1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

1st Street Ale - No Label Brewing Company

Not Rated.
1st Street Ale
No picture uploaded.
Have one? Upload it now.
BA SCORE
76
okay

48 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 48
Reviews: 6
rAvg: 3.26
pDev: 13.8%
Wants: 0
Gots: 6 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
No Label Brewing Company visit their website
Texas, United States

Style | ABV
American Blonde Ale |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: jngrizzaffi on 08-09-2013)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 48 | Reviews: 6 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by BEERZILLA:
Photo of BEERZILLA
BEERZILLA

Texas

2.7/5  rDev -17.2%

This beer is not good but its not terrible either,of all the blonde ales i have had this one is the worst.no label continues to disappoint ,i have yet to have a good beer from them.

it pours a nice looking hazy orange,a little head and no lacing.

the taste is off somehow.maybe its the rice that gives it that twang that i cant quite put my finger on.

The mouthfeel is not very good either too thin for a blonde ale.too much carbonation too imo.

Overall their are many more and way better blonde ales out there than this one and its not like its dirt cheap either so its a lose lose.I want to like no label brewery,i really do, just like all my local breweries but no label does not even do what st arnold and karbach and southern star do,which is make a lot of good beers and not many great beers.step up your game no label.

02-02-2014 03:40:54 | More by BEERZILLA
More User Reviews:
Photo of SmellsofMahagony
SmellsofMahagony

Texas

2.75/5  rDev -15.6%

08-26-2013 23:14:34 | More by SmellsofMahagony
Photo of beaverapproved
beaverapproved

Texas

3/5  rDev -8%

12-12-2013 01:58:15 | More by beaverapproved
Photo of ExaltedNecrosis
ExaltedNecrosis

Texas

2.73/5  rDev -16.3%

12 oz bottle poured into pint glass.

A - Hazy yellow/gold, just under a finger of quickly dissipating white head.

S - The first thing I smell is metallic, with an underlying sweet smell of rice. Interesting aroma.

T - I was hoping it wouldn't taste like it smelled. The rice flavor is definitely there, but it has a metallic quality to it. This almost tastes like an adjunct lager, not a blonde ale. It gets a little better as it warms.

M - Light bodied, high carbonation. It's definitely crisp and refreshing.

O - I guess this is a good summer beer, but the metallic rice was an off putting flavor for me. I can't argue that it's not refreshing, though.

09-05-2013 17:20:43 | More by ExaltedNecrosis
Photo of Shafaegalo
Shafaegalo

Texas

3/5  rDev -8%

02-01-2014 23:50:48 | More by Shafaegalo
Photo of jerefreakinmiah
jerefreakinmiah

North Carolina

3.25/5  rDev -0.3%

08-26-2013 15:00:53 | More by jerefreakinmiah
Photo of AtrumAnimus
AtrumAnimus

Texas

3.63/5  rDev +11.3%

This one pours a cloudy golden blonde with a decent think white head that settles at a moderate rate leaving no lacing behind.

The nose is a sweet malt that has hints of citrus, coriander and pine.

The taste is decent and malty with fruity notes that give way to a mildly hopped beer that is quite satisfying an flavorful but will not satisfy a serious hop head. This is a more traditional ale that is actually quite good.

The mouthfeel is decent as well but is not great. Just good.

Overall the beer is very drinkable and not too heavy. This is a beer I would to to go to more on hot days when a lighter yet tasty beer is better suited to our hot and humid climate.

11-17-2013 20:13:39 | More by AtrumAnimus
Photo of blastoderm55
blastoderm55

Texas

2.75/5  rDev -15.6%

08-10-2014 03:36:30 | More by blastoderm55
Photo of ToMakeEndsMeet
ToMakeEndsMeet

Texas

3.75/5  rDev +15%

04-09-2014 02:16:27 | More by ToMakeEndsMeet
Photo of ilikebeer03
ilikebeer03

Texas

3.5/5  rDev +7.4%

09-09-2013 00:30:57 | More by ilikebeer03
Photo of ProImage79
ProImage79

Texas

3.75/5  rDev +15%

12-20-2013 03:20:59 | More by ProImage79
Photo of Karibourgeois
Karibourgeois

Texas

3.5/5  rDev +7.4%

06-20-2014 22:56:31 | More by Karibourgeois
Photo of greenspointexas
greenspointexas

Texas

4/5  rDev +22.7%

12-14-2013 21:24:55 | More by greenspointexas
Photo of SicemWT
SicemWT

Texas

2.75/5  rDev -15.6%

03-14-2014 03:17:54 | More by SicemWT
Photo of thereal_adam
thereal_adam

Texas

3/5  rDev -8%

08-07-2014 17:40:40 | More by thereal_adam
Photo of ruckus232
ruckus232

Illinois

3/5  rDev -8%

06-03-2014 02:14:31 | More by ruckus232
Photo of jtoledo04
jtoledo04

Texas

3/5  rDev -8%

01-11-2014 18:33:17 | More by jtoledo04
Photo of Jon4than
Jon4than

Texas

3/5  rDev -8%

08-12-2014 15:03:37 | More by Jon4than
Photo of Musineer
Musineer

Texas

3.5/5  rDev +7.4%

09-20-2013 18:26:19 | More by Musineer
Photo of kojevergas
kojevergas

Texas

2.68/5  rDev -17.8%

Label art is simple and uninteresting. 12 fl oz brown glass bottle with branded silver-coloured pry-off pressure cap acquired as a single bottle at Whole Foods HQ and served into an Avery stem-tulip in me gaff in low altitude Austin, Texas. Reviewed live. Expectations are average given the brewery. No ABV is listed on the label. "Brewed with a touch of rice." Reviewed as an American Blonde Ale because the label description identifies it as a blonde ale.

Served cold - straight from me fridge. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: No bubble show forms as it's poured.

Pours a one finger wide head of dull grey-white colour. Poor (~30 second) retention. No lacing clings to the sides of the glass, even when I tilt it to try to get some lacing. Disappointingly thin, with a weak complexion and a subpar consistency. No creaminess.

Body colour is equally mediocre: a dull cloudy peach. Lacks vibrance. No yeast particles are visible. Nontransparent. Semitranslucent.

Overall, it's below average for a blonde ale. For starters, it isn't blonde. A good blonde ale should look refreshing as hell, clean, and very appealing. This does not. Far from unique or special. Not an inviting appearance.

Sm: Pilsner malts, clean barley, honey, heavy graininess, a dash of adjunct (though I wouldn't be able to identify it as rice if I smelled the beer blind), and some peachy fruity hops. A clean aroma of average strength.

No yeast character or alcohol is detectable. No off-flavours.

There's not a lot here, and what little there is isn't particularly appealing. I'm giving the benefit of the doubt, but it's far from welcoming or interesting. I have no qualms with using adjunct, but commit to your notes.

T/Mf: I'll start with what's good. I like that it's crisp and clean to style; the finish is delightfully fizzy and crisp. I get some lovely ripe orchard peach notes, with plentiful juicy fruity esters. Also some juicy pear. It's got a good sweetness to it, probably because of the honey. The minimally present floral and fruity hop notes are welcome, but I could use a bit more depth of flavour there (and definitely overall, for that matter).

Unfortunately, the body is built with stale boring blonde malts and pilsner malts. Very grainy. The rice never really emerges, and the beer is actually surprisingly heavy for a blonde ale - contrary to what you'd expect given that leavening rice was utilized. It should have much less body and thickness than it does. It's also a bit overcarbonated. Okay presence on the palate.

Average duration of flavour. Above average intensity of flavour for the style. Low on complexity and subtlety (even relative to style). It's also not real well balanced. Has a loose cohesion, but it isn't gestalt. I'm not convinced the choices of malts and hops were ideal or even particularly well motivated. The rice seems like a gimmick, and adds little to the beer.

The texture doesn't seem custom-tailored to the taste, but it does suit it in a general sense. It's smooth and wet, but the beer isn't refreshing - quite a crime given the style.

No yeast character or alcohol comes through. Not oily, gushed, hot, boozy, rough, harsh, or astringent.

Dr: A downable forgettable blonde ale from No Label. The mean bastard in me wants to say "No Label? More like No Flavour" - but then I realize how pathetic that joke really is. In any case, I wouldn't get this beer again, nor would I recommend it to others. I'm glad I just got the one bottle. I do like a good blonde ale, but the key word is "good." No Label doesn't deliver, and the whole rice adjunct bit seems more like a strange marketing ploy than a choice intended to maximize the quality of the beer.

C-

11-11-2013 02:17:21 | More by kojevergas
Photo of Lukebell15
Lukebell15

Texas

2.5/5  rDev -23.3%

08-25-2013 00:07:19 | More by Lukebell15
Photo of christoefir
christoefir

Texas

3.25/5  rDev -0.3%

11-20-2013 15:18:17 | More by christoefir
Photo of Michaeldmanley
Michaeldmanley

Texas

2/5  rDev -38.7%

11-11-2013 03:43:59 | More by Michaeldmanley
Photo of Jame515
Jame515

Texas

3.25/5  rDev -0.3%

09-05-2013 00:36:22 | More by Jame515
Photo of UHCougar12
UHCougar12

Texas

3.75/5  rDev +15%

08-21-2013 23:34:13 | More by UHCougar12
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
1st Street Ale from No Label Brewing Company
76 out of 100 based on 48 ratings.