1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Woodcut No. 3 - Oak Aged Crimson Ale - Odell Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Woodcut No. 3 - Oak Aged Crimson AleWoodcut No. 3 - Oak Aged Crimson Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
88
very good

98 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 98
Reviews: 54
rAvg: 3.94
pDev: 13.45%
Wants: 41
Gots: 40 | FT: 4
Brewed by:
Odell Brewing Company visit their website
Colorado, United States

Style | ABV
American Strong Ale |  11.00% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Oxymoron on 11-20-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 98 | Reviews: 54 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by FernMaster:
Photo of FernMaster
FernMaster

Missouri

2.98/5  rDev -24.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

Poured from the bottle into a Tulip.

There are such a few amount of reviews out there for this beer. I don't know if it's from the price tag alone or from people who buy it refusing to put how disappointing this beer is into words. Time to add one more negative deviation to my review count....

The pour of this beer, aside from the fantastic 2+ fingers worth of head, was foreboding. More so than Hitchcock's opening to Rebbecca. The appearance, in a word, was septic. I feared for my life and grabbed for a knife thinking that the creature from the Black Lagoon was going to pop out at any time and strike. Okay, the lacing was nice. But the creature from the black Lagoon could rip through nice curtains.

The smell was just okay at best. There was caramel, raisins and a decent touch of hops in the mix. The oak barrel aging was noticeable in the smell, but not truly welcome.

The taste. Meh. I've had plenty better in this style, that didn't cost so fucking much too. The mild hop profile blended well with the oak aging and fruit flavors, the raisins, maybe other dark fruits and the caramel again. My buddy noted it's like Bigfoot Ale, we both agreed that that's better though. There's an earthyness to this beer though that probably comes from the oak aging and in this case, I don't think adding it to the barrels truly in the end added a damn thing to the beer. It was more of an unwelcome house guest, one you can't say no to, you wish he was gone, but to keep up appearances you had to grin and bare his presence.

The mouthfeel was okay, it was thick but not overbearing, something you can easily drink and enjoy.

This beer has a Twenty-six dollar price tag on it. That's a lot of freaking money! And I definitly say that it simply is not worth the money. I've had MUCH better beer in this style for a lot less money. This beer is rather pretentious. There's limited quantities, it was aged in oak (for no apparent reason) and comes with a laughable price tag. If a beer was to ever sit in a proverbial ivory tower, this would be it. I wonder if the reviews are so high because people spent so much money on a beer, they want to believe it's good. Who wants to spend this much money and be disappointed? If this beer was say, $8, how much lower would the score be? How much does scarcity and steep prices affect the psyche of the reviewer? How much does it add to the disdain? I can answer that, at least sixteen dollars worth.

Serving type: bottle

08-01-2010 04:43:49 | More by FernMaster
More User Reviews:
Photo of DaveAnderson
DaveAnderson

Minnesota

4/5  rDev +1.5%

07-22-2014 01:02:59 | More by DaveAnderson
Photo of zestar
zestar

California

3.5/5  rDev -11.2%

05-31-2014 08:21:24 | More by zestar
Photo of PappyVans
PappyVans

Wisconsin

4.75/5  rDev +20.6%

05-24-2014 16:34:51 | More by PappyVans
Photo of marqoid
marqoid

Arizona

3.75/5  rDev -4.8%

04-13-2014 21:45:55 | More by marqoid
Photo of vmdominguez
vmdominguez

Texas

4.25/5  rDev +7.9%

04-13-2014 20:41:56 | More by vmdominguez
Photo of bkeller04
bkeller04

Texas

4.25/5  rDev +7.9%

04-12-2014 22:14:04 | More by bkeller04
Photo of afsdan
afsdan

Colorado

4.25/5  rDev +7.9%

04-06-2014 00:37:54 | More by afsdan
Photo of iL0VEbeer
iL0VEbeer

New Jersey

4.25/5  rDev +7.9%

03-31-2014 22:01:49 | More by iL0VEbeer
Photo of acurtis
acurtis

New Jersey

3.5/5  rDev -11.2%

03-29-2014 19:40:13 | More by acurtis
Photo of Goblinmunkey7
Goblinmunkey7

Massachusetts

3.64/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 3.75

Thanks to blue_bleeder for the bottle.

Appearance: Ruddy copper brownish red. Head is beige loose and bubbly. Settles to a clumpy head and collar. Sheets of sticky lacing. Decent head retention. Solid carbonation given the age.

Smell: A ton of deeply caramelized malts. A touch roasted with toffee, caramel, and some overall bready malts. A touch of earthy malts as well. Some earthy hops as well. A touch of old citrus peel. Booze, grape, apple, some vanilla. Oak is still kicking around but it's a bit faded. Oxidized. Some minor medicinal edges. Malty and super bready.

Taste: Bready malts. Caramel and toffee. A touch of molasses. Oxidation adds some minor medicinal and metallic elements. Some vanilla and a solid punch of oak. Bite of alcohol with some associated boozy heat. Hops are a bit citrusy with some old orange peel and a hint of bitterness. Chewy caramelized malts. A toasted edge with some roasted sweetness as well. Plum, cherry, fig, dark fruit.

Mouthfeel: Borderline full body. Borderline chewy. Moderate carbonation. Clean.

Overall: Froot booze.

Held up well to the age. Oxidation helps and adds depth.

Serving type: bottle

03-27-2014 01:46:32 | More by Goblinmunkey7
Photo of angrybabboon
angrybabboon

Rhode Island

3.35/5  rDev -15%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Cheers to Goblinmunkey7 for sharing this

Consumed 3/26/14

Appearance: Dark amber with a ton of ruby tones - pours with a giant, light beige head - fades to a small cap, leaves some nice streaks of lacing

Smell: The aroma more or less fits the description, with amber malts, wood, and alcohol - pale, caramel, and amber malts, definitely smells like an imperial red ale - toffee, dark fruits, and a lot of sugary malts - very, very sweet - lots of oak, with some oxidation

Taste: Oak chips sprinkled with sugar and booze - big, caramelized malts, with some serious amber malt flavors - very sweet, like malt extract - toffee and some dark fruits - oxidized malts - big oak flavors, very woody, with some kind of lingering spiciness - alcohol is very prominent

Mouthfeel: Medium to full body, nice carbonation, rather syrupy, finishes kind of sticky and hot

Overall: Once again I find myself facing diabetes

I am usually a huge fan of Odell's, but I find this too sugary and too boozy. If you're looking for things to keep in your cellar, this may not make the cut.

Serving type: bottle

03-27-2014 01:44:53 | More by angrybabboon
Photo of jaydoc
jaydoc

Kansas

4.25/5  rDev +7.9%

12-23-2013 04:06:27 | More by jaydoc
Photo of kojevergas
kojevergas

Texas

3.1/5  rDev -21.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Nov 2009 vintage. Bottle 2176. 1 pint 9.4 fl oz brown glass bottle with hood-and-wire cap (aka cage) over a branded cork served into an Odell snifter/tulip hybrid glass. 11% ABV confirmed. Label is pretty simple yet appealing. Bottle acquired as part of a vintage beer release by a local CO bottle shop in November 2012. Reviewed live. Expectations are high given the brewery, which I quite respect. Not reviewed as any particular style.

Served cold - straight from the fridge - and allowed to warm over the course of consumption. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: No bubble show forms as it's poured.

Pours a 2 finger wide head of nice off-white colour. Good luscious thickness and creaminess. Nice even smooth consistency. Decently soft complexion. Retention is good - about 4-5 minutes. No real lacing clings to the sides of the glass as the head recedes.

Body colour is a really dark crimson/amber of below-average vibrance. Muddled and murky. Opaque. No floating yeast particles are visible.

Overall, it doesn't look like any specific style. I do like the head, but nothing stands out as unique or special. I'm optimistic. There are no egregious flaws.

Sm: Amber malts, caramel, caramalt, toffee, Munich malts, bready malts, an oak tone (but no rich vanilla or toasty notes), and biscuit malts. Some faded floral and fruity hop character in there too. It's a biteen boozy. No real yeast character is detectable; it's quite clean. A little raisin. Brown sugar. Some dark fruit, sort of like you'd find in a dubbel or quadrupel.

I'm not finding any of the almond notes mentioned on the label.

A decent aroma of above average strength.

T: Caramel, cream, sour green apple, vague nebulous dark fruit notes, raisin, biscuit malts, amber malts, brown malts, and some oak. I don't know that age has really helped this beer or developed its notes. Not particularly well balanced. The build isn't too cohesive either, and it's certainly not a gestalt brew. Okay complexity, but little subtlety, intricacy, or nuance.

Average depth, duration, and intensity of flavour.

No yeast character comes through. I do find some alcohol presence which impedes drinkability. I'm not finding the toasted almond described by the label.

My companion suggests oxidation, and I do find some light wet cardboard notes indicative of that. Also a bit of marshmallow.

I don't know that I like it. There are some elements I like (the cream, some of the malt character, and a bit of the oak).

Mf: Smooth, wet, a bit creamy, overly thick, too full-bodied, and unrefreshing. Presence on the palate is far from ideal. Suits the flavour profile okay. It's somehow still overcarbonated.

Not oily, gushed, harsh, or astringent.

Dr: I'll have some trouble finishing this, even with my companion helping me. I'm not sure age has done it well, and I wouldn't get it again based on this experience. I really wanted more from the oak. This isn't Odell's strongest work by any means. Not really worth trying. If you have it, drink it now because I can't see it improving at all. Doesn't hide its ABV well.

Drank fine from Odell glassware.

The green apple and toasted marshmallow notes are the highlight of the beer for me.

Fresh, my companion and I are betting it was a B- or a B. The more I drink it (and the more it warms), the better it gets.

Low C+

Serving type: bottle

12-15-2013 06:33:02 | More by kojevergas
Photo of theCoder
theCoder

Minnesota

3.25/5  rDev -17.5%

10-25-2013 12:49:21 | More by theCoder
Photo of DLucky
DLucky

Florida

3.25/5  rDev -17.5%

09-05-2013 00:58:49 | More by DLucky
Photo of mikeincharleston
mikeincharleston

South Carolina

3.75/5  rDev -4.8%

08-09-2013 12:01:44 | More by mikeincharleston
Photo of Photekut
Photekut

Tennessee

3.5/5  rDev -11.2%

05-19-2013 01:10:49 | More by Photekut
Photo of Sparky44
Sparky44

Illinois

4/5  rDev +1.5%

03-24-2013 18:07:34 | More by Sparky44
Photo of G-Hawk
G-Hawk

Colorado

4.75/5  rDev +20.6%

03-10-2013 23:29:26 | More by G-Hawk
Photo of nzerbe
nzerbe

New York

3/5  rDev -23.9%

03-05-2013 02:39:17 | More by nzerbe
Photo of AlexFields
AlexFields

Tennessee

3.75/5  rDev -4.8%

01-11-2013 21:43:32 | More by AlexFields
Photo of Pecan
Pecan

California

3.5/5  rDev -11.2%

12-20-2012 16:53:33 | More by Pecan
Photo of t0rin0
t0rin0

California

3.75/5  rDev -4.8%

12-03-2012 03:59:52 | More by t0rin0
Photo of tuckerlikesbeer
tuckerlikesbeer

Minnesota

4.25/5  rDev +7.9%

11-29-2012 05:15:59 | More by tuckerlikesbeer
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Woodcut No. 3 - Oak Aged Crimson Ale from Odell Brewing Company
88 out of 100 based on 98 ratings.