1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Diabolical India Pale Ale - North Peak Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Diabolical India Pale AleDiabolical India Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
82
good

338 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 338
Reviews: 127
rAvg: 3.64
pDev: 12.91%
Wants: 11
Gots: 9 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
North Peak Brewing Company visit their website
Michigan, United States

Style | ABV
American IPA |  6.66% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kegger22 on 12-20-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 338 | Reviews: 127 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of beernads
beernads

Florida

2/5  rDev -45.1%

04-18-2014 19:49:41 | More by beernads
Photo of GoldenChild
GoldenChild

Michigan

2.2/5  rDev -39.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

poured into a Pint Glass

Appearance--- it has a nice copper color great whit 2 finger head nice lacing.

Smell--- the smell is kind of week for and ipa i expected more hop aroma.

Taste--- all hops here no malts did not seemed very balanced at all
just bitter

Mouthfeel--- seemed a bit watered down on the mouthfeel to me

Drinkability--- this is a alright beer i can only drink one or two then i have to move on to something else. i have had the six pack in my fridge for a month now that never happens. just needs more malt to help balance it out. one more thing what is with them cheating us out of .5 of an ounce? im sure that adds up well for them over time especially because it still cost 9.99 for a six pack.

Serving type: bottle

04-07-2010 01:48:12 | More by GoldenChild
Photo of raveskdr
raveskdr

Virginia

2.33/5  rDev -36%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

One of many beers in a big box exchange with mordormongo. Thanks again, homie. Poured into my Hill Farmstead tulip.

A - Whoa. Pours a gigantic billowing head that refuses to dissipate. Just...wow. Haven't seen that in a beer that wasn't an over carbonated homebrew.

S - Tons of malt and very slightly piney.

T - A ton of malt with very little hop. There is a bit of piney and earthy hops that are in there, muddled amongst the overwhelming malt.

M - Decent mouthfeel and not as much carbonation as in the head.

O - Not the best first impression from this brewery. It feels like one of those Saranac-esque IPA's that you'd get in a mix pack at a grocery store.

Serving type: bottle

04-08-2012 19:52:29 | More by raveskdr
Photo of maximum12
maximum12

Minnesota

2.33/5  rDev -36%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Thanks to malty for an in-person trade. Never even heard of this brewery, always good to find a new face in the crowd.

Well, first off, points awarded for the sportin' old style bottle. Very cool. Points removed for the 11.5 ounces. Not cool! But points reinstated for the bottle date, 4/13/10, so this one might be at the edge of its freshness. Pours very IPA, that indistinct orange-faded-cum-red that speaks to the soul of an IPA. The nose is squatting in sweetness, with a bit of an off, sharpyly sour note that doesn't bode well.

My wife pronounces it "has that Rolling Rock aftertaste" which I divine hasn't been meant as a compliment. Diabolical is grainy & gritty as an old black & white reel-to-reel, with a splash of bitterness that doesn't entice any further flavors from the hops. Big malts surge in behind the vague gesturing bitterness, leaving this brew foundering in a bit of confusion.

The hops couldn't have faded that much, that fast, but this brew packs the hops punch of a six-year old. Glad I split this slightly height-challenged bottle with my wife. Dull.

Serving type: bottle

08-31-2010 02:07:08 | More by maximum12
Photo of juicebox
juicebox

Ohio

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

09-20-2013 20:05:44 | More by juicebox
Photo of RonnieRotten
RonnieRotten

Michigan

2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

03-12-2012 23:59:08 | More by RonnieRotten
Photo of Ryan011235
Ryan011235

Ohio

2.53/5  rDev -30.5%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Poured into an E&J Cask & Cream glass on 2/1/11

Jan 1911

Amber-brown color with a slight cloudiness. Poured one & a half fingers of foam. A thin layer of retention holds up pretty well. Lots of webbed lace of tiny bubbles.

Balanced nose; maybe leaning a shade in the direction of malty. Spritzing of oily pine & citrus (think lemon zest, grapefruit & orange rind) sit atop a solid backdrop of biscuit, caramel & faint notions of sugar cookie. Undertones of yeast.

This doesn't taste particularly impressive. Piney bitterness upfront with an aspirin-like astringency that moves in mid-swallow & remains until the end. Inklings of citrus are all but buried. The malts are about as one dimensional as the hops, imparting an overall toastiness.

Medium body; not too oily. Prickly carbonation (the second pour has far less carbonation & a plodding feel). Finishes dry & chalky with the aforementioned aspirin bitterness.

The astringency makes drinkability merely ok. With a few tweaks this could be an ok IPA. As it stands, I'd much rather have Vicious.

Serving type: bottle

02-09-2011 05:52:03 | More by Ryan011235
Photo of silentjay
silentjay

Massachusetts

2.6/5  rDev -28.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

my cousin brought this, along with a generous array of beers, from MI for me for an Xmas trade. interested by the stubby bottle, but not expecting too much after that.

pours a pretty standard barely reddish golden with a generous pure white head that sticks around for a few minutes while lacing averagely.

aroma mostly of light malts, white bread (slightly toasted), biscuit, bread dough. some herbal hops and some citrus zest.

flavor is very English-styled with the malts and herbal hops taking center stage. a good amount of grapefruit, as well, but it doesnt help much.

kinda light bodied with ample carbonation and an unpleasing grainy aftertaste.

not great. goes down ok, but strong flavors don't completely mesh well for me.

Serving type: bottle

12-27-2010 02:48:33 | More by silentjay
Photo of zoso1967
zoso1967

Michigan

2.65/5  rDev -27.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

This beer is a rusty medium amber and an ordinary pour yields a quite extraordinary amount of foam that ended up filling the top third of a pint glass. The head was parchment in color and had nice staying power, leaving equally nice lace. This really is a lovely looking beer. The aroma, however, is not so lovely. Orange citrus hops are present, but predominantly I am getting caramel malt and some funky esters. The flavor is not nearly as hoppy as one would hope in an IPA. Orange, pine and spicy herbal hops are there, but once again, the somewhat caramelized malt seems to be the main player here. There is also a flavor that reminds me of unfermented wort or malt extract and is not appealing at all. It does not taste like an infection, but it also does not taste good either. This beer also has a pretty sever bitterness that is a bit bracing. The body is medium, but perhaps a little on the thick side for a single IPA. The finish is bitter and a bit sticky, but not terrible. This beer does not leave me with the desire to drink another one.

Serving type: bottle

08-29-2010 19:17:51 | More by zoso1967
Photo of david131
david131

California

2.7/5  rDev -25.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A- A very deep orange/ amber with a bit of haze to it. The light orange head is thick and creamy looking. Very rich and appealing in appearance.

S- Grass, orange rind, and some soap. Pretty unique smelling to say the least.

T- Bitter orange rind, soap, and grass. I have never had anything that tastes like this. Very bitter and soapy.

M- Astringent and dry.

D- This is not really what I look for in an IPA. Overly bitter and soapy. I wish this was more enjoyable because I absolutely love the label and bottle design.

Serving type: bottle

01-12-2010 05:06:22 | More by david131
Photo of Trent
Trent

Michigan

2.75/5  rDev -24.5%

06-26-2012 22:59:24 | More by Trent
Photo of rjp217
rjp217

Massachusetts

2.75/5  rDev -24.5%

07-27-2014 00:49:27 | More by rjp217
Photo of DustinSWB
DustinSWB

Florida

2.75/5  rDev -24.5%

04-22-2014 01:08:26 | More by DustinSWB
Photo of wells9uk
wells9uk

Kentucky

2.75/5  rDev -24.5%

12-02-2012 02:04:04 | More by wells9uk
Photo of adamette
adamette

Ohio

2.75/5  rDev -24.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Review from notes taken 10 15 09. Poured from tap at Jolly Pumpkin Ann Arbor into a clean, clear glass.

A Amber color with creamy head and nice lacing. 3.5

S Smell of medium malt but also a kick of strong barley and alcohol. 3.0

T Strong amber, like an imperial amber (I did not have the benefit of the internet to see the style) but with a barley harshness that I did not like. 2.5

M Medium feel with lingering bitterness too far into the aftertaste. 2.5

D Fair drinkability with that lingering bitterness and relative strength of alcohol. 3.0

Serving type: on-tap

12-20-2009 20:59:00 | More by adamette
Photo of nrbw23
nrbw23

Ohio

2.83/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A- Pours a hazy golden amber color with a nice head. Head becomes a layer of bubbles and leaves some spotty lacing.

S- Smells is a bit more malty than I like. A bit of tropical fruits, but mainly piney hops. Quite a bit of bready malts here.

T- Seems like a bit of a mess going on here. Pine resin and a touch of citrus battling a medicine and stale bread.

M- Medium in body and carbonation was a on the lighter side of medium.

D- Not really what I'm looking for in my IPA's. Maybe I'll give it another shot down the road.

Serving type: bottle

02-09-2011 11:31:05 | More by nrbw23
Photo of enfield249
enfield249

Michigan

2.88/5  rDev -20.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A - Very clear golden-caramel color, with a off white foam. Pours two fingers worth of foam, and settles to a thick covering that stays with the beer. I like the little bottle that it comes in as well.

S - Not much. Can't really smell anything.

T - I think I didn't smell much because all the hops were bittering, and no aroma. Tough to pick out one hop flavor that stands out, but I would have to go with medicinal.

M - Medium light, astringent, cloying.

D - Really good price for an IPA at $1.89, but hardly a great IPA, and not a very good one from Michigan.

Serving type: bottle

02-13-2010 00:44:55 | More by enfield249
Photo of Cresant
Cresant

Kentucky

2.9/5  rDev -20.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured this 11.5 oz. stubby brown bottle into a Sam Adams glass. Date stamped on the label: AUG 310, I hope this is the bottled on date, not the best by date. The slightly hazy body was honey colored with a light tan head. Dark yeast/sediment swirled in the last amount of beer I left in the bottle. Some lacing remained and there was a nice puffy film on top throughout.

The smell was really a one note song - just sour candy.

Taste was like sucking on pennies. A sharp bitterness smooths out in the aftertaste. Pith of white grapefruit. Also a light powdery yeastiness. Green apple peel. I think this one tastes a lot like 21st Amendment IPA, they probably use the same hops. Somewhat drying finish. I attempted to look that up on the North Peak website but this beer is not even listed on their site?

The mouthfeel was slick and medium bodied. Lightly carbonated.

Serving type: bottle

10-15-2010 14:16:15 | More by Cresant
Photo of bigkingken
bigkingken

North Carolina

2.9/5  rDev -20.3%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

I had some trouble with the pour on this one. It was overly carbonated or something, because the first bit to pour was nothing but foam and continued to have trouble with a large amount of head. Hazy deep copper in color with a giant beige head that refuses to subside. Large hop aroma on the pour and afterwards. After the pour, a strong yeast aroma. Wonder if something is a bit off on this one. Taste is a bit off too. Not picking up much of a hop or malt profile. The basic notes are there, but I can’t pick up on any of the nuance. I’ve had it before, so I know it should taste a little different. But for now…

Serving type: bottle

04-20-2012 18:37:00 | More by bigkingken
Photo of MbpBugeye
MbpBugeye

Ohio

2.9/5  rDev -20.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Single purchased at Ale, Wine & Spirits of Powell. $1.99. Dated FEB 1411 so this is pretty fresh.

A- I just reviewed Vicious and this beer looks very, very similar. Lightly hazed, rusty orange with a

S- Pine sap is the first thing you notice as you raise the glass. Other than that there isnt much else but a hint of buttery malt and some citrus.

T- Eh, very strange. Harsh pine sap and rough citrus sit atop a buttery malt foundation. The finish is bitter and vegetal.

M- Initiating Hyperdry, Captain!

D- Not bad, not great.

Serving type: bottle

03-12-2011 22:40:05 | More by MbpBugeye
Photo of output01x
output01x

Ohio

2.93/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle (Bottled On JUN 27 11) into a pint glass.

A strong pour yields a 2-finger cream-colored head that recedes after a few minutes to a decent dusting and thick foam ring. The body is a translucent honey amber with a fair amount of slow-rising carbonation bubbles. Some light lacing can be seen throughout consumption.

Strong pine hops and citrus hops combine nicely. Sweet, bready malts are noticeable in the background, but are shadowed by the dominant hops.

Sweet, grainy malts start the sip with piney hops following quickly after. A decent bitterness comes with the hops flavor, but does not present itself fully. Furthermore, the bitterness comes in to the experience at the same time as the hops and fades quickly, as opposed to being a lingering aftertaste.

Medium bodied with light carbonation, this beer is drinkable, but not by a whole lot. A severe lack of carbonation makes this beer stagnant in your mouth and a little tough to swallow as it warms up.

Serving type: bottle

08-19-2011 00:41:27 | More by output01x
Photo of BuckyFresh
BuckyFresh

Michigan

2.93/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance: Poured from an 11.5oz bottle into an oversize wine glass. Beer is fairly clear with a deep golden/amber color. There is a large creamy head that is kind of yellowish in color. Good head retention and significant lacing.

Smell: Fairly bitter aroma. Floral hops and citrus fruits are quite prominent. Malt and bit of alcohol are also present to a minor degree.

Taste: There is some pleasant hop flavor here, but the taste just seems a bit out of balance. There is a lot of bitterness, but not much in the way of malt richness. The bitter flavor transforms into a sour puckering sensation as time progresses.

Mouthfeel: The beer is medium-bodied, but considering the bitter nature of the Ale, I think that there may have been a little too much carbonation for my liking; it may have added to the dry, biting character as previously described. The bitter aftertaste also lingers a bit too long.

Drinkability: The drinkability is alright, and I think that the beer is pretty close to being a decent IPA, but with the balance as is, I don't think it's a beverage I could tolerate more than one or two of.

Very cool bottle design and a fair attempt for North Peak, but there are many other IPAs I would buy before this one. A couple of tweaks and it's a beer I might give a second go though.

Serving type: bottle

01-15-2010 18:40:18 | More by BuckyFresh
Photo of samie85
samie85

Illinois

2.93/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A-Pours an orange, amber color with two fingers of white head.

S-Pineapple and pine with some honey and caramel.

T-Pineapple and pine with light caramel notes.

M-Medium and effervescent with a dry finish.

D-This one uses a hop profile that I'm not terribly fond of, but other than that this is a decent beer.

Serving type: bottle

01-01-2012 04:54:36 | More by samie85
Photo of TCHopCraver
TCHopCraver

Michigan

2.95/5  rDev -19%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Reviewed from notes on 6/9/10.

A: From a stubby little bottle, this beer pours a golden-orange color, which is very pretty and makes me think of autumn. A fluffy, 1.5 finger head sticks around forever. The lacing is splashy and sticky.

S: A very grassy hop aroma combined with a grainy presence meets my nostrils. There is a slight band aid aroma thrown in there, as well. I do not really detect any citrus character from Diabolical.

T: There is definitely a forward hop bitterness standard for an American IPA, but the flavor is somewhat one-dimensional. I taste a lot of the grassy-ness that I smelled (I know; I've eaten grass), but I get only the slightest hint of bitter grapefruit. An earthy, metallic taste is also present, as well as a little foamy, soapiness. I would like a little more sweet malt taste to balance out the bitter hops.

M: Pretty thin. I get a lot of the dry hop, alpha acid bitterness throughout my palate, but none of a sweet, coating sensation to complement the dryness.

D: With so many other delicious IPAs out there, I will not be returning to this one. For me, this beer is too one-dimensional with its hop dominant character. It's not awful, but not good enough to reel me in.

Serving type: bottle

06-15-2010 01:16:34 | More by TCHopCraver
Photo of WuAnquo1
WuAnquo1

Michigan

3/5  rDev -17.6%

01-07-2012 18:47:09 | More by WuAnquo1
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Diabolical India Pale Ale from North Peak Brewing Company
82 out of 100 based on 338 ratings.