1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Ridgeback Ale - No Label Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Ridgeback AleRidgeback Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
82
good

93 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 93
Reviews: 9
rAvg: 3.62
pDev: 13.26%
Wants: 1
Gots: 8 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
No Label Brewing Company visit their website
Texas, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Ale |  6.10% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: champ103 on 01-08-2011)
View: Beers (20) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 93 | Reviews: 9 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by Ford:
Photo of Ford
Ford

Texas

3/5  rDev -17.1%

01-18-2013 00:23:19 | More by Ford
More User Reviews:
Photo of madanielson
madanielson


3.5/5  rDev -3.3%

06-28-2014 20:21:59 | More by madanielson
Photo of Mickeyp2814
Mickeyp2814

Alaska

2.75/5  rDev -24%

06-21-2014 17:41:04 | More by Mickeyp2814
Photo of shawnohall
shawnohall

Texas

3.75/5  rDev +3.6%

06-17-2014 06:21:36 | More by shawnohall
Photo of Shafaegalo
Shafaegalo

Texas

3.5/5  rDev -3.3%

06-03-2014 20:50:04 | More by Shafaegalo
Photo of rspauldi
rspauldi

Texas

3.25/5  rDev -10.2%

06-02-2014 20:39:08 | More by rspauldi
Photo of Mortarforker
Mortarforker

Texas

3/5  rDev -17.1%

04-27-2014 23:30:42 | More by Mortarforker
Photo of Karibourgeois
Karibourgeois

Texas

3/5  rDev -17.1%

03-09-2014 13:55:50 | More by Karibourgeois
Photo of Mtn
Mtn

Texas

2.6/5  rDev -28.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.75

Appearance - It looks like an amber ale. poured from bottle into pint glass

Smell - Toasted malts. that's pretty much it.

Taste - Extraordinarily one dimensional. Toasted malts, and that's it. No sweetness or bitterness to balance the toasted malts.

Mouthfeel - Thin, weak - again, not enough bitterness to balance the malt flavor.

Overall - Tasted with another amber ale. This one paled in comparison. no depth of character at all. Toasted malt...again, that is it. It didn't taste bad, but it was blown away by another amber that gets pretty pedestrian ratings here. Will probably try it again to see if this was an anomaly.

Serving type: bottle

03-08-2014 05:14:01 | More by Mtn
Photo of Fr0stb1te
Fr0stb1te

Wisconsin

3.25/5  rDev -10.2%

03-07-2014 22:29:13 | More by Fr0stb1te
Photo of SicemWT
SicemWT

Texas

2.5/5  rDev -30.9%

02-24-2014 04:26:09 | More by SicemWT
Photo of aarongbrown
aarongbrown

Texas

4.5/5  rDev +24.3%

02-13-2014 17:39:02 | More by aarongbrown
Photo of EGreen
EGreen

Texas

3.5/5  rDev -3.3%

02-10-2014 02:04:43 | More by EGreen
Photo of valkyre65
valkyre65

Texas

3.25/5  rDev -10.2%

01-24-2014 15:05:48 | More by valkyre65
Photo of PaulUH
PaulUH

Texas

3/5  rDev -17.1%

01-20-2014 20:31:32 | More by PaulUH
Photo of dmorgan310
dmorgan310

Panama

3.75/5  rDev +3.6%

01-16-2014 00:17:09 | More by dmorgan310
Photo of Lukebell15
Lukebell15

Texas

3.25/5  rDev -10.2%

12-30-2013 00:06:27 | More by Lukebell15
Photo of ProImage79
ProImage79

Texas

4.25/5  rDev +17.4%

12-20-2013 03:22:30 | More by ProImage79
Photo of brett606
brett606

Texas

3.75/5  rDev +3.6%

12-15-2013 20:07:56 | More by brett606
Photo of greenspointexas
greenspointexas

Texas

3/5  rDev -17.1%

12-14-2013 21:38:10 | More by greenspointexas
Photo of BayouBengal1537
BayouBengal1537

Louisiana

3.25/5  rDev -10.2%

12-07-2013 17:42:45 | More by BayouBengal1537
Photo of Gregaroo
Gregaroo

Pennsylvania

3.5/5  rDev -3.3%

11-26-2013 01:13:39 | More by Gregaroo
Photo of blastoderm55
blastoderm55

Texas

3.5/5  rDev -3.3%

11-10-2013 21:53:16 | More by blastoderm55
Photo of jdwilliamson79
jdwilliamson79

Texas

4/5  rDev +10.5%

11-10-2013 20:39:02 | More by jdwilliamson79
Photo of kojevergas
kojevergas

Texas

3.24/5  rDev -10.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

IBU: 24. OG: 1.055. "13C71G." Label identifies it as an American Amber, so I'm reviewing as such. Label art is simple and uninteresting. 12 fl oz brown glass bottle with branded silver-coloured pry-off pressure cap acquired as a single bottle at Whole Foods HQ and served into an Avery stem-tulip in me gaff in low altitude Austin, Texas. Reviewed live. Expectations are average; this brewery has yet to impress me. No ABBV is listed on the label. Brewed with Cascade and Golding hops.

Served cold - straight from me fridge. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: No bubble show forms as it's poured.

Pours a one finger wide head of off-white colour. Nice creaminess and thickness. Decent even lacing clings to the sides of the glass as the head recedes. Head retention is average - about 2 minutes.

Body colour is a nontransparent semitranslucent dark amber. Has an understated glow when held up to light. No yeast particles are visible.

Overall, it's a bit darker than the best ambers I've had, but it looks pretty standard otherwise. Not unique or special. There are no egregious flaws.

Sm: Amber malts. Cocoa powder. Generic floral hop character. Bready malts/bread crust. Toffee. A hint of vanillicin. Light toasted character. Heavy caramel/sweet caramalt. Some hints of char. Maybe a kiss of stonefruit. A surprisingly multifacted aroma for an amber, but one that abandons the usual bright refreshing character of a good amber. I'm interested to try it. Pleasant overall and of above average strength.

No yeast character or alcohol is detectable.

T: Plenty of amber malt and caramel/caramalt, along with a healthy amount of toffee and bready malts. Hopping is underwhelming - generic floral character is all I find. Soma cocoa and toasted character. I didn't expect it to be quite this bready. It's got interesting complexity for an amber, and even dips into winter warmer character. Unfortunately, what little stonefruit fruitiness it has isn't enough, and I'd prefer a brighter more juicy fruit character. More sweet than it is bitter. There's some subtlety, particularly inasmuch as the cocoa powder is concerned.

Overall, it's a balanced flavour profile with some interesting elements, and its different approach to an American Amber does make it stand out. An intriguing build, and one I'm enjoying more with each sip. That said, it's far from mind-blowing. I like it for what it is.

No yeast character or alcohol comes through.

The cocoa is a highlight for me, and really sells this as a different type of amber than most breweries are doing.

Mf: Smooth and wet. Has a full-bodied strong presence on the palate, with plenty of thickness. A biteen overcarbonated. Complements the flavour profile well, but I wouldn't say the texture is custom-tailored to the taste per se. Its bready qualities make it a filling beer - again, this straddles the line between an amber and a winter warmer.

Not oily, harsh, rough, gushed, boozy, or hot - though there is a slight alcohol-induced warmth which is atypical of a conventional amber but suits the vague winter warmer vibe this beer gives off.

Dr: Not a beer I would want to kill a 6 pack of on a gameday, but it's quite drinkable, sure. I'd have another. Hides its ABV decently. I could see myself getting this at a local bar when (i.e. if) it gets a bit colder in the upcoming winter months. This is my second beer from No Label and is considerably more interesting than the first. I'll be giving their other beers a try based on the relative strength of this one. While I wouldn't recommend it to trade partners, I might endorse it to friends if I see it at a bar. Well worth trying.

On a more local (Austin) note, I don't see this as a competitor to Thirsty Goat Amber (which by my estimation is currently the widely available amber around restaurants and bars in Austin.) It's a different type of amber and I'll be happy to see both coexist in the same market.

Serve cold and let warm a bit. Like a Winter Warmer, it develops a bit with some warmth.

Actually, this might age decently for a year or less. It's got the right malt presence for development with a bit of time.

Drank fine from a tulip, but I'd recommend a nonical pint glass.

High C+

Serving type: bottle

11-09-2013 21:38:46 | More by kojevergas
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ridgeback Ale from No Label Brewing Company
82 out of 100 based on 93 ratings.