1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Hop Shortage - Knee Deep Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Hop ShortageHop Shortage

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
89
very good

274 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 274
Reviews: 52
rAvg: 3.99
pDev: 11.53%
Wants: 18
Gots: 27 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Knee Deep Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  11.30% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Ghenna on 10-11-2012)
View: Beers (36) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 274 | Reviews: 52 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of BGsWo22
BGsWo22

New York

1/5  rDev -74.9%

03-26-2014 18:53:35 | More by BGsWo22
Photo of Thorpe429
Thorpe429

Illinois

2.75/5  rDev -31.1%

09-05-2013 16:11:35 | More by Thorpe429
Photo of Charlie_Hoss
Charlie_Hoss

New Jersey

2.75/5  rDev -31.1%

02-21-2013 19:53:36 | More by Charlie_Hoss
Photo of Brew33
Brew33

Ohio

2.75/5  rDev -31.1%

06-06-2013 11:50:57 | More by Brew33
Photo of Arbitrator
Arbitrator

California

2.8/5  rDev -29.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Chilled bottle into a glass.

A: Pours a murky copper-amber body with a pinky finger of off-white head. It leaves lace as it collapses into a thin film on the beer, but during sips, there is only a little bit of soapy, curtainy foam on the glass. I see other reviews mention its clarity, so I'm really surprised to find the opposite experience. Chill haze?

S: Traditional citrus hop aromas (grapefruit, orange), pine, and a noticeable sugariness that gives a candied impression to the whole affair.

T: Citrus-dominated, especially when cold: grapefruit, orange, and tangerine are most evident. Pine comes later. The hop flavors are buoyed on a strong backbone of caramel malt; its sweetness pulls into the finish with a mild burn, giving a candied citrus aftertaste. As it warms, however, it becomes one-dimensionally bitter.

M: Medium-plus bodied. A warming effect gives nod to the high ABV of the beer, and a slight sugary burn in the finish reveals its heft. Tolerable when cold, but when warm, it becomes unbearably bitter.

O: I generally don't buy Knee Deep -- no bottle dates means that you never know if you're getting the six-month old batch or the fresh one. This is relatively fresh, having been released just once, and I don't find it that remarkable. It is outdone by Stone Ruination 10th, Stone Enjoy By, Knee Deep's own Simtra, Drake's Black Label Hopocalypse, and others. It's good that TIPAs are getting more commercial, but the flip side is that we're starting to see some mediocre entries. Its shortcomings are especially apparent when warm; I wound up drainpouring it.

Serving type: bottle

11-24-2012 00:15:09 | More by Arbitrator
Photo of PhxHorn
PhxHorn

Arizona

2.98/5  rDev -25.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This one pours a transparent light copper color, but does not generate much head at all. Nor does it leave lacing on the glass. Smell is a light aroma of hops, but not that intense. The flavor is on the tangy orangy side for an IPA, with some hints of grass and herbs in there. The finish is intensely bitter. Carbonation is on the light side, imo. This would be considered a decent IPA, but for an imperial it's definitely on the thin and wimpy side.

Serving type: bottle

11-20-2012 21:34:06 | More by PhxHorn
Photo of Trilogy31
Trilogy31

California

3/5  rDev -24.8%

01-13-2013 20:25:56 | More by Trilogy31
Photo of bahnfire
bahnfire

Vermont

3/5  rDev -24.8%

02-09-2013 01:57:21 | More by bahnfire
Photo of leodarko
leodarko

California

3/5  rDev -24.8%

11-02-2012 02:06:33 | More by leodarko
Photo of MrDave
MrDave

California

3/5  rDev -24.8%

07-23-2013 19:03:42 | More by MrDave
Photo of RattleheadKV2
RattleheadKV2

New Mexico

3/5  rDev -24.8%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Served from 22 oz bomber with bottled on date of 03/15/13, into Duvel tulip.

Appearance: Pours a clear golden, copper color with about a finger and a half of dense white head the recedes to a thin cap after a few minutes.

Smell: Hop resin, and malty sweetness, a touch of citrus, and a faint earthiness.

Taste: A touch of piney, resinous hop bitterness up front, followed by a massive amount of alcohol, that ends with a piney bitter aftertaste. Just a straight up boozy mess, hardly any hop character when compared to the alcohol bite.

Mouthfeel: Full bodied with a very nice prickly carbonation.

Overall: Just a boozy mess IMO, lacks any real hop punch, after a few drinks all I can taste is the alcohol.

Serving type: bottle

04-27-2013 05:35:01 | More by RattleheadKV2
Photo of EdTheEdge
EdTheEdge

California

3/5  rDev -24.8%

04-13-2014 23:25:44 | More by EdTheEdge
Photo of lordofstarside
lordofstarside

Nevada

3/5  rDev -24.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Another imperial ipa from knee deep. I wasn't impressed with Hoptologist but liked Simtra, so let's see where this one falls. Bomber to a snifter, bottled on 1/4/13

Pours a balanced coppery gold with a finer of foam. Really good color on this, right where a dipa should be. Very little carbonation, maybe a single bubble every three or four seconds. Foam has died down a bit, nice froth in the middle with a nice ring around the edges. Good lacing, with a bit longer of a retention time this would have been perfect

Aroma of hops, some spicy resin, lemon and orange zest, along with a subdued alcoholy malt. Some more floral hop and citrus come out as I agitate the glass

Taste is very boozy. Good amount of hops backed up with some sweet malt, but the alcohol is the first thing to stick out and the last thing to leave, not very concealed at all

Feel is full bodied with little carbonation. Good tongue tingle, sticky, nice finish. This isn't something I'd want to have more than a bottle of

This beer could really be a lot better. The alcohol is high and poorly masked with eclipses all the other flavors of the beer. Drop it down a couple percent and add more hoppy citrus. Frankly, this stuff isn't worth $10 a bottle, I'd advise against it if you paid what I did

Serving type: bottle

02-06-2013 03:18:16 | More by lordofstarside
Photo of JMScowcroft
JMScowcroft

Vermont

3.06/5  rDev -23.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Knee Deep - Hop Shortage - 1pt 6fl oz bottle

Look - Clever bottle. Pours a dark copper/amber with a minimal, bubbly head. Minimal lacing and carbonation. Hazy.

Smell - Hops are present, as well as sweet honey and some citrus.

Taste - Bitey sweet malt intro, wave of sweetness in the middle, driest of the dry hoppy finish. Booze somewhat throughout.

Mouthfeel - Rests like a tough IPA on the sides, a little overly bitter. I'm somewhat reluctant to keep sipping but curiosity killed the cat so I do. Ends quite a bit on the boozy side, which is not surprising considering the strength of this brew. I would say the mouthfeel is the worst aspect of this brew, which is big.

Overall - Not quite sure what to make of this one, I wanted to like it but I'm afraid it's so-so. Less alcohol would be one place to start as it would likely soften the boozy blow at the end and lend more attention to the complex flavor. Oh well, can't love them all!

Serving type: bottle

02-28-2013 12:57:48 | More by JMScowcroft
Photo of flayedandskinned
flayedandskinned

California

3.19/5  rDev -20.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Bottled on 4/23/13
Poured into the Sierra Nevada/Dogfish IPA glass.

Appearance: Pours a clear, pale amber/orange with a white 2 finger head that has decent retention and leaves some spotty lacing.

Aroma; Not nearly as aromatic as a I'd expect from a triple IPA.; sweet orange blossoms, resinous pine, some distant notes of grapefruit. There is an overbearingly sweet malt presence that really bogs the nose down. So sweet in fact, that it actually smells akin to malt extract. No alcohol is present in the nose.

Taste: The beer opens with very pine forward hops with a growing grapefruit presence. Some sweet caramel-y malts cut the initial hop nuances a bit short, but the dry finish leaves the bitter hop oils naked on your palate with lingering notes of resinous pine and grapefruit rind. For 11.3% ABV, the alcohol is remarkably masked and the the little that there is coalesces nicely with the strong and assertive hop bitterness.

Mouthfeel: Full bodied, very oily in texture with moderate carbonation.

Overall: Not nearly as explosively hoppy in aromatics and in taste as I'd want a Triple/Double IPA to be. The hop notes that do come across are fairly simple and are left dulled by the overbearing malts. The hops do come across a bit more in the finish, but they of a more oily and resinous nature rather than bright and citrusy. For what it's worth it definitely does go down very easily, a bit too easily in fact, for 11%.

Serving type: bottle

04-30-2013 00:49:26 | More by flayedandskinned
Photo of gillagorilla
gillagorilla

Maryland

3.25/5  rDev -18.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Bomber from a trade on 05/15/13 w/ a bottling date of 03/15/13 had in a Burley Oak tulip

A: A very hazy dirty blonde with ok lacing. Minimal head.

S: I get a lot of nice citrus notes here. It is nice but not too strong of a smell.

T: Lots of boozy alcohol with the pine only coming through on the tail end and in the aftertaste. Not a sharp alcohol burn, but a kind of mild steady presence, which taints the hop profile and covers a lot of it up. An odd malty pine resin aftertaste that is kind of dulled due to alcohol burn bit.

M: It is quite crisp with a ring of coarse bubbles in it. Crisp and coarse if you keep it in your mouth.

O: I will have trouble finishing this beer. It was an extra in my first trade, so I can't complain. I was worried that my waiting a month from when I got it to open it would make it be bad, but not with this high ABV. There is no alcohol shortage here.

Serving type: bottle

06-25-2013 03:35:03 | More by gillagorilla
Photo of Kaymord
Kaymord


3.25/5  rDev -18.5%

12-12-2012 22:47:07 | More by Kaymord
Photo of Absolut
Absolut

California

3.25/5  rDev -18.5%

07-13-2013 22:12:17 | More by Absolut
Photo of kdown
kdown

California

3.25/5  rDev -18.5%

11-24-2012 22:55:08 | More by kdown
Photo of barrelofbastard
barrelofbastard

California

3.25/5  rDev -18.5%

06-02-2013 18:09:56 | More by barrelofbastard
Photo of yourefragile
yourefragile

District of Columbia

3.25/5  rDev -18.5%

03-19-2014 23:14:28 | More by yourefragile
Photo of fellowrs
fellowrs

Ohio

3.25/5  rDev -18.5%

12-18-2013 18:27:07 | More by fellowrs
Photo of AgentMunky
AgentMunky

California

3.28/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 22 ounce bottle into a St. Bernardus goblet.

A: A finger of off-white head. Clearish, dark amber.

S: Garlicky-sweet hops. Onions and sweet, red fruit (apples?).

T: Tasty, but underwhelming. The ABV doesn't show at all. Moderately rich, with little impact on the tongue, and a very light flavour. Bittersweet hops and a drying endtaste. It's not that the taste is bad -- far from it -- but there's so little of it.

M: Smooth and flat, if thickish.

O: Unfortunately boring. I would not have another or recommend it.

Serving type: bottle

12-17-2012 17:15:55 | More by AgentMunky
Photo of Lordmuffinpants
Lordmuffinpants

California

3.31/5  rDev -17%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Nice bitter but just nice, the head was thick and creamy. The taste was less then I expected for a bottle of this price.

All in all drinkable just not driving all overtown to find one

My litmus test is the wife, she thought it was smooth, means a tad weak even for a stroke ach content

Serving type: bottle

03-15-2013 23:41:18 | More by Lordmuffinpants
Photo of DoctorQ9
DoctorQ9

California

3.38/5  rDev -15.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.25

Taste is disappointing. When you advertise a beer as "Will Work for Hops", I expect a strong hoppy finish. A good brew, but did not deliver on its promise. Weak finish with slightly astringic opening. Bitter taste without the deep floral tones that most highly hopped beers exhibit.

Serving type: bottle

04-17-2013 00:50:44 | More by DoctorQ9
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Hop Shortage from Knee Deep Brewing Company
89 out of 100 based on 274 ratings.