Barrel-Aged Project Brew No. 6 - Porto - Brouwerij Hof Ten Dormaal
No picture uploaded.
Have one? Upload it now.
Ratings: 19 | Reviews: 4 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by TMoney2591:
2.85/5 rDev -22.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
Served in a snifter at Local Option.
I used this beer as a sort of canary to tell me whether or not the investment in the entire bottle series is safe. Yup. it pours a clear gold topped by a finger of light cream-white foam. The nose comprises light dark wheat surrounded by Port grapes and a hint of booze. The taste brings in more of the same, along with clove, licorice, banana peel, light earthy greens, and a sense of rye and pumpernickel. The combination is just too odd to work very well for me. The body is a light-leaning medium, with a light moderate carbonation and a sorta/kinda drying finish. Overall, as much as I like the idea of Port-barreling beers in general, this particular one just didn't really do it for me. Suffice it to say that I spent a decent amount of money on beer on the way home, but I saved $170 or so by not pulling the trigger on this series.
Serving type: on-tap
11-30-2012 22:29:36 | More by TMoney2591
More User Reviews:
3.63/5 rDev -0.8%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5
Bottle from Etre Gourmet. Shared at Edward's poker and Mexican night.
A - Late-rising white foam settles to not much else. Hazy amber cider body. Not terrible for a 12% brew, but not much to look at either.
S - Loads of port and oak presence; quite a bit of barrel presence compared to the other beers I've had in this series. There's a hint of green apple and acetone that mars the port flavors, and only mild malt sweetness and Belgian yeast character contributed by the base beer. Alcohol is well-hidden, and at least this isn't infected like the cognac version. Still, it's a bit rough around the edges.
T - The taste is similar, with a mixture of port, vinous oak, and some fruity esters from the yeast. The combination of malt sweetness, yeast, and port actually gives this more of a brandy-esque vibe to me than a port one - grape, berries, and a bit of honey. I'm surprised a 12% base beer didn't hold up to the barrel, but that's what happened here; not sure if I could have differentiated this from a wheatwine or a number of other styles.
M - Dry, medium-full body, with lower carbonation and a mildly sticky finish. Some obvious alcohol warmth that gives this a modest spirit 'vibe' to it. More spritz would help offset some of the sweetness.
D - This drank a bit more like watered-down port or brandy than an oak-aged Belgian. While this is the first beer in the series that has delivered obvious barrel character it has veered way to far on the barrel side of things; as a result of this intensity it's hard to drink in large quantities. Not worth the entry price, but might be of interest to port fans.
Serving type: bottle
06-07-2013 20:33:18 | More by MasterSki
2.98/5 rDev -18.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5
Poured into a goblet. 2012 vintage, one of 2536 bottles.
2.5 A: Moderately hazed orange brown color. No head was formed. There doesn't appear to be much of any carbonation in this.
4.0 S: This is quite fruity and probably the fruitiest of the three variants that I've had. Vinous grape with strong raspberry notes with mixed other berries behind that. Sugary sweetness that emphasizes a berry fruit juice type deal. Figs, dates, and plum to follow. Beyond the fruit, there is hay and grassiness, caramel, and a bit of toffee. Plenty of pepper and a bit of clove from the yeast. Booze is well hidden.
3.0 T: I'm immediately taken back by medicinal alcohol and astringency from the barrel. The nose was quite void of these flavors, but they are aggressive in the taste. The fruits of the nose are also found in the taste: grape, sherry, raspberry, mixed berry, plum, figs, dates. Again there is just a bit of grassy and hay funk with caramel and toffee. Lots of pepper and a touch of clove. If the head-on booze and astringency was removed (or even just lessened), this would be a pretty good brew. Even as it is, the good flavors push this to average.
2.0 M: Medium body. Almost no carbonation. An almost velvety chewiness. This desperately needs the carbonation. The mouthfeel on this sucks without it.
2.5 D: This beer is far too fucking expensive to not be properly carbonated. I was contemplating purchasing the rest of the variants given that I enjoyed the other two quite a bit, but based on the quality issues with this and the other reviews that indicate other problems, I'm going to quietly spend my money on something else.
Serving type: bottle
11-01-2012 00:10:40 | More by DavoleBomb
3.55/5 rDev -3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5
750mL bottle from Belgium.
A: Clear copper with a quickly receding head. Woo, it’s different!
N: Grape, cherry, honey, biscuit. Really heavy on the port/brandy sweetness.
T: Grape, pepper, cherry, honey, biscuit. The most discernible of the bunch.
M: Medium heavy. Alcohol burn is expected.
O: Best of the bunch but not saying much. If you're going to get one, this is the one I'd recommend as the port barrel works with the base beer the best.
Serving type: bottle
10-18-2012 19:34:18 | More by writerLJBerg
Barrel-Aged Project Brew No. 6 - Porto from Brouwerij Hof Ten Dormaal
83 out of 100 based on 19 ratings.