Saison Style Ale (Sonoma Farmhouse) - Lagunitas Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Saison Style Ale (Sonoma Farmhouse)Saison Style Ale (Sonoma Farmhouse)

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
79
okay

103 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 103
Reviews: 66
rAvg: 3.43
pDev: 13.7%
Wants: 4
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Lagunitas Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
Saison / Farmhouse Ale |  5.20% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: magictrokini on 12-10-2008

No notes at this time.
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 103 | Reviews: 66
Photo of BlindPig
2.03/5  rDev -40.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1

A- About a 1" thick white head when poured hard. It sits on a Light golden body with a little haze to it.
S- Breads, light hints of skunk (I think that is how it is supposed to be though), light european hops, yeast, and light toaster malts (almost like what you would smell in a amber ale). Almost has hints of a lager aroma.
T- The light toasted amber malts come through breads, yeast, dry grass hops, some kind of skunky funk, and kind of like a corn flavor.
M-Medium body with low carbonation.
D- Well this beer is really bad. It's like a mix between a light amber ale, saison, and a European lager. I think this is a beer for the sink to drink.

Photo of Talisker
2.35/5  rDev -31.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A misfire from Lagunitas. Not only is not a Saison, it's not really very good.

Pours an ultra-clear medium yellow. Not quite fizzy American lager, but not much richer. Dense one-finger head dissipates almost immediately. Aroma unpleasant - bitter edge - possible I've got some skunk in a fresh brown bottle?

Taste is no Saison. No yeast, no hoppy crispness. I might even mistake this for a funky lager. Some toast, but the skunky off-notes are really putting me off. Texture is thin enough - mirrors the clear light appearance. But I can't finish the bottle.

Funny - the Hop Stoopid DIPA in this same Sonoma Farmhouse line from Lagunitas is a masterpiece. This one is not.

Photo of JDV
2.38/5  rDev -30.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Cloudy yellow orange color and smells like a witbier or a hefeweizen. Light bodied, heavily carbonated, and light flavor to begin, with a bigger finishing flavor after you swallow. A definite wheaty, spicy belgian like beer, which is not my style, but this is decent and drinkable. Almost no bitterness too.

Photo of Overlord
2.58/5  rDev -24.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Did not care for this beer.

Pours a semi murky yellow. Somewhat of a hefeweizenish look to it, and the smell is wheat, grass, and bready yeastiness. The taste is pure wheat and yeast. Overwhelmingly so. There isn't a lot of depth or crispness to the flavor, and it grows bland within a short time.

Will not look for in the future.

Photo of mrasskicktastic
2.66/5  rDev -22.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

A - A cloudy gold brew with a sizable bubbly head that lasts a few minutes. There are thin rings of lacing all around the glass.

S - Honey, malt, mustiness, cloves and a bit of horse blanket. There is also some herb which is sort of like mint, but it is not quite a mint smell. It smells too sweet. It sounds better than it is.

T - Dominated by a dry maltiness and hay, these are supported by a hint of honey, vegetables (like mild cabbage), some sweetness, mint and ... mud. The aftertaste is a smooth, bland astonishingly bitter finish with some lingering hay and some lightly sweet malt. I am not pleased with the taste. It leaves me unpleased at the prospect of taking another each time.

M - Smooth, thin, watery, a little refreshing at first, but there is a drying effect on the tongue.

D - Alright. Lagunitas is a fantastic brewery. I am generally quite pleased with their beers. This was a let down. Saisons are a very weird style - it very much depends on the particular beer. Two breweries may brew a "similiar" saison and I will like one but hate the other. Very subtle characteristics can make or break the beer. This one was definitely disappointing. It didn't deliver te whole package. I will not have this again.

Photo of lacqueredmouse
2.7/5  rDev -21.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a very slightly hazy gold colour, with masses of streams of fine carbonation. The huge lines of bubbles are easily the most prominent aspect of the beer. Big frothy ultra-fine head of white foam. Looks like a fine beer.

Light wheaty, barnyard and spice characters on the nose. Hint of hefeweizen to it, a bit of fresh herbal characters and perhaps some cut grass. Pretty nice, pretty fragrant.

Unfortunately, the palate is a major let down. Thin, insipid maize or rice lager sweetness with a very faint hint of dirty, dusty bitterness. Very short, the only deposit it leaves is a vague yeast bite on the back palate. Mouthfeel is quite smooth, which is a plus, but given the rather insipid and unpleasant flavour, it doesn't have a lot to work with.

A disappointment - this could well have been a promising beer given the fragrant nose - but it's just a major let down on the flavour side of things, leaving it as a very insipid beer to drink.

Photo of jeffjfindley
2.77/5  rDev -19.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Golden color, two inch head dies out quickly. Smell presents yeasty hints of the style, but sans any of the zestiness one would expect. Taste is pleasantly clovey at first, and immediately falters. It falls very short of the style, exhibiting characteristics more like those of a lager, with a slightly odd, grainy aftertaste. Mouthfeel is okay, rich at first with a dry finish.

Photo of Floydster
2.78/5  rDev -19%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

22 ounce bomber from Cooke's

Did not have a glass at friend's house to pour this into unfortunately

Not bad, but too many citrus hops going on with a sour aftertaste

Color was very golden when pour into a dixie cup to determine its texture

Probably the worst beer I have from this brewery

Photo of theopholis
2.8/5  rDev -18.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Appearance- Pours a fairly clear, golden- light amber corlor with a nice frothy, white head that ihas some retention, and a good level of lacing.

Aroma- Lots of malt sweetness with hints of corriander. Not much else. Very crisp smelling however. Gets a woody smell as it warms.

Taste- Contrary to the aroma, very little malt sweetness. A very subtle, complex sour-mash A tad in the bittering hops. Not much else. It doesn't taste bad, just not much like a Saison.

Mouthfeel- Light bodied with a good level of carbonation. The water they used was far to hard for the style. Probably the root of all their problems.l.

Drinkbility- Not really a Saison, but a nice, easy-drinking, over-priced lawnmower beer.

Photo of DogFood11
2.81/5  rDev -18.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I must have hit my local bevmo on the right day because Hop Stoopid was in and so was the rare Saison from Lagunitas. 3 days later and all was gone. Poured this offering into a tulipt it formed a whispy off white head. Good retention. Golden body.

First impression was that the smell and taste were off the beaten path. Cereal was up front with some bready malt in the backdrop. If you've ever had Ponzu sauce while eating sushi there is a bit of that in there as well. Subtle fruitiness with suggestions of sweetened pineapple. Theres something very earthy about this. Like chewing on dryed wheat. Not as dry as some leaning towards watered side of the house.

Notes: A decent attempt and I like to see Americans attempting the Saison style but I've had a hard time finding one that could hold up to their Belgian counterparts. This lacked any definition and was pretty lifeless. Below average.

Photo of twiggamortis420
2.93/5  rDev -14.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Very clear dark gold color. Head is little to none and there is no yeast.

What is this? Maltyness from Lagunitas?! Malts dominate the nose, but not sure that they picked the right style to start doing that. I get honey, hawaiian bread, malty sweetness and flour.

Definately strange. Might be the most malty saison I have ever had. Not much funk and some...but not much hops. Kind of wheat-esque hay tasting. Earthy.

This is not a bad tasting beer, but definitely not a good example of the style. Lagunitas surprised me with this one...both for the fact it is heavily malty and that it does not taste that great. Will pass on this one next time.

BTW...Came in last in a blind tasting we did with DuPont, LeMerle, Phantome, Boulevard and Hennepin

Photo of
2.97/5  rDev -13.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

22oz. bottle

Slightly hazy, pale gold. Medium sized head, composed of medium bubbles. White in color. No legs, some lacing.

Scent was quite promising. Spicy, citrus, Belgian character. Sugary sweetness and some coriander.

Taste was a let down. Citrus and sweet, with a bit of salt? Crackery middle. Not much here, lacks complexity. Herbal bittering at the finish.

Light in body. Medium carbonation. Dry.

Not too impressed. Taste very simplistic and, frankly, lacking. Lawnmower beer.

Photo of Gusler
3/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

On Tap @ Papago
The beer resides a clear gold with a portly creamy white head that fades leaving the lace to form a thin veil upon the glass. Nose has a fair to middling malt aroma, slight hint of hops, citrus like crispness, start is somewhat sweet, with a touch of bitterness at the back, top is light to moderate in feel. Finish has a prickly acidity, the hops understated but present with a sour and dry aftertaste, seems to pick up on all fronts as it warms to the glass and room, fair drinking beer, certainly not as good as expected from “Lagunitas”!

Photo of Georgiabeer
3/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

I'd say this tastes more like a summer ale than a Saison. Where is the snap? The pepper? the fruitiness? The depth? Not the worst beer out there, but as a Saison it dissappoints. Pours yellow with a light white head that sticks around as a swirl of foam. Constant stream of bubbles, but no lacing. Smells dry and herbal, but not spicy or fruity. The taste is also dry and herbal, but also far too light- more like a small beer than a Saison in flavor. Needs some pepperiness, fruit, or hint of sweetness to jazz it up. Crisp, but not snappy, dry. Okay for a quick quaffer in the summer, but not what I reach for when I reach for a Saison.

Photo of Westsidethreat
3/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Clean golden wheat color with substantial bubble activity. Head is thin yet present, just a tint off white.

S: I hate to say this…but it sort of smells like urine. Some metallic coins, sugar snap peas, dandelions and butter.

T: Really watery. It starts off much like an European pilsner. I can taste nobel hops which add the coinlike smell and taste. Really mineralistic too, whole pile of limestone. Not till long after the swallow does any sort of saison flavors come into play…but they do eventually arrive. When they get here, it is still weak and watery but grassy notes and dried hay tastes can be found. Finishes slightly bitter with more European pilsner aspects to it.

M: Light bodied with a hard mouthfeel.

D: This beer really doesn’t have anything going for it. Although very easy drinking and refreshing.

Photo of blackc5
3/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This saison struck me as being completely average in all characteristics. Unfortunately, nothing really stood out about it, and I wouldn't make an effort to really go back to it.

It poured a cloudy amber, with a medium head and little lacing. Smell was earthy hops and pine, with some floral and fruity notes. Taste was fairly routine with a fairly bitter aftertaste. Mouthfeel was crisp and dry, improving a bit as it warmed.

Photo of ckeegan04
3.04/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Picked up late last year at Beverage World in Ft O, GA. Always interested to try a new saison.

A - Dark golden-yello with a thick creamy white head. Very clean and clear with very active carbonation.

S - Surprisingly strong bready aroma with just a hint of peppery spice. As the beer warms a touch of lemon zest comes through. Very muted saison aromas.

T - Light fruity tastes along with a big bready backing. Just a hint of lemon zest a nd some very muted peppery spice. Alot of the typical saison tastes are in here, they are just not very noticeable. Light sweetness in the finish.

M/D - Light and crisp without a whole lot going on. Easy drinking but dissapointing by saison standards.

Photo of beertunes
3.12/5  rDev -9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I don't have much experience with this style, so I may re-review at a later time. This was a very active beer and the publican had difficult time getting a good pour. After finally getting the beer it was a very sharp, clear yellow with a thick, bright, white head that dissipated at a medium pace, leaving lots of sticky lacing.

A lovely spicy, yeasty aroma greeted the nose. In a change for me the aromas were stronger and more pronounced than the flavors (this may have to do with how active the beer was causing it to be a little flat by the time I could drink it). The favors were were subdued compared to the aromas and I was slightly disappointed by this.

Again, without a lot of time with the style, I' calling the body and drinkability average. I found the body slightly thin and the drinkability to be very good, but this may be typical of the style and not representative of the beer.

A good beer, worth trying, from a brewery I like.

Photo of everetends
3.12/5  rDev -9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

22 oz bomber that I picked up at Arbor Place Beverage in Douglasville, GA. I think the bottle was a little under 4 bucks, which keeps with the nice priced Lagunitas theme. Always, always dig the price of Lagunitas brews. Well its Saison Sundsy so I figured this should be in my Free the Hops tulip.

A: Well it hits the glass and I am a bit thrown off. This has the thinness and color of a pretty typical macro. Really generic golden yellow that is crystal clear. The head was a good finger of bubbly white foam, but it fell to a decent ring with an amoeba-like cap. It doesn't throw up any lace due to lack of stick. Carbonation is incredibly active, with a fountain like appearance of constant streams of quick moving bubbles. Sadly this is the only thing that stands out about the look. This straight up looks like a lager.

S: Smell is not bad. Getting some lemon first. Probably some zest actually. Touch of pear and maybe some peach. Light pale malts are coming across with a touch of breadiness but not sweet in the least. I am getting just a touch of earthiness, maybe some hay and dirt but no real funk or tartness. It really does have the bare minimum of what you expect from the style.

T: Pretty much the same as the nose. Getting a bare minimum in the effort to make a saison. Yet again there is a light lemon presence coming first, maybe a touch of sour mix type flavor mingling with the lightest of pear flavors. Malts are light, no real sweetness or heft. Just a dull pale malt presence. There is a touch of floral hops coming out and that does make me happy . . . a little happy. Yet again no real funk coming out. Maybe touch of wet hay and some earth. There is a residual honey sweetness lingering here. Also a touch of tart flavor on the backend. Its ok.

M: Light bodied with a big time and very crisp carbonation. It is refreshing with all the carbonation and the thinness. This beer does have a pretty decent dryness to it, almost of a white wine quality. Its wierd but this beer almost seems to have a heavier ABV than the recorded 6%. Thats strange. Aftertaste is a little honey and touch of tart.

D: Well, it seems I got what I paid for. 4 bucks for a Saison got me a 4 dollar quality Saison. With that said, yes it is simple bu its not breaching the bad real. Maybe it just rests in the disappointing arena. This beer is just there, doing just enough and at times not enough. It is very accessible but that may not necessarily be the best of things in this example. Ah well. Shit happens.

Photo of GbVDave
3.13/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Served in a 16oz pint glass at Map Room 9/15/07.

A: Served a pale yellow color that was pretty actively carbonated. Also observed was a tight, bright-white head.

S: Fruity, yeasty, and a little bit funky. Not much in the way of barnyard or horse blanket.

T: Lightly toasted malt, with some slightly tart fruit, and a pinch of funky yeast.

M: Smooth with just the right amount of bitterness.

D: Pretty decent, but as a saison, I found this to be pretty darn average.

Photo of champ103
3.13/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: Pours a straw yellow color. A two finger head forms and leaves some patchy lace.
S: Very light doughy and biscuit malt aromas.
T: Follows the nose. Not much their really. Just some dough and biscuit malt again. Kind of dull.
M/D: A light body that is thin and watery. Not difficult to drink at all. Smooth and easy going.

Not the best saison that I have had. It just seems kind of blah. Nothing I would recommend, but it is not bad.

Photo of Murchmac
3.15/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

San Francisco reached in the 90s today so I reached for this saison

Looks like the urine of a budweiser.

Smells of some sweet honey, not much else.

Tastes of tartness, apples, refreshing on a hot hot day.

Lingering aftertaste of macroness.

Great lawn mowing beer, as its not too alcoholy. Not a bad beer, not great, but not bad.

Photo of GClarkage
3.15/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

03/12/07- Received from BA member and friend Talisker.

Presentation- 22oz bottle with no freshness dating. Poured into my Pilaarbijiter flute style glass.

Appearance- Urine-straw colored gold. About as clear as you can get. Can virtually read my computer screen though the liquid. A first a spritzy champagne like head which fades totally after a minute or two. Tons of prosecco style bubbles rice to the surface. Leaves behind marginal lace.

Smell- As I will get to in the taste. This is an all out witbier from the nose. Sugary white pepper with a dash of corriander. Sweet scented with maybe even a nose of grain.

Taste- Classic wit. Light powdered sugar sweetness with shards of lemon rind, white pepper and a touch of corriander. You farmyard aspects whatsoever. Seems a bit watered down.

Mouthfeel- Almost champagne style carbonation. Lots of gassy bubbles. Light mouthfeel and a bit watery as stated above.

Drinkability- Don't get me wrong. This is a perfectly acceptable american wit version. Just not anywhere near a saison IMO. Overall it's pretty tasty and queching on a hot night like tonight. Just not to style me thinks.

Photo of Jettanbass9
3.19/5  rDev -7%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

this was a last second pick up from Capones in Norristown.

Slightly cloudy with a pale pilsen gold hue. a high level of carbonation can be seen as tightly knit bubbles float to the top. A light thin eggshell hued head caps this refreshing looking brew.

Earthy, grainy notes take the forefront but a metallic blast cuts through it all. I searched for some sour notes but only found sweet malts and possibly some earthy/herbal hop aromas. The metallic note is very distracting.

Pilsner grains, sweet malts and an earthy, just barely, pepper character come through. This beer is clean, way too clean for the style. Nothing is offending, too extreme or too subdued but it just lacks any umph.

Mouthfeel is smooth and dry with spot on carbonation. What it lacks in taste makes up in mouthfeel and body. This beer is easy to put down, no doubt about it. There is nothing offending about this brew just not a lot of character. If this were on tap, this would make a helluva contender to pair with just about any hearty dinner or rustic sandwich at lunch. It's clean, crisp profile makes a perfect pair with just about any meal.

Photo of cjgator3
3.22/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

22oz bottle.

A- Pours a golden orange color with a thin white head that leaves a moderate amount of lacing.

S- The aroma features faint malt and citrus notes and yeast. Not much spiciness or funk that I have come to love in Saisons.

T- The taste also lacks many of the characteristics that I enjoy in Saisons. It is more malty with hints of citrus and lacking the spices and hoppy finish.

M- The taste is light bodied with a high amount of carbonation.

D- Not bad, but it is definitely lacking in overall character.

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Saison Style Ale (Sonoma Farmhouse) from Lagunitas Brewing Company
79 out of 100 based on 103 ratings.