1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Pale 31 - Firestone Walker Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Pale 31Pale 31

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
87
very good

1,319 Ratings
THE BROS
85
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,319
Reviews: 468
rAvg: 3.85
pDev: 10.65%
Wants: 54
Gots: 65 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Firestone Walker Brewing Co. visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  4.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Todd on 08-23-2002)
View: Beers (73) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Pale 31 Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,319 | Reviews: 468 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Sean9689
Sean9689

Illinois

3.9/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a golden color with very little white head that quickly leaves little or no lacing at all. Smell is very slight hoppy/citrus, which is pretty much what I am expecting. Taste is much of the same, very slight hoppy/citrus notes, very clean finish. Mouthfeel is light, crisp, and clean with a small amount of carbonation. A really good Pale Ale that is perfect during the hot summer months.

Serving type: bottle

05-04-2009 20:52:06 | More by Sean9689
Photo of mikereaser
mikereaser

Pennsylvania

3.88/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A - pours a clear copper color with no foam to speak of

S - lemony citrus hops aroma, unexpected for me from this one

T - sweet malt and citrus hops leaving just a bit of a hop bite to it, nothing too over the top or outstanding

M/D - light bodied and nice carbonation. not bad for the style but nothing too outstanding. Just a nice APA.

Serving type: bottle

04-26-2009 02:24:57 | More by mikereaser
Photo of PatronWizard
PatronWizard

California

4/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

**Please tolerate my 'Short Review Series' which come from sparsley populated notes.

Pours a clear gold with a decent head. Smell is, uh, good! Citrus hops; I'm happy with this. Taste is good clean crisp bitter hops. Very nice. Smooth brew. I like this one. Could easily sit back with a sixer and some Married with Children reruns.

Serving type: bottle

04-23-2009 22:01:29 | More by PatronWizard
Photo of yemenmocha
yemenmocha

Arizona

3.83/5  rDev -0.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours translucent light amber to orange, with thin white head. Nose is suggesting orange candy to me, with some ripe fresh orange juicy notes - both natural citrus and candied orange. Palate has a nice balance of malt with hops, but it is rather light bodied and weak in flavor. Finish is light as well. Decent drinkability but nothing to be excited about.

Serving type: bottle

04-19-2009 06:01:01 | More by yemenmocha
Photo of ClockworkOrange
ClockworkOrange

Pennsylvania

3.55/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Firestone Walker is new to PA. Picked up a single bottle at The Beer Stop for $2. Poured into my shaker "pint" glass. Appears a clear golden yellow color with about half an inch of quickly fading off white foam. Smells lemon, tangerine, biscuits, and pine. Tastes of bitter orange peel, bready malts, maybe a touch of grapefruit pith. Slightly thin bodied with medium carbonation. Dry, bitter finish. Not too shabby for an APA.

Serving type: bottle

04-17-2009 03:06:28 | More by ClockworkOrange
Photo of prototypic
prototypic

Ohio

3.93/5  rDev +2.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Many thanks to EinWeizenbitte for this fine extra. Very thoughtful selection, Todd.

Pours a pale gold color with a slight orange tint. A very light amount of haze clouds it a little. A slightly off-white head caps it off. Retention was good and a sticky coat of lace clung to the glass. Not bad at all.

Pale 31 smells very well hopped. It features a diverse bill, whatever it may be. There's some citric notes of grapefruit and mango with light floral elements blended in. Smells earthy and a tad grainy. Pale malts and a healthy amount of caramel malts appear to be present. Smells like the caramel malts balance out the hop qualities to a degree. More on that in a few. All in all, it's pretty well done. I like it.

Pale 31's a nice APA. It's a little sweet up front. Pale malts seem to be the primary malt flavor. There's perhaps a little caramel, but it's less prominent here than on the nose. That's a good thing. Hops are flavorful and give it a nice bitter buzz. It's not quite as hoppy as I'd like, but it's not bad at all. It's not as balanced as I expected and I like that quality. Hops do their job pretty well and aren't completely balanced by the malts. The hops are mostly citric and have a nice grapefruit and orange flavor. They're a little grassy and earthy. Finishes sweet, bitter, and a little dry.

Pale 31 is light with relatively buzzy carbonation. It's not quite smooth, but it's not bad either. A little more body would improve it a little. Drinkability is good. I like the flavor and it's too easy to drink. There's a number of better APAs out there, but this one's far from a bad choice.

I haven't tried a bad Firestone Walker beer yet. This one's no exception. It's fairly straight forward and really doesn't have any special qualities that grab you, but it's a nice representation of the style. There are a number of better APAs, but Pale 31's probably second tier for the style. A little more body (and hops) would improve it, but I don't have any material criticism for it. It's pretty damn good as it is. Thanks, Todd.

Serving type: bottle

04-10-2009 02:32:41 | More by prototypic
Photo of philbe311
philbe311

Pennsylvania

3.83/5  rDev -0.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A - A finger and a half of crisp fizzy white froth... Very nice lacing... Glowing pale amber color... Still with only the slightest amount of noticeable carbonation... If a beer can look clean and pure, this is the one...

S - Lemon... Floral notes... Mandarin orange... A surprisingly hoppy nose... Very nice aroma for a Pale Ale...

T - Vanilla wafer... Biscuit... Orange... Malt... The hops are present, but the intensity don't match the nose... A faint peppery finish...

M - Light and fluffy with biting carbonation on the tongue... Slightly dry with a muted hop aftertaste.... Crisp and refreshing... Sturdy...

D - A very sessionable Pale Ale... Terrific nose and above average in all other categories...

Serving type: bottle

04-08-2009 01:35:10 | More by philbe311
Photo of biegaman
biegaman

Ontario (Canada)

3.9/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A bright and sunny yellow-tinged scotch with sheer transparency. The colour is golden and gleaming and the clarity consummately clean. Its head, although sickly anemic, is resiliently sticky. Tight clinging bands of white lace appear hopelessly stuck to the glass. This visual certainly imparts the temperate, sunny climate of Paso Robles to my mind.

The aroma is about as existent as it is non-existent. The faint grapefruit-like pungency of the hops suggest this may not be intentional but the lack of aromatic malt suggests it is. I keep taking bigger and bigger whiffs to be sure but my nostrils are largely drawing blanks. The floral qualities of the English Fuggles are apparent but I don't note much to resemble any of the big American C's (Cascade, Centennial, Chinook).

Is it just me or does the "California Pale Ale" taste a touch better than regular old pale ale? Strong bready, biscuity, doughie, cookie and wafer-like malts and a sprinkling of green, zesty recently ripened hop flowers (there's the American influence!) make for a delicious beer in my opinion. The caramel outweighs the grapefruit but not by much, the beer really does taste fresh-hoped even nearly 6 months after the bottling!

This is barrel aged but the beer itself doesn't advertise it. Good. Why should it have to? Novelty and insatiability have become driving factors in a lot of America's (especially California's) microbreweries. Special releases and experimental, high gravity beers (often with the use of blending, wild yeasts or barrel aging) have become the focal point of many breweries and the products on which they're most often judged...

While Firestone is responsible for making what are arguably the best examples of such beers (Firestone 10, 11) it's good to know they put every bit the same craftsmanship and attention into their normal lineup of pale ales too. Between the Double Barrel, the Union Jack IPA and now the Pale 31, I would say with little hesitation that Firestone is responsible for some of the best simple but solid drinking ales on the entire continent. Thanks BuckeyeNation!

Serving type: bottle

03-31-2009 21:48:01 | More by biegaman
Photo of Metalmonk
Metalmonk

North Carolina

3.6/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

From California to Portland, OR (thanks Brian!) to Virginia, where it was finally opened and poured into my dependable pint glass. Color is slightly hazed washed-out copper, with a bountiful cloudy head that lessens fairly quickly to a thin soapy skim.

Clean aroma offers a quintessential pale ale smell--caramel malts and springy citrus-like hops mingling happily and with total balance. Nothing more and nothing less.

Flavor is citrusy hops that are controlled and accessible--some soapy lemon elements here--with spicy and caramel-like malts giving the backup and balance necessary for a solid pale ale. Pale 31 is so solid that it borders on generic--not really in a bad way, but more because it resembles a ton of other well-made pale ales out there with nothing to differentiate it from the masses. The flavor dies quickly, and not in a drying way. So the flavor is a little thin, and that's frustrating, especially considering there's not a lot to grab onto in the first place. Maybe a slightly higher dose of hops/malts would've done the trick? (And I don't mean anything drastic, as I appreciate a good, sensible APA. Who doesn't?)

The mouthfeel is almost thin itself, although there's a slight buttery slickness and plenty of carbonation to carry it along pleasantly enough.

Just a decent, solid pale ale, but not dissimilar to so, so, so many others out there in craft and brewpub world. Thanks to msubulldog25 for sending this bottle--a more reliable and downright cool trader you'll not find.

Serving type: bottle

03-25-2009 22:19:36 | More by Metalmonk
Photo of Risser09
Risser09

Pennsylvania

3.38/5  rDev -12.2%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle poured into a snifter - Fridge temp - 2008

Appearance: Pours a clear golden yellow with a short-lived, 1/2", white head. Very little lacing and/or carbonation activity.

Smell: Floral and citrusy hop aroma is strong for a pale ale. Lemon, orange and an underlying pale malt. Fresh flowers.

Taste: Hop bitterness is nice, but fades for a cereal grain/malt flavor. Not very complex, but quite pleasing. I am a fan of the floral freshness.

Mouthfeel: Medium to light body with a decent share of IBUs. Smooth drinking and a lingering bitterness. Not much alcohol at all.

Drinkability: A decent pale ale, but it doesn't compare to some of the other great ones out there. I would drink it again.

Serving type: bottle

03-20-2009 11:49:13 | More by Risser09
Photo of Cresant
Cresant

Kentucky

4.38/5  rDev +13.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 5

Poured this 22 oz. brown bottle into a Sierra Nevada glass. No date. The body was a clear pale amber. One finger + of creamy head which left splotchy lace.

Smell was sweet citrus. Caramel. Fresh grains. Nice.

Taste was fruity and mildly bitter. A tad piney with a bittering finish. Cracker-like. Well balanced and well crafted. Moderately dry. Very drinkable and flavorful.

Mouthfeel thinner than expected. Some slickness.

Serving type: bottle

03-19-2009 01:54:04 | More by Cresant
Photo of PittBeerGirl
PittBeerGirl

Pennsylvania

3.6/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This bottle was a great extra that I received in a recent trade! 22 oz bottle.

A- Body is a nearly transparent golden yellow. Pours with an approximately 1 finger foamy white head and leaves some lacing behind in the glass.

S-Sweet pale malt collides with a semi-bright citrus and piny hop presence. Nose is on the hoppier side of APAs

T-Upfront is a minimal balance of seltzer flavor and some piny flavor with a substantial sweet pale malt backbone. There is a touch of piny and floral hops as well as a sudden quick burst of citrus flavor for the finish and a medium strength hop bitterness lingering. Though my description sounds very hoppy the flavors are all pretty subtle and the general balance of the beer comes through the most.

M-High tingly carbonation and light body that is still full and drinkable.

D- This is a decent-definitely above average APA that, to me, is pretty typical for the style. It really doesn't have anything unique and it is quite drinkable-but not my favorite APA. I'm all over the place with this style as it is and this example falls somewhere in the middle of the road.

Serving type: bottle

03-15-2009 02:41:09 | More by PittBeerGirl
Photo of pokesbeerdude
pokesbeerdude

Colorado

3.95/5  rDev +2.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Thanks to Wasatch for this one in a trade. 12oz Bottle. Alcohol noted at 4.8%.

A: Pale orange, light gold in color, somewhat cloudy, dense rocky head about a quarter of an inch thick. Spotty lacing.

S: Not a whole lot going on, pretty strong malt flavorings, piney hops. Pretty standard, but smells tasty. Just not a lot going on.

T: Really a mild tasting beer, light graininess, very doughy malt character, slightly astringent pine/citrus bitterness at the end, really comes to life as it warms up a bit, malt is quite doughy, and hops are piney, quite balanced between the two though. Quite tasty!

M: A little over carbonated for my taste, really is quite prickly on the tongue, dry, and begs for another drink each and every time. Just a little to prickly for my taste.

D: Good session beer, very tasty, I'd love to have this one on tap. All around great beer, I'll have to find out where John got it so I can snag some more of it. Tasty beer!

Serving type: bottle

03-05-2009 00:32:14 | More by pokesbeerdude
Photo of birdypowder
birdypowder

Oregon

4.22/5  rDev +9.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Pours with an off-white head of mixed bubble size. Leaves just a little lacing.

Beautiful full hop aroma, delicious! Brillant yellow color, filtered star bright.

Medium to medium high carbonation.

Slight lingering bitterness with very little sweetness.

A delicious pale ale, one that is actually pale in color...not that it matters too much.

I could have 4 or 5 of these and be happy.

Serving type: bottle

02-25-2009 03:09:46 | More by birdypowder
Photo of glid02
glid02

Georgia

4/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Had this at the Brickskeller in Washington DC.

Pours a clear light copper color with a one-finger off-white head. The head dissipates into a wispy layer on top leaving decent lacing.

Smells of citrus and floral hops with a decent malty undertone. Pretty pungent for an APA.

Tastes similar to how it smells. Sweet malt flavors kick things off, followed shortly by citrus flavors. There's a mild bitterness at the end and the grapefruit flavors tend to stick around.

Mouthfeel is good. It's a bit on the light side, but it still goes down smoothly.

Drinkability is good. This is not a really flavorful beer but I could certainly have a lot of these.

Overall this is an APA that is actually an APA and doesn't try to do too much. Worth a shot.

Serving type: bottle

02-13-2009 03:58:33 | More by glid02
Photo of tugdriver7
tugdriver7

Maryland

4.43/5  rDev +15.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Yes, an "exceptional" for drinkability. 31 is now my new favorite number and (ironically) ended-up being #731 on my all-time taste list (an expensive collection with nothing to show for it). In any case, this was good stuff. The photo on the bottle was "right on," as the beer poured gorgeous gold into the glass with a nice had that quickly dissipated and left very delicate lacing on the glass. Very subtle fruity, piney hops were evident in the smell and that carried into initial taste. Nice balance of sweetness (very light) and the aforementioned hops, with a moderate malty body, punctuated by delicate carbonation. Those are two words I'd use a lot with this beer: delicate and subtle. Nothing "in your face" about it. No alcohol taste at all, with a very slight dry bitterness at the end. I never put the glass down--and it tasted great right through to the warmer last few swallows. It's an excellent session beer you'd never grow tired of. Clearly a winner all the way around.

Serving type: bottle

02-05-2009 14:40:10 | More by tugdriver7
Photo of htomsirveaux
htomsirveaux

Texas

3.33/5  rDev -13.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12 oz. bottle tried 18 Sep 2008.

Medium yellow-white foamy head. Moderate carbonation. Clear golden caramel color. Aroma is quite floral and hoppy, somewhat soapy, lightly sugary. Starts dry with a medium hoppy bitterness. Finishes with a faint sweetness. Light body, almost watery.

Taste is good but overall light in flavor.

Serving type: bottle

01-28-2009 04:52:27 | More by htomsirveaux
Photo of hopdog
hopdog

Pennsylvania

3.1/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12oz bottle.

Poured a medium and cloudy golden color with a smaller sized white head. Aromas of citrus, grainy, floral, and some breadiness. Tastes of ligther citrus, grainy and the same floralness. Thinner body.

Notes from and tasted on: 1/26/09.

Serving type: bottle

01-27-2009 00:32:56 | More by hopdog
Photo of aforbes10
aforbes10

Iowa

4.35/5  rDev +13%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Pours a noticeably light brownish yellow with a big pillowy white head that looks great in the glass. Smells of nice lemony hops and mild clean malt. Flavor is nice and subdued. Clean, easy drinking and sweet with a nice hop bitterness thats just aggressive enough to remind me that I'm drinking a intentionally restrained beer. I love that this isn't an IPA labeled as a pale ale and that its actually true to style, not overly bitter or hopped up beyond belief. Very easy to drink and delicious and an exemplary example of what a "session" beer can be when made well. Incidentally, this is my second FW beer (im starting off with their easy-to-find ones) and i've been VERY impressed with both.

Serving type: bottle

01-23-2009 05:22:11 | More by aforbes10
Photo of roadhouse
roadhouse

Florida

3.68/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a tulip pint glass.

Appears a clear golden orange color with a one inch thick off-white head. It settles to a cap and leaves some moderate lacing on the side of the glass.

Aroma is of piney hops more than anything with some citrusy orange and lemon coming through as well. Malt backbone is there in the form of a mild caramel sweetness.

The taste starts out with a bit of sweet caramel malts then it gets bitter with flavors of pine, citrus, and a bit of a spiciness. Finish is a nice balance between the malt and hops, but the hops slightly taken an edge.

Mouthfeel is medium-light, a nice creaminess compliments the crisp feel on the tongue. Quite drinkable.

While this one won't go down as my favorite Pale Ale, I like it. I would still take a Sierra Nevada or something over it, but this one is a good choice if you prefer more of the piney/spicy flavors in your pale ale over the citrus.

Serving type: bottle

01-20-2009 21:35:14 | More by roadhouse
Photo of ccrida
ccrida

Oregon

4.43/5  rDev +15.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Bomber (stamped 10/1/09) poured into my Meantime snifter, Pale 31 is chill-hazed golden orange with a creamy off-white head that leaves scattered lace. Nice glow to it.

Smell light and clean, limes, oranges and apricots, a touch overripe and soured, nice.

Taste is pleasantly hoppy, more so then I expected for a pale, with really clean but satisfying fresh bread malt backbone that goes great with the fleeting citrus of the hops and esters before the dry, spicy finish. Not super complicated, but an exceptionally well made and tasty APA. Very impressive, I love the freshness (even though it's 3 months old) and sessionability.

Mouthfeel is light, crisp and dry, a sharpness to it, although served at fridge temp.

Drinkability is very high, this is a tasty but clean pale ale that's not to robust or strong but very satisfying, I can see really sucking down a bunch of this at a party. This immediately became my all time favorite APA, from a style that I granted don't normally much care for.

Serving type: bottle

01-15-2009 01:51:38 | More by ccrida
Photo of DavoleBomb
DavoleBomb

Ohio

3.4/5  rDev -11.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a pint glass.

3.5 A: Medium orange color. Very clear. Snow white head with less-than-average retention.

3.0 S: Some citrus and some hop aroma, but mainly not much of anything.

3.5 T: Pretty good. Nice hop profile and great balance between hops and malts. Still, nothing spectacular. Citrus with a pleasant hop bitterness.

3.5 M: Smooth, a little undercarbonation. Medium body.

3.5 D: Good drinkability in that it's very smooth, but simply too boring.

Serving type: bottle

01-11-2009 18:42:56 | More by DavoleBomb
Photo of beertunes
beertunes

Washington

3.2/5  rDev -16.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured into straight pint glass. Poured with less than an inch of head that very quickly dissipated. Left light but sturdy lacing. A dark yellow color. Clarity is very good. Pleasant floral hop aroma with citrus notes. Flavor followed aroma closely, with the citrus flavors leaving a sharp taste. Body is what was expected for the style. Nicely drinkable. I received this as a gift, if this was available locally I would put this in my regular rotation.

Serving type: bottle

01-05-2009 23:06:58 | More by beertunes
Photo of armock
armock

New York

4/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Thanks goes out to Wasatch and NitroGen for both send this out as an extra to me.

A - Poured a hazed golden color with a white head that leaves lacing

S - Theres a lot of nice citrus hops in the nose

T - For the most part it follows the nose but theres some maltiness that balances the hops out

M - This beer has a medium body with medium carbonation to it

D - I liked this beer quite a bit its easy to drink with a nice citrus hop flavor that I could easily session

Serving type: bottle

12-31-2008 21:09:06 | More by armock
Photo of davexisxrabid
davexisxrabid

California

4.08/5  rDev +6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

This brew poured a clear amber color with a thin head. Adequage carbonation, not too much lacing.

There was an unmistakible sweet bubblegum aroma with a piney floral hop scent.

Taste was almost on par with the smell, bittersweet grapefruit flavor. Well balanced between the sweet malts and bittering hops.

Good mouthfeel; slight bitterness in the aftertaste which clings to the palate in a good way. Ale was not too thin but had a very light refreshing body.

Very drinkable brew. The only difficult decision on my part is whether I enjoy Firestone 31 or Double Barrel more!

Serving type: bottle

12-29-2008 18:49:49 | More by davexisxrabid
Pale 31 from Firestone Walker Brewing Co.
87 out of 100 based on 1,319 ratings.