YumYum - 3 Floyds Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
YumYumYumYum

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
90
outstanding

1,033 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 1,033
Reviews: 121
rAvg: 4.01
pDev: 10.97%
Wants: 56
Gots: 303 | FT: 8
Brewed by:
3 Floyds Brewing Co. visit their website
Indiana, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: MasterSki on 01-18-2014

Congratulations! Welcome to flavor country. This most recent FFF’s pale ale has just the malt backbone to support an explosive juicy hop profile derived from a new blend of proprietary hops. Cheers.

55 IBU
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 1,033 | Reviews: 121
Photo of paco1029384756
2.26/5  rDev -43.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Melted crayons with a hint of some spice that I don't care to remember the name of.

Photo of Bosoxbennie
2.63/5  rDev -34.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.5

Just Overall not a fan, thought this one missed its mark..and to hear its taking over for Pride n Joy as a year round I think is silly

Photo of Beersmuggler
2.8/5  rDev -30.2%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3

I didn't like this at all. I only bought it because it was produced by 3 floyds. I wouldn't try again.

Photo of Endeavor11
2.83/5  rDev -29.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Outlier? I like what I like. This is ok.

Photo of OpieMisfit
2.86/5  rDev -28.7%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Had it on tap at Kuma's in Chicago. Not impressed. Bizarre, malty, bread-like aftertaste takes away from the hop profile. Almost tasted like it came from a bad tap line. Not the best offering from the usually stellar 3 Floyds. I have a feeling you'll be able to find this one in stores easily. Not so much everything else they make.

Photo of tikk
2.99/5  rDev -25.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Looks like an unfiltered ipa
smells like sweet onions
tastes like, sweet onions and with a bit of grapefruit splashed on it. Hint of pine at the end
feels pretty smooth on the palate
overall I'd call it meh meh, don't love it. Maybe it fell off a cliff at about a month old, really shouldn't.
Not bad for a session, but I expect more from FFF.

Photo of BigJim5021
3/5  rDev -25.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I love the folks at FFF. That said, not every beer they make is a winner, folks. If any other brewery made this beer they'd be lucky if it made it to an 80 overall. And you guys aren't fooling anyone. 5.5% is only session beer if you're an alcoholic.

Photo of denver10
3/5  rDev -25.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours yellowish golden with an off white head. Aroma has some sweet tropical fruits, a touch of citrus, and toasted grains. Flavor is similar but watered down as is typical in the "session" IPA style, though this one isn't quite a "session" beer at an abv above 5. A medium bodied mouthfeel. Overall, this one didn't do anything for me. I will admit, I tried it with a definite bias against it as I am not a fan of Three Floyds and found the price point for this bottle to be offensive, I only bought it because the beer guy strongly recommended it. I figured if someone liked it that much, it would be worth a shot.

Photo of atrocity
3/5  rDev -25.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This one had a strange sweetness that I wasn't a fan of.

Photo of Zomdust
3.14/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Beer is lacking, flavor is off

Photo of iron--mike
3.14/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Pretty good. I would buy this beer

Photo of Maryobeerian
3.35/5  rDev -16.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Poured at local craft beer bar in 16oz pint glass. Followed a much more robust DIPA which may have influenced my impressions. The taste was less juicy fruit than I expected given Alpha King and Zombie Dust flavor profiles, and I was surprised by the straw that presented forward. I liked the dry edge of this beer, but in the end, it was rather dull. If someone handed me a pint I would thank them and drink it, but won't go looking for it.

Photo of Rimbimhoot
3.5/5  rDev -12.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Blueberry, light caramel, strawberry, pine, light wheat, light honey

Photo of UCLABrewN84
3.52/5  rDev -12.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

On tap at the 2014 Firestone Walker Invitational Beer Fest held at the Paso Robles Event Center in Paso Robles, CA.

Pours a clear orange with a foamy bone head that settles to a partial film on top of the beer. Small streaks of lace form around the glass on the drink down. Smell is of malt, citrus zest, and floral aromas. Taste is much the same with citrus zest and earth flavors on the finish. There is a mild amount of hop bitterness on the palate with each sip. This beer has a lower level of carbonation with a slightly crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty good beer that is tasty but simple in my opinion.

Photo of emerge077
3.61/5  rDev -10%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Draft pint at Xoco.

Slightly hazed golden orange, lots of visible carbonation, two fingers of creamy parchment colored foam on top. Sticky concentric rings of lace form around the rim of the glass.

Aroma is somewhat hoppy, though I wouldn't call it "explosive" as the description does above. Floral, orange peel and or dried mango, though sort of mild and not over the top. Some pale malt comes through also.

Taste is similarly mild, plenty of pale malt to back up the citrus and floral hop notes. Doesn't really seem characteristic of FFF, but is definitely easy drinking and sessionable. Light bodied and smooth. Kind of sad to lose Pride & Joy for this, to be honest.

Photo of boilermakerbrew
3.62/5  rDev -9.7%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

Pours a bright orange-gold in color and fairly hazy. There is a decent sized head that retains a while and laces very, very well. The hops hit first and foremost on the nose of the beer with an aggressive bitterness. The scent in very piney, but there is a unique and different aspect to it. I would describe that unique smell as a blend of herbal, pine, and spicy. When this beer hits the tongue, the aggressive hop bitterness from the scent kick in almost immediately. The taste way outdoes the scent in terms of bitterness and assertion, and it pretty much follows the same course as the scent, with pine and herbal flavors. Mouthfeel on this one is a little thin and light for the aggressive flavor profile. It is highly carbonated, and outside of the strong flavor of the hops, it is fairly easy to drink.

Overall, this is a decent, yet odd pale ale. The level of bitterness makes me feel as if this one should really be considered an IPA instead of an APA. In the end, this isn't exactly my thing, but someone with an affinity for more hops than me may disagree.

Photo of JohnnyHopps
3.67/5  rDev -8.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Appearance - The is golden with a bubbly whie head.

Smell - The smell is a weakly citrus.

Taste - The taste begins with a modest citrus as a defining hop profile. Notes of butterscotch and sweet malts hide in the back. The aftertaste is dry and biscuity, largely erasing the sweet hops.

Mouthfeel - The carbonation was potent enough to brush away the sweetness of the citrus.

Overall - The overall profile is that of a weakened APA. I will take regular over unleaded.

Photo of PaulyB83
3.68/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 3.5

Enjoyed on tap in a straight pint glass.

A- Yellow gold, high clarity, one finger white head.

S- Smells like shredded wheat to me, not really getting hops first here. I do get some citrus notes but again mostly like a light toasted hay.

T- Similar to aroma, light bitterness and a bit more citrus than the aroma.

M- Light, easy drinking.

O- Shoulda gotten another pint of ZD instead of this. This one was a letdown for a 3Floyds hoppy beer. I like this better than All Day but not other stuff like Go To, or Daytime.

Photo of snaotheus
3.68/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

2015-04-19
12oz bottle split between two Georgetown sampler glasses. Date on the bottle is 03/13/2015. I hope that's "bottled on", not "best by".

Pours very slightly hazy, straw yellow, medium head that fades slowly and lots of carbonation. Smell is citrus bitter hops. Smells nice.

Taste is hoppy, bitter, lacking a bit on the malt side. Calls itself an "American Session Ale", tastes like a session IPA, billed on here as an APA. Bitter, but thin and with too little on the other side.

Mouthfeel is thin, light, effervescent. Overall, it's not bad. Not great by any measure, but I could easily session it.

Photo of chinchill
3.72/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

12 oz bottles (with revision in April 2015).
Medium body and carbonation.
Head has great retention. Deep amber body.
Some unusual elements in both the aroma and the flavor.
Fruity and piney hops dominate. Near medium bitterness.

Photo of MNishCT77
3.74/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

16 oz. pint on draft at the brewery,

Photo of farrago
3.74/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Big, frothy head, two plus fingers, off white in color, delicate foam with a hilly surface, leaves close to no lacing behind, glides off. Cloudy yellow to orange hued liquid, easily translucent although there’s no problem seeing the numerous fat bubbles rising inside the glass. Soft, juicy and full nose, loaded with sweet orange, grapefruit citrus, then apricot, peach and nectarine fruit, after that you register lighter pine sap, pepper and freshly baked biscuits, hints at some funkier earthiness but more or less decides to stick with the moist fruit and citrus. Full-bodied, creamy mouth feel even with a strong veer to dryness at the end. The metallic earth, grass more pronounced here and the scone, malted milk ball and pine sap only partially able to soften the contours. The sweetness remains in the orange, tangerine citrus, however, it lacks staying power. Same for that apple, apricot, pineapple fruit albeit more bite here. The carbonation offers slow, steady churn, insufficient to scrub palate. Best taken as a whole rather than parsed out plus shows better when colder. Then it is a more than just a simple quaffer.

Photo of WoodBrew
3.75/5  rDev -6.5%

Tried this at Haymarket. It was a very nice easy drinking pale ale.

Photo of harrisonpainter
3.75/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Three Floyds has better offerings, but YumYum is still pretty yummy.

Photo of HuskyinPDX
3.75/5  rDev -6.5%

Bottle opened on 10.18.14

A bit weak and thin.

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
YumYum from 3 Floyds Brewing Co.
90 out of 100 based on 1,033 ratings.