1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Fuego - Twisted X Brewing Company

Not Rated.
FuegoFuego

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
82
good

44 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 44
Reviews: 6
rAvg: 3.59
pDev: 15.32%
Wants: 1
Gots: 6 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Twisted X Brewing Company visit their website
Texas, United States

Style | ABV
Chile Beer |  6.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: jefe2 on 08-25-2011)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 44 | Reviews: 6 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by Jame515:
Photo of Jame515
3.75/5  rDev +4.5%

Jame515, Jun 07, 2014
More User Reviews:
Photo of Tiernan
3.25/5  rDev -9.5%

Tiernan, May 06, 2013
Photo of Mora2000
3.8/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Growler from The Whip In in Austin.

The beer pours an orange color with a white head. The aroma is mainly full of pilsner and biscuit malt, with a little bit of grass. Hidden in the background is some fresh jalapeno notes.

The flavor is similar. I get a lot of toffee and biscuit notes, as well as some of the fresh, green jalapenos. There is also some light burn from the peppers which builds as you drink more of the beer. The pepper notes are present but are not too in your face. This is a fairly well done pepper beer.

Medium mouthfeel and medium carbonation.

Mora2000, Nov 03, 2011
Photo of Dello
3.25/5  rDev -9.5%

Dello, Aug 09, 2014
Photo of jheezee
3.5/5  rDev -2.5%

jheezee, Apr 12, 2014
Photo of zonker17
3.75/5  rDev +4.5%

zonker17, Nov 23, 2013
Photo of GenericWarrior
3.5/5  rDev -2.5%

GenericWarrior, Jul 22, 2014
Photo of gsumers
5/5  rDev +39.3%

gsumers, Jun 22, 2014
Photo of GRG1313
3.5/5  rDev -2.5%

GRG1313, Aug 03, 2014
Photo of cfrobrew
3.25/5  rDev -9.5%

cfrobrew, Oct 21, 2014
Photo of Brising
3.6/5  rDev +0.3%

Brising, Sep 12, 2014
Photo of TKBrewing
3.44/5  rDev -4.2%

TKBrewing, Nov 15, 2014
Photo of jeisemann26
3/5  rDev -16.4%

jeisemann26, Jul 22, 2014
Photo of CraigTravor
3/5  rDev -16.4%

CraigTravor, May 25, 2014
Photo of Big_Dave
3/5  rDev -16.4%

Big_Dave, Aug 22, 2014
Photo of TheStashRide
5/5  rDev +39.3%

TheStashRide, Oct 08, 2012
Photo of Xzfgiimtsath
4/5  rDev +11.4%

Xzfgiimtsath, Aug 07, 2014
Photo of Rocketman2013
3/5  rDev -16.4%

Rocketman2013, Jul 05, 2014
Photo of IPA_LUCILLE
4/5  rDev +11.4%

IPA_LUCILLE, Feb 27, 2014
Photo of JohnBender
3.5/5  rDev -2.5%

JohnBender, Mar 06, 2014
Photo of greenspointexas
3.75/5  rDev +4.5%

greenspointexas, Dec 14, 2013
Photo of ChaseTheAce
3.75/5  rDev +4.5%

ChaseTheAce, Aug 19, 2014
Photo of AlCaponeJunior
3.95/5  rDev +10%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4

Well this is a chile beer, that's for certain. However, grouping this beer with a beer like Rogue Chipotle doesn't really lend itself well to a proper comparison. The beers do both contain chiles, but the chilies are not the same variety (a small, fairly irrelevant point). What is more important, and at the heart of the problem with chile beer evaluations, is that the base beers on which chile beers are based can be wildly different. I've had chile beers based on porters, stouts, lagers, blonde ales, reds, etc etc I hope my point is clear.

This lends itself to the classic beer rating problem of "if it's not an over-hopped abomination of a double IPA, an imperial stout, or a rare whale of a sour or wild ale, it gets low ratings." This is a huge problem, and is the reason why beer ratings are generally not worth a velvet painting of a whale and a dolphin gettin' it on. Despite the obviousness of this fact, I will continue to rate beers, if for no other reason than to selfishly document my own tastings, or to nobly attempt to dilute the bias in beer ratings via my own noble, unbiased observations on beer. [warning: previous paragraph may contain self-serving BS]

Now onto the beer. This may be my first encounter with what appears to be yet another delicious Texas brewery. This encounter certainly lends itself to another in the near future. I even took a chance and went straight for the beer which I felt actually had the highest potential for dislike amongst the three varieties I had to choose from. However, the horrible memories of cave creek chili beer haven't actually panned out in any other chili beer that I have tried since. Thus, I forced myself to resort to the logic of "well nobody would make a chili beer so ridiculously hot that it was undrinkable" again. Possibly faulty logic, but it's worked so far.

This is more of a lagery/blonde ale of a beer style, with jalapenos added (at least from the label, looks like japs to me). As a lager or blonde ale, it's quite good, containing all the sorts of things you'd want from those styles: drinkability, smooth taste, no over-the-top flavors, something that's thirst quenching and you can drink more than one of.

The ABV is slightly high for what I just said, but it's not really a flaw, just a bit higher than I'd want for a typical blonde or lager.

Then the peppers, making this a chile beer. They're real nice. They offer a little heat, a little flavor, a little nose, basically in just the way I like my jalapenos... a little at a time.

I think they did a fine job on this one. Next time I'll try another variety from Twisted X

AlCaponeJunior, Nov 08, 2014
Photo of cgrunin
3.5/5  rDev -2.5%

cgrunin, Aug 07, 2014
Photo of kojevergas
2.56/5  rDev -28.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12 fl oz brown glass bottle with uninteresting label art and unbranded black pry-off pressure cap acquired as part of a 6 pack in a local bottle shop and served into an Independence Brewing pilsner glass in me gaff in low altitude Austin, Texas. Reviewed live. Expectations are average. Reviewed as a chili pilsner because the label identifies it as a jalapeno pilsner.

Served cold - at fridge temp. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: No bubble show forms as it's poured.

Pours a two finger wide head of off-white colour. Thickness could be better. Should be creamier. Not real frothy. Spotty inconsistent lacing clings to the sides of the glass as the head recedes. Head retention is above average - about 3 minutes.

Body colour is a translucent transparent weak-looking pale copper of average vibrance and excellent clarity. It looks a bit watery. Clean; no floating yeast particles or hop sediment is visible. Appears overcarbonated.

Overall, it's looking substandard; it looks like a budget pilsner, not like a strong full-bodied Czech or German pilsner. Far from unique or special.

Sm: Has some unbecoming candi sweetness and way too much caramalt. Cotton candy, confection, even praline. No pilsner should be this sweet. Clean barley. Maybe a corn adjunct? Sweet bready notes.

Surprisingly, I'm not picking up on any crisp pilsner malts. There's also no noticeable hop profile.

No yeast character or alcohol is detectable. I don't find any off-notes except for maybe some buttery diacetyl.

Overall, it's not an appealing aroma - especially for a pilsner. Also, where are the jalapeno notes? The overbearing sweetness evident here has me really worried.

Aroma is of average strength.

T: Overly sweet, with plenty of sweet malt, sweet bready character, and even those confection/praline/candi notes from the aroma. There's no crisp pilsner malt foundation or any light floral hop character. I think this beer would benefit from a multi-decoction mashing. The jalapeno is extremely faint to the point that this is barely a chili beer. The beer also has that vinegary character typical of low quality chili brews; I'm unimpressed.

It's hard to like given it fundamentally fails at the pilsner style, but if I regard it mentally as more of an English pale ale or something, it's a bit less of complete failure. Frankly, it's just not very good.

Average depth, duration, and intensity of flavour. I wouldn't call it intricate, complex, nuanced, or subtle. Neither the pilsner aspect of the beer nor the chili aspect of the beer is working, and together the two wrongs do not a right make.

No yeast character or alcohol is detectable.

Balanced? Not really. Gestalt? No. Cohesive? Sure, kind of.

Mf: Has a nice softness to it, and the subtle chili warmth is lovely (and growing on me as the beer comes to temperature). Unfortunately, it's unrefreshing - but not because of the chili heat, because of the unbecoming sweetness and lack of crisp fresh pilsner notes. Smooth and wet. Medium bodied, but it should be lighter than it is. A bit too thick and weighty on the palate for a purported pilsner. Overall presence on the palate is average, but disappointing. This texture is poor for the style, but does a decent job at complementing the flavour profile.

Undercarbonated. Not oily, gushed, boozy, astringent, or harsh.

Dr: It's drinkable, but I definitely wouldn't pick this up again. It's a pretty underwhelming take on a pilsner and brings little to the table in terms of chili character. I'll have no trouble finishing the bottle, but I wouldn't recommend it to friends or trade partners. There are better beers in both of the constituent styles, and nothing here stands out. Not a particularly inspired brew. Meh.

C-

kojevergas, Apr 12, 2014
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Fuego from Twisted X Brewing Company
82 out of 100 based on 44 ratings.