1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Big Whig - Noble Ale Works

Not Rated.
Big WhigBig Whig

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
86
very good

143 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 143
Reviews: 13
rAvg: 3.85
pDev: 10.65%
Wants: 1
Gots: 13 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Noble Ale Works visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American IPA |  6.80% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: UCLABrewN84 on 10-03-2012)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 143 | Reviews: 13 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of tourdot
2.75/5  rDev -28.6%

tourdot, May 12, 2013
Photo of jvillefan
2.75/5  rDev -28.6%

jvillefan, Mar 09, 2014
Photo of TheBoog013
3/5  rDev -22.1%

TheBoog013, Oct 18, 2013
Photo of kborning
3/5  rDev -22.1%

kborning, Sep 19, 2014
Photo of jenray
3/5  rDev -22.1%

jenray, Dec 28, 2013
Photo of EricSS
3.09/5  rDev -19.7%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

served on draft at obriens in san diego

Apperance - golden amber with haze. No head , but lace forms down the glass

Smell - floral hop aroma, slightly sweer, not complex. Very hard to pick out anything else.

Taste - while not bad, its nothing to write home about. Slight piney hop taste on the front with a pure bitterness on the back end. Some grain does push through right before the final biterness, but its hard to catch.

Mouthfeel - it has a medium body. Mouthfeel is better than taste in my opinion.

Overall I have only tried this beer on tap and their "IPA" from bottle before. I lthought the normal IPA was better. They may be the same beer with a new name. I have no idea if this beer is old and has lost hop profile, but I will most likely not order again. I feel like the bitter finish is not balanced out by anything else. Which some people may like, but I prefer slighly more balanced IPAs. In San Diego that's not hard to find.

EricSS, Feb 05, 2013
Photo of kojevergas
3.16/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

1 pint 6 fl oz brown glass bottle with standard pressure cap acquired at a local SoCal beer store and served into a conical Samuel Smith's pint glass in me gaff in low altitude Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California. Reviewed live. Expectations are average; I'm not big on the beers I've had from this brewery so far. I try to support locals. Cost was $5.00.

Served cold, straight from the fridge. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: Pours a two finger beige colour head of decent cream, nice thickness, and good (~4-5+ minute) retention for the fairly high ABV. Body colour is a dull unfiltered cloudy yellow-copper. Abundant floating yeast are readily visible. No bubble show. Decent for the style, but there's nothing unique or special here.

Sm: Heavy dominant grapefruit, with some underlying pine hop character. Pale malts, resins, honey. Floral hops. Intriguing, but I'm not sure the hop selection here was ideal. A bit of biscuity yeast when I look for it. No alcohol is detectable. A bit of hop oil. A mild to moderate strength aroma.

T: Hm. Grapefruit hop character, resinous floral hop character, and a bit of nectary hop oil. The light citrus is interesting, and it works well with the simple pale malt body. Honey lightens it and adds a pleasant balancing sweetness, but it never gets too sweet. Nor does it get too interesting; it's a rather simple IPA. No yeast character comes through in spite of the abundance of visible yeast particles noted in the appearance. No alcohol comes through, thankfully. I can see what they're going for - an IPA that conforms to the image of "West coast IPAs" in order to sell bombers at $5 a piece. And hey, it worked here for me. But it's not a bold or experimental beer, and by chasing others they've created a boring product. Decently balanced, but fairly pedestrian.

Mf: I like the softness, but it's too thick for its lack of deep and/or diverse flavours. Overcarbonated. Smooth and wet. A bit oily. Decent presence on the palate.

Dr: An uninspired IPA that will likely gain acclaim for its conformity. It seems more effort was put into the label and marketing than into the beer - which is kind of the point. Many people will happily spend $5 per bomber for this stuff, but I will not be one of them. An enjoyable if forgettable IPA. There's potential here, but this brewery needs to focus on innovation. Hides its ABV well. Drinkable stuff. I do like it, but it's poorly priced for its quality in a market oversaturated with better cheaper beers.

C+

kojevergas, Apr 05, 2013
Photo of largadeer
3.25/5  rDev -15.6%

largadeer, Oct 16, 2014
Photo of jeff1973
3.25/5  rDev -15.6%

jeff1973, May 15, 2014
Photo of JulianTellez
3.25/5  rDev -15.6%

JulianTellez, Aug 25, 2014
Photo of mactrail
3.25/5  rDev -15.6%

mactrail, Mar 27, 2013
Photo of Zbeetleman
3.25/5  rDev -15.6%

Zbeetleman, Jul 09, 2013
Photo of ncstateplaya
3.25/5  rDev -15.6%

ncstateplaya, Aug 14, 2014
Photo of ezperkins2
3.25/5  rDev -15.6%

ezperkins2, Feb 18, 2013
Photo of terence
3.25/5  rDev -15.6%

terence, Oct 21, 2013
Photo of Alek
3.25/5  rDev -15.6%

Alek, Mar 20, 2013
Photo of joeyjoey104
3.5/5  rDev -9.1%

joeyjoey104, Aug 02, 2014
Photo of GRG1313
3.5/5  rDev -9.1%

GRG1313, Mar 28, 2013
Photo of dvmin98
3.5/5  rDev -9.1%

dvmin98, Jun 29, 2014
Photo of Rick778
3.5/5  rDev -9.1%

Rick778, Jun 06, 2014
Photo of jwswigs
3.5/5  rDev -9.1%

jwswigs, Mar 09, 2014
Photo of jaeone
3.5/5  rDev -9.1%

jaeone, Jul 09, 2014
Photo of Jessenimmo
3.5/5  rDev -9.1%

Jessenimmo, Mar 10, 2013
Photo of BARFLYB
3.5/5  rDev -9.1%

BARFLYB, May 11, 2014
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Big Whig from Noble Ale Works
86 out of 100 based on 143 ratings.