1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

St. Louis Premium Pêche - Brouwerij Van Honsebrouck N.V.

Not Rated.
St. Louis Premium PêcheSt. Louis Premium Pêche

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
75
okay

32 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 32
Reviews: 17
rAvg: 3.14
pDev: 16.56%
Wants: 0
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij Van Honsebrouck N.V. visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Lambic - Fruit |  2.60% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: TheLongBeachBum on 10-08-2005)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 32 | Reviews: 17 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by TruePerception:
Photo of TruePerception
4.19/5  rDev +33.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25

(Previous review, transferred from beer journal)

St. Louis Peche Lambic: medium head, steady fade;

Appearance: peach color;

Smell: decent acid, peach skin;

Taste/Mouthfeel: bright acid, nicely sweet, peach/nectarine, active tiny carbonation; very short peach bitterness on the finish; good/really good

Poured into a pint glass.

TruePerception, Sep 01, 2013
More User Reviews:
Photo of iemailjack
3.5/5  rDev +11.5%

iemailjack, Jan 07, 2013
Photo of Cynic-ale
3.25/5  rDev +3.5%

Cynic-ale, May 07, 2014
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
3.03/5  rDev -3.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Auburn, peach colored beer, looks the part so far. Aroma reveals a sweet, fruity essence, peach if you say so, no funky aroma or brett feel to it.

Taste, sweet and sour come closer to balance, would like to see more sour though. Too much of a syrupy sweet feel instead of sour in this one.

Seems like it fits under the fruit beer category more than the lambic, too much thick viscosity and not enough sour and dryness to it. Not a bad beer per se, only $5 a bottle, but still. . .

Beerandraiderfan, May 03, 2011
Photo of SoCalBeerIdiot
2.75/5  rDev -12.4%

SoCalBeerIdiot, Nov 15, 2014
Photo of Ciocanelu
3.5/5  rDev +11.5%

Ciocanelu, Mar 07, 2014
Photo of Beertracker
3.5/5  rDev +11.5%

Beertracker, Jan 27, 2012
Photo of sunofneurot
2.5/5  rDev -20.4%

sunofneurot, Feb 01, 2014
Photo of Phyl21ca
2.23/5  rDev -29%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Bottle: Poured a clear light copper color beer with a small fuzzy head with minimal retention. Aroma of peach syrup is totally dominant. The peach syrup, which I am not too fond of to begin with, and some very subtle sourness also dominate taste. I would have Lindemans pêche any days over this, which I guess says a lot about my fondness for peach based beer.

Phyl21ca, May 02, 2006
Photo of BeerFMAndy
2.63/5  rDev -16.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12.7 oz bottle split and poured into a Bruery tulip.
07-2007, no info available on the bottle.

A - Odd, this pours a dark burnt orange color with almost no head. Loose tan bubbles rest on top lightly. A bit cloudy, it's still mostly see-through.

S - Smelling this is like stepping into a Micheal's store. Undertones of potpourri, wood-paneled basement, and a bit of peach fruit. Funky but not wild yeast funky. Not bad though, just very different.

T - Heavy peach syrup with sugary sweetness that's not offset very well, this beer has a surprising lack of lambic notes. Faint wild yeast on the back end.

M - Low carbonation and high sugar makes for a thicker-feeling, medium body with a sweet finish with a lingering trail of dryness.

O - Purchased for $4.49, I paid $4 too much for this. It's odd, not very drinkable, and certainly not a good example of a fruit lambic. Given it's age and it's alcohol percent, I suppose I can't dock it too much.

BeerFMAndy, Apr 28, 2011
Photo of matjack85
3.5/5  rDev +11.5%

matjack85, Feb 02, 2013
Photo of patre_tim
4/5  rDev +27.4%

patre_tim, Jun 26, 2014
Photo of BIll_Currie
3.5/5  rDev +11.5%

BIll_Currie, Jul 24, 2014
Photo of davey101
2.48/5  rDev -21%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

750 ml bottle. The cork reads 08-2005, but the bottle says 08-2007. I'm assuming the former is the bottled on date, and the later the best by date? I purchased this bottle that has sat on a store shelf in the light for far too long at a discounted $3 off, making it $7.99. The foil was stuck to the bottle and crumbly, the cage was heavily oxidized and created powder when I unscrewed the twist, and finally the exposed portion of the cork was rough and looked like ants had chewed on it. Off to a great start!!! Surprisingly enough it created a light popping noise when opened. Poured into an over sized wine glass.

A - Darker than I was expecting. An opaque dark brown/light red body with some swirls of light brown foam resting on the top. Looks....dirty? Looking up the glass through the beer is like looking through contaminated pond water.

S - Funky peach juice. And not in the pleasant way that fou' foune has that funky apricot aroma. No, this is like leaving a peach in a dirty sock for a few months and then straining it into a juice concoction. Maybe throwing it into a bag and adding some bread to let it ferment ala prison wine. Its not horribly offensive, its just not pleasant at all.

T - Certainly better than that aroma. Peach syrup, bread, and a chemical finish. This is like an expired peach soda or something. Its not bad, but I don't find my self wanting to take that next sip. Did I mention this was a 750 ml? Thats about 25 oz of a fluid that I really don't want to be drinking...

M - Effervescent yet syrupy. Has retained a decent amount of carbonation after these 7 years. 2.6% abv? Whyyy?

O - I won't be refilling my glass to finish the bottle. I recently tried a similar beer of the same vintage, a 2005 De Boomgaard Peche. It was absolutely abysmal, This was a hair better as I actually found it somewhat drinkable. I keep buying these old sweetened lambics for some reason, its not even fun to experiment with them anymore. Perhaps I'm being harsh on a product that has been retired for a while and had no business being aged, but whatever. Avoid!

davey101, Mar 23, 2012
Photo of TheLongBeachBum
2.23/5  rDev -29%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Presentation: 12.7 fluid ounce green glass bottle which has a dimpled base. Thin but clinging bronzed-orange foil wraps the neck and covers the large crown cap. Main label has the words “Premium Peche” above a pair of juicy peaches. Recommended to be served at 5°C (that’s 41°F). Allegedly this stuff is the regular St. Louis Peche (3.5%) but with more Peach juice/extract. Best Before 10-2006. No strength listed but research tells me that this is a massive 2.6% ABV...oh my, do Belgians understand the word “Premium” I wonder!?

Appearance: Rising carbonation supported with streamers. Copper-orange body with some peach flashes. Finger thick white head is resilient and easily supported. Light off-white lacing with Asti Spumante conditioning.

Nose: Boiled sugars soaked with thick syrup Peaches. Candy-like with some distilled apricots.

Taste: Sweet sickly peaches and apricots run in the front and never go away, though it does fade a little. Sticky and syrup like the peaches are way too concentrated. Fruit beer with more extract than anything else. One-dimensional and way too sweet.

Mouthfeel: Cloying throughout. Sticks around on the teeth and lies way too heavy on the tongue with a sugary residue. Awful.

Drinkability: Low key beauty. Peachy in the worse possible sense. Not very nice at all.

More Standard… than Premium.
More Beer with Fruit Extract… than Fruit-Lambic.

Overall: Uurgggh, totally unappealing.

TheLongBeachBum, Oct 09, 2005
Photo of ncstateplaya
4/5  rDev +27.4%

ncstateplaya, Aug 25, 2014
Photo of oelergud
3.48/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Heavy green 12.7oz glass bottle with gold orange foil around the neck and a black orange label showing two peaches.
Translucent maple body with large floaters. Large off-white head of small to large bubbles. Good retention and decent lace.
Sweet peach suryp smell.
Sweet peach flavor with a puckering tartness that takes over fairly quickly and lasts into becoming the aftertaste. An odd metallic note is unfortunately present.
Medium body, puckering and dry.
Pretty good drinkability. Seems to be more of a peach soda than a peach lambic. Still refreshing and tasty.

-Oelergud

oelergud, Mar 01, 2008
Photo of spycow
3/5  rDev -4.5%

spycow, Sep 06, 2014
Photo of dalepryor
3/5  rDev -4.5%

dalepryor, May 08, 2013
Photo of Mosstrooper
3/5  rDev -4.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle dated 10-2006. Poured from 12.7oz bottle into a pilsner glass.

Appearance: Dark amber color with a large (for its style) tanned head that stays around a while but doesn't leave behind any lace.

Smell: Sweet peach backed up by slight lemon and earthy funk.

Taste: Begins very sweet and stays that way. There is some very faint funk and real "lambic flavor" in the background, but not nearly enough.

Mouthfeel: Lighter in body with light, fleeting carbonation and a watery finish.

Overall: This really isn't bad, but could use a little less peach and a lot more lambic.

Mosstrooper, Dec 30, 2011
Photo of ArsMoriendiOU818
4/5  rDev +27.4%

ArsMoriendiOU818, Sep 12, 2014
Photo of psychoholicagogo
3.1/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Suprisingly dark compared to other Peche lambics I've imbibed. Almost oaken in appearance with a very sparse head that dissipates within moments.

Smell: Mildly sweet with a minimal scent of peaches. A deep-seated sourish smell that is slightly offputting. Almost vinegary.

Taste: Very sweet upfront with a slight peach bouquet. A very hard to detect oaken flavor that is heavily masked by the overall sweetness.

Mouthfeel: Thin yet flavorful, the flavor persists only momentarily though the sweetness persists in the back of the mouth for several minutes. Suprisingly refreshing.

Drinkability: Sweet, but not too sweet it could be enjoyed in quantity a bit more than its' competitors. Not a session beer for me, but I would enjoy it for dessert. I'm anxious to try this with cheesecake.

psychoholicagogo, Nov 14, 2005
Photo of allengarvin
3.43/5  rDev +9.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured the bottle into a Lindeman's flute. Pours out a hazy, turgid brown. Nose is very lightly fruity, but not identifiably peach. Can't detect any brett character either. Flavor is nicely peach, though, much more tart than sweet (unlike the cloying Lindeman's peche), though a lot of residual sugars do remain. Lack of brett funk is still notable. Finishes sour.

Overall, a disappointing lambic.

allengarvin, Mar 07, 2006
Photo of GCBrewingCo
3.63/5  rDev +15.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

The beer poured into the glass clear golden amber with a low white head which lasted to coat the glass.

The aroma was acidic sourness with a fruity peach presence with a bit of diacetyl buttery character mixed in.

The flavor was sweet with a strong peach fruit flavor followed by a light sourness that was acidic and complemented the peach character very well. The flavor being sweet and sour was very tasty, yet not very complex in nature.

The finish was dry with a lasting peach fruit flavor and light acidic sour character into the aftertaste. The body was medium and the carbonation made the beer lightly effervescent. The beer had no real complexity, but ding dang it, I liked the flavor. It could be a favorite for some since it drinks very easily.

37.5 cl bottle, 01-2003 on cork, 03-05 on back label.

GCBrewingCo, Feb 15, 2006
Photo of Gueuzedude
3.05/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

August 2005 Cork Date; Sampled June 2008
As I pour this a floral note of peaches mixes with a lactic tart aroma. A reasonable pour produces an almost two-finger thick, light tan colored head that sits on top of a clear, amber colored beer that shows a brilliantly clear, full copper color when held up to the light. A fuller inspection of the nose yields more lactic sourness, more than I was expecting from this beer. Floral peach notes are here as well, but they actually play less of a role than the tartness; a peach flesh floral note becomes a bit more noticeable as I get used to the tartness. This really is quite floral smelling.

Quite sweet tasting, more than I was expecting given the tart leaning aroma. There is some tartness here, but the sweetness does a good job of drowning it out at first, luckily it is substantial enough that it cant be repressed and it does help to balance the ample sweetness. While this is sweet and fruity tasting, in fact amply so, this does not scream peach; this makes sense as I have found that peach is more floral than being a distinctive flavor in and of itself. This has a fairly viscous body and heft to it. Thicker than your typical soda, but probably at least as sweet as one. There is a prickly carbonation here as well that probably helps to lighten this beer just a touch.

Not really beer, even the noticed tartness doesn't make this seem any more like a Lambic.

Purchased: Plaza Liquors, Tucson AZ

Gueuzedude, Jun 15, 2008
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
St. Louis Premium Pêche from Brouwerij Van Honsebrouck N.V.
75 out of 100 based on 32 ratings.