1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Tap Room No. 21 Amber Ale - World Brews

Not Rated.
Tap Room No. 21 Amber AleTap Room No. 21 Amber Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
65
poor

158 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 158
Reviews: 76
rAvg: 2.71
pDev: 27.31%
Wants: 1
Gots: 6 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
World Brews visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Ale |  4.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: brewdlyhooked13 on 05-17-2007)
View: Beers (82) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 158 | Reviews: 76 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of NickyBox
NickyBox

West Virginia

1/5  rDev -63.1%

09-13-2013 22:26:07 | More by NickyBox
Photo of sendbeer
sendbeer

Georgia

1/5  rDev -63.1%

10-27-2012 16:05:15 | More by sendbeer
Photo of rspauldi
rspauldi

Texas

1/5  rDev -63.1%

06-06-2014 13:26:40 | More by rspauldi
Photo of imaguitargod
imaguitargod

Ohio

1.02/5  rDev -62.4%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Poured to a medium head out of a bottle that was adorned with a nicely designed label. Yellow/copper in color but those things are the only good points about this beer. This thing tastes like artificial sweetener. Horrible! There's no hop presence and it's terribly flat. I don't know what else to say, this is a very one dimensional attempt at "beer". DRAIN POUR!

~Jonathan Passow

Serving type: bottle

06-15-2009 20:34:56 | More by imaguitargod
Photo of Timbo86
Timbo86

Nebraska

1.25/5  rDev -53.9%

03-01-2014 17:13:18 | More by Timbo86
Photo of khargro2
khargro2

Kentucky

1.25/5  rDev -53.9%

01-11-2012 04:48:26 | More by khargro2
Photo of Dubbercody
Dubbercody

Washington

1.38/5  rDev -49.1%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1

Glad I only picked up one bottle of this...ye-sh! I gave it a vigrous pour resulting in a off smelling quickly fallen, but lacing head.

I do have to say that the taste grows on you....or maybe it’s just my taste has been deadened. I never gets to good, but it does taste, less gross....sorry, but not good...my FIRST homebrew was better than this.

Serving type: bottle

11-22-2007 06:01:39 | More by Dubbercody
Photo of PintOHops
PintOHops

California

1.48/5  rDev -45.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a mug.

Appearance/Smell - Appears clear amber with 1/3 an inch of lite, fluffy head, and it had very good retention. Lite carbonation can be seen, and it left spotted & broken lacing. Smells of lite caramel & molasses, mild nuttiness, pretty grainy & bready. Has an almost dominate, if not bright tart fruitiness to it, grape & apple, kind of a stale aroma, and this one was still fresh.

Taste/Mouthfeel - Tastes of mild graininess, molasses & caramel, semi tartness from fruity grape & pair notes, and finishes with lingering malts, molasses & caramel notes, and very very subtle hop bitterness. Needs complexity, All the flavors are pretty boring and flat, almost stale tasting. Mouthfeel is a little crisp, smooth, somewhat creamy, medium bodied, around average.

Drinkability/Final thoughts - Well this one is pretty boring and very mediocre, I really didn't like the overly grainy, molasses flavor profile, and the aroma wasn't great, it was kind stale. All in all this beer was seriously lacking and it really needed complexity, The thing that kind of turned me off was that it reminded me of Negro Modelo, which I could of got allot cheaper. Easy to drink a few, but why bother, this one is a pass, they do make a decent Pale Ale though, so don't back away from the entire brewery.

Serving type: bottle

07-03-2009 22:25:58 | More by PintOHops
Photo of TexAggie011
TexAggie011

Texas

1.5/5  rDev -44.6%

01-31-2012 01:54:25 | More by TexAggie011
Photo of commanderc00l
commanderc00l

California

1.58/5  rDev -41.7%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

I should have listened to the reviews on this site. This beer is absolutely disgusting. No flavor, no personality. It's like drinking water. I wouldn't bother with this one, there are plenty of other pale ales out there that taste better.

Stay away from Tap Room 21.

Serving type: bottle

11-09-2009 07:58:30 | More by commanderc00l
Photo of ThreeWiseMen
ThreeWiseMen

California

1.6/5  rDev -41%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Purchased by Wiseman Zach, but reviewed by Wiseman Nick.

Poured into a "Cheers" (same as the TV show) mug.

Appearance: Ew. Sounds like Rice Crispies. Looks... nasty. Fizzy white head disappears in a matter of seconds. Color is light copper, and body looks very watery. After about 45 seconds, there is no head left - absolutely none. I've only seen one amber this bad before (Wingwalker) and it was made by the same brewery. Go figure.

Smell: Smells like stale bread and sweat. I guess you could call that caramel. Really not looking forward to this.

Taste: Not nearly as bad as anticipated from appearance and smell. Caramel and bready yeast, but there's still that sweatiness to it. Definitely not enjoyable.

Mouthfeel: Watery, with medium carbonation and a ton of chewiness. Chewiness is so high I would classify it as fuzzy. Imagine licking a wet carpet.

Drinkability: Borderline drain pour. May still end up a drain pour. Wiseman Zach said it was average - I should've known [slow head shake]. Wiseman Zach is far from wise...

Looking back at my review of R.J. Wingwalker Amber Ale, I think I should review these two side-by-side. They come from the same brewery - they should both be equally as bad right? Two worst ambers I've ever had.

Serving type: bottle

11-19-2008 03:11:07 | More by ThreeWiseMen
Photo of Aldebaran
Aldebaran

Virginia

1.63/5  rDev -39.9%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

I have been curious enough to sample this. Curiosity can lead you to some excellent finds...or in this instance NOT. Flat tasting no distinguishable characteristics at all unfortunately. Was looking for something along the lines of some nice NY flavors like Saranac. No Body at all. Like a home Brew that hasn't been allowed the proper time to "get there" Sorry cannot make it out to be more than it is, serve it really cold after working up a sweat doing yard work and it might satiate your thirst but that's about all. Sneak it in an iced down cooler at you next Summer BYOB fling maybe someone else will drink it !

Serving type: bottle

05-09-2009 22:27:15 | More by Aldebaran
Photo of avisong
avisong

Virginia

1.75/5  rDev -35.4%

04-15-2012 03:19:39 | More by avisong
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

1.75/5  rDev -35.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Appearance: Pours a thin-looking, pale amber-hued body with a thin, white head.

Smell: Good heavens! This is, regrettably, is my third beer and Tap Room certainly saved their worst for last. Bargain bit malts stirred up with adjuncts and plastic shavings. It's only the sick, depraved masochist in me that presses onward.

Taste: Minimal malt character with a noted dusting of aspartame for added, if unpleasant sweetness. Almost no hop character or bitterness, instead you're treated to some repulsive plastic overtones. This is inexcusable and one I can't throw down the drain fast enough.

Mouthfeel: Light-bodied. Medium carbonation.

Drinkability: Avoid. As was the case with the pale ale and the lager, this is unenjoyable and wholly unrewarding. It's pretty understandable this horrid thing rolled out of the doors of a major malt liquor producer.

Serving type: bottle

08-22-2009 21:04:58 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of bnorioles
bnorioles

West Virginia

1.83/5  rDev -32.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

Ok this beer is really bad. It tastes like domino sugar was thrown in during the late stages of brewing. Very fake flavor. Characteristics of this brew are poor brewmaster(s) and cheap ingredients. Blow chunk city on this beer. I guess thats what you get for $5 a 6 pack, although that is expensive for a 6 pack. You know what I mean?

Serving type: bottle

12-09-2007 04:57:44 | More by bnorioles
Photo of Mosstrooper
Mosstrooper

California

1.88/5  rDev -30.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Poured from 12oz bottle into nonic pint glass.

Appearance: Looks more like a pale ale- a darker straw color with only a hint of amber to it. Two finger white head, dissipates slowly with a nice lacing.

Smell: Mild aroma. Sweet malt with hints of grain and grassiness. Expected a lot more in this area.

Taste: Sweet through and through, but it's a weird corn-glucose sweetness. The taste of this is so odd, I can barely tolerate it.

Mouthfeel: Thin and watery with balanced carbonation.

Drinkability: Avoid this beer- it doesn't look like an American Amber, let alone taste like one.

Serving type: bottle

09-25-2009 20:10:41 | More by Mosstrooper
Photo of hackmann
hackmann

Michigan

1.9/5  rDev -29.9%
look: 2.25 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Appearance: clear amber colored body with ¼ inch white head that leaves no lacing behind.

Aroma: dusty grains and muted spice mingled with some sweet bread

Flavors: a strange sweet note (if that is the honey – I don’t like it) – I think that sweet note is coming from the corn, stale caramel malt, flat dusty grains – old corn, dainty non-descript spice on the back

Mouthfeel: light in body and just a bad taste on the palate, strange, strange and strange, good thing it has a weak nasty aftertaste.

To the Point: a first time home brewer can do better making it out of their bath tub. Yes, this is terrible, save your money, save your taste buds, save the future of mankind -

Serving type: bottle

02-05-2013 01:09:46 | More by hackmann
Photo of RealCoolHand67
RealCoolHand67

Arizona

2/5  rDev -26.2%

05-21-2013 07:55:17 | More by RealCoolHand67
Photo of Rod_J
Rod_J

Kentucky

2/5  rDev -26.2%

10-13-2013 00:48:43 | More by Rod_J
Photo of JasonTaverner
JasonTaverner

Virginia

2/5  rDev -26.2%

02-01-2014 17:52:23 | More by JasonTaverner
Photo of Mardukk
Mardukk

Ohio

2/5  rDev -26.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Pours an amber color with little to no head or lacing.

Smells predominantly of adjuncts and oddly...apples, not good.

This has a thin mouthfeel with medium carbonation. The taste is malty with an offtasting adjunct flavor in the finish. Also mixed with the adjunct finish is a metallic bitterness. Little or no hops to speak of. This just has that macro sour coating it leaves in your mouth, throat and stomach.

Thin, sweet and offtasting would be the three words to describe this beer.
This is a very poor attempt at an amber ale, I wouldn't drink this again if it was free.

Serving type: bottle

01-07-2010 01:49:34 | More by Mardukk
Photo of Pmorel
Pmorel

Georgia

2/5  rDev -26.2%

04-22-2014 23:31:36 | More by Pmorel
Photo of buckyp
buckyp

South Carolina

2/5  rDev -26.2%

01-28-2012 21:05:51 | More by buckyp
Photo of collander
collander

Washington

2/5  rDev -26.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

What the hell did I just drink?? The best thing about this was the color. Aside from that it was thin and uninteresting. Lean in flavor and complexity. Some malt, some hop, but not enough to warrant a revisit. I gave it to my yellow beer drinking neighbor.

Serving type: bottle

03-21-2010 00:32:20 | More by collander
Photo of Chuffbomb
Chuffbomb

Ohio

2/5  rDev -26.2%

07-23-2014 13:05:19 | More by Chuffbomb
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Tap Room No. 21 Amber Ale from World Brews
65 out of 100 based on 158 ratings.