1. Rating beers by attributes (look, smell, taste, feel, overall) is back! Read the latest update ...
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Evil Twin The Cowboy - Evil Twin Brewing

Not Rated.
Evil Twin The CowboyEvil Twin The Cowboy

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
85
very good

183 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 183
Reviews: 47
rAvg: 3.76
pDev: 12.23%
Wants: 7
Gots: 12 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Evil Twin Brewing visit their website
Denmark

Style | ABV
Smoked Beer |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: LiquidAmber on 10-13-2012)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 183 | Reviews: 47 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of mattafett
1/5  rDev -73.4%

mattafett, Nov 13, 2012
Photo of MonkeyBread
1.75/5  rDev -53.5%

MonkeyBread, Apr 27, 2014
Photo of bubseymour
2/5  rDev -46.8%

bubseymour, Feb 12, 2013
Photo of sgregory
2.75/5  rDev -26.9%

sgregory, Mar 23, 2014
Photo of bralston345
2.75/5  rDev -26.9%

bralston345, Feb 16, 2013
Photo of woodchipper
3/5  rDev -20.2%

woodchipper, Feb 15, 2014
Photo of Elicoleman
3/5  rDev -20.2%

Elicoleman, Aug 29, 2014
Photo of -NESTO-
3/5  rDev -20.2%

-NESTO-, Jan 02, 2014
Photo of akttr
3/5  rDev -20.2%

akttr, Feb 04, 2014
Photo of EZEKIEL_F
3/5  rDev -20.2%

EZEKIEL_F, Apr 28, 2014
Photo of jbertsch
3/5  rDev -20.2%

On tap. Proper yelllow goldn color.

Aroma is very mild. Expected a bit more smoke.

Flavor is just okay. I want either (or both) more smoke, or a more clear pilsener taste from the malt bill. The malt profile tastes a but too generic. No real hop profile to make note of (didn't get any saaz, that's for sure). A sweet note is noticeable on the finish, which throws me a bit.

As a whole the beer doesnt taste bad, and some people will probably be content with it. But it just doesn't serve up what I want in either a smoked beer or a pils.

jbertsch, Aug 25, 2014
Photo of Alex5
3/5  rDev -20.2%

Alex5, Dec 10, 2013
Photo of rdilauro
3.06/5  rDev -18.6%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pour like any normal light beer ... No really detectable aroma, nothing for the nose to pick up on.
The first taste and all I could feel is carbonation, a bit too much for my liking.
Then, I can taste smoke, lots of it. Now I know what it feels like to be a ham inside a smoker!
The smoked taste and the light carbonated style was very balanced for me.

rdilauro, Apr 07, 2014
Photo of macrosmatic
3.18/5  rDev -15.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 3

Reviewed from notes. Poured from bomber into an Upland pint glass.

A: Hazy gold with a huge fluffy white head and mild visible carbonation.

S: Smoky like an old campfire. Maybe some light pilsner malt aroma…but mostly smoke. Not particularly pleasant - very much one note.

T: Smoke, pilsner malts, smoke, some grassy and citrus hops, and more campfire smoke in the hang.

M: Light body, modest carbonation sensation, no alcohol presence to speak of.

O: There's just too much smoke here with no other flavors big enough to hang with it or balance it out. I suspect it may have been a tasty pilsner, but instead it ended up as a glass of smoke that you needed to hunt around for any other flavors, rather than the smoke being an integrated part of the beer's flavor profile. Not recommended.

EDIT - Having now read some of the reviews below describing the smoke flavor as "light", I'm wondering if there may be some batch variation or perhaps something with the particular bottle I drank.

macrosmatic, Apr 05, 2014
Photo of Mdog
3.18/5  rDev -15.4%
look: 4.25 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Appearance: Yellow-gold, lots of particles, good head.

Smell: Skunky, bit of smoke.

Taste: Hits first with citrus and some skunk, then some breadiness. Just a little bit of smoke is noticeable.

Overall: I like smoked beers so picked up one of these as Evil Twin just started distribution in Minnesota. Not a very good first impression, kind of a mixed bag taste with only a hint of smoke flavor.

Mdog, Apr 20, 2014
Photo of seavercm
3.25/5  rDev -13.6%

seavercm, Jan 31, 2014
Photo of maxwelldeux
3.25/5  rDev -13.6%

maxwelldeux, Jun 05, 2013
Photo of NJBeer265
3.25/5  rDev -13.6%

NJBeer265, Jun 17, 2014
Photo of 510a
3.25/5  rDev -13.6%

510a, Jan 26, 2013
Photo of rudabegga9
3.25/5  rDev -13.6%

rudabegga9, Apr 18, 2014
Photo of fuzzcherry
3.25/5  rDev -13.6%

fuzzcherry, May 19, 2014
Photo of XmnwildX12
3.25/5  rDev -13.6%

XmnwildX12, Jul 20, 2014
Photo of dexterk1
3.28/5  rDev -12.8%

dexterk1, Jan 06, 2014
Photo of beergoot
3.4/5  rDev -9.6%

Bottling stamp on the bottle is 04/22/14

Strong golden color to the body and a thick, rocky, white head sits atop (3.75). Faint aroma all around with no noticeable smoke and a mild malt graininess (3.25). A mild smokiness reveals itself in the taste along with an equally mild malt and ester flavors; good bitterness (3.25). Medium bodied; dry finish (3.5).

Not a bad beer for a pilsner but the smoke component is pretty much missing-in-action. I would give this a higher score for a pilsner (3.75), but if you're looking for a more prominent smoke aspect, you won't find it here, so therefore, a relatively low score.

beergoot, Sep 07, 2014
Photo of Dirtyhands
3.45/5  rDev -8.2%

Dirtyhands, Sep 08, 2014
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Evil Twin The Cowboy from Evil Twin Brewing
85 out of 100 based on 183 ratings.