Seven Hills Pale Ale - Wormtown Brewing Co.
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 38 | Reviews: 14 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by Flounder57:
3.1/5 rDev -9.9%
I picked this growler up the other day down in Weymouth at Granite Liquors. Beer was poured into a pint glass.
Appearance: The beer poured a one finger head. It is a golden yellow with signs of carbonation running up the glass. The head has reduced and left some lacing on the glass.
Smell: light hop profile, sweet malts that give off a honey and bread aroma. Smells nice.
Taste: More bread and sweet malts. Not really noticing too much hops.
Mouthfeel: high carbonation, chewy, and medium bodied.
Overall: This is not too shabby of a pale ale from Worcester. Not sure how old the growler is, but wouldn't mind trying this out on draft sometime. The growler could be old and have lost some characteristics to it.
11-09-2011 03:34:00 | More by Flounder57
More User Reviews:
4.63/5 rDev +34.6%
This beer is exactly what i hopped and thought it would be. It was very clear with a good head. I thought it had a nice but mild aroma. Very smoothe tasting with a light hop character. I thought for one of the first releases it was perfect because it was a great easy drinking beer with nothing aggresive so most people will like it. I think Ben has done a wonderul job and i am looking forward to a summer of drinking lots of Wormtown beer.
03-23-2010 22:17:16 | More by kegwizard
3.9/5 rDev +13.4%
Served on tap at Peppercorns Bar and Grill this is one of the first offerings from Wormtown Brewery in Worcester, MA. Poured a pale golden color with a small white head, less than I would expect for this style beer. Aroma was mildly hoppy, unmistakably American, with some bready undertones. This was a very easy beer to drink, well balanced and not excessively bitter at 30 IBUs. Very crisp with a dry finish and a slight soapy aftertaste on my tongue which seemed to diminish as the beer warmed. Overall this is a very good example of this style, I may have appreciated a slightly more floral hop aroma on the nose but this is still something I would order again.
03-22-2010 02:17:09 | More by jadedfire32
4.6/5 rDev +33.7%
A - A gorgeous glistening golden yellow color. Straw. Pretty large head that retains and laces very very nicely. Even lacing all across the glass.
S - Yeasty, very yeasty. Fresh grass. Smells very "beery" overall.
T - Mmmm. Nice and light. Grassy taste with yeast and some lemon rind perhaps. Very earthy and "dirty" tasting on the swallow with a moderate hoppy kick that's real pleasant. This is pretty delicious.
M - Quite light but not in a watery way. Well-carbonated but not overly so at all. Crisp as hell and perfect for springtime.
D - This is the best-crafted beer I've had from Wormtown and the only one that has the right mouthfeel. This is a really nice, well-crafted beer that I could see any other good microbrewery across the country releasing. Victory or Lagunitas could release this and it would still meet expectations. Very nicely done here, Wormtown. So drinkable. I'm impressed.
04-07-2011 22:12:45 | More by jmerloni
3.9/5 rDev +13.4%
The second beer brewed at Wormtown.. the first batch of this particular style.
Appearance: Light, golden, with the expected haze of a young, unfiltered beer.
Smell: Some American hop aroma mixed with bread, and a touch of yeast. I'd love a bit more hop aroma (or perhaps less of the yeastiness).
Taste: Light and balanced. Gentle, bready malts with a bit of American hop crispness. The slight yeastiness is a factor as well, again, largely owing to the batch's relative youth.
Mouthfeel: Very dry and crisp, the way I tend to like my APA. I sometimes find the crystal malt character in other pales to be distracting.
Drinkability: At 4.5%, certainly sessionable. I had three while visiting Peppercorn's for the Wormtown release party.
The first few batches of beer from a new brewery are always going to be a bit experimental, and I don't doubt that the recipes and processes will see some tweaking in subsequent batches. I generally prefer my APA to have a more pronounced hop character, but this is still within the parameters of the style. I would be interested to see how this stands up with a bit more age, to allow some of the yeast-driven character to subside a touch.
03-18-2010 14:54:44 | More by krantul
4.33/5 rDev +25.9%
This one caught me off guard, as it tastes to me more of an IPA than most pales. A pleasant surprise as I love most IPAs. A clean burst of hops, not too heavy or light taste wise. Has a light yellow-amber hue, which at first glance only seems thick. For myself, this is a very drinkable brew.
02-12-2011 22:59:37 | More by OBoftheDEAD
3.78/5 rDev +9.9%
Tap at peppercorns
Light creamy head fades med pace with light lacing, crystal clear golden pale yellow color.
Nose of light grassy hops, fresh light hops but very light, golden malts, fairly light, touch of spicy hop.
Taste is light, a bit off bitterness wroth some mild grassy hops and but spicy fresh hops, light golden pale malts, refreshing and drinkable. Finish brings a bit more spicy and floral hops and bitterness, semi dry, light hop spicy sting.
Mouth is a bit lighter but decent body and carb
Drink is great, light bitterness, light booze, drier finish, crisp and sessionable
02-11-2011 03:43:42 | More by jlindros
3.45/5 rDev +0.3%
Very light orange, decent white head. Doesn't stick around very well and leaves a bit of lacing. Smell is weak but pale malt, light fruit and hops and are detectable. Taste is decent, light citrus and good hop presence. Hints of grass and bread. Has a bit of a weird soapy off-taste but seems to go away after a while. Gets the job done as a pale ale, it's light, crisp and refreshing. I did feel a bit strange paying $5 for one seeing as I could see the brewing tanks from my table though...
03-28-2010 03:31:29 | More by Chico1985
3.1/5 rDev -9.9%
First time here and perhaps I just got a bad batch. The beer followed the trend of the other beers I had (maple brown and IPA) with some other issues:
Appearance: Much hazier than necessary, a simply extension in the bright tank at a lower temp would have resolved this.
Aroma: Here was the major issue: Major DMS. It was cutting right through the mild hop aroma so much so that it was difficult to over look.
Flavor: Decent, nothing to brag about. Pretty light on the hop punch, but a little bit there with some mild malt to back it up.
Mouthfeel: Medium to light, works fine for the style.
Drinakbility: I was expecting more from this one. The IPA was nice and hoppy (although still a bit cloudy) and pleasant and the brown as well a bit different than its description, but still nice. This beer could work, but needs to have the DMS issue that I experienced cleaned up which may push the hop aroma and flavor a bit more. Eitherway, a decent place to get some good food and fresh beer.
05-15-2010 02:13:43 | More by WinkyDowBrew
2.38/5 rDev -30.8%
If you like bright, clean, bubbly pale ales, this is for you. If you like pale ales that have aroma and taste, this is not for you. The defining flavor, such as it is, is old corn, with a touch of grass in the aroma. Otherwise, this is a Kingfisher: all fizz and water. You can do much better.
05-22-2011 23:15:38 | More by gfreed
Seven Hills Pale Ale from Wormtown Brewing Co.
79 out of 100 based on 38 ratings.