1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Small Batch Series No. 6: Flanders Red Ale - Ranger Creek Brewing & Distilling

Not Rated.
Small Batch Series No. 6: Flanders Red AleSmall Batch Series No. 6: Flanders Red Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

57 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 57
Reviews: 11
rAvg: 3.5
pDev: 22.86%
Wants: 3
Gots: 5 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Ranger Creek Brewing & Distilling visit their website
Texas, United States

Style | ABV
Flanders Red Ale |  8.00% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Radome on 09-14-2013)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 57 | Reviews: 11 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by tastyville:
Photo of tastyville
4.18/5  rDev +19.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 4.25

what is wrong with you! this one apparently is understated. i think the halo and pitchfork effect is taking place- that is, others rate it poorly and others feel they should probably rate it poorly also. get real! i traded a Russian RIver Consecration for this for the amazing hospitality that was shown to me at Craft & Growler in Dallas, TX. I am not regretting it one bit as I drink it now and am watching Futurama. Again- get real!

Not a whole lot of red going on. It's more brown than red but then again I'm colorblind (ha!). Not a whole lot of head that sticks around, just a bit of a ring as it gets lower on my Cigar City snifter. Kind of underwhelming as far as looks go. It gets made up for with aroma. Smells rich, bretty and smoky- very enticing! Flavor does not disappoint, despite being a bit thin. There is a slight off flavor of butterscotch, though, but I do enjoy a tiny bit. Toffee, brett, a bit of barrel, caramel comes through. It's very, very tasty!

tastyville, Dec 02, 2013
More User Reviews:
Photo of GameOfBeers
1.16/5  rDev -66.9%

GameOfBeers, Aug 18, 2014
Photo of SmellsofMahagony
3.75/5  rDev +7.1%

SmellsofMahagony, May 30, 2014
Photo of Cynic-ale
3.75/5  rDev +7.1%

Cynic-ale, Jul 31, 2014
Photo of valkyre65
3.5/5  rDev 0%

valkyre65, Jan 11, 2014
Photo of hansenme
4.75/5  rDev +35.7%

hansenme, May 08, 2014
Photo of whatname
3.5/5  rDev 0%

whatname, Jan 19, 2014
Photo of bkeller04
4.25/5  rDev +21.4%

bkeller04, May 16, 2014
Photo of XicanoBeerRun
4/5  rDev +14.3%

XicanoBeerRun, Sep 09, 2014
Photo of largadeer
3.25/5  rDev -7.1%

largadeer, Dec 30, 2013
Photo of ExaltedNecrosis
2/5  rDev -42.9%

ExaltedNecrosis, Oct 04, 2013
Photo of AtrumAnimus
3.1/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The Ranger Creek folks have been steadily impressing me more and more and have really done some outstanding brewing and distilling.

This one is a Sour, which is my least favorite of all beer styles. So I am reviewing it based on what I understand the style to be and ignoring my personal preference.

This one pours a nice cloudy umber in color with little to no head and therefore no lacing. As can be expected with a sour the beer is lacking in effervescence. The color is beautiful and rich.

The nose is cherries, sour dough, figs, coriander, yeast and hints of alcohol.

the moutfeel is a lot more watery than I was expecting based on the appearance and the nose. While it is watery it does not take away from the surprising quality of the beer.

As far as sours go I really like this one and would definitely drink it again

AtrumAnimus, Nov 29, 2013
Photo of blastoderm55
1/5  rDev -71.4%

blastoderm55, Nov 16, 2013
Photo of TomTown
4/5  rDev +14.3%

TomTown, Sep 19, 2013
Photo of ARaces23
4.25/5  rDev +21.4%

ARaces23, Sep 15, 2013
Photo of JuanAlberto
4/5  rDev +14.3%

JuanAlberto, May 31, 2014
Photo of greenspointexas
3.25/5  rDev -7.1%

greenspointexas, Dec 14, 2013
Photo of spham
3.7/5  rDev +5.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Poured into a slim pint glass.

A: Pours a slightly hazy amber with almost no head.
S: Definitely the smell of a red flanders, but
T: Very earthy sour from the lactobacillus strain (along with the brett and pedio). A decent red flanders, but with more complex flavors with the extra yeast and ferm time.
M: A little chewiness from the tart elements, with a lingering sour.
O: A very different beer, but I did enjoy it and appreciate what ranger creek is doing here. Look forward to aging the other 3 bottles to see what cellaring/aging will do.

spham, Dec 29, 2013
Photo of IrishColonial
2/5  rDev -42.9%

IrishColonial, Oct 04, 2013
Photo of TMoney2591
4.11/5  rDev +17.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4.25

Served in a tumbler.

Man, I haven't had any Ranger Creek since my trading days, but, luckily, some generous and genial Texans were present tonight and shared with me some Small Batch goodness. This stuff pours a kinda murky garnet-sienna topped by a short finger of relatively short-lived wan khaki foam. The nose comprises sweet caramel, lightly-toasted biscuit, mild vinegar, light oak, and a touch of Malbec. The taste pulls a slight 180, putting a stronger vinegar contingent on top, leaving the caramel-y sweetness to provide more of an accent, much like the Dude's rug, bringing the whole thing together and whatnot. And I feel it only necessary to note that the vinegar is quite tart here, and it almost seems to have been joined by a bit of tart blue raspberry, but that may just be a figment of my overactive brain at this point in the night. The body is a lithe medium, with a light moderate carbonation and a sticky-ish finish. Overall, a very nice modern take on the Flanders red. 'Nuff said.

TMoney2591, Sep 28, 2013
Photo of thereal_adam
3.25/5  rDev -7.1%

thereal_adam, Aug 07, 2014
Photo of BlesstheHarvest
3.5/5  rDev 0%

BlesstheHarvest, Mar 17, 2014
Photo of kojevergas
2.98/5  rDev -14.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3

August 2013 release. 12.7 fl oz brown glass bottle with waxed-over (black wax) pressure cap and no-nonsense Ranger Creek label art acquired at a local bottle shop for $8.99 USD and served into Cantillon stemware in me gaff in low altitude Austin, Texas. Reviewed live. Expectations are above average; I've found Ranger Creek to be one of the better breweries in Texas during the very short time I've lived here. Bottled 07/01/13. Reviewed as a Flanders Red Ale because it identifies as such quite clearly on Ranger Creek's website. "Blend of 18 month and 24 month barrels."

Served cold, straight from me fridge, and allowed to warm over the course of consumption. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

Cap comes off quite easily for a waxed cap, and there's no gushing once it's off.

A: No bubble show forms as I pour.

Pours a half finger wide head of grey-white (ecru for the pretentious) colour. Retention is horrible - maybe 10 seconds - and too short for me to gauge the creaminess/thickness/frothiness. Tilting the glass, I can get some lacing but it doesn't stick.

Body colour is a dark murky auburn with brown hues. Translucent. Nontransparent. No yeast particles are visible. It's a bit weak looking for a Flanders Red, but I'm optimistic. It could use a glow or vibrance of some sort.

Sm: Wet cardboard, light vinegar, caramel, red wine notes, very light oak wood, and vague acetic cherry notes. I'd love more of the acetic cherry. Timid tartness and middle-of-the-road sourness. Yeast/bacteria wise, all I'm getting is lactobacillus - no lambicus or funky brettanomyces. The sourness seems too clean and clinical to have come from true spontaneous fermentation. The website claims this was brewed with figs; I look for them and struggle to find any.

A decent aroma of moderate strength. I'm hoping the flavour profile goes more towards the acetic/cherry/oak side and less towards the wet cardboard/vinegar side. In spite of its off-notes, the aroma is generally appealing. I'm optimistic.

As it warms, it develops and comes together a bit more, yielding a more approachable aroma with a more pronounced sherry-like red wine character.

T: Some of the wetcardboard is unfortunately present and sits alongside the disappointingly timid acetic notes. Tart cherry presence is also disappointingly timid. Biscuit malt, light vinegar. The oak is very buried and contributes little. Not finding any fig. Vague sherry-like red wine comes out as it warms and is most present right on the finish, leaving the drinker with a nicely fruity red wine aftertaste. The sourness is very middle of the road and is entirely lactobacillus-derived. No lambicus yeast or true bacteria/spontaneous fermentation here. I also don't find any funky brettanomyces yeast.

As it warms, I'm getting some more subtle fruit notes - raspberry, maybe even a touch of blueberry.

Average depth, duration, and intensity of flavour. It could sure use more depth.

It's an inspired brew that falls short. It tries for complexity and subtlety - and admirably so - but never quite achieves a cohesive gestalt whole. It's obvious immediately that this is a blend, and not a very carefully executed one at that. The result is a pretty decently balanced and enjoyable brew, but it's not going to incite any double-takes.

No hop presence or alcohol is noticeable. The wet cardboard off-note does hold it back severely.

Mf: While it's acidic, the acidity is actually below average for a Flanders Red. Has a light bite in the third act. Mellow for a sour. Unrefreshing, but approachable. It's well carbonated; the bottle fermentation was a good decision. Suits the flavour profile well in a general sense, but the texture seems far from custom-tailored specifically to suit the taste. It's not a soft feel, and has a light sharpness. It's a bit thin, actually. The coarseness/smoothness is off; it's not uniform and never quite feels right. The same can be said for the dryness/wetness; it's wet right up until the finish, whereupon it gets strangely dry.

Dr: It's a drinkable Flanders Red, but it falls short of its obvious ambitions. In spite of its flaws, it does have some good elements and shows long-term potential for their barrel aging; if they can master blending a bit more and commit more fully to the wild yeast, I can see superior beers on the horizon. This is a passable sour that will impress few; It's on the high side of average. I do think it's unfairly overpriced at $8.99 for such a small format and I definitely wouldn't buy it again.

Aging would absolutely help this beer, but I wouldn't push it past 3 years.

High C

kojevergas, Oct 05, 2013
Photo of kevindp9
3.25/5  rDev -7.1%

kevindp9, Sep 27, 2013
Photo of Dicers
4.25/5  rDev +21.4%

Dicers, Oct 31, 2013
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Small Batch Series No. 6: Flanders Red Ale from Ranger Creek Brewing & Distilling
80 out of 100 based on 57 ratings.