1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Velvet Fog - Wild Rose Brewery & Taproom

Not Rated.
Velvet FogVelvet Fog

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
79
okay

63 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 63
Reviews: 33
rAvg: 3.43
pDev: 14.87%
Wants: 1
Gots: 6 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Wild Rose Brewery & Taproom visit their website
Alberta, Canada

Style | ABV
American Pale Wheat Ale |  4.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
A special blend of 50% wheat malt and 50% barley gives this unique unfiltered ale a distinctive hazy, golden colour and a fresh tangy character. The choice is clear. The beer isn't.

8 IBU

(Beer added by: IronDjinn on 08-04-2003)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 63 | Reviews: 33 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of ptarmigan98
3.25/5  rDev -5.2%

ptarmigan98, Feb 11, 2013
Photo of SickGnar
3.6/5  rDev +5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A: Medium dark yet rich golden, totally hazed, it looks to have good carbonation as some bubbles are still visible at the edge of the glass. Good-size, stark white head with nice retention & some okay lace.

S: Fairly clean US style wheat beer. Hint of grain, hint of bready yeast, faint bit of softly lemony twang from hops and/or yeast. Good strength & reasonably nice.

T: Usual wheat beer for this hemisphere. A bit grainy, a bit bready, a really slight bit of sweetness with perhaps a pinch of light crystal (perhaps not), bright – but not overly potent – hops, and a very slight & soft lemony twang at the edge.

M: Slightly over medium body with moderate and slightly under-matched carbonation. Soft up front, but a touch of an edge of tartness at the back gives it some quench. Refreshing.

D: Standard, but a quite fine rendition. This is what you would expect when ordering a wheat beer in pretty much any brewpub in North America. Well done and highly drinkable.

SickGnar, Aug 26, 2012
Photo of BigGruntyThirst
3.75/5  rDev +9.3%

BigGruntyThirst, Aug 24, 2012
Photo of sAws
3.45/5  rDev +0.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Nice cloudy unfiltered light amber colour. Smell has some fruity notes but nothing outstanding. This is the part the shocked me it feels creamy in the mouth and the taste has hints of apricot. I really enjoyed the flavours and feel of the beer. It has not bitter flavour and is a smooth easy drink.

sAws, Aug 14, 2012
Photo of Alberta_Beer_Guy
4/5  rDev +16.6%

Alberta_Beer_Guy, Jul 16, 2012
Photo of leaddog
3.88/5  rDev +13.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance- Pours a foggy straw yellow with a finger width of bubbly white head.

Smell- Barley, malts, citrus, grainy/grassy.

Taste- Bready malts and barley with a grassy finish. Light wheat flavours. Mild flavours overall.

Mouthfeel- Medium bodied with light carbonation. Smooth and light creaminess to the body.

Overall- A refreshing and light wheat ale by Wild Rose. Crisp, clean flavours and a surprisingly smooth mouthfeel makes this an easy summer session brew.

leaddog, Jun 18, 2012
Photo of Avant_Garage
3.5/5  rDev +2%

Avant_Garage, Jun 10, 2012
Photo of TJMcScmeebs
3.25/5  rDev -5.2%

TJMcScmeebs, May 21, 2012
Photo of Converge
2.9/5  rDev -15.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

341ml bottle poured into a 16oz pint glass.

A - Pours a remarkably bright, glowing yellow. It's almost opaque, but still light as hell... odd. Aggressive pour yielded almost no head, which is peculiar for a wheat beer, but the small bit of foam that did appear retained well. The color still strikes me as being unnatural, though.

S - Mild wheat presence for a moment, but instantly gets buried under piles of insanely sweet fruit. So much mango and peach this literally smells more like juice than beer.

T - tastes nothing like the nose implied. Pretty much a generic Western Canadian APWA here, with a profile dominated by uninteresting barley malt upfront, with the wheat character taking the backseat. Maybe even some adjuncts in here as well. The fruitiness from the aroma just barely shines through.

M - Carbonation is fairly high, bordering on fizzy. Body is pretty light, sort of watery.

D - While the appearance and aroma had me thinking this APWA might go beyond the generic, boring beer I'm used to getting with this style, the flavor still ended up being the same old song. A marginal improvement over other beers I've tried under this style, but that's not saying much.

Converge, May 11, 2012
Photo of mdevonshire
3.5/5  rDev +2%

mdevonshire, Jan 15, 2012
Photo of hockeybarbie
4/5  rDev +16.6%

hockeybarbie, Jan 15, 2012
Photo of EskimoDave
3/5  rDev -12.5%

EskimoDave, Nov 28, 2011
Photo of Vandelayindustri
3.75/5  rDev +9.3%

Vandelayindustri, Nov 23, 2011
Photo of thehyperduck
3.68/5  rDev +7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours an appropriately foggy golden-orange colour with a thin white head that doesn't hang around long. A collar and some patchy lacing remains on top. The odour is both fairly pleasant and potent, with notes of citrus, wheat, yeast, malt sweetness, and granny smith apples. The smells blend together well and aren't easy to make out individually, but the overall bouquet is very nice.

The flavor is a bit of a letdown after staring at and sniffing this beer, but it's still quite good; just a little two-dimensional. Wheat flavours dominate along with slight bready malts and yeast. There is a nice citrusy quality to the hops, but this takes a back seat to the aforementioned flavours. A bit of bitterness remains on the tongue after swallowing, along with the taste of yeast. Rather heavily carbonated; refreshing but not all that crisp/clean - this looks light-bodied, but the wheat, yeast and bready malt flavours make it a bit thicker and linger on your tongue. I guess that's kind of the idea though.

A solid pale wheat ale, more 'true-to-style' (and slightly better IMO) than their Wred Wheat Ale, and considerably better than Big Rock's Grasshopper. Still, there is nothing here that will blow your mind. Worth a try, along with the rest of Wild Rose's brews - this was the last beer in a 6-type sampler, and they were all quite good.

thehyperduck, May 22, 2011
Photo of CrazyMike
4/5  rDev +16.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance is cloudy and orange with minimal head. Smell is mostly of citrus and wheat, also picked up grass and fruit.

Taste is also dominated by wheat and citrus, picked up pepper, bread and grass as well. Texture is very ceamy. Light bodied with good carbonation. Aftertaste is dry and spicy.

Overall, this is a decent wheat ale and good introduction to wild rose. Would recommend on tap.

CrazyMike, Jan 12, 2011
Photo of WalterWalter
3.73/5  rDev +8.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

I was a huge fan of this beer when I lived in Calgary. It was easy to find it at the local liquor store and was generally very fresh.

The appearance is a very nice yellow-orange with lots of cloudiness from the yeast. Sometimes a bit of settled yeast pours at the end and I tend to try to get as much of it into the pour as possible (swirling the last bit around in the bottle to dissolve it if necessary). As with many of these beers it seems the yeast settles out over time and the cloudier it is, the fresher it is (or the more agitated it was on the drive home).

The aroma is very, very sweet; an empty bottle smells like candy - very sugary.

Taste is likewise quite sweet. I used to find it quite rich and complex, but I think I've been spoiled by some of the microbreweries on the west coast. After picking up a new batch on a recent trip I found it to be more blunt than I remembered. Nevertheless it is a good beer, though my taste for it may be inspired somewhat by nostalgia (freezing cold nights around the backyard firepit in the middle of winter with a 6-pack of the stuff). But the sweetness is quite dominant. Otherwise it has sort of typical hefeweizen-type flavours (wheat malt and yeast, not hoppy) without the banana esters found in real hefs, or the added spices / citrus of other wheat beers out there.

Mouthfeel is excellent; has a fullness that I appreciate.

Because of the apparently high sugar content it is a bit difficult to drink more than a couple of these, but I did my best to polish a few of them off while reminiscing about Calgary.

Would recommend it to a friend, and would drink it again, but there are nicer unfiltered wheats out there. I still prefer it to, for example, Rickard's White.

WalterWalter, Jan 03, 2011
Photo of DoctorStrangiato
2.78/5  rDev -19%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured a 341-ml bottle into a long tulip glass.

Appearance - faint cloudly light gold colour with light carbonation, has a short little head that dissipates into surface bubbles.

Smell - not much going on here, a little cream aroma over light wheat malt.

Taste - fairly active and even taste, with the wheat flavour punching through at the eleventh hour without any citrus or floral qualities. In some regards this is a rough, hard wheat ale.

Mouthfeel - not too bad but far from anything special, fizzy and active has a short thirst-quenching quality.

Drinkability - two of these is where I'd stop as it is rather uninspiring. Gives a decent refresh but not a premium example of taste.

DoctorStrangiato, Nov 20, 2010
Photo of andrenaline
3.08/5  rDev -10.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Not the first time having this, but first time reviewing.

A - Pours a very thick, hazy, golden orange, no real head, nor any lacing. The yeast was a little "lumpy" and unattractive, which is consistent with the other times I've had it.

S - Smell is rather mild, but a grassy wheat dominates, with a sour lemon citrus scent on the finish. A bit of pepper spice and sour apple as well.

T - The flavour is decent, the grassy wheat is complemented by some very mild hop flavours and a bit of pepper. The lemon comes through as well, but is more sweet then the scent implied. Finish is quite bready as well, lingering on the tongue.

M - Very light, nicely carbonated and goes down quite smooth.

D - Quite tasty, nothing mind blowing, but nothing offensive either (except for the lumpy yeast). Memorable? Not really. Would I turn one down? Never.

andrenaline, Aug 17, 2010
Photo of joemcgrath27
3.25/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Had this on tap many times and enjoyed it, but never did a critical review
A - poured a hazy golden into a pilsner glass, creamy white head was short and didn't last too long
S - rich wheaty biscuity malt smell, some very light grassy hops, and maybe a little citrus
T - the wheat flavour really overpowers anything else, there is a faint grassy hint but only after several gulps
M - the carbonation and the savoury breadiness make for a fuller mouth feel than it looks
D - it is fairly easy drinking, although a little one dimensional on the flavour, I like it better on tap

joemcgrath27, Aug 01, 2010
Photo of beerbum05
3.58/5  rDev +4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Appearance - Medium head, lots of carbonation, cloudy/foggy, yellow with a hint of green in the colour.

Smell - Wheat and hops

Taste - Wheat, smooth tasting

Overall - It's a nice light ale taste. It's quite mild almost watery. A nice summer's light ale.

beerbum05, May 24, 2010
Photo of scott451
3.1/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - Poured into a glass using the" Hoegaarden method" (pour half, swirl, then pour the rest) as recommended on the box. Moderately cloudy, slightly greyish yellow. Two finger fluffy white head which quickly diminished to a thin layer. Weak lacing.
S - Lemony citrus
T - Weak fruity taste. Moderate hops.
M - Light smooth
D - Very drinkable. The hops might get to you after a while.

scott451, Apr 21, 2010
Photo of wordemupg
3.43/5  rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

341ml bottle poured into pint glass oct8 2009

A cloudy light peach color with one fingers worth of fast falling head that left a ring of lace at the top of the glass

S lots of grain with some mild yeast and citrus

T like I'm drinking bread, lots of wheat some mild citrus and a little bit of yeast, as it smells really

M light, crisp and refreshing with a little bite

D not bad overall may be better with a hot sunny day instead of this crappy October snow I see outside my window

one of the better beers from Wild Rose and hard too avoid in Calgary so you might have to try one when your in the area

wordemupg, Oct 09, 2009
Photo of berley31
3.75/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured with an average-sized, off-white head that diminished to a very thin film. Body was dark-yellow and quite cloudy. Aroma was quite boring... slightly wheaty, but that's all. Thin with a bit of oiliness on the palate, average carbonation. Nice taste of light wheat, and slight bitterness in the finish. Overall, a decent beer of its style, but nothing special.

berley31, Jul 21, 2009
Photo of biboergosum
3.13/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

20oz pint at the Original Joe's Oliver location, another after-work bitch and moan session in full swing.

This beer pours a slightly hazy medium golden yellow colour, with two skinny fingers of puffy, loosely foamy, and tangentially creamy off-white head, which leaves some thick low-pressure system cloud lace around the glass as things slowly abate.

It smells of mildly sweet biscuity, grainy, and bready wheat malt, yeast, muted floor-cleaner lemon, a bit of fermenting wine wine must, and soft pithy citrusy, grassy hops. The taste is more yeasty, softly grainy and edgy wheat malt, a touch of fruity stale lemon, a light sugary candy character, and faint earthy, citrusy hops.

The carbonation is basically tame and barely frothy, the body medium-light in weight, and a bit sticky in its wheaty, um, 'smoothness'. It finishes mostly dry, grainy, awkwardly fruity, and otherwise clean, a strange toastiness emerging as it warms.

A little sweet up front, and kind of all over the place for a new-world attempt at a hefeweizen, or even the local generic version of a wheat ale. Easy enough to put back, I suppose, but when actually thinking about it, one pint is all I really want.

biboergosum, Mar 13, 2009
Photo of Voonder
3.4/5  rDev -0.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours cloudly hazy yellow in colour with no head. Not too much smell here, citrusy and malty notes. Taste a bit citrusy as well with a bitter finish. Feels good, with just enough carbonation. It's drinkable, but I don't think it's a good wheat beer. There is just something else you would expect from a wheat beer.

Voonder, Sep 01, 2008
Velvet Fog from Wild Rose Brewery & Taproom
79 out of 100 based on 63 ratings.