1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Hook & Ladder Ember Amber - Hook & Ladder Brewing Company (No. 2)

Hook & Ladder Ember AmberHook & Ladder Ember Amber

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
77
okay

30 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 30
Reviews: 27
rAvg: 3.26
pDev: 14.72%


Brewed by:
Hook & Ladder Brewing Company (No. 2) visit their website
Maryland, United States

Style | ABV
Black & Tan |  5.20% ABV

Availability: Fall

Notes/Commercial Description:
Two parts Golden Ale and one part Backdraft Brown.

(Beer added by: CaptainIPA on 11-16-2008)
View: Beers (7) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 30 | Reviews: 27 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of budgood1
budgood1

Minnesota

2.35/5  rDev -27.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

pours out a crimson hue with a thin light tan head and minmal lace. light malty aroma...you can tell that this is a blend. cocoa and vanilla hints. the taste is rather lackluster with the golden ale character still showing off diacetyl and the brown only giving it more buttery and marshmellow notes. it has a cereal characteristics...maybe rice krispie bars made with cocoa or chocolate puffs, etc. whatever. medium bodied...smooth, clean and a bit crisp mouthfeel. the slickness i've been experiencing so far with these H&L offerings seems to be somewhat muted in this concoction. reserved drinkability. i'm bored with this.

overall...with having the brown yet to review...i was wholly underwhelmed with this "black and tan". or amber...or whatever the brewer was trying to accomplish. good causes aside, brew a beer that is worthy of the charity.

Serving type: bottle

05-16-2012 23:43:46 | More by budgood1
Photo of tone77
tone77

Pennsylvania

3.85/5  rDev +18.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured from a brown 12 oz. bottle. Has a dark amber color with a 1/2 inch head. Smell is malty, some sweetness. Taste is also malty, some sweetness, easy drinking and refreshing. Feels medium bodied in the mouth and overall is an interesting and quality brew.

Serving type: bottle

02-25-2012 23:46:41 | More by tone77
Photo of Stinkypuss
Stinkypuss

Pennsylvania

3.18/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: Light brown in color, small head recedes to a ring around the edges.

Smell: Barley malt , light caramel and a soft cereal grainyness.

Taste: Follows the nose closely, caramel malt, sweet grains. Little to no hops, tea like and mild. Ho hum, but nothing out of place. See it more as an Amber than a Black n Tan, though it is a blend.

Mouthfeel: Light to medium bodied.

Overall: A decent beer overall. Mild and easy enough to drink.

Serving type: bottle

08-08-2011 00:09:11 | More by Stinkypuss
Photo of Arithmeticus
Arithmeticus

Maryland

3.55/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

poured chilled in an ale glass

A: copper orange color; small head, rather inert; bits of lacing left over
S: brown sugar, raisin
T: orange, brown sugar, sweet; unlike other reviewers I didn't mind the taste at all; it's not complex, but I didn't have high expectations in this area either

overall, a decent sessioning beer.

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2011 15:15:41 | More by Arithmeticus
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

Ohio

3.23/5  rDev -0.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Let's see two beers I didn't particularly didn't care for, blended together as a black and tan. Good idea? Appears a dark amber murky brown hue with alight beige head forms fine speckled lacing. Let's take a smell of it...some malty dark roasted malt layers with herbal hops cooking in the back end. Actually like biscuit dough and yeast cakes is what I'm getting in the smell. A malt driven slightly sour dough bread flavor with some dark roasts and pale cocoa driven malt kicking the backend of this beer. I'm okay with these guys I'm a nurse and they are firefighters donating toward local burn centers for anybody out there who has seen a bad burn victim believe me you'll never argue with this foundation/fundraising group. Does that concept make this a better black and tan, of course not, but it is what it is a contract brewed charity driven beer label brewed in Wilkes Barre PA and the actual company is based out of Maryland.

Serving type: bottle

09-13-2010 19:24:51 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of HalfFull
HalfFull

California

3.4/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a pint glass from a 12 oz. twist off bottle, this beer shows a clear golden amber with a half inch of shell white foam. Decent retention and lacing as the carbonation keeps a steady cap on the glass.

Watery caramel notes on the nose mix with some earthy hops along with some roasted grain. Hop presence improves notably with warming.

Roasted notes and a bit of brown sugar are in the forefront in the flavor initially. This segues to a rather thin body on the swallow as there is a steep gradient between the initial taste, where the brown ale is dominant, to the finish where the lightness of the golden ale component is dominant. Drinks a bit like a Schwarzbier in that sense. This too becomes more muted with some warming and exposure. A bit wishy washy on the feel but fairly drinkable once you become accustomed to it.

Note: 5.2% and considered a 'Black & Tan' by the brewer as this is a blend of 65% Golden Ale and 35% Backdraft Brown Ale. Regardless, it drinks more like an amber give the light texture and notable sweetness.

Serving type: bottle

12-14-2009 01:44:19 | More by HalfFull
Photo of jeffjeff1
jeffjeff1

California

3.1/5  rDev -4.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

My fiance picked this up for me at Cost Plus in the create your own six pack thing.

Appearance- dark amber color, little head

Smell- bready malt, kinda average and plain aroma, nothing really stood out for me

Taste- some sweetness, bit of malt

Mouthfeel- light to medium bodied

Drinkability- ok, I would drink it again. Definitely not bad

Serving type: bottle

12-04-2009 01:21:14 | More by jeffjeff1
Photo of flexabull
flexabull

California

3.05/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a clear and dark amber ale, almost brown, with a faint off white head.

Aromas are faint, some nuttiness and breads. But not much going on here.

Taste is dry, with a light nutty flavor. There is a touch of sweetness, some caramel, and an underlying creaminess. Finish has a little crispness, and a light mineral hop bite.

Mouthfeel is a little prickly. It feels pretty full though.

Drinkability is ok. This is pretty boring, but it's not bad. While drinking this I kept thinking that the brown ale component of this might pretty good. But this just tastes to me like a brown ale that has been watered down a bit.

Serving type: bottle

11-23-2009 01:45:51 | More by flexabull
Photo of BeerFMAndy
BeerFMAndy

Wisconsin

2.93/5  rDev -10.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

12 oz bottle poured into a Sierra Nevada Imperial Pint. No date or info. 65% Golden Ale, 35% Backdraft Brown Ale.

A - Amber brown and clear in color with a low off-white head. Poor retention and virtually no lacing on the glass.

S - The aroma bursts with sweet honey and pale base malts with a bit of bready, darker malts. A straight-forward aroma with no hop nose.

T - Crisp hop flavor that barely stands out. The malts disappear into the background while that honey sweetness is knocked back a bit in the flavor.

M - Incredibly sharp carbonation that bites the whole way through. A light body and a dry, very slightly bitter finish. Thin overall.

D - A mediocre beer at best, the harsh carbonation bothers me the most. It's so damn filling! Besides that, there really isn't much to behold here. It's all bland. I would never turn it down but its another Hook and Ladder I wouldn't search out.

Serving type: bottle

11-11-2009 02:18:21 | More by BeerFMAndy
Photo of Offa
Offa

California

3.53/5  rDev +8.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

This is ok and pleasant, with at least some character, but it's very simple and slightly on the sweet side. The bottle says it's a black and tan, a blend of their golden and brown ales.

Dark amber, slightly brownish, it has a small off-white head soon dissipating to a foamy ring and some wispy hints of weak lace.

The aroma is a mix of light, simple elements: mild toasted grain, hints of caramel, grapes, yeast, mineral.

The taste is light whole wheat, slightly musty, apple, light mineral and caramel/brown sugar. Elements are subdued, not meshed particularly well, simple a,d it's a bit on the sweet side with little bitterness. However, it's pleasant, has at elast some character, and is only slightly onthe seet sidel, almost getting a dryish finish.

Serving type: bottle

10-14-2009 22:53:19 | More by Offa
Photo of Risser09
Risser09

Pennsylvania

3.68/5  rDev +12.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

12 oz bottle poured into a zotten glass - fridge - 2009

Appearance: A copper colored, transparent ale has some carbonation, and builds the ivory head rapidly. A 2" head develops quickly and shows good retention. Some lace remains behind.

Smell: Bready biscuits and caramel base malt. Slight nuttiness of almond and buttered english muffins.

Taste: A nicely balanced beer that is bitter and malty at the same time. Biscuits are sweet with a hop bitterness that takes over the finish.

Mouthfeel: Very smooth and balanced with good carbonation and sweetness.

Drinkability: An all around approachable, sessionable brew that could be consumed all year round. Not a barnburner, but a solidly crafted beer.

Serving type: bottle

08-21-2009 11:42:01 | More by Risser09
Photo of dmamiano
dmamiano

West Virginia

4/5  rDev +22.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pretty polished bronze color, active carbonation producing little head.
Milled malts of biscuit, caramal and hints of darker roasts in the nose.
Malty on initial bite, lingering sugars woth a slightly metallic twange. Bitters pain the back sides of the tongue upon the beers departure.
Pretty solid, if not down right quaffable.

Serving type: bottle

07-15-2009 00:31:06 | More by dmamiano
Photo of MLasoski
MLasoski

New Jersey

2.48/5  rDev -23.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured into a pint glass, very thin head formed, disappeared quickly. As advertised, it is an amber color, but the whole "ember" bit...not understanding it. I expected to taste a roasted malt out of this beer but it is pretty plain. I have had darker, fuller black and tans before. The hops are practically non-existent and I feel like I'm tasting a generic, mainstream beer. It's light enough to throw back a few of these, but I'd rather not. Definitely not my favorite from Hook and Ladder.

Serving type: bottle

05-07-2009 20:14:20 | More by MLasoski
Photo of generallee
generallee

New York

3.68/5  rDev +12.9%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Presentation: It was poured from a brown 12oz bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance: It had a light white color head that quickly faded out leaving no lacing behind. Its body was a deep amber color with very good clarity.

Smell: The aroma had a light sweet malty character with just a hint of hops coming through.

Taste/Mouth feel: Its flavor was much the same as its aroma with a big malty body and some mild hops. Its texture is smooth with light carbonation, a medium body and a sweetish finish.

Notes: Overall it's not bad at all but it's also not a standout either.

Serving type: bottle

05-06-2009 23:38:33 | More by generallee
Photo of Gyle41386
Gyle41386

South Carolina

2.63/5  rDev -19.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 12 oz bottle into a pint glass.

This is a blend of their Golden and Backdraft Brown. I just had the Backdraft Brown, and I'm smelling and tasting much more of it than the Golden in this "black and tan."

Pours a dark amber. Small head, decent retention, thin lacing.

It smells like Backdraft Brown, just with pale malts instead. Watery chocolate, grains, caramel, complete lack of hop character. Yeah, just like Backdraft Brown.

It tastes like Backdraft Brown, except with a lager-y grain aftertaste. The pale malt backbone, however, provides more character in Ember Amber. I don't want to say depth, so character will have to do.

Body is pretty thin, pretty light and watery texture. It's a decently smooth drinker, though, and mostly inoffensive.

Serving type: bottle

04-30-2009 07:26:52 | More by Gyle41386
Photo of number1bum
number1bum

Pennsylvania

3.18/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a dark amber color, good clarity with some bubbles rising to the top. Two fingers of light beige head settle pretty quickly leaving only a thin lace and minimal stick on the sides.

Smells of some pale malt, caramel, a bit of grain. I really don't get much in the way of hops.

Taste has a biscuity, pale malt base with a touch of caramel sweetness. Also has a bit of a grainy bite and an earthy, woodsy sort of flavor in the finish. I'd actually describe the finish as being 'dirty' in flavor, as it feels sort of ashy and tastes a bit bland and earthy. Really no hops to speak of. I also start to get just a bit of cocoa powder in the finish, the only real brown ale sort of character to speak of.

Mouthfeel is a light medium body with a somewhat chalky/ashy finish. Carbonation is appropriate and it's decently smooth.

There really isn't much too this. Not much flavor, and really no detectable hops to even provide some balance. Could use more caramel sweetness and just a minimal hop profile to balance it out a bit more. Bland is the best word to describe it.

Serving type: bottle

04-19-2009 21:57:18 | More by number1bum
Photo of Gambrinus1184
Gambrinus1184

Connecticut

3.65/5  rDev +12%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from a 12-ounce bottle into a SA pint glass.

A: Poured a light copper color with a two-finger head of bubbly white foam. Carbonation is lazy and the lacing minimal.

S: Smells a bit grainy, with lightly toasted cereal malts and husk over a slightly roasted aroma.

T: A crisp, clean malt profile is accentuated with toasted caramel malts which throw off a little bit of sweetness. Bitterness is low and there is only a slight hop resin detected in the otherwise crisp finish, though the brew does have a certain metallic quality to it.

M: Mouthfeel is light-medium bodied and pretty drinkable.

D: This went pretty well with my parmesan garlic chicken wings, but the flavor on its own was nothing too special. One could session it for sure, but there are far better reds, coppers and amber out there.

Ember Amber is certainly no black and tan, and none of the character from the Backdraft Brown shines through. Pretty mediocre, but still worth a try.

Serving type: bottle

03-08-2009 21:30:12 | More by Gambrinus1184
Photo of SurlyDuff
SurlyDuff

Oregon

3.35/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours more of a wood brown than amber.
They're calling it an amboer, but its really just a mix of their brown and golden. I defintily like the idea, and its a good beer, just not really an amber at all.

Getting grain and not to much else off the aroma. It's not bad by a long shot, just kind of bland.

Bit think in the mouthfeel, maybe the fact that its 60% golden ale is kinda throwing me off. Getting some toffee, caramel, and a bit of roastiness. It's a good drinker for sure, but just nothing to make me seek this beer out again...

Serving type: bottle

03-02-2009 01:57:12 | More by SurlyDuff
Photo of confer
confer

Pennsylvania

3.78/5  rDev +16%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A- Reddish-Orange with an off white head. Never really liked this color.

S- I liked the smell. Slightly fruity and hoppy.

T- I also liked the taste. There was nothing really strong about the taste, just plain very small amount of hoppiness.

D-Goes down real easy. This is a definitely a beer that you can have more than one of if you like

Serving type: bottle

02-10-2009 03:39:10 | More by confer
Photo of Pleepleus
Pleepleus

New York

2.48/5  rDev -23.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

Third Hook and Ladder I tried from the sampler 12 pack. Poured from bottle to SA Pint glass a reddish amber color with a half inch of cream head that reduced to a nice bubble sheen with some spotty lacing. Smell is mild with a hint of brown sugar. Taste is a mild sweet malt flavor of the Brown ale that is muted by the Golden. Thin wattery mouthfeel. Drinkable? Yes, but I will have my non-BA guests suck the other two of these down. If I wanted a "Black and Tan" I would pour it myself. This is a lame filler in this sampler, the beer is not all bad but the concept is. They didn't brew a fourth beer so they put two together and bottled it and called it Ember Amber. Lame.

Serving type: bottle

02-07-2009 03:04:41 | More by Pleepleus
Photo of argock
argock

Virginia

3.03/5  rDev -7.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from 12oz brown bottle into a clear pint glass. No freshness date. Purchased in a 12-pack H&L sampler for $12.99 from Harris Teeter (Charlottesville, VA).

A: Nondescript golden-amber with foamy, 1-finger beige head with minimal lace.

S: Some buttery caramel and light herbal hops note

T: Messy with buttery and malty flavors smattered with mild herbal hops.

M: Thin and overcarbonated. Aftertaste is herbal hops and mild maltiness.

D: Skip it and drink the H&L Brown or Irish Red ales.

Serving type: bottle

01-20-2009 04:17:55 | More by argock
Photo of Rootdog316
Rootdog316

Virginia

3.4/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I was actually in Harris Teeter and a representive from Hook & Ladder was giving out free samples. Ember Amber is a combination of 65% Golden Ale and 35% Backdraft Brown. Pours a clear, nutty brown with a small white head. Yeasty aroma. Smooth, but thin palate. Very slight hop note, but too thin to really note. Not too bad...if I run into a place that has both Backdraft and Golden Ale on tap, I'll mix myself an Amber.

Serving type: bottle

01-11-2009 23:16:16 | More by Rootdog316
Photo of kennyo
kennyo

New York

2.35/5  rDev -27.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

tried this out of the sampler 12 pack. brown color, white head, clear. No carbonation bubbles to see but the beer was carbonated.

there really isn't much to this beer, not a lot of aroma, not a lot of taste. The high points is that you can taste the brown ale portion of the mix, the bad part, it isn't the brown ale but some mutation of the golden ale and the nice tasting brown ale.

my suggestion, find a six pack of the brown and leave everything else alone.

Serving type: on-tap

01-07-2009 04:08:27 | More by kennyo
Photo of Minkybut
Minkybut

Virginia

2.98/5  rDev -8.6%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I poured this beer into my tumbler at 50 degrees. The beer was a reddish amber color with a decent head and lacing. The beer smelled like all the rest of the beers in the sample pack. I think they are all made from each other. No matter, I did not like this one of all the others I tried. It is a combo of two others and taste like neither. It was kinda sweet with a malty hit to it but rather confusing. No.

Serving type: bottle

01-06-2009 17:48:35 | More by Minkybut
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

3.03/5  rDev -7.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The bottle describes this beer as a blend of the Golden Ale and the Backdraft Ale, or in their words, "a black and tan". If I had known this going in, I would have saved money and bought both of those and blended them myself. Or better yet, just buy this one outright.

All silliness aside, this beer has a lot of attribues of the Backdraft, but uses the Golden to lower the boldness of the brown ale. The darker beer unfortunately lends the buttery flavors and textures, while the lighter beer gives a light vegital quality. The blending doesn't do a whole lot to improve either aspects of the separate beers.

The beer takes on more of an English Mild character than an amber. The hopping is would be light for both, and the beer takes on a bit too much of a toasty character for an Amber. The beer finishes too sweet, isn't as crisp, or is as dry as Ambers should be. But as a Mild the profile fits a bit more closely.

The beer doesn't really offend, but there are better places to go for an Amber, or a half-and-half. Gees, I sure don't get the blended beers.

Serving type: bottle

12-18-2008 03:54:50 | More by BEERchitect
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Hook & Ladder Ember Amber from Hook & Ladder Brewing Company (No. 2)
77 out of 100 based on 30 ratings.