1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Ass Kisser Double IPA - Ass Kisser Ales

Not Rated.
Ass Kisser Double IPAAss Kisser Double IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
76
okay

278 Ratings
THE BROS
70
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 278
Reviews: 122
rAvg: 3.29
pDev: 16.72%
Wants: 3
Gots: 13 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Ass Kisser Ales visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  7.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Retired in August 2013.

(Beer added by: Brad007 on 06-28-2010)
View: Beers (3) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Ass Kisser Double IPA Alström Bros
Ratings: 278 | Reviews: 122 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of ccrida
ccrida

Oregon

2.42/5  rDev -26.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Bomber poured into a tall tumbler, Ass Kisser is a murky burnt gold / pale auburn, with thin off-white head that leaves scattered lace.

Smell is malty, really dusty. Hops?

Taste is, uhmm, not so kick ass. There's a firm hoppy bitterness, but the flavor is really earthy, dirt, aspirin. Smoother then an epic fail could be, but as my taste in DIPAs go, it's not good. It's more like a 4x English bitter. A little peanut butter on the aftertaste, which I get from certain American hops.

Mouthfeel is a bit thick, dry, slick.

Drinkability is low. This is a heavy, hot gut bomb. I was down for the count.

Serving type: bottle

09-23-2011 04:11:40 | More by ccrida
Photo of ArrogantB
ArrogantB

Colorado

2.93/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

22oz bottle received as an extra from match1112, thanks man! Orange color, decent head, looks alright. Smell is boring malts, no hops, meh. The taste is balanced between malt and hops but the hops only impart bitterness and in a bad way. It was literally like bitter aspirin, not a fan of this one at all. Oddly this one said it was brewed in San Jose, CA.

Serving type: bottle

09-19-2011 01:44:53 | More by ArrogantB
Photo of mryuk
mryuk

Illinois

3.35/5  rDev +1.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

pours an unfiltered orange with two fingers of head.

smell is very sweet with molasses with very little else. almost no hops.

taste is also very sweet disappointingly not hoppy at all for an "ipa".

mouth is medium-thick with good carbonation.

overall not very good. way too sweet with almost no hops.

Serving type: bottle

09-18-2011 02:29:01 | More by mryuk
Photo of Stinkypuss
Stinkypuss

Pennsylvania

3.25/5  rDev -1.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Rahr & Sons : Ass Kisser

22oz bomber. Pours a hazed orange in color. Aroma of floral hops, big sweet malt and ale yeast fruityness. In the taste, malty, with brown sugar, caramel, and almost barleywine like in it's bigness. Alcohol is there. The hops are on the edges, with a small bitterness, citrus and herbal elements. Full bodied, smooth creamy yet chewey feel. The Ass Kisser is a strong ale that may as well be called Ass Kicker. I can only assume this wasn't the freshest of bottles, as the malt seems to have overtaken the hops and dominated the flavor profile. Still, Rahr & Sons proves they can make 'em strong.

Serving type: bottle

09-08-2011 01:56:26 | More by Stinkypuss
Photo of jeffjeff1
jeffjeff1

California

3.23/5  rDev -1.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I picked this up at Monument Wines and Spirits a few days ago.

Appearance- cloudy copper color, very thin head

Smell- some hops and malt

Taste- hop bitterness from the start, piney and floral hops

Mouthfeel- medium bodied

Drinkability- pretty good but light for a DIPA, probably won't buy it again

Serving type: bottle

08-17-2011 01:23:46 | More by jeffjeff1
Photo of Dmann
Dmann

California

2.65/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A very non traditional DIPA, the name alone had me interested enough to purchase once but I don't think I will get it again. The beer poured a cloudy copper color with a thin white head. Smell was very bready and malty with a slight hint of citrusy hops. Flavor was a mixed bad with a powerful malt presence, slight citrus hop bite in the middle and an unexpected nuttiness on the back end finish. For a beer at 9% abv the alcohol flavor is not very prominent at all. Mouthfeel was thick and not over carbonated, but the heavy malt flavor translated into a heavier mouthfeel as well.

This tasted like a beer that does not know its own identity. Definitely not hoppy enough to be a DIPA and a confusing malt profile that made this a not too enjoyable experience.

Serving type: bottle

08-13-2011 02:44:50 | More by Dmann
Photo of caddybuyer
caddybuyer

New Jersey

3.08/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 22 oz bomber into a snifter

A-Pretty bright copper amber with a near filted quality to it. Very little head to speak of, and that is a shame, because the coloration is very nice.

S-Not picking up any of the malts that one would normally assoicate with a DIPA. Earthy, bready rich caramel malts and some sugary caramelized dark fruits. Smells like a barleywine.

T-Rich sweet creamy malts mesh into bubblegum and caramel. Mild citrus rind with a hint of sweetness is drenched in astringent, but not necessarily tasty hops that round out the finish. I would not classify this as a DIPA, but probably put it in the "catch all" strong ale category. That said, it is not terribly drinkable, or tasty, and while interesting, I'm not sure why I would buy this again.

M-Creamy texture and decent carbonation balance.

D-Interesting beer that I have no need to revisit again.

Serving type: bottle

08-05-2011 22:18:36 | More by caddybuyer
Photo of MusicaleMike
MusicaleMike

Pennsylvania

2.23/5  rDev -32.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 2

I picked up this bottle on my journey to Boston recently. I have not seen it in Philly before.

No freshness date on the bottle. I poured it into my snifter beer glass, which according to the label is the way "to get maximum aroma and flavor."

The beer pours a rich copper color with an attractive, cream-colored head. Hazy body, and no lacing on the glass. Appears fairly dark for the style, but then again, what isn't acceptable in the world of IIPA's?

The aroma is where this beer loses it for me. Unless they are using an aroma hop which I am totally unfamiliar with (completely possible...), then I think that are either using the wrong hops for the job or they just don't understand what someone is looking for in a Double IPA. Sweet nose, with some hints of plum, it smells heavily dominated by the malts and alcohol.

The taste is obviously no better. You get a sweet caramel flavor, followed my honeyish notes and then a lingering bitterness in the aftertaste. No real bitterness up front, and the bitterness on the back end isn't the most pleasant either. This is "Double" for sure, but no IPA....

As for the carbonation level and the mouthfeel, I think this is excellent. The beer has a soft, almost creamy texture and there really isn't much wrong with it.

I do not dislike this beer, but I do take issue with the labeling of it as a Double IPA. Check your facts first! The Double IPA should have a considerable hop presence, not a diminished one. Even the label states "Ass Kisser Double IPA is a rich malty ale that has warm caramel notes that open up as it warms up to your glass." Call it something else! Get a better score...

Serving type: bottle

07-29-2011 02:45:28 | More by MusicaleMike
Photo of Brent
Brent

Kentucky

2.48/5  rDev -24.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Double IPA? Doesn't that require hops? The best this beer could hope for is to be a sub-par ESB with a big ABV. Poured a caramel. Up front very malty, with caramel and toffee notes. Nondescript, vague hops bittering, followed by a rather raw bite of alcohol. Given the name and label, I can only assign this beer the the gimmick category.

Serving type: bottle

07-27-2011 14:21:11 | More by Brent
Photo of jzeilinger
jzeilinger

Pennsylvania

2.98/5  rDev -9.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

8-30-13 Revision:

A - Pours an opaque Copper amber color with moderate carbonation, and a medium lacing ring around the top.

S - Faint pine and caramel, mostly malt... that's it. Needs more substance.

T - Pine, caramel, and moderate orange /grapefruit citrus bitterness at the end. The beer has more bitter bite when cold and loses that edge as it warms.

M - Medium body and smooth on the tongue.

O - The best thing about this beer is the great name and label. It's an IPA, it has a bitter bite at the end, it's balanced, aside from the label, not very memorable. Better than some IPA's I've had, definitely better this time around now that I've tried a fresher bottle.

Serving type: bottle

06-24-2011 23:28:12 | More by jzeilinger
Photo of seeswo
seeswo

Ohio

2.58/5  rDev -21.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Pours a dark golden color with a small off-white head. Smell is big malt, caramel, grain. Not much if any hops. The taste has the faintest suggestion of slightly orange/pine hops, but mostly the hops come through as a reserved bitterness in the finish. The malt dominates. It is also a bit boozy. Totally unbalanced. Only half the bottle was consumed and then drain poured. Blue Dot was also open and was 100x the beer that this was. Mouthfeel was ok carbonation with some sticky sweetness. Overall, this was not a good representation of the style with the lacking hop profile and the malt out of balance. It also didn't taste good. Not a success.

Serving type: bottle

06-20-2011 14:14:14 | More by seeswo
Photo of MrVonzipper
MrVonzipper

California

3.4/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a rich cloudy caramel color with practically no head

Very simple and different nose for a DIPA. Caramel, alcohol and malt

The flavor is pretty much overwhelmed my the maltiness. Not like a DIPA at all. The defining DIPA characteristic hop notes are faint. Sweet maltiness up front with a little bit of hops from middle to the end and then a caramel aftertaste

Full bodied and a little heavy due to the malt. A little tacky. Very little carbonation

Overall I gotta say this is not a great representation of the style. It's very heavy handed on the caramel malt and lacking in the hops department to balance it out and better represent the style. Not sure I'd get it again.

Serving type: bottle

06-05-2011 05:25:15 | More by MrVonzipper
Photo of JamnesCameron
JamnesCameron

Illinois

3.48/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured into a snifter. Pours a deep honey gold, with a light tan head of two fingers. Head drops after a few minutes to nary a wisp. Some lacing evident.

Aromas of earthy, citrusy, piny hops. There is likely some malt in there, but you wouldn't know it from the smell.

Flavors of earthy, piny hops, hints of citrus. Good level of bitterness. Some sweet malt in the after flavor.

Mouthfeel is medium, some sticky sweetness, mouthcoating bitterness, a slight pull at the back of the teeth.

Overall a very nice DIPA. A little earthy. Bitterness is subdued for the style. Not a punch in the face, but a light kiss.

Serving type: bottle

05-28-2011 00:53:15 | More by JamnesCameron
Photo of mdaschaf
mdaschaf

Washington

2.85/5  rDev -13.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Review from notes.

A: Pours a hazy orange with a small fizzy white head. The head dissipated very quickly, but there was some rings of lacing left behind.

S: Very light hop aroma, really not much there. A little bit of orange and orange peel, but overly malty with some caramel and a bit grainy as well.

T: Quite boring and grainy. Not much hop presence on the flavor profile. Overly malty, full of caramel and a little doughy. Slightly bitter finish.

M: Medium bodied and a little grainy. No sign of 9%, wouldn't have guessed it that high.

O: Not even close to hoppy, and overall quite boring. No bottle dating, so could be old, but I have old DIPAs that are still good, this one, new or old, just didn't do anything for me.

Serving type: bottle

05-23-2011 18:39:12 | More by mdaschaf
Photo of THECPJ
THECPJ

Delaware

3/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

reviewed from notes:

appearance: dark orange brown with a 1 finger off white head

smell: very malty, little hop presence

taste: malty, grainy, some hops

mouthfeel: mild carbonation, medium body,

overall: needs more hops, not a very smooth drinker.

Cheers,
The CPJ

Serving type: bottle

05-22-2011 14:26:01 | More by THECPJ
Photo of patreely12
patreely12

Maryland

3.93/5  rDev +19.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

22 oz bottle poured into a snifter.

A - pours a very cloudy copper, can't see through this at all. the head is about an inch to 2 inches tall and off-white with a shade of orange. some sudsy lacing.

S - good bit of sweetness made up from caramel or toffee, really easy to pick up on. some citrus and fruity aromas. also a healthy whiff of hop bitterness and some rum like alcohol. as you let it warm up the flavors become stronger. really nice.

T/M - sweet malts and caramel right up front. very strong and rich. lots of citrusy fruit (orange, apricot) to balance out the sweetness and the bitterness of the hops. a strong bite of spicy, floral hops as well as some rummy alcohol on back end. finishes really clean. medium bodied, high carbonation.

Overall this was a lot better than I thought it was going to be. I really enjoyed the nose on this. worth a shot for anyone who enjoys double IPAs.

Serving type: bottle

05-18-2011 03:39:44 | More by patreely12
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

3.55/5  rDev +7.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

An enjoyable imperial ipa with a few celebratory attributes, but also with some flaws. Citrusy and resiny, the beer's hop character shines above a caramel sweet malt base for a balance that tilts away from malt character in favor for the hops.

A very appetizing appearance with a diffused amber glow. A creamy, froathy off-white head amounts to a thick blanket of foam, showing remarkable, durable staying power, leaving a heavy coat of lace behind.

Aromas are more balanced that you'd think. Deeply caramelized malts create the aroma of toffee, bread crust, graham cracker, and fresh breads. Hop character exhibit a sharp white grapefruit scent with pine resin, fresh cut grass, and ethynol. The sweeter-than-usual aroma reminds me of Avery's Maharaja.

Flavors however take a more Dogfish 90 Minute turn; with the malts sweetness receeding just a bit in taste, and allowing the hop flavor and bitterness to shine. Caramel and bread crust add the right amount of support for the strong display of grapefruit, sappy pine, and herbal grasses and teas. Very resiny and moderately sweet throughout. But again, the overall taste is disrupted by the strong flavor of alcohol, revealing a more bitey element of hops that make the beer less smooth than preferred.

Where imperial ips are usually medium-full, this one yeilds a more full character than most; partly because of the dense malt make up. Semi-dry in finish, the beer also carries a bitter alcohol/hop bite that lingers well into the next sip.

Even with the alcohol flavor hurting throughout, the bitterness and hop flavor save it. Looking for more delicate citrus notes could give this beer much more identity and charm, but the reliant on resiny hops soley leaves the beer regretably and slightly mundane.

Serving type: bottle

05-18-2011 03:28:25 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of deepchills
deepchills

Texas

3.68/5  rDev +11.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pouring into a Tulip stemmed glass the color is brown-orange and slightly cloudy. The head is thick and large with a slightly foamy top. A sweet fruity aroma reaches me without having yet picked up the glass. After 3 minutes the head has receded to a half finger, leaving a nice, slightly loose lacing.

The smell is less sweet now as I bring the glass to my nose, some caramel and a light bitterness.

First taste there is a little sweetness which is blended well between the malty caramel and the fruit, which is now presenting itself as apricot. The bitterness of the hops is also present, though not overwhelming. The 9% ABV is well hidden throughout the tasting. The finish is a mix of malt and hops.

Continued drinking sees the fruitiness disappear. The malt starts barreling out, with the caramel and slightly bitter hop still present, by the end of the bottle the malt/caramel becomes stronger.

The beer drinks as easy as silk, with an ever so slight creamy feel.

As a Double IPA this seems to fall short. To be honest, this might not even be an IPA. The malt is strong and the hops take a back seat. But if you want to try something in between classifications this might be for you. I'll drink it again.

Serving type: bottle

05-17-2011 01:48:01 | More by deepchills
Photo of JMad
JMad

Texas

3.93/5  rDev +19.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I poured this into my tulip...

The beer is an orange amber color with a thick bubbly head. It smells of lots of sweet caramel malt with some sugar and tangerine. Tastes good but it's not nearly as bitter as a double IPA should be, the taste is mostly piney hops, grapefruit, an almost donut-like flavor followed by a lingering piney bitterness. It's really thick and has lots of subtle carbonation and a lingering finish. This is a different take on a double IPA but I did enjoy it.

Serving type: bottle

05-15-2011 02:06:37 | More by JMad
Photo of lacqueredmouse
lacqueredmouse

Australia

3/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

I believe this may be my first brew from Texas. Let's see if the excitement of the premise lives up to the excitement of the experience.

Opens with a muted hiss, like a very tired and lethargic hurrah, and pours a flat looking orange-amber hue complemented with a bright haze. Head almost doesn't form, just leaving a smattering of big bubbles across the surface of the beer. Looks very heavy in the body, as though the carbonation can't escape. Quite a mediocre look to it, to be honest.

Nose is very muted indeed for a beer claiming to be an IPA, let alone a double IPA. Slight grainy sweetness, huskiness and a very slight twinge of green hops, almost lending a vegetative quality to the aroma. Very average.

Taste is also quite paltry, with a very mild bitterness vaguely covering a sweet molasses and malt extract flavoured basis. Dry finish, but without the sting I expect from an IPA. To be fair, the only flavours they mention on the bottle are "rich, malty", and "warm caramel", which is not the profile I expect from an IPA, but at least it's delivering what it promises.

Feel is average, and smooth, and to be fair the heat and booze of the 9% is well hidden.

Eh. A poor example of an IPA, but not an undrinkable beer overall. It's not something I'm particularly happy with, but I'm pleased to have tried a beer from the Lone Star State at least. I just hope they're not all like this.

Serving type: bottle

05-06-2011 01:25:40 | More by lacqueredmouse
Photo of Metalmonk
Metalmonk

North Carolina

3.65/5  rDev +10.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Gotta call this pour "true to style," that's for sure. Big creamy head, rocky and firm, sitting on stop of a lightly hazed orange sunset color. And absolute gobs of lace. Very nice.

Aroma is as malty as it is hoppy, plenty of caramel tones and some toffee too. Juicy and candy-like, similar to Arrogant Bastard or other US strong ales. The hops are herbal and flowery for the most part, even a bit of cannabis sneaking in. Trace of alcohol far back.

Taste brings it down just a notch, lacking a bit of character and direction. Still juicy, still candy-like, and very much not (unlike the aroma) leaning toward American Strong Ale land...Rahr & Sons calls this a double IPA and so it is. But there's a medicinal quality to the alcohol that could be reeled in, and the tangy, minty, orange-tasting hops don't quite mesh with the malt as well as I'd like, and there probably isn't enough malt here to begin with, but having said all that, it gets pretty close to the mark and brings at least something to the DIPA table.

Would have liked a creamier, silkier texture, as this has a fair bit of carbonation bite. There is, surprisingly, a softness trying to creep its way in, but it never makes it totally. Alcohol persists, if relatively tame, in the sticky finish.

Not bad, but after having a Surly Abrasive Ale just 24 hours ago, well, the bar just got even higher for this style. Glad to have tried Ass Kisser, though, and it's probably worth at least a shot by any Double IPA aficionado, if only for reference's sake.

Serving type: bottle

05-04-2011 21:57:19 | More by Metalmonk
Photo of drabmuh
drabmuh

Maryland

3.08/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

OK, I only bought this because of the label, I totally admit it. Beer poured into a Golden Pheasant glass. Beer is dark amber and hazy with a decent head, some lacing and low to moderate carbonation.

Aroma is sweet with a mild piny? hop aroma in there.

Beer is medium to heavy in body, pretty malty on the front but not overly sweet, the finish isn't too bitter and there is an obvious void of hop flavors on the midpalate of this beer. Oh well, not a repeat for me.

Serving type: bottle

05-03-2011 02:02:57 | More by drabmuh
Photo of GarthDanielson
GarthDanielson

North Carolina

3.95/5  rDev +20.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured from a bomber into a snifter per the directions on the bottle, I picked this up from Central Market in Fort Worth while we were staying with a friend. The beer pours an opaque reddish-orange coloring with a thin, densely bubbled head. The nose is complex, with a blend of citrus, caramel, and spice. There is almost a sour tang to the smell, as well. The body has a sharp carbonation to the mouthfeel. The flavors have a tangy caramel foundation with peppery spice and hoppy flavors playing off onto the palate. The beer has a tangy sweet aftertaste that borders on sour. Very smooth and creamy finish to begin with, that dries and puckers the mouth as you go. Pretty interesting brew.

Serving type: bottle

05-01-2011 02:06:53 | More by GarthDanielson
Photo of RoyalT
RoyalT

Ohio

3.85/5  rDev +17%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance – This is a deep, hazy orangish-brown with a pretty good off-white head.

Smell – There’s a huge mix of tangerine and grapefruit hops at the nose laced with ultra-sugary caramel malt.

Taste – The rindy citrus takes over at the taste. I can get supplemental pine as well. The malts try to keep up but struggle. They are less sweet than I thought from the nose but still quite caramelly.

Mouthfeel – This is big, almost full-bodied, with a harsh dry finish and light carbonation.

Drinkability – The sum did not live up to its parts here. The hops were sophisticated and heavy and the caramel was very clean, but together the balance was off. The hops came across as heavy-handed, which often is good but in this case didn’t work.

Serving type: bottle

04-30-2011 01:19:48 | More by RoyalT
Photo of perrymarcus
perrymarcus

Massachusetts

2.7/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

22oz bottle served in an oversized wineglass.
no dating found.

pours a cloudy, dull amber tone while yielding 3/4" off-white head. head lapses fairly quickly into a thin cap, collar around the glass. nice lacing, both otherwise nothing to write home about.

nose is headlined by caramel malt. the label does indicate a malt backbone but this is more in barleywine territory than anything that could be considered a DIPA. muted floral/citric hops in the background. a hops bouquet this is not.

flavor follows the aroma. much more a malt bomb than a DIPA, with at best a few hoppy notes as secondary characters. and due to the lack of dating, it's anyone's guess as to how much of this is intended. not a drain pour but decidedly underwhelming.

mouthfeel is decent. medium bodied with some prickly carbonation.

overall, not too impressive. too malty. sorely missing that potpourri of hops i look for in my DIPAS. brewery needs to bottle date.

Serving type: bottle

04-26-2011 02:51:14 | More by perrymarcus
Ass Kisser Double IPA from Ass Kisser Ales
76 out of 100 based on 278 ratings.