Roebling Imperial Robust Porter - Rivertown Brewing Co.
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 177 | Reviews: 39 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by shand:
More User Reviews:
3.44/5 rDev -4.4%
Saw this and passed on it while in Cincy this past summer. Pours deep dark nearly black with cola brown highlights, light khaki tan head dwindles quick as the pour. Aroma has hints of Hershey's chocolate syrup, mild coffee roasts, and hints of creamy vanilla character. The chocolate syrup, baker's chocolate combo comes off up front, very sweet for an imperial porter, it's packing a bit of residual sugar. Okay I just read the six pack holder, imported sweet vanilla beans, cold pressed espresso, and raw cane sugars. It's kind of confused, limited malt profile, big alcohol expression, and one sided sweetness from the raw cane sugars. The coffee additions to give it that acrid bitterness that add some balance with the dark roasted malts. It's totally missing something in the backend of the finish, hits hard with the burnt roasts, sweet sugars, and vanilla upfront and it all disappears. Mouthfeel becomes a bit cloying rich residual sugars overwhelm my palate, throw some of this in some whiskey barrels see how it adds to the beer. Overall, first beer from Rivertown I appreciate at all, so that's a complement.
12-07-2013 00:38:42 | More by WVbeergeek
3.68/5 rDev +2.2%
12 oz bottle served in a Belgian snifter.
Pours clear reddish-brown but looks nearly black in the glass.
Aroma: vanilla, dark roasted malts, coffee and hints of smoke and dark chocolate.
The flavor is a bit sweet, and probably seems more so due to the ample use of vanilla, but there is a clear if mild bitterness too, and some coffee in the finish and aftertaste.
O: well crafted and tasty but not as robust as an "Imperial Robust Porter" should be.
08-18-2013 23:59:29 | More by chinchill
3.93/5 rDev +9.2%
This one is dark, almost black but that it lets a little brown peek through. The tan head that forms is small but tight, lasts for neither a long or short time, and leaves just enough spotting to be what I would consider slightly above average in appearance.
There's a bit of a roasted malts note going on here, which isn't traditional but that I do like. Otherwise, some dark cocoa nib comes through strongest. There's the faintest touch of vanilla sweetness that is hard for me to get at first. It comes out more strongly as it sits to counter the robust, malty sort of bitterness.
The body isn't as big as it should be, at an average medium, slightly lacking richness and depth as it goes. It may be that it's only got a bit of smoothness to it, that the carbonation is present but doesn't "move," per se, but whatever it is, it could use a bit more. Otherwise, this is the best or close to it that I've tried from Rivertown to memory.
10-31-2012 23:13:45 | More by Brenden
3.58/5 rDev -0.6%
Deepest brown/black in appearance, with a small, single-finger head and almost no lace at all. Not impressive.
Nose is sweet chocolate. Unusual but appealing.
Taste is deliciously brownie-like at first, with more fudge or chocolate and only a hint of coffee. Overall flavor is a bit sour, though, but otherwise I downed this with no trouble. If this is an "imperial", I get no sense of a heightened alcohol content. Nonetheless, I enjoyed this one.
12-02-2011 06:34:46 | More by secondtooth
2.03/5 rDev -43.6%
A - Pours dark brown, almost black into a tulip. Thin in body, very little, quickly fading, eggshell colored head. Leaves no lacing at all as it fades.
S - Not much aroma at all. What smell I can pull from it is of toasted nuts, faint hints of burnt marshamallow.
T - Alot of vanilla, almost vanilla extract flavor. There's no body to this beer. Its more similar to vanilla coke than to any other porter I've had. The label notes "like a big, chewy, vanilla, coffee infused brownie". Where's the coffee and chocolate? Where's the chewiness I was promised? There's also a slight sourness to it. Could I have an infected bottle? I don't toss the "infection" word around lightly, I think this beer may be off.
M - As stated twice before, there's no toothiness to it. No body, too much carbonation.
O - Not a good beer. I pride myself on being a porter afficianado. Its my favorite style. This was one of the worst I've ever had.
12-11-2011 19:58:15 | More by RocPorterFanatic
3.23/5 rDev -10.3%
Pours like every other porter. Roasted malt, smoke, coffee, and chocolate in the aroma. Carbonation gives a bit of bite, Flavor isn't quite as big as the aroma sets up, but it's well balanced and has a wonderful finish. Charred oak lasts forever.
Nice, but not amazing
09-10-2013 02:02:25 | More by McNealc31
3.98/5 rDev +10.6%
A buddy of mine gave me this beer from a (make your own) six pack.
At first look:
I liked the packaging...very clear and laid out vey well. (i like that in any product; if they pay atten to the outside chances are good they will do the same with the inside.. :) )
At first smell:
the coffee piece hits you right away, but gives way to vanilla and some sweeter lighter notes. Nice :) ; To get the nose to layer like that is impressive.
At first taste:
As the name states it is very robust in the front....coffee and roasted flavors hold down the first half..then you feel the ABV kick in (7.8% nice :) )....with a stroke of the vanilla as the tail lightens up (in mouth feel and body). This laying is there sip after sip...
Im new to this but with a complex and very ordered nose and taste this beer has made it into my regular and fav's all in one bottle. (Two locked it in for me...lol)
Now i know imperials aernt for everyone....and if so try this one when your up for it. But I like stronger beers and this one borders on an ohio guinness for me.
08-05-2013 14:40:30 | More by chuck-chillout
Roebling Imperial Robust Porter from Rivertown Brewing Co.
82 out of 100 based on 177 ratings.