepleus
Photo of cjgator3
cjgator3

Florida

2.9/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

12oz bottle

A- Pours a golden yellow color with a thin white head that leaves a decent amount of lace.

S- The aroma is pale malt, wheat with some fruits and just a hint of hops.

T- The taste features some wheat malt and is a bit fruity with a very mild hop presence in the finish. Not overly complex by any means, but an easy drinker for sure.

M- The mouthfeel is light bodied with a good amount of carbonation.

D- This one is pretty damn drinkable. Not much flavor in this beer, but I could see myself easily consuming a few bottles in a sitting.

Serving type: bottle

11-10-2008 04:37:07 | More by cjgator3
Photo of beerthulhu
beerthulhu

New Jersey

2.9/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Poured a clear pumpkin orange with a 1 finger frothy egg shell white head that settled to a thin, whispy covering after the first 2 minutes. No visible lacing was observed while the visible carbontion was moderatly strong and fairly rapid.

S: fresh oranges with perhaps some dried pears. Honestly there really wasn't a lot of complexity or scent to this and came off rather mundane, light in strength and rather boring. Yawn.

T: The flavor was fresh sweet oranges, dried pears with a decent spicy hopping. Some lemon and orange citrus with some sweet ripe fruit skins were detected. The oranges tasted more artificial like those sugar coated orange candies you buy at the store which only cheapened the flavor for me a bit. Some fruitiness of honey dews with a touch of muskiness and a honey suckle flowery hopping. Overall was light , sweety and fruity.

M: a light viscosity with a slick buttery texture and a good deal of tingly carbonation. Leaves a sweet orange honey malting behind on the swallow. Ok but doesn't get any better the longer you hold it so there really is no incentive here to savor. Average at best.

D: While the flavor was average it certainly doesn't warrant a repeat and falls short per style when compared to other staples of this style. shoulder shrug here.

Serving type: bottle

03-18-2009 00:33:32 | More by beerthulhu
Photo of erosier
erosier

Connecticut

2.9/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a nice golden yellow color with a medium sized white head that laces pretty well. The aroma is more malty than hoppy and the taste is the same as well. It is a very malty taste. A bit rough on the mouthfeel as it could be smoother which would make it more drinkable as well.

Serving type: bottle

02-11-2008 03:59:38 | More by erosier
Photo of dmamiano
dmamiano

West Virginia

2.9/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Very light yellow om the eyes, with just a wisp of head and plenty of bubbles.
Faint aroma of wheat mixed with flour slightly malty with no hops detected.
Taste is thin on the mouth. Very slight malt noted, maybe picking out some caramel and graininess.
Not real bad, but not real good either.

Serving type: bottle

06-14-2009 18:27:34 | More by dmamiano
Photo of DIM
DIM

Pennsylvania

2.88/5  rDev -8.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

a: This was a slightly hazy yellow. It was served to me with a short lived, creamy white head.

s: Pretty bland, I found a little sweet wheat and not much else.

t: Things are a bit better here, with mild banana wheat flavors and faint peppery tingle.

m: Decently carbonated, but a bit thin.

d: This isn't one I'd try again, but it wasn't offensive at all.

Serving type: on-tap

07-29-2008 10:41:10 | More by DIM
Photo of matjack85
matjack85

Illinois

2.85/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I found this single 12oz brown bottle at the Binny's in Glen Ellyn, IL for $1.39. There was no freshness date.

The beer poured a hazy straw yellow color and made a 2 finger white head that lasted several minutes. It left lots of spotty lacing on the glass.

Not much to the smell - faint citrus is all I get.

"Lite" is the key word to describe this beer. It's lite on malty sweetness, lite on hop bitterness, and lite on lemony citrus. It has some flavor, just not enough of it.

This is a weak and watery beer. The carbonation level is decent but the drinkability is only so-so. There's just not enough flavor. I did discover that this will taste better as it warms up a bit, so don't drink it ice cold right out of the fridge.

Serving type: bottle

01-23-2010 01:13:25 | More by matjack85
Photo of Portertime
Portertime

Florida

2.85/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

I bought this soley for the charity factor. I had low expectations going into this one...So we have a golden ale brewed by a bunch of firemen. Maybe they should have made a smoke beer! Poured a bright, lucid gold color with a few bubbles dancing within, very Bud-like. Smell was faint of cereal grain and soap suds. Taste was muted hops and a corny aftertase that stung the tongue. I like the charity aspect but I will take a lot of choking down this beer to make it worth while.

Serving type: bottle

02-11-2010 06:20:32 | More by Portertime
Photo of becktone
becktone

Ohio

2.85/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

From notes 10-28-08

Eye: Golden coin in color and the beer is nice and clear. Head formation and retention are super poor. It looks worse than algae growning over a pool of shit water. After pouring the Lighter from Hook and Ladder I'd expect a much better eye appeal from a beer that has less adjunct and more flavor.

Nose: Huge buttery notes, over the top in my opinion. In addition to that there are fruity esters floating round in there. Coupled with a caramel malt sweetness the previous two aromas combine to create a cloyingly sweet aroma. Not quite what I'm looking for in any beer. The aroma is potent, however, its just too much.

Tongue: Big caramel notes, fruity esters, and buttery. If it weren't for the hops here to give some balance it'd be pretty much undrinkable. Hop flavor is just about non-existent. Pretty uncomplicated in flavor, and really nothing outstanding about it. Nothing that really makes me want to drink another one. Nothing that damns it and nothing that makes me want to celebrate it.

Mouthfeel and Drinkability: Medium-light body and fizzy. Finish is pretty dry. Average nothing more. Easy enough to drink, though I don't think that I'd want to drink more of it. Just nothing worth coming back to.

Serving type: bottle

11-09-2008 17:36:24 | More by becktone
Photo of budgood1
budgood1

Minnesota

2.85/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

pours out a slightly hazed golden colour with a minimal mead and subsequent minimal lace. sweet toffeeish aroma...a bit buttery showing off some grainy and sugary notes. upon tasting...more characteristics of the golden ale style present themselves...sweet maltiness, cloying at times; a strange spicy boozy note i wasn't expecting...and more buttery diacetyl that really isn't all that welcome. minimal hopping...just enough to notice...and no real bitterness. bigger body than most other golden ales with a slick and sugary mouthfeel. drinkability is ok...i'm drinking on a very warm day in spring after work and it's having a hard time hitting the spot.

overall i would say that since this is a delicate style, with subtle nuances being most important...this is a heavy handed stab at the style and misses the point. oh well...i didn't have to pay for this.

Serving type: bottle

05-14-2012 23:25:02 | More by budgood1
Photo of treehugger02010
treehugger02010

Pennsylvania

2.85/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I had this at a "tasting" at the faculty club I am a steward at.
Appearance: A pale gold colored body with a frothy white head having decent retention and leaving a fair bit of lace.
Smell: It certainly smells like a Wheat Ale, but I'm not 100% sure that's what is should be classified as. Obviously the wheat is what stands out, but there is a bit of spiciness (not much) that probably comes from the wheat.
Taste: Kind of watered down, but there is more of a hop spice present with a very week backing of wheat.
Mouthfeel: Way to smooth, I was looking for more of a crisp mouthfeel.
Drinkability: Ok, but certainly not "case worthy."
Don't drink and review.

Serving type: bottle

01-28-2008 20:14:13 | More by treehugger02010
Photo of katan
katan

Colorado

2.85/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle into a pint

A - Pours a clear, highly filtered, medium golden color. Head formation very strong, light white in color. Carbonation is obvious.

S - A light malt note combined with some yeast scents. No hopping.

T - Starts off rather dry, flat, wheaty and grainy. Very boring. Mid-stream develops some bitterness, but no hopping is detected. Finishes with a more sweet malty note.

M - Medium to light bodied. Carbonation sensations are quite evident. Leaves behind a light film on the tongue.

D - Very drinkable from an abv standpoint, and it isn't very filling which runs against its carbonation profile. If only the flavors were worth sessioning.

Not bad - just - boring.

Serving type: bottle

08-14-2009 04:18:34 | More by katan
Photo of thekanna
thekanna

Maryland

2.83/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Had on-tap at Jaleo in Bethesda, MD

A: Thin, clear yellow with some active effervescence and a very small, white head.

S: Some aromatic citrus aromas, general clean malt smell.

T/M: Watery and actively carbonated malts with some honey sweetness, some faint citrus. Much more like a lager to me: thin and crisp.

D: I've tried some other blonde ales before, but this doesn't taste much like them. This is much more like a lager for me (especially since I followed it up with Stella Artois and found it similar).

Serving type: bottle

01-30-2010 05:36:05 | More by thekanna
Photo of deltatauhobbit
deltatauhobbit

Maine

2.83/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a golden yellow with a bit of haze.

Smell is the least savory of the features. The combination of a slight hop smell and other aromas does not meld well that leaves the nose a bit off-putting.

Taste is decent and the beer is light to drink but has enough hops to be pleasing, little more than usual carbonation though.

Serving type: bottle

12-14-2007 23:06:48 | More by deltatauhobbit
Photo of bigbeers84
bigbeers84

Minnesota

2.75/5  rDev -12.4%

03-30-2013 08:20:59 | More by bigbeers84
Photo of grahamboudreaux
grahamboudreaux

Tennessee

2.75/5  rDev -12.4%

03-17-2013 14:17:13 | More by grahamboudreaux
Photo of bboven
bboven

Texas

2.73/5  rDev -13.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

This is what I'm supposed to crave if I want an ice-cold beer. After a 2.4 mile hike with 50 camp kids, we'll see...

Great deep golden color with a finger of head and rings of lacing all the way down the glass. Crystal clear.

Smells like a macro with a lot of diacytal. But then, it is a bit warmer than ice-cold.

Taste is the same; diacytal dominates a slightly malty body.

Highly carbonated and very very drying. Definitely encourages a bunch of sips.

I gave it a shot, and it's not bad if you can get past the diacytal and pretend it's flavor. I'd drink it over macros, but being as it's priced the same as all the great craft beers on the shelf, I think I'll pass on paying for this again.

Serving type: bottle

03-28-2008 01:15:04 | More by bboven
Hook & Ladder Golden Ale from Hook & Ladder Brewing Company (No. 2)
73 out of 100 based on 151 ratings.