1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Girardin Gueuze 1882 (White Label) - Brouwerij Girardin

Not Rated.
Girardin Gueuze 1882 (White Label)Girardin Gueuze 1882 (White Label)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
85
very good

61 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 61
Reviews: 39
rAvg: 3.79
pDev: 12.4%
Wants: 21
Gots: 4 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij Girardin
Belgium

Style | ABV
Gueuze |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Filtered version.

(Beer added by: TheLongBeachBum on 02-24-2003)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 61 | Reviews: 39 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Jeffo
Jeffo

Netherlands

1.78/5  rDev -53%

Lined up nine different gueuze for a comparison the other night. This one finished dead last. Just horrible. Got this bottle at De Bierkoning in Amsterdam, for what it's worth.

From a 33cl bottle into a mini sinfter

APPEARANCE: Pours a two finger, thinner, loose white head with good retention. Clear gamboge orange with higher levels of carbonation evident. Head fades to a good cap that sticks around. Looks fine.

SMELL: Totally different than all the other gueuze. Fruity and plenty of ginger on the nose, with some orange peel and floral notes. Some very light funky aromas, but this is more ginger and fruit. Doesn't resemble a gueuze at all.

TASTE: Same story here. Ginger comes out first, with some caramel sweetness and floral bitterness at swallow. Quite mild and not gueuze-like at all. Some light funk shows up, but the sour ginger flavor is just unpleasant. Pretty lousy.

PALATE: Medium body and lower levels of carbonation. Watery on the palate, goes down fine and finishes a little stickier than the others.

OVERALL: Very different than the others in the style. The added sweetness really didn't do this any good, as the resulting ginger is quite off-putting. Not something I ever want to lay eyes on again. Easily the worst of the lineup. Was glad to introduce this to drain.

12-21-2012 18:09:29 | More by Jeffo
Photo of scottfrie
scottfrie

California

2.86/5  rDev -24.5%

375ml bottle into Cantillon gueuze tumbler. Cork says REF BX 2013. Who knows.

A: Pours a clear citrus amber with a finger of fuzzy off-white head that faded into a thick soft looking film. Streaks of lace were left down the glass.
S: Fruits and funk, but not that typical earthy barnyard funk. This smells very different than the black label; this funk is more fecal and fruity, like fermented fruit mixed with rotten fruit. I love me some funk, but to be honest this doesn’t smell great. Smells like vomit frankly.
T: More fermented fruits, hints of stomach acid, sweet candied sugar or caramel, musty oxidization, dry oak, earth and earthy spice, pepper faded hops and apple juice. Sour candy finish is pretty tame, and the sweet fruity aftertaste is reminiscent of prunes, plumes, figs, and honey.
M: Airy, fluffy carbonation, medium body, slick and frothy mouthfeel.
O: Definitely not my favorite, and a disappointment compared to black label. Drinkable, but not pleasant.

02-24-2013 01:53:28 | More by scottfrie
Photo of cosmonick
cosmonick

Indiana

3/5  rDev -20.8%

07-19-2014 02:13:54 | More by cosmonick
Photo of JAHMUR
JAHMUR

Connecticut

3/5  rDev -20.8%

06-24-2012 22:44:57 | More by JAHMUR
Photo of HardyGeneraL
HardyGeneraL

Netherlands

3/5  rDev -20.8%

04-01-2012 14:36:01 | More by HardyGeneraL
Photo of mattfancett
mattfancett

United Kingdom (England)

3.1/5  rDev -18.2%

08-27-2014 16:56:18 | More by mattfancett
Photo of callmemickey
callmemickey

Pennsylvania

3.35/5  rDev -11.6%

Young bottle opened at Delirium Cafe in March 2011.

A: Orange-straw body. Skim of off-white foam. Spotty lacing.

S: Funky barnyard aromas, lemon, oak, a bit of cheese. Comes across more like an unblended lambic than a gueuze.

T: A weird blend of funky, musty lambic and cloyingly sweet lemon-lime soda. Not a good mix.

M: Cloying sweetness overwhelms the moderate body. Carbonation was spot on, but couldn’t keep the sweetness moving fast enough.

O: An odd ball. Not likely to revisit for a while, especially given the superior Girardin Black.

04-28-2011 22:38:07 | More by callmemickey
Photo of cpetrone84
cpetrone84

Pennsylvania

3.38/5  rDev -10.8%

Big thanks to Kevin for sharing this one!

A-pours a darker glowing orange color, mostly clear with just a touch of haze, little white head to it.

S-the nose is sweet, apple cidar with a carmelized malt sweetness, light notes of acetone with some plums and cherries in the back.

T-tons of malt in this, caramel and sugar, dark fruits of plums and cherries, this is quite sweet with more cider notes in it and a hint of sourness towards the back.

M-very syrupy medium body that thins out towards the back and lacks a strong carbonation presence I would have liked to see.

D-very sweet with some issues, one dimensional and a little cidar like. had next to some tasty gueuze and was the least complex of the group and just was too sweet.

08-18-2010 17:41:47 | More by cpetrone84
Photo of Squelch
Squelch

United Kingdom (England)

3.4/5  rDev -10.3%

Appearance: Hazy. brown. No head. no bubbles. Looks very unappetizing

Smell: smells of vinegar. Some cider notes in here.

Taste: sour dominates. Winey, Slight malt in there.

Mouthfeel: Dry, sour, puckering.

Overall: Not my style but on the better end of it.

11-04-2011 18:50:20 | More by Squelch
Photo of HopHead84
HopHead84

California

3.43/5  rDev -9.5%

6/23/2012

Thanks for sharing! Snifter. Tasted after a really nice bottle of Black Label.

Dark orange and transparent with a big creamy white head that rises above the liquid about two inches. Scattered lacing. The aroma is of lemon, barnyard, and a light mustiness. It's really toned down from the Black Label. There's a little oak. The flavor possesses a simple lactic sourness with a mellow tartness. Lightly oaky and citric with a little leather and barnyard, but the filtering seems to have stripped this beer of positive attributes and turned it into Gueuze light. The beer is lower medium body with high carbonation. An okay beer in its own right, but pales in comparison to the Black Label.

07-27-2012 20:39:30 | More by HopHead84
Photo of Luk13
Luk13

Quebec (Canada)

3.46/5  rDev -8.7%

Bottle 375ml. Clear golden pour with decent white head. Aroma is (too) light barnyard and leather, hay but mostly green apples. Light tartness and wood, sweet apples and leaf. Nice carbonation. Lacks authenticity.but still enjoyable. A shadow of the Black label.

06-15-2013 16:41:05 | More by Luk13
Photo of emerge077
emerge077

Illinois

3.48/5  rDev -8.2%

Cork dated 2011, served side by side with Black Label 1882.

Right off the bat, the color is a deeper copper-tinged crystalline amber orange than the paler Black Label. There are also larger bubbles rising persistently from the base of the glass. Head retention is not as good, after 5 minutes the head has completely vanished with no lacing. There was some residue in the bottom of the bottle, oddly enough for a filtered product.

Smells oaky with some citrus and cidery notes, not as funky as its unfiltered counterpart. A dash of malt sweetness and slight oxidation creeping in.

Tastes less complex with slight oxidation, though still quite oaky and cidery sour. Finish is very dry with a lingering moderate tartness on the back of the palate and some moderate tannic bitterness. Refreshing. Overall it's not bad, but its one-dimensional nature is a slight letdown. Not missing much, Black Label is certainly a cut above.

Thanks Eric for the opportunity to try this!

06-18-2012 23:34:19 | More by emerge077
Photo of errantnight
errantnight

California

3.5/5  rDev -7.7%

07-23-2014 23:22:06 | More by errantnight
Photo of ygtbsm94
ygtbsm94

Virginia

3.5/5  rDev -7.7%

11-15-2011 02:38:36 | More by ygtbsm94
Photo of Thorpe429
Thorpe429

Illinois

3.5/5  rDev -7.7%

From the bottle at Brasserie Cambrinus during our trip to Belgium last week. Reviewed from notes.

Served in a Girardin tumbler.

Pours a very clear golden color with a thin white head that fizzled out pretty quickly.

The nose brought a very mild amount of funk and faint acidity. Light lemon peel as well. The taste was about the same. Nice and refreshing, but not terribly complex.

Light body with crisp carbonation and mild acidity. Decent enough, but nowhere near what the black label is.

09-15-2011 13:52:00 | More by Thorpe429
Photo of GRUUMSH
GRUUMSH

Belgium

3.5/5  rDev -7.7%

06-02-2013 16:49:26 | More by GRUUMSH
Photo of dgilks
dgilks

Australia

3.5/5  rDev -7.7%

04-30-2012 11:15:40 | More by dgilks
Photo of Filosoof
Filosoof

Netherlands

3.6/5  rDev -5%

It is only because I like sour beers, that this beer is still getting a B.

L: almost amber; nice top for a geuze.
S: although, is this a geuze? I miss the things that make geuzes attractive. Almost no bretts or oak. Prunes and white raisins.
T: boring sour, finish too hoppy and tart; roadblock stuff.
M: very weak.
O: pity one; weakest geuze I know.

09-09-2011 16:44:00 | More by Filosoof
Photo of muttyd
muttyd

Massachusetts

3.6/5  rDev -5%

A - Golden, amber body with little to head.

S - Horse blanket, citrus, grass/hay barnyard, and some vinegar.

T - Dusty horse blanket, sour green apples, citrus, grainy malts, and slight oak.

M - Body was disappointing, but what I expected for a filtered gueuze.

D - Tried this one in a line up of other sours, and I wasn't too upset when my glass was finished and we moved on to the next. Still a very good beer.

05-16-2010 15:41:19 | More by muttyd
Photo of DefenCorps
DefenCorps

Oregon

3.68/5  rDev -2.9%

12.7oz bottle poured into my Duvel Green tulip. IMO, the best bottles of the 1882 Black Label are the best gueuzes on the planet bar none, so I'm curious to see what the filtered version is like.

Clear light amber with a dense, off-white head with excellent retention, this is a great looking gueuze. The nose is interesting. Definitely not as sharp as the Black label, but not as sweet as some of the other sweetened gueuzes (from Timmermans, Chapeau or Lindemans). A grassy funk and a mild tartness are present, but there's also some sweetness, some juicy, fruity character. Rather cheesy, there's some mild mustiness, as well as a mild rancidity. Decent.

The palate opens quite sharp, quite unlike anything I was expecting given the nose. Super sharp, very sweet lime-like, almost artificially so with some grass. In this regard, it's unique - I've had grapefruit or lemon forward gueuzes, but this sweet lime flavor is the first that I remember. A little sour cider is present as well. Again, there's quite a strong cheesiness, but the fact that this is filtered takes away from the complexity, making this aspect stand rather alone without really lingering. Light in body, this finish crisp, along with a little aspirin, a little floral character, particularly, some rose. Solid stuff.

02-20-2011 00:14:58 | More by DefenCorps
Photo of JAXSON
JAXSON

Pennsylvania

3.68/5  rDev -2.9%

Thanks Kevin. Poured quite a dark, clear amber. No yeast in the bottom as this is filtered unlike the Black. Nose was sweet and sour, some toffee that I initially characterized as butterscotch. Sweet notes were held in check well by all the funky, sour elements. Sour in the mouth but with a sweet quality that most of the other sours we sampled did not have. Sweetness came of as toffee mostly. More malt than a traditional lambic. Medium low carbonation, thin body. Cider-like at times.

09-06-2010 20:12:30 | More by JAXSON
Photo of Aethien
Aethien

Netherlands

3.7/5  rDev -2.4%

Looks like apple juice with a large foamy off white head. Not much retention although it leaves nice lacing around the glass.

Smells like sour apple juice with some citrus. Not a whole lot going on here but it's a pleasant smell.

Tastes much the same, sour dominates and there's green apple and lemon flavour behind it. Again, not very complex but it's refreshing.

Mouthfeel is very dry and sour with plenty of carbonation that makes it very light and easily drinkable.

Overall this beer can be best described as simple and good but not great.

03-24-2012 12:26:59 | More by Aethien
Photo of grub
grub

Ontario (Canada)

3.75/5  rDev -1.1%

biegaman brought this back from his trip to belgium and was kind enough to share this rare treat. thanks a bunch jan!

37.5cl bottle, corked and caged.

pours coppery orange colour with a nice fluffy cream coloured head. the head drops fairly fast but leaves some chunky lace behind.

aroma is great. nice earthy funk. leather. tobacco leaves. sour cherries. bit of cracker and bready malt. grain. bit of vanilla. hint of bakers chocolate.

taste is nice. sour cherry. nice earthy funk. bit of grain. hint of grapefruit. low bitterness level. i expected more based on the aroma, but the taste just fell a little flat.

mouthfeel is good. cling feeling that coast your mouth and tongue. medium-high carbonation level. very dry finish. fairly light bodied.

drinkability is good. the aroma is great, and the simple taste just didn't quite live up to it.

08-26-2007 23:23:34 | More by grub
Photo of Danny1217
Danny1217

Florida

3.75/5  rDev -1.1%

05-12-2013 08:48:28 | More by Danny1217
Photo of Saind
Saind

Netherlands

3.75/5  rDev -1.1%

01-06-2014 22:26:18 | More by Saind
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Girardin Gueuze 1882 (White Label) from Brouwerij Girardin
85 out of 100 based on 61 ratings.