1. Don't miss our 7th annual American Craft Beer Fest featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers this May 30 & 31 in Boston, MA! Buy your tickets now!
  2. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Pyramid Amber Weizen - Walnut Creek Alehouse (Pyramid)

Pyramid Amber WeizenPyramid Amber Weizen

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
73
okay

29 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 29
Reviews: 26
rAvg: 3.01
pDev: 18.27%


Brewed by:
Walnut Creek Alehouse (Pyramid) visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Dark Wheat Ale |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Summer

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 03-01-2005)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 29 | Reviews: 26 | Show All Ratings:
Reviews by idResponse:
Photo of idResponse
idResponse

North Carolina

1.4/5  rDev -53.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

This is seriously one of the worst beers I have ever had. Perhaps I had a bad batch, perhaps I just don't like dark wheat ales and don't know it yet, but this is seriously a disgusting piece of Pyramid. I've liked a couple Pyramid beers but have never been all that impressed. This beer turned out to be a nightmare. It looked okay, so I picked up a six pack from the store. I got home, cracked it open, and took a whiff... then looked at the label, then smelled it again... it boasts a caramel apple flavoring... that's a caramel apple? smells like a caramel carcass. I took a swig... OH GOD I wanted to hurl. I took a few more gulps hoping it would get better. OH man is this bad. I even tried muscling my way though another 12oz bottle, hoping the first one was bad... Nope...

The rest of the week I kept trying to drink these hoping the next one would redeem the rest. Each time I had to force myself to finish it, or toss the rest of it out before I became ill. The mouthfeel was horrible, the taste was disgusting, and the drinkability was wrong.

I would seriously pick up a 211 Steel Reserve before drinking this swill.
I'm really sorry... The Curveball wasn't too bad, and their summer ales aren't so bad - but they really aren't anything special.

This beer... was BAD. I regret to inform you. I hate having to leave a bad review, but I can't overlook this. :( Sorry Pyramid. Try Harder.

Serving type: bottle

08-27-2006 17:42:52 | More by idResponse
More User Reviews:
Photo of LXIXME
LXIXME

New Mexico

2.75/5  rDev -8.6%

01-02-2014 05:24:33 | More by LXIXME
Photo of TexAggie011
TexAggie011

Texas

2.5/5  rDev -16.9%

01-09-2012 16:14:04 | More by TexAggie011
Photo of schoun
schoun

Texas

3/5  rDev -0.3%

01-07-2012 14:32:09 | More by schoun
Photo of bmwats
bmwats

Louisiana

2.93/5  rDev -2.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a standard pint.

A: A little cloudy, medium-dark brown. Not really anything of a head to speak of. No lacing.

S: Wheat, yeast, and a little Italian spice. A touch of lemon, and an indistinct sweet aroma.

T: Very wheaty, with the yeasty nature of freshly baked bread. Kind of a sweet tea thing going on with the savory of clove and oregano. Pretty woody.

M: Light in body with a grainy mouthfeel. Lightly pungent yeasty aftertaste.

D: The light body makes this a refreshing brew, with only a lightly off-putting finish.

Atmosphere is pretty average. Appearance is acceptable, but no real head and no lacing. Nose is a fair combination of grain tones, with a bit of savory spice and sweetness. Flavor is wheaty, yeasty, sweet, and savory... not a poorly done combination. But does have something of a grainy feel. Overall, this is an okay quaff.

Serving type: bottle

04-14-2011 01:44:55 | More by bmwats
Photo of EnojysAnyBeer
EnojysAnyBeer

Colorado

3.7/5  rDev +22.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

I dunno what everyone is complaining about, but I've never had a beer of this style so I'm no pro.

A- Dark caramel with a hint of copper rod. Some sediment and a hazy transluscency. Weak tan head

S- Smell is OK but I can see how this would turn some people off. banana/clove esters along with a sweet malt backbone.

T- Taste is like the smell but the caramel malt is more dominant and some dark fruit flavors make an appearance. Label says there are nugget hops, but I don't really get a hoppy feel except maybe in the aftertaste.

M- Feels great, I love the feel of unfiltered beer. Moderate body and smooth carbonation

D- Drinks good but I feel the ABV% should be higher

Serving type: bottle

08-18-2008 02:25:20 | More by EnojysAnyBeer
Photo of PiecefulToker
PiecefulToker

Tennessee

3.6/5  rDev +19.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A: Opaque and hazy, dark amber, reddish copper. Large bubbled head quickly dissipates. Little lacing.

S: Caramel, dark sugars, crystallized wheat, some yeastiness.

T: Sweet caramel with a mild toasted wheat follow through. Not overly sweet, it has a nice nuttiness that is very appealing.

M: Smooth, carbonation good.

D: Pretty high, though not as high as other Pyramid brews.

Serving type: bottle

06-26-2008 01:06:29 | More by PiecefulToker
Photo of Gehrig
Gehrig

Illinois

3.45/5  rDev +14.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Burnt orange body topped by a slightly tan head that dissipates too quickly for this nice-looking brew. Too faint aroma, some grain malt and the faintest hint of citrus hops. Not bad taste, smooth and nicely malted with some caramel and a bit of berry. More flavor, however, is necessary to make this a better beer. Not bad, but not bold. Nice carbonation, nice texture, smooth--the best part is the mouthfeel, in my humble opinion. Decent beer in all, nothing to knock the proverbial socks off, but not one to turn down.

Serving type: bottle

05-29-2008 00:43:36 | More by Gehrig
Photo of biggred1
biggred1

Indiana

3.08/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A-Cloudy dark reddish brown with suspended yeast visible.Thin tan head with minimal lace.

S-Very mild nose some sweet malts and a faint apple fuitiness.

T/M-Rich and chocolaty almost like a fudge popsicle.No bitterness or hops detected,creamy smooth mouthfeel with a squeaky clean finish.

D-Kind of weird take on the style but not bad,unique at least and unoffensive.

Serving type: bottle

04-30-2008 22:49:50 | More by biggred1
Photo of JDV
JDV

Texas

2.63/5  rDev -12.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a light cloudy reddish orange color with a medium white head. There is a swirl of the fine yeast particles visible. Smell is subtle at first and different than any beer I've smelld before. There is some sweetness to the smell and the rest is hard to pinpoint. Perhaps its from the wheat. Not a traditional hop or malt smell... Taste is fairly smooth, and creamy for the style I think. It's very lightly hopped. Not any noteworthy bitterness but it has something different in the taste too. Maybe its just the wheat, but I don't know. Not my favorite, but not undrinkable. I actually thought this was an amber until seeing the description on this page.

Serving type: bottle

01-31-2008 21:54:18 | More by JDV
Photo of Bookseeb
Bookseeb

Washington

3.45/5  rDev +14.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance is a murky amber with a head that dissapates real quick. Smell has not much to it, mild and clean. Taste has a light caramel sweetness, toasted malts and a bit fruity. Mouthfeel light to medium with good body. It has a good amount of carbonation that helps make it crisp and refreshing making it not too bad a beer, worth a try.

Serving type: bottle

07-19-2007 03:36:43 | More by Bookseeb
Photo of geokills
geokills

California

3.55/5  rDev +17.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Cloudy amber out of the bottle, pours with a moderate head that disappates to produce a very fine lacing throughout the duration of the drink. An easy drinker, refreshing enough for a mild summer's afternoon while hearty enough for a winter's night by the fire. With a tangy aftertaste, all in all a decent and versatile brew with a comfortable mouthfeel that I find suitable to drink most anytime.

Serving type: bottle

06-20-2007 21:46:28 | More by geokills
Photo of TurdFurgison
TurdFurgison

Ohio

2.95/5  rDev -2%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a pint glass. The beer was hazy and copper colored, with a thin tan head. The smell was too weak to make an impact, slightly malty. No yeasty by-products I prefer from wheat beers, but then they didn't use a hefe yeast strain I think (maybe only Pyramid house yeast). The taste was kind of blandish too, more malty than not but not rich in any way. The best I can say is it's refreshing. But much more could have been done.

Serving type: bottle

05-28-2007 17:10:36 | More by TurdFurgison
Photo of theopholis
theopholis

California

3/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appreance- Was very cloudy, light mud color. No head at all.

Aroma- Basically, smelled of a dark, European wheat with a dash of malt sweetness. No hops, no banana, no clove.

Taste- Not nearly as sweet as the European dark wheat. I don't know if this is a good example of an American dark wheat or not. It tasted okay.

Drinkability- Semi-refreshing. Medium body, CO2 level good.

Failry drinkable. Worht a shot.

Serving type: on-tap

02-16-2007 23:10:54 | More by theopholis
Photo of beeragent
beeragent

Texas

3.8/5  rDev +26.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from a 12oz. bottle, into a pint glass. The beer poured a hazy deep amber, forming a nice 1 inch head, that left thick lacing on the glass. Not much in the nose. A little wheat, and a slight bit of hops. The flavor is interesting. Not much in the way of wheat, but more like sweet malt and a little citrus. Nice thick mouthfeel, with a smooth finish. Not exactly what was expected, but still tasty. I could drink a few of these in a session.

Serving type: bottle

01-03-2007 06:32:01 | More by beeragent
Photo of GeoffRizzo
GeoffRizzo

Texas

2.65/5  rDev -12%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Beautiful see-through amber in color, a dissipating head that once held life. Major malts on the nose, there is also a hint of caramel and cotton candy. Sweet malts and caramel noted in the initial sips; grainy malts and a sweet granny apple like flavoring noted. Highly carbonated, struggling to get to medium bodied. The palate is left with a sweet caramel candy after-taste. The body failed to develop; a rather risky attempt on the bottle to advertise the nugget hops—they’re tough to detect, if they’re there. One last jab--an American Dark Wheat--um no! One to skip; might be ok on a 110.4 degree sticky day.

Serving type: bottle

11-21-2006 02:42:38 | More by GeoffRizzo
Photo of jmbranum
jmbranum

Oklahoma

3.03/5  rDev +0.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Dark amber brew with smallish head. Nice hazy appearance in the glass.

Aroma is mostly malty. The flavor is . . . also malty, but with little wheat flavor to speak of at all.

I love dark wheat beers (i.e. Aventinus and other dunkel heffeweizens), but this beer is a bit bland for it's style. It is very smooth but to me would be much improved with some citric bite. Definitely too sweet.

Also I don't like the excessively sweet weird funky aftertaste.

I normally like Pyramid beers but this one is a disappointment.

Serving type: bottle

11-07-2006 08:29:52 | More by jmbranum
Photo of Mebuzzard
Mebuzzard

Colorado

2.8/5  rDev -7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Not too impressed with this one. Poured a hazy light amber with minimal head..looked flat.
Smelled flat, some malt, some yeast, just a touch above vinegar.

Taste was not as bad. A wheat beer, without much wheat and more malt. Some bitterness, but not enough for balance.
Finishes weak, yet it does leave the mouth fairly quickly.

Serving type: bottle

09-12-2006 23:49:45 | More by Mebuzzard
Photo of Vancer
Vancer

Illinois

3/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This amber wheat falls short; since it’s my first one I don’t know if it is the style or the brew. On we go:

Glowing deep amber pour – but a fizzy, dying tan head pulls this one down. Although, the bottle conditioning yeasty sediment at bottle end brings the score back up.

Some subtle hints of banana, clove and wheat in the aroma, just not enough. Taste was also somewhat weak – just some notes of wheat and malts. I expect more from a roasted wheat brew.

Thin texture, fizzy carbonation. A decent drinker, sad that this one doesn’t have much going for it.

Serving type: bottle

07-07-2006 12:37:55 | More by Vancer
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

2.13/5  rDev -29.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I never really expect 'great' beer from Pyramid Breweries, but I do expect better beer than this. From the lable I expected a rounded toasty, caramelized brew with wheaty, yeasty esters and fruitiness. Real potential for creativity and variety. This beer lacks impression straight from the bottle with a muddy copper hue and fizzy head retention. Not enough wheat character in either the visual texture or in its aromatics to promise solidarity. Tastes under-malted, under-wheated, grain-hull-like, and lightly contaminated. It lacks sweetness from caramelized malts, and lacks fruity / spicy flavors from wheat. It lacks body from the lack of a solid malt base. There persists a mild Belgian-Lambic sourness that seems to have robbed the beer of sweetness, breadiness, and body. Maybe intentional, maybe not. Fermenting this beer at a higher temperature is sure to bring on cerain characteristics like this, but I still expected the beer to stand up. We will see if other BA's taste this or not. Needless to say, I was not impressed with this beer.

Serving type: bottle

06-27-2006 14:07:39 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of Padron4KM
Padron4KM

Arizona

2.2/5  rDev -26.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12 oz bottle. Enjoy by date on the label is smudged, but this is a new arrival so it’s pretty fresh.

Hazy amber with a large tan head that evaporated quickly.

Aroma was weak, sour dirty socks, caramel. Some banana comes out with vigorous agitation.

Flavor was bland. Some wheat and some light hops on the finish.

Drinkable, but boring.

Serving type: bottle

06-18-2006 07:48:19 | More by Padron4KM
Photo of assurbanipaul
assurbanipaul

Texas

3.25/5  rDev +8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a hazy amber with a medium head. Aroma is clean, mild and toasted grain.

Taste is toasty malt, very biscuity and mild. Just a little caramel sweetness with some honey and tea flavors. Not bland but it just doesn't flash.

Mouthfeel is too thin; it says unfiltered but it sure is weak, no texture at all. Decent, even sessionable, but not inspiring.

Serving type: bottle

06-03-2006 02:30:41 | More by assurbanipaul
Photo of IntriqKen
IntriqKen

California

3.8/5  rDev +26.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

This was interesting as I'd never had an Amber Wheat before and didn't really know what to expect.
What I got is exactly what I imagine from a Pyramid Amber Wheat.
Poured a hazy amber with a full 2 finger craggy head that melted to substantial lacing.
Aroma is malt and dough
Taste is initiallly sweet amber malt, bread, peppery spicy wheat with a slightly sweet finish.
Mouthfeel is full with tiny carbonation.
Aftertaste is of the peppery wheat and bread yeasts.
Overall, an enjoyable brew with a little more 'oomph' than the standard American Hef. fares available. Good summer cooler.

Serving type: bottle

05-16-2006 03:29:54 | More by IntriqKen
Photo of Gusler
Gusler

Arizona

3.1/5  rDev +3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

The beer upon its release from the 12-ounce brown bottle sets in the glass an deep amber with orange high lights, somewhat hazy as there was a tad bit of sediment on the bottom, head is moderate in size, semi-creamy in texture and the color a nice light tan, after its decomposition, the lace forms a nice cling sheet on the glass. Nose has a nice malted grain aroma, sweet with a bit of fruitiness; start is lightly sweet the grain presence adequate and the top light. Finish is stern in its acidity, the hopes detectable but mild, dry lingering aftertaste, a drinkable beer, refreshing today as its 100 degrees at the moment.

Serving type: bottle

05-14-2006 22:25:52 | More by Gusler
Photo of Schwarzbart
Schwarzbart

Pennsylvania

3.58/5  rDev +18.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: When poured there were definitely some big clumps of debris, but they sank to the bottom quickly. The head was medium-small in size and dissipated quickly to a thin layer of foam. The foam stuck around, but no lacing though. The color was a dark, cloudy, red amber.
Smell: Sharp to my nose with a heavy yeast aroma. Some sweet fruit smells like apple and pineapple were present.
Taste: The taste is much different than the German Weizens that I am used to. The taste is sweet, but not overbearing and minimal aftertaste. It makes it easy to drink, but harder to dial into the taste because the flavor disappears quickly. Some sourness like a tart candy and more refreshing than I expected.
Mouthfeel: Tight little bubbles make it smooth and refreshing.
Drinkability: Good, but I will definitely have to try more American dark wheats to compare.

Serving type: bottle

03-17-2006 03:15:00 | More by Schwarzbart
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Pyramid Amber Weizen from Walnut Creek Alehouse (Pyramid)
73 out of 100 based on 29 ratings.