1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Old Reading Beer - Ruckus Brewing

Not Rated.
Old Reading BeerOld Reading Beer

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
77
okay

54 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 54
Reviews: 40
rAvg: 3.31
pDev: 18.73%
Wants: 1
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Ruckus Brewing visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  4.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Phatz on 03-15-2007)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 54 | Reviews: 40 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by HopDerek:
Photo of HopDerek
HopDerek

Pennsylvania

3.93/5  rDev +18.7%

Picked up a case at a very great price. Even though it's not my usual preferred style, I couldn't pass on the price.

Pours a clear golden yellow color with lots of bubbly white head that dissipates quickly, leaving no lacing. Smells are faint, but hints of honey, grapes, and lite hops can be picked up. Tastes of lemon and honey with white grapes in the finish. A very clean sessionable beer light in body with nice carbonation.

08-15-2007 00:00:25 | More by HopDerek
More User Reviews:
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

West Virginia

3.03/5  rDev -8.5%

First off, I have no great memories of drinking this stuff with my dad or buddies. I had never heard of the label until Legacy revived the brand a few years back. The retro labeling and 6 dollar price tag peaked my interest when I saw a sixer of this at the Gian Eagle Market District. Pours fizzy yellow with a fleeting bright white head not much different than most of the other Lion offerings. Label states that it is brewed by Ruckus Brewing in Wilkes-Barre, PA. I know better this is contracted at the Lion. Fine speckled lacing lines my fluted pils glass. Aroma has a slight metallic edge that isn't overbearing and is supported by a blend of cereal grains/cooked veggies/maize. Light herbal dusting of hops in the back end just barely detectable. Flavor is nothing special, cereal grains/overtly sweet corn notes with a touch of green apple. No metallic flavors or offness clean drinking industrial lager, very comparable to Lionshead Lager. Mouthfeel is a bit heavy on the carbonation a bit of residual sugars peak out the body to land above watery texture. Drinkability is effortless and some what pleasant no harsh off flavors, no frills PA brewed lager. I like the abv if that 4 percent is accurate, definitely something I'd have around just to offer to people who just want a beer.

01-10-2011 07:35:04 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of biboergosum
biboergosum

Alberta (Canada)

3.53/5  rDev +6.6%

12oz bottle. I assume that this is the same-ish beer currently being distributed in these parts as 'Reading Premium Beer'. Also, does this have something to do with that railroad from Monopoly?

This beer pours a clear, quite pale golden yellow colour, with one finger of thin, foamy white head, which melts away before my eyes, leaving nothing in the way of even semi-permanent lace around the glass.

It smells of moderately sweet pastry-like malt, more toward the southern biscuit or bready side of things, with a slight drupe fruitiness, and a bit of light grassy, earthy hoppiness. The taste is more sweet, grainy malt, rather redolent of a bakery's enticing general essence, some aged orchard fruit, and nicely metered leafy, grassy hops.

The bubbles are pretty sublimated and sedate, the body a decent medium weight, and all is smooth enough. It finishes sweet and malty, the pastry notes just not willing to let go.

A tasty APA, I suppose, but focused in a quite different direction than I have steeled myself against lately - no big Yankee hops, no caramel malt. This is actually more of what I've come to expect from an above average American Blonde Ale. APA, ABA - more than splitting hairs, I know, but it's good to have an idea what you're getting into in such a broad category (with either style, I might add).

08-31-2012 02:45:05 | More by biboergosum
Photo of GratefulBeerGuy
GratefulBeerGuy

New Hampshire

4.05/5  rDev +22.4%

A slightly hazy golden color, average white head dissipates moderate fashion.

A sweet, heady malty aroma, subtle sweet fruits, sour yeasty, peppery and cold spring water in the aroma.

A very delicate, light lager feel with simple but very effective flavor's in a classic style. The malt is sweet and bready, not overlly hefty, sour-dry notes, complex yeast with great balance. This one oozes authenticity and quality. An intesrting version of classic from long ago, victorian-Industialization era beer, a true throw-back with new life.

A classic lager recipe for today.

08-17-2011 00:01:38 | More by GratefulBeerGuy
Photo of alovesupreme
alovesupreme

Massachusetts

3.63/5  rDev +9.7%

Poured aggressively yielded a 2 1/2 finger head that dissipated rather quickly leaving a sticky ring around the glass. Lots of carbonation with a light yellow body.
Grainy smell alluding to corn although the style indicates that this is not an ingredient.
Grainy flavor with very little bitterness. Carbonation is high but expected.
A great beer for the money.Although I wouldn't drink much during the winter this is a good summer value.

07-28-2009 22:52:03 | More by alovesupreme
Photo of ko21361
ko21361


3.75/5  rDev +13.3%

02-27-2013 01:24:34 | More by ko21361
Photo of Kegatron
Kegatron

Pennsylvania

3.65/5  rDev +10.3%

12oz bottle into a pint glass.

Pours a clear gold with a finger width of brite-white foams that eventually settles down and actually retains pretty pretty well with some decent lace. Aroma is to be expected sweet malt with some light hopppiness.

The taste is pretty much the same as the aroma. The same smooth malt sweetness followed by some light bitterness. The mouthfeel isn't half bad being fairly medium bodied with a crisp feel.

This overall wasn't a half bad Macro Lager and was pretty darn drinkable. I had hoped for a little more flavor and aroma but I think that this is definitely a step up from your usual fizzy yellow Macro-crap.

01-22-2008 17:30:07 | More by Kegatron
Photo of Chinon01
Chinon01

Pennsylvania

3.58/5  rDev +8.2%

Nose is grain, fruity and sweet and a little malty. Flavor is similar with some corn and citrus-orange. Finish is clean with low hop profile. This beer is a crowd pleaser. Sort of like a richer PBR. Old School. Clean macro finish. A slightly more interesting version of your dad's beer. Mouthfeel and drinkability are good.

10-07-2008 03:37:26 | More by Chinon01
Photo of tone77
tone77

Pennsylvania

3.25/5  rDev -1.8%

Poured from a 12 oz. can. Pours a pale yellow with a small head. Smell is mild, some malt and grains. Taste is also mild. Some malts and grains and finishes a tad bitter. Feels light in the mouth and goes down easy enough. Overall this is an average brew.

08-10-2009 22:42:23 | More by tone77
Photo of puboflyons
puboflyons

New Hampshire

3.48/5  rDev +5.1%

From a 12 fl. oz. bottle with a partially smudged marking that ends in 1740. Sampled on March 15, 2009.

Appearance - It is your basic pale yellow with about a pinky's width of fizzy white head that does not last long. Some lacing graces the pint glass.

Smell - The malts are the first aroma I whiff followed by someting kind of grainy or grassy but not offputting.

Taste and Mouthfeel - The mouthfeel is of medium, creamy texture with good stability. The taste has an element of malts and vague hops. I don't know if this is the same recipe that Reading brewed in the 19th Century but although it was better than most pales, it was mostly average to above average in the end.

03-15-2009 19:32:26 | More by puboflyons
Photo of akorsak
akorsak

Pennsylvania

3.65/5  rDev +10.3%

A pint glass served at the 3rd and Spruce cafe in West Reading, PA.

A: The lager is yellow and fizzy. No frills here, as it seems to adhere to the style spot on.

S: The nose is grainy, light with a corn aroma and a mere kiss of hops.

T: The flavor is as pale as the color. Generally lacking in flavor, a corn adjunct sweetness emerges occasionally to add a bit of pep to the carbonated drink. Hops are generally nonexistent, giving only a faint hint of bitterness.

M: For a yellow fizzy lager, this one goes down alright. The flavor is just enough to make this a go-to over several more well-known brands.

D: At $2.50 per pint, this beer is a steal. It is a nice tribute to a bygone era in which Reading was a brewing hotspot.

11-18-2007 21:28:45 | More by akorsak
Photo of LJWalker
LJWalker

Alabama

4/5  rDev +20.8%

11-18-2012 06:06:47 | More by LJWalker
Photo of Ragingbull
Ragingbull

California

3.35/5  rDev +1.2%

This is a premium beer brewed with the care of any craft beer. My wife's aunt got me a bottle of it. I drank it at their summer rental overlooking Lake George and to be fair the setting may have caused me to enjoy it more. It was gold in color with a frothy head and was quite pretty for such a pale beer. Grain and malt nose. Smooth fresh attack with a heavy malt flavor and hints of banana. Clean finish. A good beer for sitting around and sipping. I was willing to call it a B-.

08-07-2008 15:02:15 | More by Ragingbull
Photo of vrazionale
vrazionale

Vermont

2.58/5  rDev -22.1%

12 oz. bottle at refrigerator temperature poured into a snifter

A - Clear golden brown with a full head that quickly dissipates into a thin coating across the top of the brew.

S - Wet grass, green hops, and a slight off-aroma of skunkiness. The smell definitely reminds me of the kind of beer that I used to use to play beer pong in college. I don't mean that in a good way.

T - Pretty watered-down and bland. The malt and hops don't feel well-balanced. I get those corn and rice flavors that are often associated with macro brews.

M - The carbonation levels are fine, but there isn't much else to say about the mouthfeel. Doesn't have much about which to get excited.

D - I was hoping that this beer would be a better macro alternative for a cheap American lager. It's really not that much better than Budweiser, in my opinion. It's just a pretty uninspired beer that I wouldn't seek out again. The only reason I would drink it again is if it was between this and Budweiser.

05-28-2009 22:21:21 | More by vrazionale
Photo of Drinking_Milkshakes
Drinking_Milkshakes


2.75/5  rDev -16.9%

03-11-2012 02:41:12 | More by Drinking_Milkshakes
Photo of mwbecker
mwbecker

North Carolina

4.43/5  rDev +33.8%

I loved the beer and so did my backyard full of friends who attended my Memorial Day BBQ. I wish I could get more but limited supply down here in NC. The taste was clear and clean with no aftertaste. I guess I will have to make a run to PA next time I go north to fill my truck up with a few cases.

06-07-2011 18:42:55 | More by mwbecker
Photo of Phatz
Phatz

Pennsylvania

3.55/5  rDev +7.3%

Served straight from the tanks at the brewery. Thanks for hooking me up Mark.

Appearance: Pours a clear pale gold yellow color with a massive head.

Smell: Very reserved nose. hints of pale malts and light grain attribute.

Taste: Crisp clean easy session beer, with nothing special to offer. Starts lightly sweet and finishes with dry grain and hops. Apropos to style.

Mouthfeel: Light easy refreshing.

Drinkability: It is a macro re-built for the fans of this beers long history.

Hope this is helpful.
Cheers!

03-15-2007 22:01:46 | More by Phatz
Photo of titosupertramp
titosupertramp

Tennessee

3.38/5  rDev +2.1%

A: Light golden in color. Fizzy head that fades fast leaving behind slight lacing and film.

S: Not much here, but decent enough. Sweet, pale malts..sort of bready.

T: Crisp and clean. Sweet, bready malts with a grassy hop backend. Not half bad.

M: Carbonation gives this a slightly fizzy feel. Moderatly dry finish.

O: Not bad for style. If you're looking for something better than Budweiser, but want to spend around the same amount of money, this might be a good option for you.

09-29-2011 22:23:08 | More by titosupertramp
Photo of jneiswender
jneiswender

Massachusetts

3.43/5  rDev +3.6%

Poured out of a 12oz brown bottle into a pint glass.

A--Deep yellow color and a very nice fluffy head or medium density

S--clean, no off colors, sweet

T--its not a full flavor lager, in nice balance between hop and malt. However, just not there in volume of flavor.

M--light, fizzy, dry finish

D--Really nice beer for the style. American Macro brew...this is better than what you will get from the major breweries. A good example of a working man's beer, that is cheap and brewed local and consumed quickly is good beer sense.

02-22-2008 18:58:19 | More by jneiswender
Photo of TheManiacalOne
TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

2.68/5  rDev -19%

Poured from a 12oz can into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a light yellow color, with a large white head that fades quickly and leaves a thick lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is kind of faint but contains light malts, grain and a touch of hops.

T: The taste is bready up front with flavors of grain and barley. There's a little bit of malt sweetness and a faint touch of hops, but there's not much flavor present. The after-taste is slightly bready.

M: Crisp and a little smooth, light body, medium carbonation, finish is clean.

D: Not very flavorful, goes down ok, not filling at all, very mild kick, there isn't a lot too this beer, so it's drinkable for that reason, but it's not something that I would go for unless my choices were quite limited.

06-07-2009 02:56:58 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of OneDropSoup
OneDropSoup

Pennsylvania

2.45/5  rDev -26%

Cool retro label. Poured into a pilsner: 2 fingers talc head, foamy, over golden-yellow body. Very little nucleation. Head drop sot thin, loose coating, just a few strands of lace.

Smells just a little bready, cold oatmeal, & a tad buttery. Not great, but at least it's weak/restrained enough not to be offensive.

Tastes of subuded fruit chewing gum, a little bit of lemon "drink" bite around the sides, then white bread. Ends with a little bitterness with a dull sweetness in the aftertaste.

Smooth enough, a little spritzy action, with tongue-grabbing sugars. Not bad.

Not hard to drink, mostly bland overall, but a bad lawnmower of "end-of-night-of-drinking" beer. I feel this isn't too far off from most macros, & gets some points for being a local, so there you go.

01-18-2011 22:23:31 | More by OneDropSoup
Photo of DrinkingDrake
DrinkingDrake

Massachusetts

3.75/5  rDev +13.3%

A friend of mine picked this up randomly. Neither of us had seen it before. No info on the bottle at all. A bubbly golden yellow with one finger of head. Smells of faint malt with some lemon rind. Taste is crisp and smoother than expected. A light Pilsner malt taste with some dry zesty lemon hop bitterness that is mild but balanced. The beer had a great carbonation all the way down and was very smooth

05-02-2011 23:34:19 | More by DrinkingDrake
Photo of IPAchris
IPAchris

Pennsylvania

4.75/5  rDev +43.5%

08-20-2012 01:58:08 | More by IPAchris
Photo of woodychandler
woodychandler

Pennsylvania

3.3/5  rDev -0.3%

I reviewed Old Reading in a CAN when it had recently been revived by a couple of local entrepreneurs. They subsequently folded and Ruckus took over the label. It is still being brewed at The Lion in Wilkes-Barre FWIW.

From the bottle: "The Touch of the Pennsylvania Dutch".

I got an initial finger of French Vanilla-colored head which fell pretty quickly while I was typing. Color was a deep golden-yellow with NE-plus quality clarity, enabling me to see into the future. Croesus and Midas were seen scouring my reefer for another bottle. Sorry, fellas, just this one. Nose had an odd chemical/disinfectant smell to it. Hmm. Mouthfeel was medium and thankfully, it did not taste like it smelled. Instead, it had a clean, honey-like lager taste that is the hallmark of an adjunct-free lager. Hallelujah, Hollywood! I do not think that even the original brand was adjunct free, so this represents an upgrade and retooling of the recipe. Finish was semi-dry and very refreshing. Very nice, except for the nose.

12-26-2012 18:29:06 | More by woodychandler
Photo of moulefrite
moulefrite

Massachusetts

2.85/5  rDev -13.9%

I can't get too analytical about this beer. It is basically yellow fizzy water. But, it is dirt cheap (15.99 a case at Marty's Newton) and it makes you feel (kinda) good to support a beer that doesn't advertise at the super bowl. The drink just barely hints of beer. It is light, with miniscule flavors of bread/yeast and the hop component is almost non-existent. It does not offend. It is not memorable. Nonetheless, one can put a sixer of this stuff away in about 90 minutes, and at 4 dollars a six if your budget is tight this beer is just alright. Perfect beer to sip while tuning into willies place on Serius Satelite. And, after drinking a few cases of this you've got money for the good stuff, and then, boy does really good beer taste special.

07-12-2009 18:07:23 | More by moulefrite
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Old Reading Beer from Ruckus Brewing
77 out of 100 based on 54 ratings.