1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Weihenstephaner Oktoberfestbier - Bayerische Staatsbrauerei Weihenstephan

Not Rated.
Weihenstephaner OktoberfestbierWeihenstephaner Oktoberfestbier

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

896 Ratings
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 896
Reviews: 492
rAvg: 3.68
pDev: 12.5%
Wants: 27
Gots: 23 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Bayerische Staatsbrauerei Weihenstephan visit their website

Style | ABV
Märzen / Oktoberfest |  5.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: mzwolinski on 10-27-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 896 | Reviews: 492 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of JeffWorcester

1/5  rDev -72.8%

09-09-2012 15:56:37 | More by JeffWorcester
Photo of TwoForty


2/5  rDev -45.7%

12-28-2013 22:45:10 | More by TwoForty
Photo of Knapp85


2.03/5  rDev -44.8%

I'm not a big fan of most Pilsners, and even though this brew is classified as a Marzen I still felt like this was more like a Pils. Big time grassy notes on the palette which is not my favorite thing in beer. The more I drank of this brew, the worse it got. Normally when a good beer gets warmer the flavors get better. This one wasn't like that. I was very happy once I finished this because I was afraid that I wasn't going to.

03-20-2011 16:44:52 | More by Knapp85
Photo of xare


2.08/5  rDev -43.5%

Pours as a lemon-colored very clear brew, has a good sized 3-finger white head. Overall, nice appearance but the color is very very light. I don't quite like it being that light.

Smells musty, lemony, somewhat wheaty. Doesn't appeal to me but I know others would go wild over it. Somewhat below average for me.

Tastes old, musty, and has touches of citrus. Definitely not something that I like, hopefully I didn't get an old bottle since there is no freshness label or made-on date.

Mouthfeel is slippery, almost like an unfiltered wheat beer but it isn't cloudy and lightly carbonated. I'd say average mouthfeel.

Drinkability - didn't want to finish this beer. Just wanted to find something else that I wanted to drink. I might give it a try again if I can find something that I can ensure is 100% fresh and not take a risk on a bottle without a date again.

03-29-2008 02:11:31 | More by xare
Photo of Rennpferd


2.15/5  rDev -41.6%

It poured pale yellow with one finger of head and moderate carbonation. The head quickly retreated into a lite lacing.

It had an astringent off scent that was accented by hops. There was adjunct like qualities. No definitive barley or wheat malt characteristics from what I can tell.

It tasted bitter, slightly hoppy. Those astringent scent characteristics really took over in the taste department. It had a lite to medium body what was smooth and refreshing.

It's drinkable, but not very. I am not impressed. I had heard good things about this beer but it did not live up to the hype. I question the ability of this being sold as a Marzen. Not to be crude, but this is almost what I urinate after a night of drinking real Marzens.

10-26-2008 03:04:44 | More by Rennpferd
Photo of masey222


2.2/5  rDev -40.2%

pours a pale yellow color. It's very clear. Backlighting gives it a distinct yellow color. A foamy white head tops it. It stands about a finger and a half tall and falls relatively quickly. ABV? Perhaps. Lacing was a little sticky, but very light. Meh. Not exciting.

The nose is below average. It's very weak, and doesn't feature much in terms of aromatics at all. It's earthy and grainy throughout. There's definitely a corn scent that's prominent. Alcohol is noticeable, but isn't overwhelming. That pretty much wraps it up. Not much to smell here.

The flavor is a little better actually. This isn't the pungent beast I anticipated. Is it good? Absolutely not. But it's far from the worst beer I've ever had. It kicks off with a strong corn flavor. It should come as no surprise that that flavor lingers throughout. There are some earthy and grainy flavors that aren't altogether bad. I'm getting a tad bit of sweet malt. It does a decent job of holding things together. Alcohol is definitely there, but this is a malt liquor after all. What'd you expect? Finishes a little sweet and corn-y (no pun intended).

Body that's on the light side of medium. Carbonation is active. While it doesn't feel smooth, it doesn't have a bad feel. Drinkability is below average. Eh. The flavor's alright, but there's not enough here to really draw you in. It's not a disaster, but I'm not enjoying it. Finish the can? Eh. We'll see about that.

Now that you have read that I hi-jacked that from a review for Steel reserve by prototypic, this beer for the $12 a six that I payed really is no more impressive nor does is it really any different than steel reserve (it tastes almost identical to a malt drink I had once at a friends called clear creek ice) or for that matter anything that comes in a 40 and is drank from a paper bag.

10-27-2010 08:13:30 | More by masey222
Photo of ultralarry2006


2.42/5  rDev -34.2%

Poured from a 500ml. bottle. Leaves less than one finger of a white head that quickly dissappears, and leaves very small trace amounts of lacing. Body is clear gold, looking like a Helles Lager or Euro-Lager rather than a Marzen with a Marzen's characteristic orange-amber hue.

Smell - cooked veggies, slight aroma of toasted malt biscuits. Not promising. I smell a disappointing Euro-Lager here.

Taste - as promised by the nose, which is to say not much. Cooked veggies with a faint hint of toasty malt biscuits, washed with some sour grassy hops. This tastes like a mediocre, mass produced Euro-lager, and nowhere near a Marzen. Disappointing.

Mouthfeel - medium to thin bodied.

Drinkability - This is certainly not a Marzen, and it is not very good, not even as a Euro Lager.

10-15-2007 15:01:15 | More by ultralarry2006
Photo of drpimento


2.45/5  rDev -33.4%

You know, these new fangled blonde fest/marzens just don't cut it with me. As a pale lager it's not bad, not great, but not bad. As a fest, it's the requisite malty, easy drinking beer. But the key red/Vienna malt thing is ignored. Oh well. Served with a nice, white, foamy, frothy head and lots of lace. Color is a clear yellow gold. Aroma is a very mild malt. Flavor show's a lot more hop (fest?) bitterness and good balance with the malt, so I have some decent bittersweet flav. Body is quite good and so is carbonation. Finish is quintessential pale lager. Session beer for a pale lager but NOT for a fest/marzen.

10-06-2009 01:39:23 | More by drpimento
Photo of Beerbuddy21


2.5/5  rDev -32.1%

09-20-2013 02:19:26 | More by Beerbuddy21
Photo of pin


2.5/5  rDev -32.1%

09-18-2012 03:41:45 | More by pin
Photo of davidwhatshisnam

New York

2.5/5  rDev -32.1%

05-13-2014 23:05:39 | More by davidwhatshisnam
Photo of Paige


2.5/5  rDev -32.1%

10-13-2012 22:37:27 | More by Paige
Photo of lostinfla


2.5/5  rDev -32.1%

11-23-2013 02:59:37 | More by lostinfla
Photo of Kyrojack


2.5/5  rDev -32.1%

10-20-2012 22:06:09 | More by Kyrojack
Photo of udubdawg


2.5/5  rDev -32.1%

08-19-2014 20:39:03 | More by udubdawg
Photo of Fatehunter


2.53/5  rDev -31.3%

Poured a finger of head on a clear, golden colored body.
The aroma is metallic and dry grain; much like a Euro pale lager....
The taste starts sweet and then alternates between metallic bitter and dry bitter. Not pleasing.
The texture is crisp with moderate carbonation.
An unpleasant experience overall.

10-21-2013 23:13:23 | More by Fatehunter
Photo of adamette


2.53/5  rDev -31.3%

Live review. Poured from the 11.2 oz. brown bottle that I bought as a single last week from Save-On in Mentor, Ohio for $1.68 into my “The Second City” Weizen glass. “4241” stamped on the bottom of the back label, whatever that means.

A 3 inch off white meringue head over a surprisingly light, golden, translucent body with minimal trails of bubbles rising up from the bottom. Ho-hum look really. 2.0

S The expected barley malt smell is there but it is really a bit thin. I had to sniff a few times to appreciate the grains in the smell. 2.5

T Again the expected barley malt is there but I am surprised (and a little dissapointed) to report that it is a rather thin tasting beer. I just had Victory’s version of a Marzen and it was much fuller, more satisfying than this one. It is not like this brewery has not had time to get it right, it is the “World’s Oldest Brewery” afterall! 2.5

M Again, rather thin. I have to admit I am dissapointed in the feel of this beer. 2.0

D/O Drinkability is high (as per the style) but overall this is a thin example of the style. I believe that I would much rather have a Victory Festbier. 3.0

09-05-2011 00:36:12 | More by adamette
Photo of Padron4KM


2.58/5  rDev -29.9%

16.9 oz bottle. Freshness date on back label but I can't read it.
Clear golden with a fluffy white head. Moderate lacing.

Aroma is grassy and biscuty.

Flavor is mildly bitter, light grain, acidic finish.

I expect better from this brewery. Maybe it has been sitting on the shelf for a while.

04-21-2007 05:57:38 | More by Padron4KM
Photo of bonbright7


2.58/5  rDev -29.9%

As I soon as I spied this on the shelves in a local stop, I thought I had to have it immediately as I had been very impressed with the same brewery's other selections. The golden ale poured seemingly well, but the comparisons to the other ales ended shortly after that. The nose on the ale reminded me of a bitter- sweet mass produced lager from Holland, which many people mistake for German. The first taste confirmed it was a mix of ale and lager tastes that made me want to retreat to the IPA's and Stouts in my fridge. I thought that maybe I got either a bad bottle or that it was another attempt to cash in on the Oktoberfest theme in the American market.

10-12-2009 00:35:37 | More by bonbright7
Photo of RedBeerHead


2.58/5  rDev -29.9%

Light carbonated head. Pretty good fruity and hoppy smell. Hoppy bitter flavor that gets worse on the second sip. Actually starts to taste a little like cough syrup. Definitely overwhelming. The taste of this beer is excessively complicated and way to bitter. This one still needs a lot of work.

01-10-2008 02:29:21 | More by RedBeerHead
Photo of civilizedpsycho


2.58/5  rDev -29.9%

Poured bottle into mug.

Appearance: Poured a golden, clear color with a nice head.

Smell: Very hoppy aroma, but a little funky. Not exactly appealing.

Taste: This was bitter and a little funky flavor, but it finished smooth.

Mouthfeel: Pretty thin. Not much to tell here.

Drinkability: This is a beer that's good enough for me to finish the 6-pack I bought, but not good enough for me to buy again.

08-20-2009 04:21:21 | More by civilizedpsycho
Photo of fo5s

District of Columbia

2.58/5  rDev -29.9%

12oz bottle served in a sam adams perfect pint glass. No dating on the bottle.

A- pours a pale golden. crispy 2-finger white head that recedes quickly with no lacing.

S- lots of straw, hint of yeast. A touch of toast, but well hidden.

T- Mostly wheat and straw, some yeast. Sweet. Not a lot of malt coming through. Really not what I'd expect for the style.

M- crispy, pretty lively carbonation.

O- overall a disappointing take on the style. More of a mediocre wheat beer than a true marzen. At least the bottle wasn't green...

10-30-2011 20:50:45 | More by fo5s
Photo of Jayli


2.6/5  rDev -29.3%

Consumed 10/4
Poured in to a pint glass

A: This beer pours a somewhat hazy, straw yellow with a one finger of sudsy white head. Head recedes leaving minor wisps of lacing on the glass.

S: Nose is grainy, bready, a bit of off malt sweetness.

T: Taste abundantly sweet. Grains, bread, and sweet malt flavoring. Sweetness mingled with the grains and bread are just not blended well, sweetness is actually more cloying. Finish has just a hint of earthy hops.

M: Light body, medium carbonation, thin bodied and somewhat watery with a potentially crisp finish.

D: Doesn't go down all that easily, minor kick, not a very good representation of the style. I would definitely opt for others of the style.

10-07-2010 00:51:22 | More by Jayli
Photo of RickS95


2.7/5  rDev -26.6%

I'm giving it a 2 for looks for one reason only. The head is stellar. The beer itself is a click darker than Budweiser. Looks nothing like any Oktoberfest I've seen. Very clear, looks like ginger ale. The head, however is a looker. A couple fingers of white bubbles, good retention. Looks like cotton balls. Thin white lace left behind.

Smells like Budweiser. Nothing to indicate it's an Oktoberfest.

The taste is slightly redeeming. Very much a stock pilsner, but there are some spices in there. Very yeasty with some pepper accents, but mostly standard pilsner malts.

It's light to medium bodied, fairly crisp, with just a hint of some spices. Slight hop presence in the finish.

Overall, it would make for a world class pilsner, but it's fairly lacking for an Oktoberfest. Not sure how they call it a festbier because it just isn't. But nonetheless, it's not a bad tasting beer, just nothing like I was expecting. I'm glad I bought a six pack because it'll make for good drinking, but I wouldn't call it a marzen.

10-29-2012 02:18:37 | More by RickS95
Photo of Phillyduke


2.73/5  rDev -25.8%

A: 12 oz. NR poured into an Imperial Pint glass. Beer is very pale for a Märzen/Oktoberfest...a bright golden color with an ever so slight chill haze to it. A 1-finger head of fizzy foam dissipates quickly to a very thin cap. Barely any retention and only the slightest bit of fine lace.

S: Sweet malt and some yeastiness with a twinge of medicinal alcohol.

T/M: Mild, light-to-medium bodied lager with very little, if any, hop character. Dominant flavor is of bready malts. Carbonation is a little on the flat side, but the beer coats the palate nicely. Slightly bitter finish lingers for awhile.

D/O: The taste is relatively tame and one-dimensional, which leads to a pretty high score on the drinkability scale. Classifying this as a Märzen/Oktoberfest leads me to review it against the style, which I think this beer completely misses. I understand this is a newer-breed of lighter "Oktoberfest" beers, but it's certainly not a Märzen lager (if it is, it's a pretty poor attempt by such a good brewery). If this was brewed to be consumed in mass quantities over the course of the day, then it's a successful, easy-drinking lager that does what it was intended to do. I enjoyed it for what it was, but think a different style classification is in order here.

11-22-2008 20:48:46 | More by Phillyduke
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Weihenstephaner Oktoberfestbier from Bayerische Staatsbrauerei Weihenstephan
83 out of 100 based on 896 ratings.