1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

He'Brew Rejewvenator (Year Of The Grape) 2010 - Shmaltz Brewing Company

Not Rated.
He'Brew Rejewvenator (Year Of The Grape) 2010He'Brew Rejewvenator (Year Of The Grape) 2010

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
83
good

123 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 123
Reviews: 95
rAvg: 3.65
pDev: 14.79%
Wants: 5
Gots: 9 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Shmaltz Brewing Company visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
Dubbel |  8.20% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: glid02 on 05-27-2010)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 123 | Reviews: 95 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of ktrillionaire
ktrillionaire

Florida

1.93/5  rDev -47.1%

ISO: Any He'Brew that is not horrendous. Does that exist?

I am not an expert on their stuff, but between He'Brew and Coney Island, they average from bad-to-worst in my book.

Also worth mentioning is their rep Darren from Georgia; this guy wrote to me feigning concern over a terrible experience that I had (along with most everyone at the 2010 Whole Foods Tampa cask event) regarding a horribly disgusting experimental brew: http://beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/262/57345 -that was foisted upon us unsuspecting consumers. Apparently crocodile tears work for this guy, but I think that making unsolicited offers intended at rectification are foolhardy and vacant if not realized. Anyhow, I am willing to give Schmaltz a chance, despite all indications that I should not.

So, this brew:

A - It looks okay, brown and semi-translucent; it does not have a tremendous head or lace, but still looks decent.

S - Uh oh. Damn! Not another 'Uh oh!', is it? Yes, alas, it is. I'll cover this in the taste.

T - Just as with the nose, there is a fine line tread between two evils, the lesser of which is irrelevant; there is nasty, cheap, rotgut booze, and there is a terrible, nasty, cheap rotten vegetable and mushy pea flavor.

M - Uggghhh. How can I do this to my own gullet?

D - This is like if MD20/20 made a malt liquor, but totally cheaped out on it, with like, say, half the budget of Steel Reserve or Schlitz Bull Ice Reserve Special Draft Gold.

02-22-2011 06:26:50 | More by ktrillionaire
Photo of SnatchyMcPants
SnatchyMcPants

Indiana

2/5  rDev -45.2%

04-09-2012 20:25:51 | More by SnatchyMcPants
Photo of jneiswender
jneiswender

Massachusetts

2.17/5  rDev -40.5%

Poured out of a bomber bottle into a four ounce tasting glass. Served cool.

A-dark amber body with an off white head. nice head retention.

S-grapey for sure

T-subdued hop flavor makes way for malty front and a grape flavor finish

M-medium

D-not a great representation of the style. Kind of reminds me of Kool Aid.

07-20-2011 04:31:09 | More by jneiswender
Photo of katybee
katybee

Oregon

2.25/5  rDev -38.4%

weird!
I've had some nice doppelbocks recently, and had my hopes up from this one's cute hype. But I was not impressed with this bitter brew! It was more complex than some of the reviews below describe, but nothing like what I expected.

Appeared light brown (definitely not purple!) and little if any tan head. Unimpressive.

Smelled slightly medicinal...of pressed grape rinds.

Perhaps along the lines of a Belgian sour, it had no sweetness or creaminess at all, definitely not like other doppelbocks I've had. More like a single, than a Belgian dubbel. Dry spoiled brown fruit...not Port!

Overall, I was not impressed... I've had "cheap" blueberry beer before, and I've tried Basil beer, and ones from sorghum and rice, not to mention sake, and they were all infinitely more drinkable than this higher priced...schmaltz!

This will put me off He'brew for a while...

04-02-2011 07:39:47 | More by katybee
Photo of charlzm
charlzm

California

2.33/5  rDev -36.2%

Consumed at Blue Palms Brewhouse, Hollywood CA on January 27, 2012.

Beer is a dark amber brown with ruby highlights. Very fine one-finger off-white to light tan head.

Not much aroma - some red grape. Tiny touch of musty malts.

Flavor is strong and none too pleasant. Tastes like Manischewitz Concord Grape wine with bitter wood accents blended with musty old malts. Kind of like sneaking some wine in a cellar. Not enjoyable!

Slightly dry on the finish, which goes a little way to ameliorating the frankly bad flavor.

It is safe to say I did not care for this beer at all, though I did manage to finish my glass.

01-31-2012 21:18:02 | More by charlzm
Photo of 2378GCGTG
2378GCGTG

Texas

2.35/5  rDev -35.6%

this was aged 2 years, 22oz bottle poured into a Duvel tulip.
Appearance: Good look to start, Browish-red, with very little head, no retention, and very little lacing.

Nose: Grapes, Figs, dates, and candy sugar

Taste: Grapes and raisins at the beginning with a bit of malt and toast, then it just fades into a nasty grapey finish that is hard to overlook

Mouthfeel: Carbonation supporting a medium body, but it's impossible to shake the grape aftertaste, it carries over into the finish.

Overall: This started out nicely, but there was way too much grape and raisin- it was a drain pour for 4 out of 7 of us.

01-17-2012 13:21:47 | More by 2378GCGTG
Photo of Beaver13
Beaver13

Colorado

2.5/5  rDev -31.5%

22 oz bottle. Pours a hazy light brown that looks slightly purplish and has a smallish off-white head that quickly diminishes to a dusting.

The aroma is sweet figgy caramel malts, candy sugar, sweet grape juice and wood.

The flavor is sweet grapes with some vinous alcohol and some off bitter notes (card-boardy). The fruitiness fades as it warms and figgy caramel malts become more pronounced. The mouthfeel is medium bodied with low carbonation and is a bit watery.

Overall, an interesting idea. It's a bit watery and I didn't care for the flavors much - it just wasn't too interesting.

08-25-2010 06:05:20 | More by Beaver13
Photo of route66pubs
route66pubs

California

2.83/5  rDev -22.5%

pours a dark amber / light brown with a thin, almost white head. Head is very thin, but retains well along the glass. No bubbles appear to have survived the pour at all.

Very slight roasted malt aroma, with just a hint of Welch's grape juice as well. Very, very little aroma at all.

Has a bit of a caramel maltiness initially, which gives way to a slightly fructose-like bitterness. Very bizarre indeed, but not unexpected from the folks at Shmaltz. However, that slight bit of burning bitterness is not all that welcome in this brew, and more sweet malts would be appreciated.

I hate to say it, but the bitterness combined with something akin to Pop Rocks really just does not work here. It could be so much more if it were much smoother and sweeter, but it is just simply not working on this.

For a unique, one-off beer, this can be fun. For an everyday drink, well, I'd rather have water. This is just not something that I am willing to drink at all regularly.

10-03-2010 00:31:09 | More by route66pubs
Photo of Aiptasia
Aiptasia

Florida

2.83/5  rDev -22.5%

Sampled on 2/08/2011 from my superbowl 2011 mix and match selection. Love the name of the brewery and the beer, and the art on the bottle being a Jewish theme is fun.

A: Deep orange pekote tea color with the head dissipating rapidly. Micro-lacing on top fades fast.

S: Vanilla, fig and aged grape notes on the nose.

T: Toasted malts leave an umami flavor. Not super balanced, can taste the alcohol and the hops presence leaves it tasting astringent on the front and hopsy on the backend.

M: Light carbonation makes it a smooth drink, but other qualities leave the mouth a little stingy and a little bitter.

D: Drinkable for those that like Bocks. Not exactly my suds of choice but not terrible either. Would pair well with Unagi, beef, burgers.

02-08-2011 18:11:47 | More by Aiptasia
Photo of mdaschaf
mdaschaf

Washington

2.85/5  rDev -21.9%

Thanks to THECPJ for the share. Review from notes 11/20/10.

A: Pours a dark copper with a small white head. Head reduces to a layer of small bubbles on the top. Little wisps of lacing form.

S: Lots of grape and also some apple. also get some sweet dates/figs and a little vanilla.

T: Taste like grape juice with a little bit of malt in it. A letdown based on the aroma, not really much going on.

M/D: Medium bodied with low carbonation. Overall, its just not great. It seems a bit watered down and I am not a huge grape juice fan to begin with.

02-01-2011 04:05:50 | More by mdaschaf
Photo of n2185
n2185

North Carolina

2.88/5  rDev -21.1%

A: Pours a hazy copper color with about a finger of beige head that fades into a thin ring with a little lacing.

S: Some dark fruits like plum at first followed by a scent of grape juice. The grape juice is pretty overwhelming.

T: Similar to the aroma, there is some dark fruit up front and then the grape kicks in. It's pretty strong, but not overwhelmingly so. The finish is yeasty and slightly bitter.

M: Medium-light body with medium combination. Slightly oily characteristic.

D: For a very fruity beer, it's not too bad. The grape's a bit too strong for me, but it's not like some fruited beers that taste like they just mixed fruit juice with beer.

02-15-2011 22:27:19 | More by n2185
Photo of armock
armock

New York

2.88/5  rDev -21.1%

Bottle from BevMo in San Francisco, CA

A - Poured a rusty brown color with a tan head that leaves some lacing behind

S - Is mostly of sweet malt with grapes and Belgian yeast

T - I'm not really digging the train wreck of flavors the sweet malt and then the grapes with the Belgian yeast just do not work for me

M - This beer has a watery body with light carbonation to it

O - To me this beer just isn't worth it the blending of a Doppelbock with a Double doesn't taste good to me I like both on their own but not together pass this on by and grab something else

06-21-2011 00:24:21 | More by armock
Photo of jaidenjb
jaidenjb

Ohio

3/5  rDev -17.8%

04-22-2012 10:20:13 | More by jaidenjb
Photo of CuriousMonk
CuriousMonk

Virginia

3/5  rDev -17.8%

Pours a hazy deep copper with a short-lived dense tan head. The nose is richly malty with notes of jew grape (Maneschewitz), toffee, caramel, and fig jam. Very little hop aroma, if any. The flavour is exactly what the aroma suggests. It is rich, full-bodied and gently carbonated, without feeling to slick. If not for the hint of clove spice, this is very similar to a good dunkle wiezen. The finish is mostly grape, sweet toffee. Too sweet and gimmicky for me. I wish Shmaltz would focus on just two He'Brew beers and make 'em really good instead of making a whole gimmicky line out of several types.

02-14-2011 18:31:16 | More by CuriousMonk
Photo of GClarkage
GClarkage

California

3/5  rDev -17.8%

07-03-2014 15:41:45 | More by GClarkage
Photo of chevre
chevre

Massachusetts

3/5  rDev -17.8%

01-04-2012 23:18:32 | More by chevre
Photo of TenHornsProud
TenHornsProud

Colorado

3.03/5  rDev -17%

Pours an amber/copper color with some white head that dissipates quickly.

Smells of husk and acidic-ness with some sweetness.

Tastes like caramel grape juice.

Thinner mouthfeel, which is OK, but adds to the juice-not-beer quality.

This beer is dominated by the grape flavor and is, again, more like a grape drink that beer. There are hints of malt and some bitterness, but it does not meld well with the other grape flavors.

04-27-2011 19:44:26 | More by TenHornsProud
Photo of emmasdad
emmasdad

Colorado

3.1/5  rDev -15.1%

Pours a nice mahogany color, shot through with bright red streaks. Aroma is mostly sour grapes, a little Belgian candi sugar and just a suggestion of hops. Very cabernet/merlot-like on the palate, with a sweet and ultimately very unsatisfying finish.

07-31-2010 05:33:11 | More by emmasdad
Photo of flagmantho
flagmantho

Washington

3.15/5  rDev -13.7%

Poured from 22oz bomber into a tulip.

Appearance: murky amber-brown body with a thin finger of tan foam atop. Looks pretty nice, actually; more like a dubbel than a doppelbock (the label claims this is a mixture of both).

Smell: sweet malt aroma with a little woodiness; on top of this is a burst of fresh grape. It's actually not bad, but it conjures a pretty strong reminiscence of grape jelly. Odd for a beer, but overall the effect is alright.

Taste: sweet, malty and fruity. Right off the bat is a grape jelly flavor with a drier, more bitter undertone. Finish is more on the dry, bitter and astringent side of the scale. Grape jellyness holds on for the ride, though. It's oddly compelling, but the jelliness is getting to me.

Mouthfeel: medium body with a good level of carbonation. This beer is nice and creamy and feels pretty good.

Drinkability: this beer, while interesting, is not going to interest me past this bottle. The first burst of flavor is too, well, grapey, and the hard bitterness at the end is just not that pleasurable. Not an extremely drinkable beer.

08-23-2010 03:02:08 | More by flagmantho
Photo of froghop
froghop

Washington

3.2/5  rDev -12.3%

pours a semi-clear dark copper-red with a very small beige head, and not much lacing.

smell of malt, burnt toffee, and fruit.

taste is a little thin, malt, caramel, grape, a few hops, and nuts, ends a little tart.

overall a little more fruity than a doppelbock, but an average brew.

06-30-2010 17:08:05 | More by froghop
Photo of warnerry
warnerry

Michigan

3.25/5  rDev -11%

A - Pours a reddish brown with very little head. Not really any lacing to speak of.

S -- As advertised, smells like a dubbel/dopplebock mix. Candi sugar, raisin, a bit of rum, caramel and grape.

T -- Similar to smell. For me, the grape presence seems out of place. An undesirable top layer on what might have been a pretty good base beer.

M -- Medium mouthfeel with low carbonation. Finishes somewhat earthy and dry.

O - Interesting, but not something I would come back to.

10-08-2011 17:45:33 | More by warnerry
Photo of Duff27
Duff27

Illinois

3.25/5  rDev -11%

04-14-2012 23:49:25 | More by Duff27
Photo of jhhollier
jhhollier

Louisiana

3.25/5  rDev -11%

08-09-2012 13:06:35 | More by jhhollier
Photo of ramblinwreck101
ramblinwreck101

Georgia

3.25/5  rDev -11%

06-08-2013 00:10:57 | More by ramblinwreck101
Photo of womencantsail
womencantsail

California

3.3/5  rDev -9.6%

A: The pour is a dark amber color, maybe burnt orange, with a fluffy off-white head that settles down to a thin layer.

S: Sweet fruits on the nose, which does have some grape character, but not overly vinous. A definite malt and caramel note as well.

T: Semi-sweet and malty on the tongue without too much in terms of grape flavor. There is a bit of a fruit sweetness, but I can't tell if that's from the base beers (apparently a blend of doppelbock and dubbel). Overall, the flavor is on the bland side.

M: The body is medium and so is the carbonation. There's a bit of a flat feel overall to the beer, though.

D: Really underwhelming. I've enjoyed several of the He'Brew beers, but I can't say this is one of them. Just not much going on in terms of flavors.

09-06-2010 22:11:04 | More by womencantsail
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
He'Brew Rejewvenator (Year Of The Grape) 2010 from Shmaltz Brewing Company
83 out of 100 based on 123 ratings.