1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Omer Traditional Blond - Brouwerij Bockor N.V.

Not Rated.
Omer Traditional BlondOmer Traditional Blond

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
83
good

200 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 200
Reviews: 69
rAvg: 3.64
pDev: 15.38%
Wants: 5
Gots: 16 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij Bockor N.V. visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Belgian Strong Pale Ale |  8.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: philipquarles on 10-02-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 200 | Reviews: 69 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of zephyr707
1/5  rDev -72.5%

Photo of RealBirkoff
1.5/5  rDev -58.8%

Photo of Fettpopps
2/5  rDev -45.1%

Photo of vinny21bal
2/5  rDev -45.1%

Photo of tbeckett
2.08/5  rDev -42.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Recommended by the bartender at One Pint Pub in Helsinki and consumed there. From notes.

A - Pours with a hazy copper colour and a fluffy, pillowy, white head that fades to a cool ice cream scoop in the middle. Leaves thick lacing at the top too.

S - Yeasy with some orange notes like a Belgian Pale Ale would be but nothing more than that really. Strong but not complex.

T - Woah. This was rough. Yeast, orange, and alcohol make up the taste with the yeast and alcohol notes mixing in a very unpleasant way which I didn't like at all. Like licking a floor in a way.

M - Dry finish leading to a sweet lingering note. Medium carbonation and a light to medium body. Lingering cardboard flavour was mixed in there too. Kinda rough and a little weird.

O/D - Not a good tasting beer. Shame really. That mix of unpleasant flavours just didn't sit well with me and I was unhappy to have tried this.

Photo of olradetbalder
2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

Photo of sliponflange
2.5/5  rDev -31.3%

Photo of GRG1313
2.6/5  rDev -28.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Rick at Beverage Warehouse in Los Angeles raved about this one, which he rarely does; thus, had to try it despite being forced into the purchase of a 4-pack.

Pours clear gold with amber tones and a nice and somewhat lasting pure white head. Nice looking and inviting.

Nose is huge assertive esters; fresh pear/peaches and assertive banana and candi sugar. Gets to a point where it smells like strong sweet lemon pie filling. Pleasant if you like a really sweet nose.

Mouthfeel is creamy with medium to full body and an elegant champagne carbonation. Flavors are of sweet white bread and sweet steamed "dessert dim sum." Some of the sweetness in the nose and mouth is clearly from the high alcohol - that simple "sugar" sweetness.

Flavors are not bad, yet I can't imagine drinking a glass of this. The nose is so sweet it's almost cloying and it obviously affect the taste so that while the beer is not sweet, one has the impression of drinking a very sweet and cloying drink.

Finish is a bit herbal green, light celery and, finally, without sweetness! Finish is the best part of this one. All in all, just way too sweet in character to drink, while not being a "sweet beer."

Photo of SpeedwayJim
2.68/5  rDev -26.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

From BBF 2011. 11.2oz bottle poured into Lost Abbey stemware. Shared with schen9303.

Pours a 2 finger frothy white head with decent retention. Beer is a clear, bright yellow. Lacing is stringy and spotty and thick with good cling. A good looking beer.

Nose is corn adjuncts, apple, and some citrus. Moderately aromatic but this one doesn't smell right for the style.

Opens sweet corn. Adjunct flavors. Some odd skunkiness. Yeasty towards the middle with some citrus, pineapple, and more corn towards the end. Really not much going on here. Finish is yeasty and sweet with a spicy aftertaste. Not good considering the style.

Light bodied with moderate carbonation. Somewhat watery and bubbly in the mouth and tingly and abrasive going down. Finish is accented with a short, lingering aftertaste. Decent.

A really poor example of the Strong Pale Ale style. Not overly complex with a just-about-average nose and feel. With all the other solid offerings floating around, this is one Belgian that I won't bother revisiting.

Photo of Hellpop65
2.75/5  rDev -24.5%

Photo of duff247
2.75/5  rDev -24.5%

Photo of DoubleJ
2.79/5  rDev -23.4%
look: 4.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Several days of drinking hoppy beers requires a break, and a Belgian is one way to go. This Belgian blond comes from a 330 ml bottle. On to the beer:

Just a beautiful contrast between liquid and foam. An inch thich of lush soapy head just sits on top of toasted orange, and in a wide Orval chalice, looks lovely. The aroma is powerful, medicinal, sweet with honey, and fruity like orange flavored Cold-Eeze. Not the best smelling beer I've come acorss.

Not the best tasting either. It tastes disjointed and the overall flavor just isn' t very appealing. There's a little honey at first, which is quickly sappedand turend into a vague bitterness. Wildflowers add a floral accent. Tastes grainy too, which really kills the mood. Probably its best aspect being the 8% alcohol hidden. A light and airy mouthfeel with gentle carbonation is a bit of a moral victory in the scheme of this beer.

No like. I'm going back to the well....

Photo of Nickls
2.8/5  rDev -23.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours with a decent pure white head, but the retention is pretty poor. Slightly hazy golden marigold color.

The aroma has a lot of sweetness in it; pears, some yeastiness; touch of grass. Not a whole lot going on, and very sweet to my nose for the style. Sweetness carries over into the taste as well, with hints of candied sugar; back to the pear; not picking up on the yeast in the flavor. Boring, too sweet, does give some warming alcohol notes over a lighter body with fizzy carbonation. This is neither interesting, or great-flavored. Not a brew that I would revisit.

Photo of weissbierdrinker
2.83/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours a hazy gold color with a faint white head that fades leaving some lacing around the glass.

Smells is fruity

Taste is sweet, and yeasty. Dry finish with a sweet lingering aftertaste.

I really don't like this beer it taste like sweet'n low.

Photo of Alieniloquium
2.88/5  rDev -20.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

750 mL bottle poured into a De Struise chalice.

Appearance - Clear golden body with a nice white head. Never fully settles and leaves some nice lacing.

Smell - Ugh. Fusel alcohol, Belgian yeastiness and sugar. Pale malt all over and I think a touch of skunk.

Taste - A marked improvement. Much more banana and clove esters. The malt is still fairly one-note, but it has a little bit of depth when combined with the sugar and yeast flavors. Bready. Still has a fusel alcohol burn in the back, though.

Mouthfeel - Tastes light, but it's pretty heavy for the style. Much bigger than a Blonde ale, even by Belgian standards. That alcohol bite is a bit much, too.

Overall - From the aroma, I thought I'd be drainpouring this. The taste is a marked improvement, but doesn't elevate it to anything interesting.

Photo of magictacosinus
2.95/5  rDev -19%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured into a tulip glass from a 330ml bottle. Freshness date is listed as "30/07/14."

Pours a familiar appearance that I've seen in other blond Belgian styles, as well as strong pale ales. Golden yellow, and excellent carbonation that provides it a gigantic head. It's bottle conditioned, but you wouldn't be able to tell with how clear this beer looks. What is undeniable is that this beer looks good and desirable.

When it comes to aroma, however, there's something far less intriguing going on. In essence, it contains a malty, biscuity smell that does not at all remind of top fermented yeast, as the bottle claims it contains. It contains the bready notes of various lagers I've had over time. This isn't necessarily a problem, but it doesn't help the fact that there's only a mere light sugary smell (at 8% ABV, no less!) and barely a bitter kick to it. There's not much really going on here.

The taste only further confirms the beer's slight blandness. It tastes as bready as it smells, and even contains the redeemable factor of holding a slightly fruity taste reminiscent of white grapes. The hoppy vibe is decent, but slightly fleeting. There is no sweetness whatsoever to this beer, which is extremely surprising due to it's high ABV. Very watery in feel. A slightly underwhelming dry, carbonated finish. Easy to drink, that's for sure, but not too exciting overall.

I haven't explored blonds as much as other Belgian styles, but I enjoy them all the same. I don't know whether or not this is a "traditional" style of strong pale ales, but as an avid fan of Duvel, I can say that this is not a very great example of the style. The fact that it contains an unbalanced feel and flavor, as well as this much alcohol that got me slightly tipsy by the end is an unpleasant combination of factors. I made a stew with the remaining yeast of this beer, and even then it didn't add much considerable flavor to the recipe. This beer would work better at 5-6% ABV, and with slightly more sweetness. That way, it would still be just as refreshing and perhaps far more balanced.

Photo of bonbini26
3/5  rDev -17.6%

Photo of Basoos1
3/5  rDev -17.6%

Photo of rkcrozier
3/5  rDev -17.6%

Photo of cfalovo97
3/5  rDev -17.6%

Photo of thereal_adam
3/5  rDev -17.6%

Photo of Scamboogery
3/5  rDev -17.6%

Photo of jtdolla911
3/5  rDev -17.6%

Photo of brandonld23
3/5  rDev -17.6%

Photo of berlinpa
3/5  rDev -17.6%

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Omer Traditional Blond from Brouwerij Bockor N.V.
83 out of 100 based on 200 ratings.