1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Ringneck Big Woody Lager - The Brew Kettle Taproom & Smokehouse / Production Works

Not Rated.
Ringneck Big Woody LagerRingneck Big Woody Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
79
okay

27 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 27
Reviews: 13
rAvg: 3.37
pDev: 10.98%
Wants: 1
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
The Brew Kettle Taproom & Smokehouse / Production Works visit their website
Ohio, United States

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  5.20% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: aracauna on 06-06-2004)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 27 | Reviews: 13 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of UDbeernut
2.48/5  rDev -26.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Ringnecks attept to please the masses is this macro style lager.

Appearance: nice amber color with 1/4" head that reduced to lacing

Smell: nothing impressive here.

Taste: Poor... I think Miller Lite has more taste than this.

Mouthfeel: Not smooth at all.

If you ever go to the Brew Kettle, you are better off drinking water that drinking this beer.

UDbeernut, Feb 11, 2006
Photo of Sammy
2.58/5  rDev -23.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Bottle from the brewery. Your basic lager. Nothing to look at,medium yellow. Neutral smell to say the best. Average mouthfeel, above average carbonation. Not very drinkable, but passable just not interesting.Macro beer subsistitute. Better stuff is brewed here.

Sammy, Oct 16, 2011
Photo of Tyrawlings
3/5  rDev -11%

Tyrawlings, Feb 16, 2012
Photo of BGsWo22
3/5  rDev -11%

BGsWo22, Aug 26, 2014
Photo of jratt79
3/5  rDev -11%

jratt79, Nov 18, 2012
Photo of amstelcat
3/5  rDev -11%

amstelcat, Nov 23, 2011
Photo of nrbw23
3.1/5  rDev -8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pretty boring beer.

A- Pours a crystal clear light gold color with a very thin white head. Looks like all the other macros.

S- Grainy, a bit of grassy hops and a light sweet.

T- Not a whole lot different than any other macro. A touch sweeter.

M- Just like all the other macros.

D- Super easy to drink and I suppose I'd take this one over a Bud or Miller. I'm just not a fan of this style at all.

nrbw23, Jun 13, 2010
Photo of wildcatboy
3.25/5  rDev -3.6%

wildcatboy, Jul 25, 2014
Photo of SpartyJoe
3.25/5  rDev -3.6%

SpartyJoe, Oct 05, 2014
Photo of BarryMFBurton
3.25/5  rDev -3.6%

BarryMFBurton, Jun 15, 2014
Photo of DeFaz
3.25/5  rDev -3.6%

DeFaz, May 03, 2014
Photo of rgille2
3.25/5  rDev -3.6%

rgille2, Sep 13, 2013
Photo of tmoneyba
3.35/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Draft at The Brew Kettle.

Pours a clear golden color with an average creamy white head that mostly lasted with fair lacing. Moderate malt and hop aroma. Medium body with a smooth texture and flat carbonation. Medium bitter flavor with a medium bittersweet finish of moderate duration.

My expectations where met.

tmoneyba, Dec 22, 2008
Photo of prototypic
3.4/5  rDev +0.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Many thanks to csmiley for the bottle.

Appearance: It's very clear and pours a light golden color. It's more colorful than it's macro colleagues, but only above average. Head is foamy white and about a finger deep. It dissipated quickly and left spotty lacing lining the glass.

Smell: It's light on the nose. Not uncommon for the style. Is it possible to make a macro lager smell good? It's got a nice, caramel malt base and smells sweet. It's grainy and earthy. It's lightly hopped, but hops are noteable. Pretty impressive for a macro style lager. That pretty much wraps it up.

Taste: Caramel malts easily take top billing. They're sweet and have a pretty good flavor. Hops are present and floral in character. It's lightly hopped, so their presence is barely noticeable. For this style, I'll take it. It's grainy and has a very earthy and floral taste. It's very straight and uncomplicated. For the style, it's definitely above average.

Mouthfeel/Drinkability: It's light bodied and carbonated pretty. Feels a bit watered down. It's easy drinking, but not very appetizing in the process. Drinkability is pretty good, especially for the style. It doesn't taste good enough to warrant more than a couple. But, it's doable.

Ringneck did a pretty decent job. For a macro style, it's alright. It suffers from some of the same flaws the macros do, but not to the same degree. It's worth a try. Gotta love the name too.

prototypic, Jun 11, 2008
Photo of adamette
3.4/5  rDev +0.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

RN Big Woody Lager Poured from tap into a clean, clear glass at The Brew Kettle earlier tonight.

A Classic lager look with clear yellowish with minimal carbonation rising up. Brief white head dissipates to a single ring around my glass. Appropriate to the style but not much to set it apart from others in its style. Just fine looking.

S Not much smell at all apart from maybe some distant distant hops, barley.

T Basic lager only with slightly stronger hops, barley but the taste dissapears quickly (within 60 seconds). I think that it is appropriate to the style once again but not much elevates this from other lagers that I have had. It IS more tasty than "The Great American Lager" however.

M Moderate with slightly stronger tastes than other well known lagers

D Fair to good for me but others may rate drinkability much higher as they may really enjoy the lager style.

adamette, Jan 16, 2009
Photo of sixerofelixir
3.5/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Draft sampled at The Brew Kettle in Strongsville, OH. Review from notes.

Pours clear and very yellow. White head. Sort of difficult to pick up on the aroma. Taste is light, sweet malts and almost wine-like (think Gewürztraminer). Interesting to say the least, and a bit of a departure from the average "helles" lager. Feel is resinous, and the finish is bitter and sweet. Easily drinkable, as expected. My glass blew the keg, so I'm glad to have tried it.

sixerofelixir, Jul 06, 2010
Photo of Nunya
3.5/5  rDev +3.9%

Nunya, Jul 27, 2014
Photo of AltBock
3.5/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

22 oz. bomber bottle with a black and white homemade label of a big beaver wearing sunglasses. In this beaver's hand is a big pint of beer. The other hand is busy giving this beer the thumbs up. A label with a big beaver and is named Big Woody? The jokes are endless. This was bought at the Brew kettle in their BOP.

I poured this big Lager into an Brooklyn Brewery Imperial pint glass. "Big Woody" poured a clear, but not pale lemon yellow. At the right angle, it looks like there's a small tint of amber mixed in with it. On top of this yellow brew was a creamy 1/4 of an inch pure white head of foam. This head of foam never receded. It stayed the same size the entire time this beer was in my glass. When the level of beer lowered, this head of foam left behind streaks of white lace.

There wasn't much going on in the aroma, but at least it didn't contain malted corn and rice. That's a huge plus coming from an Adjunct Lager. The aroma was lightly malty with toasted malts, a pinch of juicy fruits, and a slight touch of peppery hops. Not bad, but not much going on.

The taste was all about the malts! The taste starts off with toasted malts, but as the taste moves along, the toasted malts suddenly become bready malts. While the malts were changing, there was a slight taste of juicy fruits and a quick splash of peppery floral hops. I like malty Lagers and this beer was nothing but malts. This is how a Lager should taste like.

It was a light bodied crispy beer with plenty of crispy carbonation and a malty aftertaste. This malty aftertaste was a mix of toasted and bready malts and a hint of peppery hops. This clean malty aftertaste will only stick around for about 10 seconds.

I didn't have high hopes for Big Woody in the beginning, but when it came down to drinking this beer, it changed my mind. As you can tell, I really enjoyed this Lager. There was nothing in this beer that I didn't like. This beer won't give you woody, but if you ever want to try a clean stand up malty Lager, then make a trip down to the Brew Kettle to try this beer.

AltBock, Jan 18, 2009
Photo of Dogbrick
3.5/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Sample at the brewpub: Clear pale golden color with a very thin white head and spotty lacing. Light piney hops aroma. Light-bodied and clean on the tongue with a mildly malty and hoppy flavor. The finish is crisp and hoppy, with notes of pine and grass. Above average overall.

Dogbrick, Oct 16, 2006
Photo of quasimoto
3.53/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A - Its a clear dark golden ambers with very little lace.

S - The aroma of toasted malts and a background of dry hops. Also it's very vinous.

T - Strong taste of toasted caramel, mixed with a background of prunes and hops.

M- Simple. Its very light and has a dry, bitter finish.

D - Very easy to drink this beer. For the style I think Its a little big. Definitley very drinkable.

quasimoto, Feb 21, 2006
Photo of csmiley
3.63/5  rDev +7.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A - Pours mostly clear and gold. Color is darker than I expected but that is not a bad thing. Head was good - topping out at an inch - and stayed around for a while. Lacing was much better than expected.

S - Nothing really stands out and grabs the nose. Smell is light. There are several aromas that are apparent but they all seem to play an equal part overall. What is noticeable: grain, pale malt, earthy hops, and light caramel.

T - The solid malt base is quickly evident. Pale malt, caramel, bread, and grain / hay are all present. The tail end has a touch of hops and a small amount of alcohol. Flavor is simple but still nice.

M - Medium bodied with good carbonation. Finish contains a small amount of crisp bitterness but remains smooth overall.

D - Drinkability is good. It is simple, easy to drink, light enough to have several in a session, and smooth. Ringneck brewing did a good job with this one. It's nice to have a lager alternative to the typical BMC selections that are normally available. Also, gotta love a beer called Big Woody that has a picture of a beaver on the label.

csmiley, Jul 10, 2008
Photo of baconman91
3.75/5  rDev +11.3%

baconman91, Dec 26, 2012
Photo of NooseJustice
3.75/5  rDev +11.3%

NooseJustice, Dec 01, 2013
Photo of aracauna
3.83/5  rDev +13.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

This is definitely not a bad little lager. There’s light citrus and straw malt. It's even a bit floral in the aroma. The light gold color seems to contrast with the decent flavor. It’s very drinkable without being very boring. It's quite tasty, actually.

aracauna, Jun 06, 2004
Photo of Ricochet
3.85/5  rDev +14.2%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

If this was how most American macro lagers would taste, there wouldn't be a need for microbreweries.

Sweet smelling with a sweet and bitter flavor with alcohol notes present but didn't really affect the flavor. It is really full of taste and sort of reminds me of Breyers Ice Cream-just the raw materials with no extras. This is really an exceptional lager, usually not my choice when I go to microbreweries, but I'll have this one again.

Ricochet, Jul 25, 2004
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ringneck Big Woody Lager from The Brew Kettle Taproom & Smokehouse / Production Works
79 out of 100 based on 27 ratings.