1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Green Flash Grand Cru - Green Flash Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Green Flash Grand CruGreen Flash Grand Cru

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
85
very good

395 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 395
Reviews: 169
rAvg: 3.78
pDev: 12.17%
Wants: 14
Gots: 20 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Green Flash Brewing Co. visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
Belgian Strong Dark Ale |  9.10% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kleffman on 03-03-2008)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 395 | Reviews: 169 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of trytoketchup
trytoketchup

Arizona

1/5  rDev -73.5%

12-07-2013 00:15:52 | More by trytoketchup
Photo of drabmuh
drabmuh

Maryland

2.25/5  rDev -40.5%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Bottle shared by the other Matt. Thanks. Beer is dark ruby to brown, wispy head no real lacing, carbonation low.

Aroma is gross. Bubblegum. Sweetness. Bubblegum. Fermented too hot probably.

Beer is thin and really sweet with overwhelming yeast esters that dominate the mid and late palate. The esters are so overwhelming that I end up pouring it down the drain.

Serving type: bottle

06-03-2011 14:44:45 | More by drabmuh
Photo of Huhzubendah
Huhzubendah

District of Columbia

2.33/5  rDev -38.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Let's start with the positive...The beer is dark chestnut brown with a light, tan head. The head displays excellent retention and leaves ample lacing throughout the glass.

Moving on...The aroma is not awful, but certainly arouses suspicion. Bubble gum and odd fruity esters, raisins, alcohol.

Hiya! mY nMAe is gREen fLaSh gRaND cRu!

Ya, something went seriously awry. Out of balance, off kilter, simply undrinkable. It doesn't taste like the beer is soured, unfresh, or oxidized. It tastes like this beer missed its target, and is just not up to par. Sickly sweet, very present alcohol, weird fruity flavors, no continuity.

Drain, beer. Beer, drain. No me gusta.

Serving type: bottle

06-02-2011 00:50:56 | More by Huhzubendah
Photo of TTAmod
TTAmod

Illinois

2.4/5  rDev -36.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

22 oz. poured into chalice.

A: Pours a coca-cola brown with a small brown head that quickly dissipates into nothingness and leaves behind very little lacing.

S: Heavy dark fruits. Belgian yeast.

T: This one is quite mysterious. Starts with with a bit of dark fruit and yeast, then a wallop of smoked malts enveloped in dark chocolate. There's a tinge of hops underneath and it ends on a coffee and smoked malt note. Not as sweet as it should be.

M: Not as good as an actual Belgian would be, but not horrible. Heavy/medium and smooth. Feels similar to an RIS.

O: This is a bastard child of a BSDA and an RIS, with a bit of rauschbier with the smokey malt notes. The smoke is too much for this type of beer. Don't get me wrong, the smoke isn't bad in general, but not in a beer like this. A similar thing is the smoke flavor in the Aventinus Eisbock, but that was just a hint of smoke. An overabundance of smoke doesn't belong in a yeasty, BSDA, in my opinion.

Other beers have pulled off a BSDA/Stout better (Thirteenth Hour, Avery 14th immediately come to mind.) The latter is a tad more difficult to find, but go for the Thirteenth Hour if you want a good BSDA and RIS blend.

It's a shame. Green Flash brews some of my all time favorites, but this one is a miss.

Serving type: bottle

12-16-2011 04:05:05 | More by TTAmod
Photo of Dukeofearl
Dukeofearl

California

2.48/5  rDev -34.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

I'm still trying to warm to Green Flash's beer. A few times, I've had their beer and really enjoyed it. But too often, I just don't like it at all.

This one, a 22 ounce bomber, starts off well- a nice looking deep murky brew with a small head that is jsut right for the style. The aroma hits several of the BSDA notes- rich chocolate, hint of sweetness, hint of coffee. The flavor even starts out well- definite rich chocolate and chicory, pleasant mouthfeel, but then it goes south when I swallow. I would charitably call this an espresso bitterness, but no, it's way beyond that- it's harsh, medicinal, reminiscent of picking weeds as a kid and tasting them, only to find out that they taste horrible. Burnt grains, don't make me take that antibiotic pill again, please! I'm sorry, such promise, but there are so many great examples of this style- I just cannot drink this one.

Serving type: bottle

05-30-2009 02:11:10 | More by Dukeofearl
Photo of mattst
mattst

Massachusetts

2.5/5  rDev -33.9%

05-01-2013 01:59:41 | More by mattst
Photo of chefduff2
chefduff2

New York

2.5/5  rDev -33.9%

01-10-2013 06:05:34 | More by chefduff2
Photo of jophish17
jophish17

Georgia

2.5/5  rDev -33.9%

12-24-2011 08:59:23 | More by jophish17
Photo of impending
impending

California

2.55/5  rDev -32.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

22oz into a tulip. Pours an oily deep garnet, minor head even with encouragement and it receded rapidly, little lacing.

Sweet spicy vinous aroma with tobacco in the background.

Strong tobacco & leather in the flavor dominates in a less than pleasant way. A delicious strong dark does not last past the initial taste. An unnecessary bitterness rides the length of the aftertaste. Medium to full bodied mouthfeel.
disappointing unfortunately
jd

Serving type: bottle

07-24-2011 05:19:52 | More by impending
Photo of theopholis
theopholis

California

2.6/5  rDev -31.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Appearance - Pours a deep, translucent brown with a slight reddish tint. Head is off-white head with decent retention and lacing.

Smell - Semi-complex aroma, but not nearly as complex as a Grand Cru should be. I pick up hints of dark fruits (raisins, cherries, fig) a bit of chocolate along with a hint of maltiness.

Taste - Not impressive. I hate to bag on Green Flash for trying something as impressive as a Grand Cru, but this ain't that great. Tastes like a homebrewers first attempt with extract and old yeast.

Mouthfeel - Medium body, appropriate carbonation.

Drinkability - It really isn't bad, but it ain't no grand cru.

Serving type: bottle

06-27-2009 05:12:55 | More by theopholis
Photo of alexhahn82
alexhahn82

California

2.7/5  rDev -28.6%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A - Dark almost black burgundy in color with a .5 finger head.

S - HOLEY SMOKES. Literally, smoke, smoke, smoke. Wood.

T/M - There isn't much taste here other than smoke. Tastes similar to liquid smoke seasoning and beef jerky minus the beefy taste. But I guess that could be a positive if you like something that tastes like a camp fire smells?

O - 9.1% ABV, can't taste a hint of the alcohol due to the smoke. Very blah overall, complex in its own way but blah none the less.

PP (Price Point) - $6.99 for a 22oz. bomber, Delivers on the ABV with its 9.1%, flavor profile wise its not doing too much for me other than the smoke. For a Grand Cru its not living up to me personally.

Serving type: bottle

06-29-2011 01:25:33 | More by alexhahn82
Photo of SunDevilBeer
SunDevilBeer

Massachusetts

2.75/5  rDev -27.2%

08-17-2013 01:40:42 | More by SunDevilBeer
Photo of humulusphile
humulusphile

California

2.75/5  rDev -27.2%

12-12-2013 08:51:49 | More by humulusphile
Photo of Beardcore
Beardcore

Nevada

2.75/5  rDev -27.2%

09-30-2013 20:01:22 | More by Beardcore
Photo of RoyalT
RoyalT

Ohio

2.78/5  rDev -26.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Appearance - This was a rather unattractive mud-brown in color with a disappointingly modest head.

Smell - I like the playful yeast in the nose but the malts are too burnt, not a good burn like caramelized onions sticking on the bottom of your oven-roasted baby potatoes but more like that idiot at work who leaves his multi-grain bread in the toaster 30 seconds too long. Also conspicuously absent is any sort of fruity sweetness, a hallmark of the true Grand Cru.

Taste - Thankfully the burnt flavor is hardly noticeable at the taste, so that's definitely a plus. Again though the lack of a deep, dark fruit flavor leaves me wondering how they expect this effort to stand up to others readily available.

Mouthfeel - This was the low point of the ale for me. The overly-toasted malts contributed a harsh bitterness to the finish and this ale lacked the classic fluffy carbonation found in better efforts of the style.

Sinkability - It's not often I dump a 9% ale down the sink, but now that I think about it maybe that is why I did it. You can't down too many more beers after a strong bomber like this and I just didn't want to waste my alcohol intake on something so lacking in quality and appeal. Probably one of the worst Grand Crus that I've ever had.

Serving type: bottle

01-24-2009 02:46:04 | More by RoyalT
Photo of SolomonGrundy
SolomonGrundy

California

2.88/5  rDev -23.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

The basics: $7.99/bomber and a generous 9.1% ABV...

Pours a rustic mahogany. A nice cream colored head covers it like snow in Valhalla. Never really dissipates and leaves nice, sticky lacing. Hard to tell how well carbonated, or not, this is...Looks good.

Muted aromas. I get some sour apple, a Belgian style yeast component, but very faint. I also get leather boot in there. Also a hint of must.

Flavor is wack-a-doodle. It's Brown-ish, and yeasty...The yeast components are dominant here. A very odd sourness - kind of sweet and not altogether sour - hits you early middle...Then it collapses into a slightly weird bitterness that's not entirely to my liking, and this finishes off the ale. Strange and not altogether pleasant. The beginning and middle are excellent, but this off bitterness is cloying...Alcohol gets hot in your throat, but isn't huge in the flavor profile. Probably too expensive to call good beer.

What I like most: The ABV and beginning of the drink.

What I like least: The unique, yet slightly unpleasant, finish.

Verdict: Not good enough to justify the high price tag.

Serving type: bottle

03-19-2011 01:27:56 | More by SolomonGrundy
Photo of alaimoa
alaimoa

Connecticut

2.95/5  rDev -22%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

Poured from bottle with a reddish color, limited head.
Smells of coffee, citrus (orange, lemon)
Tastes like a beer you would want after dinner, dark, heavy and almost a barley wine. Definitely has the upfront alcohol that lingers in somewhat of a bad way
Overall Its ok but probably wouldn't buy again

Serving type: bottle

07-27-2013 13:14:06 | More by alaimoa
Photo of NWer
NWer

Washington

3/5  rDev -20.6%

08-06-2012 20:41:58 | More by NWer
Photo of alienlifeforcecube
alienlifeforcecube

Massachusetts

3/5  rDev -20.6%

05-10-2013 00:37:55 | More by alienlifeforcecube
Photo of MCDub
MCDub

North Carolina

3/5  rDev -20.6%

05-10-2013 14:33:57 | More by MCDub
Photo of jman005
jman005

Kentucky

3/5  rDev -20.6%

01-25-2013 23:27:17 | More by jman005
Photo of aanth
aanth

California

3/5  rDev -20.6%

11-18-2011 03:27:38 | More by aanth
Photo of MikeyJ777
MikeyJ777

New York

3/5  rDev -20.6%

06-01-2013 04:22:28 | More by MikeyJ777
Photo of micropale
micropale

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -20.6%

01-06-2014 16:57:43 | More by micropale
Photo of Chou
Chou

Oregon

3/5  rDev -20.6%

12-12-2012 04:55:33 | More by Chou
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Green Flash Grand Cru from Green Flash Brewing Co.
85 out of 100 based on 395 ratings.