P-51 Porter - Wingman Brewers
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 29 | Reviews: 13 | Display Reviews Only:
3.74/5 rDev +8.4%
Poured into a Reuben's Brew snifter. Pours a very dark mahogany brown, appearing nearly opaque in the glass. Nice two finger, fine light brown head with good retention and lacing. Aroma of dark toasted malt with mild char, hints of chocolate. Flavor is well toasted malt, char, boiled down coffee and hints of cocoa; finishes with lightly charred dark malt, light grassy hops, somewhat stark. Medium bodied with hints of creaminess, a bit thin for the flavor. A decent well roasted porter, bordering on stout territory; the initial flavor is reasonably rich with toasted malt, but the finish leaves the char and hop bitterness a bit exposed. The ABV is fairly well covered. A decent, but not remarkable example of the style. I'd get it again in a pinch.
05-22-2014 04:27:31 | More by LiquidAmber
2.83/5 rDev -18%
Appearance- Pours up a bunch of head which is pretty expansive and looks to have decent retention. Actually, the retention is more than decent- it's obnoxious. The head is a medium beige while the body is an opaque, dark chocolate black. The lacing is mainly perforated sheeting.
Nose- Not a lot of complexity or presence. I get mostly roasted notes with tiny hints of chocolate and coffee. I was thinking that it might need to open up more but I think that this might be all there is to this beer's nose. Swirling reveals nothing except perhaps a light creaminess.
Taste- Does not start off well as the front consists of that sour sweet taste that often accompanies coffee. I like coffee in beer but that acrid note is a big flaw to my palate. This is followed by a good amount of coffee which then is followed by another sour note (this one is a little more metallic.) I can't say that I am enjoying this beer at the moment- it's a little messy but not in a good way. Slight fruitiness that has an aspect of cherry but it does not seem intentioned. If so, it does not mesh well with this beer. The disagreeable notes of the flavor profile are too prominent for me to recommend this beer in anyway. It is below average but not quite BMC bad. Tiny bits of bubblegum don't help.
Mouthfeel- Medium to heavy bodied with way too much carbonation. Fairly carbonic in fact. Has some grittiness on the finish.
Drinkability- Messy with off flavors and a harsh mouthfeel- what do you think? At least it hides the 8% well.
Overall- Below average beer. It could have been an average to above average beer but there are too many flaws. I would recommend you pass on this beer.
11-21-2013 02:34:49 | More by artoolemomo
3.08/5 rDev -10.7%
Pours dark red/black with a small tan head.
Smell is roasty and malty.
Taste is odd, almost sour coffee. Licorice and a bit of nuts.
Slick mouthfeel and a bit of a sour after taste. Very interesting porter.
Not good, not bad, just middle of the road.
07-15-2013 03:54:04 | More by Smurf2055
4.15/5 rDev +20.3%
I'm not the biggest porter guy in the world. But I really liked this one. Has good flavor, good smell and overall just a really solid beer. I would recommended to anyone, regardless if they are big into porters or not. What I love most about this beer is the 8% ABV. So you will only need a few of them to make you feel real good about the evening.
If you are in Tacoma, might as well give it a try. I know I really enjoyed it.
12-09-2012 23:03:05 | More by husky13836
2.28/5 rDev -33.9%
BeerTunes sent this to me with his apologies in support of The CANQuest (TM). Apparently, he was not a big fan and hated to foist it on others, but he knows what a CANFan I am and shot some over to me in spite of his biases. Hey, CANned beer means never having to say you're sorry. I have yet to receive any CANdolences from Minhas B.C. and I am not holding my breath, either.
From the CAN: "Premium Imperial Porter"; "Brewed & CANned in Tacoma, WA"; "Authentic. Well-Crafted. Tacoma Ales."
I got an explosive Crack as beer came foaming out to greet me like a puppy happy to see its master. Filled to the rim, it were! I went too aggro on the Glug and I soon had beer everywhere and I was thankful that I had pulled napkins out of one of my seldom-worn jackets earlier today. The dense, massive, finger-and-a-half of head looked like chocolate milkshake. It was deep-brown and held up mightily until all of a sudden it gave up and fell like a souffle when the oven door is slammed. I do not think that I have ever seen anything like it. Once the Glu was complete, I was looking at a glassful of inky, deep-brown liquid with no light penetration except at the edges, which is how I could determine color. Nose was rich with scents of smoke and dark chocolate. I suddenly remembered the house in Montreal by the entrance to the Metro from the hotel where we stayed in 2002 for the Mondial de la Biere. It had experienced a fire the week before and the smoky odor hung in the air. They did not hold back on the roasted malts, that much is indisputable. My first draught from the glass left me bewildered. The mouthfeel was mighty thin and the taste was tangy/sour, like something had gone wrong in the fermentation process. The rich chocolate of the nose was hidden in the background, supplanted by this odd tang. How sad! Finish was an odd melange of flavors, many of which should not have been incorporated. BeerTunes called it one step above a drain pour and while I did not dislike it that much, there was something fundamentally wrong here.
10-13-2012 19:55:17 | More by woodychandler
3.18/5 rDev -7.8%
Woodychandler comes through again with another canned beer. Poured from a 16 oz. can. Despite careful handling this beer came gushing out of the can, finally settling with an inky black color with a 1.5 inch head. Smell is mild, roasted malts. Taste is also mild for the style, some roasted malts, a touch of hops, some alcohol is present, a bit lacking in flavor. Feels medium bodied in the mouth and overall is a mediocre beer.
09-30-2012 20:37:10 | More by tone77
2.03/5 rDev -41.2%
Poured into straight pint glass. Poured a solid black, like a stout, not the slightly translucent brownish black expected of a Porter. The beer had about 1/2 inch of medium tan head that had OK retention and lacing.
The aroma was, again, very Stoutish. Deep roast and some chocolate were the most notable aspects. Whoa!!! There was a weird funky taste that didn't show up in the aroma. A bitter, sour base note that dominated. Looking past that (trying to look past the elephant in the room) the roast dominated the flavor profile.
The body was just on the thin side of average for the style, and was just about the only non-stout like aspect to this brew. Drinkability was no good. Only my inherent stubbornness kept this from being a drain pour. Overall, your caloric, alcohol and financial budgets are better spent elsewhere. Avoid.
07-30-2012 20:04:47 | More by beertunes
1.9/5 rDev -44.9%
Viscous black with brown foamy head that dies very quickly. Heavy roasted aroma. Molasses and roasted malts. Medicinal alcohol all the way through. Sharp astringent feel and a very thin feel.
It didn’t smell bad but the flavor is just terrible. It seems to have some sort of adjunct to boost the alcohol in too high of a concentration or it may be not enough yeast was used. The feel was also thin with almost no carbonation. This is a perfect pairing in name and content for a terrible movie like “Red Tails”.
07-14-2012 21:58:06 | More by Bfarr
3.63/5 rDev +5.2%
Poured from 16oz tall can into a pint glass.
Appearance: totally black color with a thin layer of dark tan foam. Head is pretty minimal despite a vigorous pour. Still, the color is great.
Smell: a heady mélange of chocolate, coffee, vegetal hops and alcohol. It really does punch the ticket of a decently-crafted imperial porter.
Taste: an overabundance of roasted malts makes this beer a bit on the acidic side, which I don't love. The coffee undertones are great, but there's an unwelcome bite here. Still, other aspects of the flavor are good.
Mouthfeel: medium body with a decently smooth & silky mouthfeel. Carbonation is very low, so there's not much creaminess present.
Overall: this is an OK beer. I think the roasted malts were used a bit heavy-handedly, but if the brewers took this down a notch it might end up a really tasty beer.
06-23-2012 00:22:13 | More by flagmantho
P-51 Porter from Wingman Brewers
80 out of 100 based on 29 ratings.