1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

1st Street Ale - No Label Brewing Company

Not Rated.
1st Street Ale
No picture uploaded.
Have one? Upload it now.
BA SCORE
77
okay

52 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 52
Reviews: 6
rAvg: 3.26
pDev: 13.19%
Wants: 0
Gots: 7 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
No Label Brewing Company visit their website
Texas, United States

Style | ABV
American Blonde Ale |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: jngrizzaffi on 08-09-2013)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 52 | Reviews: 6 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by BryanCarey:
Photo of BryanCarey
2.98/5  rDev -8.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

Cloudy and orange/golden in color, First Street Ale has a nose that is one of sweet grain but little else. The white- colored foam on this beer is moderate and eventually fizzes out, leaving a small coating as you consume.

This beer features the taste of grains, including rice, along with some mild hops, a touch of honey, and biscuits. The body is creamy and the taste is generally crisp and refreshing. There is some metallic flavor present, but it only slightly distracts from the overall taste.

This beer was brewed as a tribute to No Label’s hometown of Katy, Texas and it is one of only a few craft beers to use rice as an ingredient. The reason is because rice has a long history with the city and the brewery was originally housed in some old rice dryers. The added rice might seem like an odd choice of ingredients, given its association with adjunct lagers, but it is actually not too bad in this instance.

First Street Ale is now a year- round beer so locals can enjoy it whenever they like. I don’t rank it among my favorite No Label products, but it is a good beer for warm weather or when in need of some simple refreshment.

BryanCarey, Sep 11, 2013
More User Reviews:
Photo of SmellsofMahagony
2.75/5  rDev -15.6%

SmellsofMahagony, Aug 27, 2013
Photo of valkyre65
3/5  rDev -8%

valkyre65, Sep 11, 2014
Photo of ExaltedNecrosis
2.73/5  rDev -16.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3

12 oz bottle poured into pint glass.

A - Hazy yellow/gold, just under a finger of quickly dissipating white head.

S - The first thing I smell is metallic, with an underlying sweet smell of rice. Interesting aroma.

T - I was hoping it wouldn't taste like it smelled. The rice flavor is definitely there, but it has a metallic quality to it. This almost tastes like an adjunct lager, not a blonde ale. It gets a little better as it warms.

M - Light bodied, high carbonation. It's definitely crisp and refreshing.

O - I guess this is a good summer beer, but the metallic rice was an off putting flavor for me. I can't argue that it's not refreshing, though.

ExaltedNecrosis, Sep 05, 2013
Photo of Shafaegalo
3/5  rDev -8%

Shafaegalo, Feb 01, 2014
Photo of jerefreakinmiah
3.25/5  rDev -0.3%

jerefreakinmiah, Aug 26, 2013
Photo of AtrumAnimus
3.63/5  rDev +11.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.75

This one pours a cloudy golden blonde with a decent think white head that settles at a moderate rate leaving no lacing behind.

The nose is a sweet malt that has hints of citrus, coriander and pine.

The taste is decent and malty with fruity notes that give way to a mildly hopped beer that is quite satisfying an flavorful but will not satisfy a serious hop head. This is a more traditional ale that is actually quite good.

The mouthfeel is decent as well but is not great. Just good.

Overall the beer is very drinkable and not too heavy. This is a beer I would to to go to more on hot days when a lighter yet tasty beer is better suited to our hot and humid climate.

AtrumAnimus, Nov 17, 2013
Photo of blastoderm55
2.75/5  rDev -15.6%

blastoderm55, Aug 10, 2014
Photo of ToMakeEndsMeet
3.75/5  rDev +15%

ToMakeEndsMeet, Apr 09, 2014
Photo of ilikebeer03
3.5/5  rDev +7.4%

ilikebeer03, Sep 09, 2013
Photo of ProImage79
3.75/5  rDev +15%

ProImage79, Dec 20, 2013
Photo of Karibourgeois
3.5/5  rDev +7.4%

Karibourgeois, Jun 20, 2014
Photo of BryantForestry
3.5/5  rDev +7.4%

BryantForestry, Sep 29, 2014
Photo of greenspointexas
4/5  rDev +22.7%

greenspointexas, Dec 14, 2013
Photo of SicemWT
2.75/5  rDev -15.6%

SicemWT, Mar 14, 2014
Photo of thereal_adam
3/5  rDev -8%

thereal_adam, Aug 07, 2014
Photo of ruckus232
3/5  rDev -8%

ruckus232, Jun 03, 2014
Photo of jtoledo04
3/5  rDev -8%

jtoledo04, Jan 11, 2014
Photo of Jon4than
3/5  rDev -8%

Jon4than, Aug 12, 2014
Photo of Musineer
3.5/5  rDev +7.4%

Musineer, Sep 20, 2013
Photo of kojevergas
2.68/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 2.25 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

Label art is simple and uninteresting. 12 fl oz brown glass bottle with branded silver-coloured pry-off pressure cap acquired as a single bottle at Whole Foods HQ and served into an Avery stem-tulip in me gaff in low altitude Austin, Texas. Reviewed live. Expectations are average given the brewery. No ABV is listed on the label. "Brewed with a touch of rice." Reviewed as an American Blonde Ale because the label description identifies it as a blonde ale.

Served cold - straight from me fridge. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: No bubble show forms as it's poured.

Pours a one finger wide head of dull grey-white colour. Poor (~30 second) retention. No lacing clings to the sides of the glass, even when I tilt it to try to get some lacing. Disappointingly thin, with a weak complexion and a subpar consistency. No creaminess.

Body colour is equally mediocre: a dull cloudy peach. Lacks vibrance. No yeast particles are visible. Nontransparent. Semitranslucent.

Overall, it's below average for a blonde ale. For starters, it isn't blonde. A good blonde ale should look refreshing as hell, clean, and very appealing. This does not. Far from unique or special. Not an inviting appearance.

Sm: Pilsner malts, clean barley, honey, heavy graininess, a dash of adjunct (though I wouldn't be able to identify it as rice if I smelled the beer blind), and some peachy fruity hops. A clean aroma of average strength.

No yeast character or alcohol is detectable. No off-flavours.

There's not a lot here, and what little there is isn't particularly appealing. I'm giving the benefit of the doubt, but it's far from welcoming or interesting. I have no qualms with using adjunct, but commit to your notes.

T/Mf: I'll start with what's good. I like that it's crisp and clean to style; the finish is delightfully fizzy and crisp. I get some lovely ripe orchard peach notes, with plentiful juicy fruity esters. Also some juicy pear. It's got a good sweetness to it, probably because of the honey. The minimally present floral and fruity hop notes are welcome, but I could use a bit more depth of flavour there (and definitely overall, for that matter).

Unfortunately, the body is built with stale boring blonde malts and pilsner malts. Very grainy. The rice never really emerges, and the beer is actually surprisingly heavy for a blonde ale - contrary to what you'd expect given that leavening rice was utilized. It should have much less body and thickness than it does. It's also a bit overcarbonated. Okay presence on the palate.

Average duration of flavour. Above average intensity of flavour for the style. Low on complexity and subtlety (even relative to style). It's also not real well balanced. Has a loose cohesion, but it isn't gestalt. I'm not convinced the choices of malts and hops were ideal or even particularly well motivated. The rice seems like a gimmick, and adds little to the beer.

The texture doesn't seem custom-tailored to the taste, but it does suit it in a general sense. It's smooth and wet, but the beer isn't refreshing - quite a crime given the style.

No yeast character or alcohol comes through. Not oily, gushed, hot, boozy, rough, harsh, or astringent.

Dr: A downable forgettable blonde ale from No Label. The mean bastard in me wants to say "No Label? More like No Flavour" - but then I realize how pathetic that joke really is. In any case, I wouldn't get this beer again, nor would I recommend it to others. I'm glad I just got the one bottle. I do like a good blonde ale, but the key word is "good." No Label doesn't deliver, and the whole rice adjunct bit seems more like a strange marketing ploy than a choice intended to maximize the quality of the beer.

C-

kojevergas, Nov 11, 2013
Photo of Lukebell15
2.5/5  rDev -23.3%

Lukebell15, Aug 25, 2013
Photo of christoefir
3.25/5  rDev -0.3%

christoefir, Nov 20, 2013
Photo of Michaeldmanley
2/5  rDev -38.7%

Michaeldmanley, Nov 11, 2013
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
1st Street Ale from No Label Brewing Company
77 out of 100 based on 52 ratings.