1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Peter's Brand Pilsner Beer - Union Export Brewery

Not Rated.
Peter's Brand Pilsner BeerPeter's Brand Pilsner Beer

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
69
poor

122 Ratings
THE BROS
76
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 122
Reviews: 88
rAvg: 2.89
pDev: 15.92%
Wants: 0
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Union Export Brewery
Netherlands

Style | ABV
German Pilsener |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 07-07-1998)
View: Beers (7) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Peter's Brand Pilsner Beer Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 122 | Reviews: 88 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of DogFood11
DogFood11

California

1.08/5  rDev -62.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Pale yellow color, highly filtered clear, huge carbonation, white fizzy head that exits quickly.

Skunk ass smell. This is like heineken except with no malt profile and slightly worse. Huge grain, adjunct, scotch bloom weedy taste. Malts are emberassed by the overpowering grass,weed body. Finishes wet and never ever cleanses that nasT crap.
Where are the saaz hops...or anything to wash this away?

Good god this is some rank stuff!

Serving type: bottle

12-25-2005 00:15:44 | More by DogFood11
Photo of Dogbrick
Dogbrick

Ohio

1.25/5  rDev -56.7%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Unappealing thin gold color with a thin white head. Skunky nose (should go without saying - green bottle). Really no redeeming qualities to speak of. Weak and boring. I disliked this one as much as Oranjeboom's other Pils and I am rating it as suck...I mean such.

Serving type: bottle

12-04-2002 12:30:42 | More by Dogbrick
Photo of DoubleJ
DoubleJ

California

1.73/5  rDev -40.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

"A Dutch style pilsener", but brewed in Germany. Comes in a plain 330 ml can, and cost a mere $0.79. bottom of the can, There is a best by date stamped on the bottom of the can, at 09.09.12. As usual, it's on to the beer:

More ups than downs with the appearance. The color is a lighter hue of gold, clean bodied, bursting with carbonation bubbles in the body. And the thick creamy head and its good retention make it convincing to grant a "4" score. But don't get too excited, it has the aroma of "the usual" macro pilsner. Steeley, DMS, sweet grain and a cooked cereal nose don't make a good omen.

Expecting something crisp and clean? Well, you're not to find it here. This is a strangely fruity pilsner, and despite the bubbles riding through the body, offers almost no crispness. Boring grain, metal, lingering steeley cooked grains, no thanks. Ah, no thank you.

I think it's best to say no to Peter's Brand. This is another reported case of a drain pour.

Serving type: can

05-01-2012 23:19:26 | More by DoubleJ
Photo of tigg924
tigg924

Massachusetts

1.95/5  rDev -32.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Appearance: gold in color, 1 inch head, clear, low carbonation

Smell: wheat and honey

Taste: honey, wheat, and grass

Mouthfeel: light bodied, moderate carbonation, slightly sweet with a bitter backbone

Drinkability: Not a favorite. This tastes a step above an adjunct lager. There are many in the style that I would turn to first. A bit watery and the flavors did not come together for me.

Serving type: can

12-20-2010 14:42:03 | More by tigg924
Photo of avisong
avisong

Virginia

2/5  rDev -30.8%

04-19-2012 02:39:25 | More by avisong
Photo of Brent
Brent

Kentucky

2.05/5  rDev -29.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Struck me as a "Heineken wanna-be." Didn't seem to have much going for it. Pretty bland and slightly skunky.

Serving type: bottle

08-17-2001 15:19:07 | More by Brent
Photo of JudgeRoughneck
JudgeRoughneck

Louisiana

2.08/5  rDev -28%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

It pours a great looking classic pils pale straw. Its just slightly hazy. The head is large and hanging on impressively for a pilsner but shows minimal lacing.

The nose is great for a pilsner. Musty hop luplin, sugary light malt, perhaps rice, and just a whif of that sulfer.

Taste starts watery then goes pretty metalic with to grassy-sweet with just a tinge of bitter at the end. I read a few of other reviews and I think folks are being too hard on this beer. It's no masterpiece but I've had worse.

A few minutes later...nevermind, I can't even finish this. There are some serious mouthfeel issues here. Every next sip is increasingly stingy and astringent. Almost like the tounge is being electrocuted. Seriously, what the hell.

Serving type: bottle

01-23-2006 01:45:48 | More by JudgeRoughneck
Photo of monkeybeer
monkeybeer

California

2.17/5  rDev -24.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A- Clear golden yellow with a white head and quick disappearing lacing.

S- Skunkey with a very slight citrus smell

T/M – Bitter and skunkey, not as smooth as I have had in the past.

D- Had this beer before in a can and it was not too bad. This time around in a bottle it defiantly had a stronger skunk smell was not as drinkable with a slightly bitter taste to it. Not sure if it was just a dab bottle

Serving type: bottle

11-16-2007 03:15:24 | More by monkeybeer
Photo of phantomwyse
phantomwyse

Massachusetts

2.2/5  rDev -23.9%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A: Pours out cough-drop yellow with a fairly impressive and fluffy two finger, pure white head. Not much carbonation to speak of. Beer is supposed to be carbonated, right?

S: Creamed corn, dry grass, iron. This is what Heineken would smell like if I had a cold.

T: White rice and water. Chinese prison food.

M: Light, light, light and quenching – look, there’s one positive thing,

O: After a run, hmm…Gatorade? Nah, this will do it.

Serving type: can

06-20-2011 23:47:54 | More by phantomwyse
Photo of pokesbeerdude
pokesbeerdude

Colorado

2.23/5  rDev -22.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

500ml can from State Liquor Store in Vernal, 1.39. Looks promising, very nondescript white can, looks like it should just say BEER.

A: Crystal clear, pale yellow, with a stark white head about an inch thick that is actually staying quite nicely, pretty fair lacing very little carbonation is seen moving in the glass. Not a bad looking pils.

S: Whew, this does not smell good, some pale malts, a little spicy hop note, and a very distinct mildew meets raw aluminum smell that almost overpowers it. Smells pretty bad.

T: Sweet malty profile, with a pretty nice spicy bitterness in the end, has almost too thick of a malt profile though, and lots of things get lost, the flavors are there but seem diluted and lost in the mix. Has a very distinct metal aftertaste, definitely aluminum, and definitely not pleasant.

M: Way off, way way way off, this thing is so thick I can practically chew it, no carbonation to speak off, and it isn't crisp, or refreshing, it feels as if I'm drinking a nitro beer, with less nitro. Not impressed at all.

D: Not so much, this pint will be more than enough for me. I'm a huge proponent of canned beer, if it's done right, which includes a can liner! I cut this beer can open and it smelled of nothing but aluminum, no beer at all, even with some residue. Might be a good beer from the bottle though.

Serving type: can

09-19-2009 00:55:18 | More by pokesbeerdude
Photo of Noelito76
Noelito76

New York

2.25/5  rDev -22.1%

10-06-2013 13:58:00 | More by Noelito76
Photo of RarianRakista
RarianRakista

Oregon

2.25/5  rDev -22.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

This is only like 10% better than the typical American swill in a can, PBR has a better aftertaste than this, the flavors are not well put together. This tastes like a beer made by formula, I'm sure no one who works at this brewer tasted it at any point or it would never of left Germany.

Wow, was surprised that Trader Joe's stocked this after all their other good 6 pack experiences I've had there lately. Especially Name Brand Lager.

Serving type: can

01-22-2011 01:45:33 | More by RarianRakista
Photo of ithacabaron
ithacabaron

California

2.25/5  rDev -22.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

In a can!

Pours a lovely, well...pilsner color. Big puffy head starts out nice, but unfortunately fades to an anemic film. Eh.

Aroma is flat, dull, and pervasive; metal, DME, skunk. You know that feeling you get when you accidentally bite down on a piece of aluminum foil? Yeah. Basically, it's that in aroma form. Not pleasant.

Taste is again, fairly uninspiring - some chemical-like hops, occasional bursts of grain husk. It's certainly a Dutch-style pils, but it's probably the worst one I've ever had.

Mouthfeel is unpleasant. There's a slick, almost greasy coating over the tongue and teeth, and carbonation is far too low. Sits in your stomach like a lead-laden, gaseous nebula.

Pretty awful. There are plenty of decent cheap beers. This is not one of them.

Serving type: can

06-19-2011 01:04:55 | More by ithacabaron
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

2.35/5  rDev -18.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

"I have conquered an empire, but I have not been able to conquer myself."

--Peter The Great

Straw yellow with sun-faded lemon highlights and a wonderful looking chunk of eggshell colored foam occupying the upper half of the glass. Small scraplets of sea foam lace are beginning to stick. Whatever else this lager has in store, it looks good.

The nose is roughly equal parts untoasted grain and grassy-musky hops. Gotta be Saaz. It's a little low on power, but more boldness might not have been a positive. Given the style, it's pretty much right-down-the-middle average.

Too bad the flavor doesn't even make it over that low bar. It tastes like this Dutch Style Pilsener (that is brewed in Germany) uses inferior ingredients. That's probably because UEB wants to keep the price down: a whopping $1 at Trader Joe's. Yeah, well, it tastes more like fidy cent beer.

Peter's Brand is reminiscent of BMC lager mixed 50:50 with less than well-brewed Euro pale lager. It has the nasty graininess of the former and the musky-grassy-skunky hop quality of the latter. Since warming is doing this stuff no favors, it's time to either drink faster or take just one more mouthful to assess mouthfeel. One more mouthful it is.

Not too bad, all things considered. It isn't watery in the least and the bubbles inject an acceptable (though low end) amount of energy. Nothing to get too excited over.

The can speaks the truth ('Imported Lager Beer') and it lies ('Superior Quality'). Here's hoping that Trader Joe's shoppers don't give up trying something other than Budweiser, Miller and Coors products based on this terrible excuse for beer. Then again, given what their taste buds are used to, they might think it's the cat's pajamas.

Serving type: can

03-10-2011 13:16:02 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of alexgash
alexgash

Connecticut

2.38/5  rDev -17.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a clear, clean medium-yellow straw, with a fluffy, off-white head. Smells of lightly sweetened cereal malt, light alcohol, and minor herbal hops. Hey, no skunk! Must be the can...
Malt flavors are barely noticeable up front. What is there is soft, kinda soapy with some graininess, but no sweetness. Slight adjunct edge. No off-flavors, just nothing really. Hops are disappointingly diminished and not very bitter. Finish yearns to be bitter with lingering sweetbread malts, but comes up short. Light bodied, high-carbonated feel. Not terrible.

Serving type: can

03-06-2005 17:38:16 | More by alexgash
Photo of RoyalT
RoyalT

Ohio

2.45/5  rDev -15.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Appearance – Yellow body with a very nice head that foamed up well and laced the glass.

Smell – I can pick up a light hop aroma, but there’s something funky going on in there.

Taste – Starts off with that dry, hint-of-malt freshness typical of the style. The body is still light but on the fully side of light. The finish though disappointed. There’s a reeky kind of aftertaste that’ll keep me from buying this one again.

Mouthfeel – Pleasant. Carbonation is non-existent in keeping with the style, and the classic pils body always keeps the cheeks happy.

Drinkabilty – If it wasn’t for that finish (and the smell of it on the nose) I’d “3” this beer, but the funk in the trunk hurts this rating.

Serving type: can

08-23-2003 01:05:24 | More by RoyalT
Photo of barongearmu
barongearmu

Minnesota

2.5/5  rDev -13.5%

11-17-2012 17:47:31 | More by barongearmu
Photo of Allurex
Allurex

Kansas

2.5/5  rDev -13.5%

11-13-2013 06:17:58 | More by Allurex
Photo of Rast
Rast

Maryland

2.5/5  rDev -13.5%

12-16-2013 14:18:00 | More by Rast
Photo of fishguyac
fishguyac

Virginia

2.5/5  rDev -13.5%

11-07-2012 06:13:50 | More by fishguyac
Photo of kylehay2004
kylehay2004

Florida

2.5/5  rDev -13.5%

11-15-2013 21:48:06 | More by kylehay2004
Photo of aquaderek
aquaderek

California

2.53/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Poured from the can into a pint glass. The appearance is yellowish golden like most macro pilsner with a head that dissipates quickly. The nose is slightly malty and skunky. The taste is slight cooked cabbage and metallic note much going on here. The mouthfeel is fizzy and carbonated. If it is nice and cold could be refreshing. I am not a big fan of this beer.

Serving type: can

10-15-2008 23:51:46 | More by aquaderek
Photo of Gusler
Gusler

Arizona

2.58/5  rDev -10.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

The beer upon disembarking the bottle a crystalline gold color with a prodigious bright white and spumescent head, after desiccation the lace forms a thin velum like sheet to conceal the glass. Nose is sweet malt, typical pilsner crisp and fresh, start is moderately sweet and the top light. Finish is mediocre in its acidity, the hops as one would expect from a pilsner, pleasing and mild, quite dry aftertaste, drinkable but not a big hit with me.

Serving type: can

01-25-2004 22:44:49 | More by Gusler
Photo of beerguy101
beerguy101

California

2.58/5  rDev -10.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Light gold color, medium white foamy head. Aroma is grainy and sweet. A lighter tasting, mild flavored pilsner. Taste is smooth, light malts and hops, slightly spicy. Mouthfeel is crisp. Nice balance. Finish is smooth and clean. Aftertaste is slightly bitter.

Serving type: can

09-14-2003 02:42:03 | More by beerguy101
Photo of UCLABrewN84
UCLABrewN84

California

2.65/5  rDev -8.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Canned on 11/25/11.

Pours a clear light orange with a 1 inch foamy bone colored head that settles to a film on top of the beer. Thin foamy rings of lace form around the glass on the drink down. Smell is of grain and some odd artificial fruity aromas. Taste is of grain and metal up front with some of the artificial fruity flavors on the finish. There is a mild bitterness on the palate with each sip. This beer has a lower level of carbonation with a slightly crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty poor beer that doesn't offer much but was cheap enough at around $0.75 for a large can.

Serving type: can

05-02-2012 03:14:33 | More by UCLABrewN84
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Peter's Brand Pilsner Beer from Union Export Brewery
69 out of 100 based on 122 ratings.