1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Snake Pro Double IPA - Figure 8 Brewing

Not Rated.
Snake Pro Double IPASnake Pro Double IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
81
good

55 Ratings
THE BROS
80
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 55
Reviews: 24
rAvg: 3.51
pDev: 19.94%
Wants: 1
Gots: 4 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Figure 8 Brewing visit their website
Indiana, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  9.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: cnally on 09-06-2010)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 55 | Reviews: 24 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by LiquidBread219:
Photo of LiquidBread219
3.1/5  rDev -11.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A= Kind of Hazy in color like a cooper color. Nice foamy head that sticks around for a little bit. Some decent lacing on this one.
S= Some hops but what I really pick up on is caramel malts and alcohol.

T= Taste for me was more of the caramel, a little bit more hops really wish there was more hop activity I just think that the backbone is a little bit to strong.

M= Medium bodied and kind of syrupy.

O= Overall, It kind of grows on you but I think the bomber prices are kind of high on this one. I just don't think this would be one I would seek out for the price.

More User Reviews:
Photo of dmheinz57
1/5  rDev -71.5%

Photo of BeerAdvocate
3.5/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Review from BeerAdvocate Magazine Issue #50 (March 2011):

Banter about 100 IBUs and a “venomous bite,” but the DIPA is a style that is getting harder and harder to master. Reddish brassy clarity, foamy topping stays for a while. First whiff is of vegetal hops with some spicy backing, ester alcohol with some vague fruitiness and a light sweetness of caramel. A smooth enough brew. 100 IBUs strong—yeah, they’re there, nearly hold- ing the palate hostage. Spice from the hops melds with the warmth from the alcohol. Malt character is a bit biscuity and very dry; yeasty tone resides in all of that. Walking the path of pushing the hops too far without much malt to back it up and the alcohol that fumes being too high. A middle-of-the-pack DIPA, worthy of a try for that hop fix you’ve been waiting for.

Photo of 1Adam12
3.88/5  rDev +10.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a murky burnt orange. Not too much head. Smell is unique to other DIPA's I've had. Alot of citrus, but there's something in there that I can't place (my wife thinks it smells like a dirty sock, i beg to differ). Tastes like....CANTALOPE! There's the smell I wasn't placing. I swear, this actually has a cantalope taste to it, remarkable! I also possibly get almost a clementine flavor as well. Definitely not an A beer, but still really good. Mouthfeel is nice. Pretty carbonated. Semi creamy. Medium bodied. Overall, I love this beer. I could drink it all the time. Different. Very impressed with my first experience from Figure 8 brewing.

Photo of thaghost
3.5/5  rDev -0.3%

Photo of acknight
4/5  rDev +14%

Photo of cubsfanjace
2.5/5  rDev -28.8%

Photo of rhoadsrage
3.9/5  rDev +11.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

(Served in a tulip glass)

A- This beer has a slightly hazy aged copper body with a thick creamy tan head and a gentle matrix of tiny bubbles working their way to the surface.

S- The fruity orange hops are juicy with a woody green hops finish.

T- The green cinnamon and sweet juicy orange flavor to the hops are full with a finish of pungent green hops and a soft dandelion bitterness hits the back of the throat after each sip.

M- The medium mouthfeel has a tight cleaning fizz in the finish.

O- The nice hop depth is overpowered by the larger bitterness and pungent finish that dominates and sticks in the back of the throat.

Photo of terrafirma
3/5  rDev -14.5%

Photo of PBRmeasap1980
3.5/5  rDev -0.3%

Photo of Al_M
4.12/5  rDev +17.4%

Photo of alleykatking
4.25/5  rDev +21.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Had on tap...

A- Poured a amber color with a light coppery off tone. One and a half finger white head shows great retention. Lots of streaky and web style lacing on the sides of the glass.

S- Caramel bready malts comes into play with a ton of earthy hops. Piney and light grassy hops in this one as well. There is a light citrus hop with clove like undertone as well.

T- There is a big citrus blast from the hops in the front end of this one. Some sweet caramel malts in the middle of the beer make this a little more balanced. Piney hops with a hint of spicey hops in the tail end of the beer. This gives the beer a ton of hop flavor which is amazing!

M- Medium mouthfeel. Carbonation is good for the style. Tons of hops destroy the palate and well as you guessed it long into the aftertaste. This beer is a hop forward beer which is expected. Clean flavors and most hop style can be tasted. Medium drying on the palate from the alcohol.

D- This beer was a wonderful surprise from a brewery who I am enjoying a lot. A nice hop bomb that I would gladly have a couple pints of. Figure 8 is going to be something big here in the next couple of years. This beer just goes to show that.

Photo of kirkse
4/5  rDev +14%

Photo of bkonk10
4/5  rDev +14%

Photo of Another6Pack
3.4/5  rDev -3.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Deep, brownish copper in the pint glass. Minimal head even with an aggressive pour; carb bubbles are few and far between, suggesting this may be a big bodied double. Head receded to a small band around the perimeter of the glass and left some thin lacing.

Nose is heavy on the citrus and sweet malts. I always hope to find some pine in my doubles, but not in this one.

First taste proves out the body is not as big as I thought it may be. Well balanced hop and malt presence in this one with an unusually dry finish for a 9% DIPA. Very drinkable, but overall pretty uninteresting. This one is much more like an above average APA than a DIPA.

Photo of Malty_Matty
3.94/5  rDev +12.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A- somewhat clear amber color with a white quickly dissipating head.

S- caramel and grassy, spicy, hop aromas.

T- intense grassy flavors with a healthy malt backbone to support this unusual flavor profile.

Mf- medium bodied with a slightly sticky residual presence.

Pretty good beer overall.

Photo of injuredreserve
3.15/5  rDev -10.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A: Nice amber hue with thin head and bubbles throughout.

S: Caramel malts, fresh bread and booze.

T: Unbalanced harshness at first, then mellows a little. Malty. Old? quite possible. Linger is mostly booze.

M: Nice creamy mouthfeel that leaves a little stickiness.

O: Ok at best, happy to try but will not seek out.

Photo of cadizkyguy
3.05/5  rDev -13.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

At 7.99 per 22 ounce bottle I went in with high expectations. What I got was an amped up, one dimensional IPA. Reminded me of a Bells Two Hearted (one of my favs) but with way too many hops and an alcohol kick that left me one and done for the nite. I want to see Figure 8 succeed but they missed the boat with this one.

Photo of ifixufly
3.5/5  rDev -0.3%

Photo of estevan1024
3.75/5  rDev +6.8%

Photo of Pulltabs_only
3.56/5  rDev +1.4%

Photo of aasher
1.5/5  rDev -57.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

This bottle is fresh, some six days old or so. This one pours an orange, red, brownish color with an off white lacing. This beer smells like salt, sweaty gym socks, some sweet malt, and dust/must. This beer tastes even worse. It tastes like a sweaty, mouth open jaunt through my grandparents abandoned basement. The sweaty salt aspect is GROSS. The flavors are so, so awful that contemplating another taste is tough. What does that say about this product? A brewery sold this to be today, and they should be ashamed. It drinks like an IPA should, maybe, if you struggle to imagine it. What the fuck is this. This beer is deathly bad. This is an IPA, let alone an imperial? They should start back at zero, and press the reset button.

Photo of csustar001
4.5/5  rDev +28.2%

Photo of lilsmizzul1225
3.25/5  rDev -7.4%

Photo of mtstatebeer
2.68/5  rDev -23.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

22 oz. bottle served in a tulip glass. Pours a hazy reddish-orange color with a small, foamy off-white head, fair lacing. Aroma is pale malts, bread, vinous fruits, peppery, pine and resiny. Flavor is dominated by various hop notes, pepper, citrus, resin, a little bit of bread flavor but doesn't even come close to putting this one in balance. Mouthfeel is medium, harshly astringent, bitterness lays on the tongue for a good while. Not a bad beer, but a little too harsh. There is a way to do 100 IBUs and not be this harsh.

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Snake Pro Double IPA from Figure 8 Brewing
81 out of 100 based on 55 ratings.