Lagunitas Imperial Stout - Lagunitas Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Lagunitas Imperial StoutLagunitas Imperial Stout

Educational use only; do not reuse.
very good

1,799 Ratings
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 1,799
Reviews: 639
rAvg: 3.79
pDev: 12.14%
Wants: 71
Gots: 317 | FT: 5
Brewed by:
Lagunitas Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
Russian Imperial Stout |  9.90% ABV

Availability: Summer

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: kbub6f on 08-31-2001

2010 8.2% abv
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 1,799 | Reviews: 639
Photo of brewcrew76
3.33/5  rDev -12.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

22oz bottle

A - Pours a deep brown/light black with slight ruby highlights and a thin brown head.

S - Chocolate and lactose and not a lot else.

T - Sweet chocolate and lactose again. Very one dimensional.

M - On the thin side for the style.

D - Not a bad overall beer, just more of a thin sweet milk stout.

Photo of MaltyGoodness
3.65/5  rDev -3.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

22oz. bottle

Pours a rich black color with a creamy tan head that fades. Mild lacing on the glass.

Dark roasted malt aroma with hints of cocoa and coffee.

Roasty malt flavor upfront with nice caramel tones. Followed by light cocoa and espresso flavors, it finishes rather clean with a mild lingering roastedness.

Medium-light body, mild carbonation.

An overall solid IS with good drinkability, but could use a little more body and carbonation.

Photo of bjohnson
3.45/5  rDev -9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Picked this up at Wyoming liquors in RI. $4.49.

A: Pours a deep brownish color with a one finger cream colored head. Tight lacing. I like my RIS jet black and this being a bit on the lighter side has me thinking...
S: Chocolate, coffee, and roasted malt notes. Dark fruitiness peaks in. Hop presence brings a freshness to the nose.
T/M: Dark fruit notes of prune and figs blend with bitter chocolate. Roasted malt notes are the most noticeable. Slight sweetness on the tip of the tongue leads into a dryer finish with a wafer like aftertaste. Thin body on this--way too thin for a impy stout.
D: Eh, I expected more from Lagunitas. A bit too thin of a mouthfeel for an impy stout. Flavors were there, but quite subdued. Not bursting like the style should be.

Photo of kimcgolf
3.08/5  rDev -18.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Not much to this one, especially for an Impy Stout. Poured to a dark brown with ruby tint, medium light-tan head that dissipated quickly and okaty lacing. Aroma showed hints of chocolatey caramel, but even as it warmed, the aroma was not real evident. Likewise, the flavor tried to taste like an Impy, but never quite made it. Mouthfell was very thin bodied, and the 8.2% alcohol never was noticewable, in either the taste or aroma. Aftertaste was mostly watery.

All and all, a disappointing Impy.

Photo of jaxon53
2.78/5  rDev -26.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Served at about room temperature, in a pint glass. Poured a very dark brown which turned black in the glass. Had about a half inch of tannish colored head that had little retention. Left virtually no lace on the glass. Smelled of burnt coffee, and some chocolatey notes. Very faint aromas coming from the glass. Taste wasn't really there either. Some malty, coffee, milk chocolate , and charcoal like flavors. Seems more like a milk stout to me than a Russian Imperial Stout. Very thin and watery in the mouth with no pop. Very little carbonation . Doesn't have that almost chewy feel like alot of other RIS's. Pretty drinkable but nothing interesting here..

Photo of longbongsilver
4.46/5  rDev +17.7%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

After a long time of the nearest decent package store being an hour away, I found this not too far from here. The magic words "Stout" & "8.20%" prompted me to grab a bottle.

Appearance: dark brown with a lot of head when poured, gradually turns pretty much black. Exactly what I expected.

Smell: hints of chocolate-like scent, some coffee-ish tones too. I kinda like ANY smell to good beer, so take w/ a grain of salt.

Taste: slightly hoppy at the beginning, overall creamy & surprisingly smooth. Doesn't taste like 8.20% at all. The malt hits the back of your tongue.

Mouthfeel: very little carbonation, light but w/ character.

Drinkability: A strong stout being this smooth is just nuts. I'd put it as "you can chug it, but you wouldn't want to". I savored it just because.

I will be stocking up, oh yes...

Photo of mnj21655
3.83/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a very dark brown, nearly black with hints of red at the edges and 2 finger tan head that leaves some decent lacing. Nice sweet aromas of chocolate, some maltiness, and dried fruits. Good taste, very malty and chocolately with roasted notes dominant. Just a bit of hop bitterness at the finish which nicely balances the flavor. Mouthfeel is too thin, there isn't much body to this beer. As for drinkability I can't score this low. I found this beer very enjoyable and will have it again in the future.

I found the name "Imperial Stout" a bit misleading. If you open this expecting a big, bold RIS then you'll certainly be disappointed. However, you will find a solid, easy-drinking stout.

Photo of bashiba
3.2/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured a nice dark brownish black with a thin creamy tan head.

Had some sweet milky chocolate smell along with a hint of anise.

Taste was light and mildly sweet with hints of coffee and chocolate. Very light amount of hop bitterness in the finish. Drinks like a cream stout. No discernable alcohol flavor.

Mouthfeel is creamy and slightly warming.

Overall it doesn't have the big bold flavors of most Imperial stouts, but easy to drink and decent.

Photo of Derek
3.98/5  rDev +5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

My 700th review...

This is a very good brew, but I wouldn't call it an "Imperial Stout". It doesn't have the hop flavour or bitterness of most American versions, but that's alright. The roastyness is too light for a stout... I think it actually boarders on the Baltic Porter style.

At the very least, call this an American Double Stout. I'm sure it's score would increase significantly.

A: Black with a light tan head. Some retention & lace.

S: Dark bread, brown sugar, slightly nutty & fruity, with a touch of alcohol in the aroma.

T: Dark bread, brown sugar, dark chocolate, dark fruit & nuts. It's mostly the malt here. The roastyness is very mild. Slight hints of grainy acidity. Bitterness is very smooth, I'd never guess it was 72.45 IBU's. Alcohol is fairly well hidden. I'd guess it was over 7%, but only because of its weight.

M: Fairly full body; creamy, almost silky smoothness. Carbonation is pleasantly on the low side of moderate.

D: Incredible for its strength.

I didn't rank this strictly to style because it would come up short. It's a well-crafted brew that I thoroughly enjoyed.

Photo of rkuhnel
3.7/5  rDev -2.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Bomber. Nearly black in color (garnet on the edges) with a nice tan head that lasted for a while and left big chunks of lacing. Nose is mostly chocolate and coffee. Mouthfeel is a lttle light for a stout, but still not bad. There is a touch of sweetnes, and quite a bit of hops showing through the dark malts. A good stout, although a little lightweight for an Imperial Stout.

Photo of Blakaeris
2.29/5  rDev -39.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Pours very dark velvety brown, almost black. Generous head is tan and creamy with nice lacing.

Smell is very slight. I expected a full and rich aroma from a RIS. What I can pick up is subdued dark malt and lactose sweetness.

Taste is sweet, smooth and very chocolatey. Flavor is very mild. Lightly malty with a mild hop finish. No dark burnt grain to speak of. High ABV is very well hidden.

Mouthfeel is light bodied.

This would be a very solid dark lager. Very mild and drinkable with a smooth chocolate character. However, this is a terribly dissapointing RIS. I have been impressed with the other offerings from Lagunitas. What happened here? I've had porters with much more robust and complex flavor (Fuller's London Porter for example). This isn't a terrible beer but it is way off from the style...

Photo of orfeu
3.55/5  rDev -6.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Sampled at cellar temperature in a 17-ounce snifter. Dark cola brown with deep ruby highlights and a sizzling and somewhat modest dark tan head. I know it's probably a dumb prejudice, but I'm always apprehensive about the quality of stouts (of any strength or style) that aren't pretty much black in color. Hmm. Nose is earthy at first, with some leafy hop aromas and increasingly louder murmurings of alcohol-soaked plums. Soft scents of chewy cocoa, like Tootsie Rolls, in the background. Not as intense or powerful as I'd expect an Imperial Stout to be. The taste is actually quite good, unfortunately just not to style. There are roasted coffee grain notes along with dark cherries and raisins, some chocolate aspects, and a demure leafy hop presence. Slight alcohol-induced pepperiness on the palate. Far too thin in body for a beer labeled as "Imperial," not to mention one that is so insistent about its "Russian" pedigree. I mean, look: This is actually a very tasty and drinkable stout. It's just not the particular *style* of stout Lagunitas claims it is. The only thing big enough here (for the intended style) is the alcohol content, and even that's just barely so. I like this beer, I really do. I just can't in good conscience rate this any higher when I consider the characteristics of other RIS's. This one just doesn't fit in.

Still a worthy purchase, however. Just don't expect a "traditional" RIS.

Photo of Ego
3.03/5  rDev -20.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

$3.99 for a bomber @ oak tree buy rite

I think a duvel tulip glass was created by the gods (probably Dionysus)... but I digress...
pours with a decent half finger of white foam, recedes rather quickly to an O-ring with an island in the middle, lacing is decent, it is black but not completely opaque as some light manages to lewis and clark it through the brew. pretty good looking but nothing to get too chuffed about.

dark bitter hot chocolate, definite presence of alcohol, some sweetness also permeates, overall not a powerfull olefactory trip down RIS lane but not bad either.

taste etc...
medium bodied,, the carbonation seems very low, for 72 IBUs there is barely any bitterness noted, some residual bitterness in the back of my maw but nothing to write home from camp Grenada about... as this goes down more it is gettign hoppier though, almost to detriment for the style as the other aspects of this aren't holding up, the funny thing is, you taste the hop oils, not neccesarily the bitterness of the hops, the dark flavors are not nearly dark enough here and this comes off a bit sweet, this is thinning out a bit.. hrmmmm, not sure what to think of this one.

too sweet for my personal taste, not bad but there are much better RIS' out there, for the money Bear Republic slays this. I can't call this "bad" by any stretch but it is very very average. pick up the cappucino stout instead, you'll thank me.

Photo of doubleipa
3.8/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Nice creamy, half inch, light-brown head that fully diminished, fast. Aroma is dark chocolate and strong coffee. Moderately sweet initial flavor. The texture was a bit of a dissapointment; it was quite thin and watery. This beer is listed to 72.45 IBUs. It certainly didn't smell or taste like that. Overal, this is not a bad impy stout, but not great either.

Photo of AndoBrew
3.17/5  rDev -16.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

*did not like would not buy*

app: looks like granny's tea. brown ruby copper tinges in a slightly see through mess. nice head cause I dumped it in my glass pretty hard. tanish kahki stout colored heady looks, kinda pillowy.

smell: I will say this.. looks and smells like a brown ale, but it smells good. sweet light happy malts, nothing big and toasty. the malts smell red. not black. they are almost fruity.. huh....HUH. lets gulp it and see whats going on.

taste: nice cocoa dry flavor then water then trash.

2nd gulp, I dont like this. It tastes like a bad brown ale. the first cocooa flavor was nice. then way to much water and an un classy rude finish.

there are some malt notes that play on and off through out the gulping that are nice, but overall?? it is just not up to par. to weak to sour to bad.

mf: do I care at this point?? lets find out. thin and a bit to spritzy. not good or bad.. but more so not good.

drinkable?: yep. it has to much carbonation to rule this score, but it is very drinkable.

I WILL SAY THIS: clean clear booze flavor, very classy and nice. leaves a pleasant aftertaste. the numbers I gave this beer, may seem low. but thats because I did not like it. I like it better than new castle.

Photo of brewandbbq
3.2/5  rDev -15.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Vintage 2000

Pours opaque black with translucent, ruby edging. Light brown head of medium density and shortish retention. No lacework, but a light ring of foam stays on top all the way down.
Aromatics are a bit middle of the road for the style, with some nice added complexity from the six years on it's side.
Chocolate dusted caramel, with mild coffee notes and a hint of vanilla bean.
Some light toasted grainyness finish the nose.
Mouthfeel is on the full side of medium, with some porters being fuller. A bit coke-like on the tongue.
Pallet is mild for a RIS, but here again, drinkability is good for the mellow character that comes with age.
Dark chocolate bits with an underlying toffee note and thinned coffee.
Finishes thinnish and quickly.
No apparent oxidation, but the overall character of this beer is a bit meek for my tastes.

Vintage 2004, re-reviewed on 3/4/08
Identical in appearance from the 2000 reviewed above, but less head that quickly dissapears.
The character of this beer is quite meek and faded. Moreso than I remember the six year old vintage to be.
Maybe the plethora of top-notch RIS's I've had recently doesn't help.
Plenty of coffee and dusty cocoa, with some caramel.
A limpy four-year old.

Photo of rayjay
3.27/5  rDev -13.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Relatively thin dark brown body with a sweet smokey carmel nose. A decent beer, nothing to turn me away, but a bit tame for the RIS title. Loses all of its carbonation very quickly. Its got a tangy roasted kick from the malts, lots of carmel malts too. Noticable bite from the hops as well.

The body isn't big enough for a stout; it reminds me more of a prickly tasting porter. It is too sweet for my taste, and the mouthfeel is a bit boring. I expect more from a beer in this category. It wasn't exactly horrible, but I wouldn't go out of my way.

Photo of vanrassel
3.54/5  rDev -6.6%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Alas, this beer doesn't live up to its grand "imperial" billing. How does "Lagunitas Adequate Stout" sound?

It poured from a 650 mL bomber dark, but not completely opaque — there was a slight ruby hue to it when held up to the light. A creamy tan head with great retention topped it off.

Subtle roasted coffee bitterness wafted from the glass, along with a nice malty aroma and a hint of molasses. The well put-together smell wasn't matched by the taste, however. The flavour started grainy and metallic before giving way to a slightly bitter roasted malt finish. The alcohol was well-hidden.

The taste became less harsh and more subtle as the beer warmed, but the carbonation was too high and abrasive on the palate when it should have been smooth and silky.

Photo of ReebShorts
3.17/5  rDev -16.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Hmmm, Dark ruby appearance, not black as I would have expected from a Russian Imperial . Thin head.

Aroma of chocolate, maybe some orange....

No bite to this, kind of watery feeling really. Not bad flavor, just weaker and more watery than I was expecting.

Photo of sockeye101
3.57/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

As many have stated before, this is a stretch to put in the RIS category, and in my mind, it is barely in the American Stout category, closer to a porter in my book. But, that being said, it is still a good beer, and worth drinking, but not worth driving out of your way in search of the almighty Lagunitas Imperial Stout. Upon pouring I immediately noticed the dark brown with reddish tints, and not a jet black color, and the head just never devolped like I was expecting, about one finger, nicely tan, and lasted about a third of the drink. No lacing whatsoever. Aromas were nicely sweet, dried fruits and chocolate. Taste was good, with a nice rich malty flavor that focused on toasted grains and chocolate. Not much hop bitterness, but a little to balance the malts. Mouthfeel was decent, kind of thin and not at all RIS-like. Overall a good beer, worth drinking and the alcohol was masked very well. But if you want a kick you in the ass RIS, go elsewhere.

Photo of dgallina
3.42/5  rDev -9.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

22 ounce brown bomber without freshness date.

Pours dark brown,with tiny head and thin lace. Smells coarse and grainy, with coffee malts, fusel alcohol. Weak in flavor. Thin grains up front; segues quickly into alcohol and toasted bread finish. Light-to-medium body, a bit high in carbonation and low in creaminess. Nothing wrong with it, but rather undistinguished overall.

Photo of GratefulBeerGuy
4.07/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

1 Pt 6 fl oz> oversize wine goblet

Appears dark brown but with red hues when in direct light, the color is a bit thin but the head is 2" thick, mocha colored and the "eye" of the head is bubbly and active like most high quality RIS display (and Belgian quads & trips.) The direct center of the head (I like to call it the eye) is very active in the center, the rest of the head dissipates to a scattered thin covering. The middle remains active and bubbly throughout.

Smells of rich sweet caramel malt, smokey oak scents. Alcohol content is mildly detectible. Overall, the aroma is very heady.

Taste: The first hit is an oaky malt flavor with semi-bitter green hops. It's not as sweet tasting as it smells, there is a sublte light-chocolate taste. This is a very hoppy RIS, not as hoppy as say...the Yeti RIS but the hops are very prominant.

As the look of the beer would suggest, it feels a bit thin, the lively and bubbly head gives it a smooth feel though.

The feel is thin, but the 8.2 % ABV makes it a bit more easily drinkable than some of the heavy RIS.

Photo of ChainGangGuy
4.15/5  rDev +9.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Appearance: Clear, dark mahogany body with a thin, frothed milk-colored head.

Smell: A hopeful scent of roasted malts, chocolate-covered coffee beans, almonds, glazed prunes and a tiny smidgen of spicy hops and alcohol.

Taste: This is a circus of chocolate flavors! Armed with plenty of lactic smoothness to round out the roasted flavors. Hints of vanilla beans and nuttiness. Finish is a blend of semi-sweet chocolate and herbaceous hops.

Mouthfeel: Medium-bodied with a milky texture and low carbonation.

Drinkability: This is my take: Certainly drinkable and fairly tasty, but this isn't really what I'd consider an "Imperial" Stout. One thing did jump out at me right from the get-go - the well-hidden 8.2%.

Photo of SilentSabre
2.95/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

This is my first sampling of anything from Lagunitas. I am reviewing this beer at approximately 20C (68F). It was easily the lightest coloured RIS I have ever seen. It was still dark, but light could easily pass through it. An aggressive pour yielded a khaki coloured foamy head the should have been the result of a standard pour. Plenty of hops in the nose, with moderate malt and nuances of coffee beans. I like the reverse to be true with my RIS's, quite honestly. Taste is citrusy bitter hops up front, with a dry roasted malt making itself noticeable several seconds after the sip is swallowed. Mouthfeel is very thin for the style. Overall, I'm a bit dissappointed in this.

Photo of rajendra82
3.4/5  rDev -10.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

This “Unlimited Release” of Lagunitas Imperial Stout came home in a 22 oz. bomber. As I was pouring it in an oversized wine glass, I immediately noticed how clear and light the body was. When held up to the light, this was a far cry from the opaque and forbidding body that many other beers from this style exhibit. Instead, this was translucent reddish brown. The head was a little too small as well. While not an unattractive pour, I had to take a full point off the appearance score for being so light.

The smell of the beer was light as well, with grassy and spicy hops, and sweet toffee. Not much roasted coffee or chocolate on the nose. The taste was clean, sweet, and lightly roasty, with tinge of acidity. In other words, it was near dead on for a Baltic Porter, and way too light to be a Stout. Thin and sticky mouthfeel was Porter-ish too, and the slight but noticeable hop bitterness wiped the palette clean after each sip. This was a remarkably easy to drink beer, considering the 8.2% ABV. Not the Imperial Stout to go for, when you are in the mood for a heavy nightcap.

Lagunitas Imperial Stout from Lagunitas Brewing Company
85 out of 100 based on 1,799 ratings.